Skip to main content

Coming Up!


20 to see in 2013

First, a couple of qualifications. I've avoided including films that have been released in the US but not the UK because anticipation is everything, and when reviews begin to spew forth that can be diluted. Even the couple on here that have received festival screenings have lost their lustre a little. Secondly, the absence of foreign language films. In part, this is an acknowledgement of my own ignorance. But it also relates to areas such as promotion and foreknowledge. Foreign language films often have the benefit of being a pleasant discovery. With Hollywood movies, if there is a positive realisation, it's that it wasn't the big pile of shit you expected from all the advance publicity. So here are some films I'm at least curious to see over the next year. 

1. The Zero Theorem

There’s probably a sound argument that Terry Gilliam has been past his best ever since Don Quixote floundered, but I’ve found merit in all three off his films since then. Dr Parnassus may have been something of a greatest hits package, and showed an indulgence that perhaps could have done with someone telling him "No", but I welcomed his imagination given vent again, unfettered (except by budget). Theorem’s script, by Pat Rushin, had been knocking around Gilliam’s door for a while and the production fell into place as Quixote continued to resist all attempts at financing. The plot concerns a computer hacker whose attempt to discover the reason for existence is continually interrupted by the Management. Shot in Romania, mostly centred on one set, it was reportedly made on a miniscule budget but managed to attract a starry cast by dint of Gilliam’s rep. Christopher Waltz takes the lead, supported by (Gilliam returnee) Matt Damon, Ben Wishaw, Tilda Swinton, David Thewlis and Melanie Thierry.

2. Inside Llewyn Davis

We were spoilt with a Coen Brothers film a year for four consecutive years until 2010. Their follow up to by far their biggest hit, True Grit, isn’t going to replicate that success but it should receive more exposure than 2009’s A Serious Man. Based loosely on Dave Von Ronk’s posthumous memoir, The Mayor of MacDougal Street, this is a comedy set within the 1960s New York folk music scene. John Goodman returns to their fold for the first time in 12 years, while F Murray Abraham is an actor you know should have been in a Coens movie before now. The cast consists mainly of newbies, however, some of whom are called upon to flex their singing muscles. Oscar Isaac plays the titular character, while Carey Mulligan and Garrett Hedlund lend support. The question mark hangs over Justin Timberlake; can Joel and Ethan wrest a great performance from him? Bruno Delbonnel (who has collaborated with Jean Pierre Jeunet and previously lensed the brothers’ Paris, je t’aime segment) fills in for the unavailable Roger Deakins, possibly shooting on Super 16.

3. Calvary

Jon Michael McDonagh’s debut feature The Guard was shot through with the same streak of black comedy as his brother Martin’s In Bruges. Ultimately, it proved lighter and more optimistic. Whether that could be said of Calvary remains to be seen. McDonagh has commented that, while humorous, it is much more serious and dramatic in narrative than The Guard. Brendan Gleeson returns as the director-writer’s lead of choice and an eclectic cast includes Chris O’Dowd, Kelly Reilly and Dylan Moran.

4. Upstream Color

I’m quite happy to admit that while I loved Shane Carruth’s Primer I knew full well that trying to pull apart its dense plot logic and time-travel mechanics would be a dangerous obsession I didn’t want to ensnare myself in. After eight year gap he returns with another science fiction tale which, if the trailer is anything to go by, owes a debt to the narrative obliqueness of Terrence Malick. The plot summary is almost willfully resistance to brevity, but appears to concern a couple drawn together through their connection to the lifecycle of an ageless life force/organism. Carruth stars again.

5. To the Wonder

And other Terrence Malick projects. TTW has already been shown at several film festivals, where it has received a predictably mixed response. Reportedly it furthers the metaphysical meditation conjured by The Tree of Life, but here centres on two romantic relationships. Voice-overs, whispered dialogue, a taciturn central character (Affleck); none of this should be surprising, and indeed is likely to be welcomed by Malick fans. I guess the only note of caution is that Malick’s films seemed all the richer for their rarity. Will we receive too much of a good thing in 2013? Also due are Knight of Cups and his untitled story set against the music scene in Austin Texas. Both of these feature Christian Bale (I think it’s safe to say he won’t be cut out of the finished films, but anyone else is probably fair game).

6. Elysium

Neill Blomkamp made a big impact with District 9, and the reward is another story of his own devising. Once again he returns to the well of sci-fi with a social conscience (the wealthy live on a space station, enforcing a strict anti-immigration policy, while everyone else slums it on an overcrowded, ruined Earth). And once again his protagonist (Matt Damon) sports some serious weapon tech hardware. Jodie Foster and Sharlto Copley are on board as villains, and the great William Fichtner has a role also. 2013 suggests studios have been persuaded to back a number of original, high-concept SF productions so hopefully some of them will be successful (if this welcome trend is to continue). 


7. Gravity

Another science-fiction film, this long in post-production feature comes from Alfonso Cuaron, whose previous foray into that genre was the remarkable Children of Men. It’s essentially a two-hander (although that may be reduced by one for much of the running time) between Sandra Bullock and George Clooney as astronauts left drifting in space following a shuttle disaster. It seemed for a while that this might never get made (finding a bankable leading lady proved problematic) but advance word suggests that what ends up on screen will be well worth the wait (as in, stunning).


8. The World’s End

Strange to think it’s nearly a decade since Shaun of the Dead (and far beyond that since Spaced). The geekgasm that Simon Pegg and Edgar Wright triggered with their movie-love has turned a bit sour in some quarters, much of this down to the perceived over-exposure of Pegg (and his high profile casting in two J J Abrams franchises). 

The long-anticipated final installment in their Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy sees them reunite with Nick Frost for a science fiction comedy beginning with an epic pub-crawl. Shaun’s reputation has only grown in the intervening years, whereas Hot Fuzz’s has perhaps been slightly tarnished. Paul was patchy, frequently lazy where it could have been inspired, and possible evidence that alchemy occurs only when the full trio are present. Or maybe it just shows that Pegg and Wright are better writers than Pegg and Frost. 

Wright, the missing man on that film, had a rocky ride with his own project. Scott Pilgrim represented his first taste of indifference outside of the vocal online community. Pilgrim may have been an expensive misfire, but no one could claim Wright didn’t put everything into it. So expectations are high, if not quite resulting in the salivation that awaited their every move in the post-Shaun period. The supporting cast includes Martin Freeman, Rosamund Pike and Paddy Considine. Probably one to savour, as who knows when or if the trio will reunite.

9. Side Effects

It can a fool’s errand hyping up a Steven Soderbergh movie. Both Contagion and Haywire sounded great on paper, but the director didn’t quite succeed with his genre dabbling in either case. In contrast, I had little expectation for The Informant! and it turned out to be a giddy delight. Side Effects is written by Scott Z Burns who previously wrote Contagion and Informant!, and is billed as a psychological thriller set against a background of addiction to prescription meds. With a cast including Rooney Mara and previous collaborators Channing Tatum, Jude Law and Catherine Zeta-Jones, if this is the director’s last big screen project for a while hopefully he’ll be going out with a bang.


10. Iron Man 3

The previous Iron Man was distinctly underwhelming (that, and Cowboys and Aliens, lead one to suspect that Jon Favreau may have just got lucky with the first Tony Stark outing), but the character successfully emerged from Avengers at the top of the Marvel pack. The key ingredient in the anticipation for IM3 is director/co-writer Shane Black, who first made a splash at the tender age of 25 with his script for Lethal Weapon. Following 1996’s The Long Kiss Goodnight he seemed to vanish as a credited writer, until his directorial debut, the pre-career resurgence Downey Jr starrer Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. Kiss Kiss is a gloriously irreverent little action comedy movie, which went belly-up at the box office. But he became friends with his star, and script doctored earlier Iron Mans. It’s credit to Marvel that they were approved the relatively untested director taking the reins. But in the post-Whedon Avengers world, that suddenly seems like a no-brainer. The trailer makes it look grimmer than it probably is, and with Ben Kingsley as the villain this could be the pick of the year’s superhero blockbusters.

11. Star Trek Into Darkness

As with Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes, it was a surprise how well Star Trek was rebooted. The first film just flies, largely banishing misgivings over J J Abrams doing his un-Roddenberry thing with the universe. Largely, because devout fans will never be happy at perceived sacrilege (to the extent that some claim he out-and-out doesn’t get Trek). If film XI in the series had a failing it was that the plot was an unwieldy attempt to justify recasting the original crew while simultaneously claiming it as canon. The villain was a damp squib too, something that seems to have been consciously remedied with this follow-up (Benedict Cumberbatch is front-and-centre in the advertising). As for all the “Is he Khan?” discussions, there seems to have been a shift to “How is he connected to Khan?” I'd argue that feeding off the iconic status of Wrath of Khan is a bad move, as it suggests a lack of confidence with striking out into new territory (and didn’t both Nemesis and, to some extent, Nero in XI come unstuck trying to copy that formula?), but I have little doubt that Abrams’ film will be a superior thrill ride.

12. Much Ado About Nothing

As with To the Wonder, Joss Whedon’s quickie “home movie” premiered at the Toronto Film Festival, but doesn’t receive a cinema release until 2013. Praise has been effusive for his monochrome Shakespeare adaptation, and there seems little reason to doubt the good word. Whedon regulars were enlisted/lined-up for parts (Nathan Fillion, Amy Acker, Alexis Denisof, Reed Diamond, Fran Kanz) and filming took place on the quiet.


13. The Lone Ranger

Johnny Depp has tumbled in reputation from daring fanboy darling to over-exposed hack, wheeling out the same old “weird” routine, in the past five years. Somewhere around the time of the second Pirates of the Caribbean movie he stopped being their precious and became irritating. He was now a box office draw (terrible!), and worse he was joined at the hip with Tim Burton (who has come in for, possibly, even more vitriol) in EVERY movie. 

I note this because I’ve not “lost faith”. I’ve enjoyed his return outings as Jack Sparrow, even some movies he’s been savaged for (The Tourist, Dark Shadows). There have been misteps with Burton (Willy Wonka and the Mad Hatter) and he could certainly be accused of failing to pick varied material, but I can’t fault him for teaming up with Gore Verbinski again. On Stranger Tides suffered from the absence of Verbinski’s imaginative compositions, but his departure from that series does not seem to have affected the relationship between star and director. They teamed on Rango (their first western together) and now reunite in the live action arena (with Pirates writers Terry Rossio and Ted Elliott). There have already been swathes of bad press written about The Lone Ranger; the runaway budget, the need for such expense on a remake that no one cares about, Depp’s take on Tonto. None of which puts me off if they are channelling the energies that went into Pirates (but fortunately minus Bloom and Knightley).

14. A Good Day to Die Hard/Red 2

Cheating perhaps, and quite possibly, as justice for picking two films for one position, both of these Bruce Willis sequels will turn out to be stinkers. Live Free and Die Hard did very nicely at the box office but was criticised by fans of the series who claimed John McClane never showed up and the jet scene was ridiculous etc. As if Die Hard 2 didn’t start the series down a preposterous route. And wasn’t a lousy film. The omens aren’t good for Die Hard 5; John Moore is directing and his filmography consists of tepid action fare and forgettable remakes. The scale of McCane’s environment continues to increase in a manner at odds with the first film’s premise (who could have foreseen Die Hard in a tower block evolving into Die Hard across Russia?) Likewise, the “One man against… “  set-up has been eroded since the third installment repositioned Die Hard as a buddy movie. So this time McClane teams up with his CIA son. Yet, the trailers have really worked for me; Willis seems to be wisecracking, the music consciously reminds us of the first film. “Yippe Ki-yay Mother Russia” is either a terrible pun or a glorious one, depending on your sensibility (I tended to the latter). Come February, we shall see.

Red was a lot of fun, mainly down to an amusing script, the chemistry between the ensemble cast and solid direction from Robert Schwentke. What’s to prevent the sequel from being The Whole Ten Yards? Hopefully director Dean Parisot, who scored a minor classic with Galaxy Quest then took a tumble with Fun with Dick and Jane. Anthony Hopkins is aboard, but that doesn’t mean anything.

15. The Monuments Men

The “based on a true story” strongly implies the formula of historical curiosity turned into prestige project that did so well for Argo. Which makes George Clooney’s involvement in both none-too surprising. Clooney directs, stars and co-authors the screenplay (the same as The Ides of March, then), although for my money his best film as director remains his first. The rest of the cast are a dream; Cate Blanchett, Bill Murray, John Goodman, Jean Dujardin, Bob Balaban, Matt Damon (perhaps), Daniel Craig. The plot? The attempts by a team of art historians to recover works stolen by the Nazis before Hitler destroys them.


16. Before Midnight

I liked, but did not love, Before Sunrise. Which made Before Sunset, nine years later, a very pleasant surprise as it seemed philosophically and romantically much richer. There’s always the possibility that returning to the well again another nine years on might screw up what was so tantalising about where Sunset left Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy’s characters. But it’s probably worth the risk.

17. Malavita

One might reasonably assert that there’s little reason to anticipate anything Luc Besson has a hand in, since his indiscriminate hack storylines have formed the basis for the likes of the Transporter series, Takens, Lockout and Colombiana. And, as a director, he hasn’t wowed anyone in 15 years. But I’m willing to be hopeful. De Niro and Pfeiffer heading up a mob family relocated to France under the Witness Protection Program? Come on Luc, make it sing.

18. Riddick

This is all about David Twohy, rather than his chrome-domed star. Pitch Black is a sharp, economically-scripted and shot, science fiction horror. The follow up is contrastingly bloated, and stuffed full of unnecessary mythologising. But still, it was an agreeable movie hoisted by its own petard. It’s only been the petitioning of Vin Diesel (okay, so it’s not all about Twohy) that has guaranteed this third part and I suspect it will prove a the equal of the first. I’m more dubious about its potential for success, however. Twohy’s last film, A Perfect Getaway, was a twisty little beauty and he seems a safe bet for delivering when he’s working within limitations.

19. The Secret Life of Walter Mitty

The Walter Mitty remake has gone through so many different stars and iterations (including Jim Carrey and Mike Myers) that it looked like it would be eternally in production hell. No bad thing, as anyone who has seen the Danny Kaye version would probably view a new take as borderline sacrilegious. But then Ben Stiller attached himself to it. Yes the star of A Night at the Museum. But wait, he also attached himself as director. Yes, the director of Zoolander and Tropic Thunder. I’m a fan of Stiller the director, not so much Stiller the jobbing actor. So I’m hopeful that this might be one big Hollywood comedy worth seeing.

20. Twelve Years a Slave

Steve McQueen’s follow-up to Shame is based on the 1853 memoir of Solomon Northup and boasts an enviable cast headed up by Chiwetel Ejiofor. Add in Michael Fassbender, Benedict Cumberhatch, Brad Pitt and Michael Kenneth Williams. No doubt a very different tone to Tarantino’s recent popcorn approach to the subject of slavery. 


Popular posts from this blog

You were this amazing occidental samurai.

Ricochet (1991) (SPOILERS) You have to wonder at Denzel Washington’s agent at this point in the actor’s career. He’d recently won his first Oscar for Glory , yet followed it with less-than-glorious heart-transplant ghost comedy Heart Condition (Bob Hoskins’ racist cop receives Washington’s dead lawyer’s ticker; a recipe for hijinks!) Not long after, he dipped his tentative toe in the action arena with this Joel Silver production; Denzel has made his share of action fare since, of course, most of it serviceable if unremarkable, but none of it comes near to delivering the schlocky excesses of Ricochet , a movie at once ingenious and risible in its plot permutations, performances and production profligacy.

Well, something’s broke on your daddy’s spaceship.

Apollo 13 (1995) (SPOILERS) The NASA propaganda movie to end all NASA propaganda movies. Their original conception of the perilous Apollo 13 mission deserves due credit in itself; what better way to bolster waning interest in slightly naff perambulations around a TV studio than to manufacture a crisis event, one emphasising the absurd fragility of the alleged non-terrestrial excursions and the indomitable force that is “science” in achieving them? Apollo 13 the lunar mission was tailor made for Apollo 13 the movie version – make believe the make-believe – and who could have been better to lead this fantasy ride than Guantanamo Hanks at his all-American popularity peak?

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

He’ll regret it to his dying day, if ever he lives that long.

The Quiet Man (1952) (SPOILERS) The John Wayne & John Ford film for those who don’t like John Wayne & John Ford films? The Quiet Man takes its cues from Ford’s earlier How Green Was My Valley in terms of, well less Anglophile and Hibernophile and Cambrophile nostalgia respectively for past times, climes and heritage, as Wayne’s pugilist returns to his family seat and stirs up a hot bed of emotions, not least with Maureen O’Hara’s red-headed hothead. The result is a very likeable movie, for all its inculcated Oirishness and studied eccentricity.

The Krishna died of a broken finger? I mean, is that a homicide?

Miami Blues (1990) (SPOILERS) If the ‘90s crime movie formally set out its stall in 1992 with Quentin Tarantino’s Reservoir Dogs , another movie very quietly got in there first at the beginning of the decade. Miami Blues picked up admiring reviews but went otherwise unnoticed on release, and even now remains under-recognised. The tale of “blithe psychopath” Federick J. Frenger, Jr., the girl whose heart he breaks and the detetive sergeant on his trail, director George Armitage’s adaptation of Charles Willeford’s novel wears a pitch black sense of humour and manages the difficult juggling act of being genuinely touching with it. It’s a little gem of a movie, perfectly formed and concisely told, one that more than deserves to rub shoulders with the better-known entries in its genre. One of the defining characteristics of Willeford’s work, it has been suggested , is that it doesn’t really fit into the crime genre; he comes from an angle of character rather than plot or h

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

You think a monkey knows he’s sitting on top of a rocket that might explode?

The Right Stuff (1983) (SPOILERS) While it certainly more than fulfils the function of a NASA-propaganda picture – as in, it affirms the legitimacy of their activities – The Right Stuff escapes the designation of rote testament reserved for Ron Howard’s later Apollo 13 . Partly because it has such a distinctive personality and attitude. Partly too because of the way it has found its through line, which isn’t so much the “wow” of the Space Race and those picked to be a part of it as it is the personification of that titular quality in someone who wasn’t even in the Mercury programme: Chuck Yaeger (Sam Shephard). I was captivated by The Right Stuff when I first saw it, and even now, with the benefit of knowing-NASA-better – not that the movie is exactly extolling its virtues from the rooftops anyway – I consider it something of a masterpiece, an interrogation of legends that both builds them and tears them down. The latter aspect doubtless not NASA approved.

You tampered with the universe, my friend.

The Music of Chance (1993) (SPOILERS) You won’t find many adaptations of Paul Auster’s novels. Original screenplays, yes, a couple of which he has directed himself. Terry Gilliam has occasionally mentioned Mr. Vertigo as in development. It was in development in 1995 too, when Philip Haas and Auster intended to bring it to the screen. Which means Auster presumably approved of Haas’ work on The Music of Chance (he also cameos). That would be understandable, as it makes for a fine, ambiguous movie, pregnant with meaning yet offering no unequivocal answers, and one that makes several key departures from the book yet crucially maintains a mesmerising, slow-burn lure.

Drank the red. Good for you.

Morbius (2022) (SPOILERS) Generic isn’t necessarily a slur. Not if, by implication, it’s suggestive of the kind of movie made twenty years ago, when the alternative is the kind of super-woke content Disney currently prioritises. Unfortunately, after a reasonable first hour, Morbius descends so resignedly into such unmoderated formula that you’re left with a too-clear image of Sony’s Spider-Verse when it lacks a larger-than-life performer (Tom Hardy, for example) at the centre of any given vehicle.

He doesn’t want to lead you. He just wants you to follow.

Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (2022) (SPOILERS) The general failing of the prequel concept is a fairly self-evident one; it’s spurred by the desire to cash in, rather than to tell a story. This is why so few prequels, in any form, are worth the viewer/reader/listener’s time, in and of themselves. At best, they tend to be something of a well-rehearsed fait accompli. In the movie medium, even when there is material that withstands closer inspection (the Star Wars prequels; The Hobbit , if you like), the execution ends up botched. With Fantastic Beasts , there was never a whiff of such lofty purpose, and each subsequent sequel to the first prequel has succeeded only in drawing attention to its prosaic function: keeping franchise flag flying, even at half-mast. Hence Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore , belatedly arriving after twice the envisaged gap between instalments and course-correcting none of the problems present in The Crimes of Grindelwald .