This rock has been waiting for me my entire life.

127 Hours

(2010)

As an exercise in making a compelling film from a subject no one really wants to see, there’s no doubting Danny Boyle’s bravura. But it always comes across as exactly that; an exercise. His familiar pop video aesthetic is employed to bring us to the point where a man hacks his arm off with a blunt penknife. The dazzling visual and aural choices distance the viewer from any kind of profundity the gruelling experience may hold, an aspect Boyle acknowledges in the most token of gestures.

Telling the true story of climber Aron Ralston who, trekking through the Utah desert, found himself resorting to desperate measures when his arm became trapped by a boulder. The film utilises every technical and narrative trick in the book to keep us on board. The structure takes in flashbacks, hallucinations and dream sequences, while visually the director throws everything into the mix; sped-up and slowed-down footage, pin-hole, video and still camera, distorted angles and split screen.

I’m prone to rag a bit on James Franco; he’s a ubiquitous, cheesily grinning presence whose multi-media assault on viewers everywhere is less endearing the more encompassing it becomes. But there’s no doubting his dedication here; he’s on screen in close-up for 90% of the time (okay, I’m guessing about that), acting his little socks off. Aside from hikers bookending the piece (Kate Mara and Amber Tamblyn the only ones with significant screen time), everyone springs from his addled mind (including Treat Williams as his dad).

If Franco does a good job of getting us into the head of this daredevil adrenaline junkie, it is only up to a point; because maybe there’s only so much insight he yields. Boyle briefly tackles Aron’s “heroic loner” fixation, but maybe it’s the same pragmatism the character shows (as a matter-of-fact engineer, he can see his way through the horror to the mechanics of what needs to be done) that puts a full stop before any deeper philosophical or metaphysical pondering.

Boyle still hasn’t hit a homerun for me since the back-to-back triumphs of Shallow Grave and Trainspotting. His blind spot seems to be fully-rounded scripts. Some have great premises (28 Days Later…, Sunshine) but flounder into predictability. Others dazzle the senses but feel ultimately rather hollow (Slumdog Millionaire, this). And now he has Olympic glory pronouncing him a national treasure… I’m sure great scripts lie ahead that will make full use of his (undoubted) talents.

I readily admit to watching the nastiness of Aron's amateur amputation through my fingers; if Boyle’s goal was to bring the viewer to the point where they will Aron to sever his limb, he is only partially successful. However you slice it, it is extremely unpleasant viewing. One might make a film about dying from exposure and have a similar sentiment as your goal (that the release is the thing!), but then he wouldn’t have been able to employ ecstatic dance anthems to express the triumphant moment. Come to think of it maybe he would, as the departee hurtles heavenwards.

***

Comments

Maybe the dingo ate your baby.

Seinfeld 2.9: The Stranded The Premise George and Elaine are stranded at a party in Long Island, with a disgruntled hostess.

Nanobots aren’t just for Christmas.

No Time to Die (2021) (SPOILERS) You know a Bond movie is in trouble when it resorts to wholesale appropriation of lines and even the theme song from another in order to “boost” its emotional heft. That No Time to Die – which previewed its own title song a year and a half before its release to resoundingly underwhelmed response, Grammys aside – goes there is a damning indictment of its ability to eke out such audience investment in Daniel Craig’s final outing as James (less so as 007). As with Spectre , the first half of No Time to Die is, on the whole, more than decent Bond fare, before it once again gets bogged down in the quest for substance and depth from a character who, regardless of how dapper his gear is, resolutely resists such outfitting.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

Just a little whiplash is all.

Duel (1971) (SPOILERS) I don’t know if it’s just me, but Spielberg’s ’70s efforts seem, perversely, much more mature, or “adult” at any rate, than his subsequent phase – from the mid-’80s onwards – of straining tremulously for critical acceptance. Perhaps because there’s less thrall to sentiment on display, or indulgence in character exploration that veered into unswerving melodrama. Duel , famously made for TV but more than good enough to garner a European cinema release the following year after the raves came flooding in, is the starkest, most undiluted example of the director as a purveyor of pure technical expertise, honed as it is to essentials in terms of narrative and plotting. Consequently, that’s both Duel ’s strength and weakness.

These are not soda cans you asked me to get for you.

The Devil’s Own (1997) (SPOILERS) Naturally, a Hollywood movie taking the Troubles as a backdrop is sure to encounter difficulties. It’s the push-pull of wanting to make a big meaningful statement about something weighty, sobering and significant in the real world and bottling it when it comes to the messy intricacies of the same. So inevitably, the results invariably tend to the facile and trite. I’m entirely sure The Devil’s Own would have floundered even if Harrison Ford hadn’t come on board and demanded rewrites, but as it is, the finished movie packs a lot of talent to largely redundant end.

Ours is the richest banking house in Europe, and we’re still being kicked.

The House of Rothschild (1934) (SPOILERS) Fox’s Rothschild family propaganda pic does a pretty good job presenting the clan as poor, maligned, oppressed Jews who fought back in the only way available to them: making money, lots of lovely money! Indeed, it occurred to me watching The House of Rothschild , that for all its inclusion of a rotter of a Nazi stand-in (played by Boris Karloff), Hitler must have just loved the movie, as it’s essentially paying the family the compliment of being very very good at doing their very best to make money from everyone left, right and centre. It’s thus unsurprising to learn that a scene was used in the anti-Semitic (you might guess as much from the title) The Eternal Jew .

You are not brought upon this world to get it!

John Carpenter Ranked For anyone’s formative film viewing experience during the 1980s, certain directors held undeniable, persuasive genre (SF/fantasy/horror genre) cachet. James Cameron. Ridley Scott ( when he was tackling genre). Joe Dante. David Cronenberg. John Carpenter. Thanks to Halloween , Carpenter’s name became synonymous with horror, but he made relatively few undiluted movies in that vein (the aforementioned, The Fog , Christine , Prince of Darkness (although it has an SF/fantasy streak), In the Mouth of Madness , The Ward ). Certainly, the pictures that cemented my appreciation for his work – Dark Star , The Thing – had only a foot or not at all in that mode.

Isn’t sugar better than vinegar?

Femme Fatale (2002) (SPOILERS) Some have attempted to rescue Femme Fatale from the dumpster of critical rejection and audience indifference with the claim that it’s De Palma’s last great movie. It isn’t that by a long shot, but it might rank as the last truly unfettered display of his obsessions and sensibilities, complete with a ludicrous twist – so ludicrous, it’s either a stroke of genius or mile-long pile up.

He tasks me. He tasks me, and I shall have him.

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) (SPOILERS) I don’t love Star Trek , but I do love Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan . That probably isn’t just me, but a common refrain of many a non-devotee of the series. Although, it used to apply to The Voyage Home (the funny one, with the whales, the Star Trek even the target audience for Three Men and a Baby could enjoy). Unfortunately, its high regard has also become the desperate, self-destructive, song-and-verse, be-all-and-end-all of the overlords of the franchise itself, in whichever iteration, it seems. This is understandable to an extent, as Khan is that rare movie sequel made to transcendent effect on almost every level, and one that stands the test of time every bit as well (better, even) as when it was first unveiled.

Sleep well, my friend, and forget us. Tomorrow you will wake up a new man.

The Prisoner 13. Do Not Forsake Me Oh My Darling We want information. In an effort to locate Professor Seltzman, a scientist who has perfected a means of transferring one person’s mind to another person’s body, Number Two has Number Six’s mind installed in the body of the Colonel (a loyal servant of the Powers that Be). Six was the last person to have contact with Seltzman and, if he is to stand any chance of being returned to his own body, he must find him (the Village possesses only the means to make the switch, they cannot reverse the process). Awaking in London, Six encounters old acquaintances including his fiancée and her father Sir Charles Portland (Six’s superior and shown in the teaser sequence fretting over how to find Seltzman). Six discovers Seltzman’s hideout by decoding a series of photographs, and sets off to find him in Austria. He achieves this, but both men are captured and returned to the Village. Restoring Six and the Colonel to their respective bodie

Now In Full Color, with a Happier Ending

Search This Blog