Skip to main content

I'm here to see... your butt!

Prediction: 2014 Box Office


Welcome to my borderline arbitrary predictions list for the most successful movies over the next year. At the end you can see how completely out of whack I was in 2013.


1. Transformers: Age of Extinction
Prediction: $1.1bn (US: $325m)

It pains me a little to put this in pole position. A series of movies functionally assembled by the king of hyperactive action frenzies, Michael Bay, but having no discernable drawing power to any but an ardent collector of the toys (so, an eight year-old). They’re utterly forgettable movies, when they aren’t drawing attention to themselves for dodgy racial stereotyping, but they have the ability to take more than $1bn a time at the worldwide box office. It’s a disappointment Bay felt his pay cheque pulling him back to a franchise he had nothing left to give to two sequels ago, but he’s not exactly a movie maker I make special time for anyway. Mark Wahlberg’s on board this time; he doesn’t quite have the teen appeal LaBeouf and Fox once did, but I’m sure Bay’s making sure he hits the necessary demographic bases. I think there’s Dinobots in the mix too; no doubt a marketing mint is to be made there.

2. The Hobbit: There and Back Again
Prediction: $965m (US: $250m)

The Desolation of Smaug is tipped to draw close to An Unexpected Journey’s WW $1bn gross when all is said and done, but much of that is down to international appetites. In the US Smaug is slipping, and adjusted for inflation the first Hobbit was significantly down on all The Lord of the Rings predecessors. The shelf life of the picture makes it a no-lose, but there’s definitely a feeling that Peter Jackson has screwed something up somewhere. The hubris of turning the tale into a trilogy, but with none of the natural epic grandeur? The obsession with ridiculous CGI at the expense of suspension of disbelief? Or simply leaving it too long, and relying on a previous generation to take it up anew? Jackson’s more likely to just be relieved it’s all over than celebrate come Christmas 2014.

3. Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1
Prediction: $920m (US: $375m)

Catching Fire has sailed past the first installment internationally, and crept past it in the US, so while it may not reach that less-and-less prestigious $1bn mark, in the region of $900m+ is quite feasible. I’m dubious that the series’ popularity will expand substantially from this point, particularly in view of the cynical splitting of the final book into two (Young Adult fiction economics; see Twilight and Harry Potter).

4. How to Train Your Dragon 2
Prediction: $865m (US: $330m)

The first Dragon was a moderate success for DreamWorks. Less substantial than Kung Fu Panda, but enough to guarantee barrel-scraping sequels. In contrast to the by-numbers Pandas, however, Dragon was actually really good. And its success on the home entertainment market over the last three years virtually guarantees a huge audience ready and waiting to turn give it the Despicable Me 2 treatment. Possibly quality-proof; DreamWorks will certainly hope so, since their hit/miss ratio has been a concern of late.

5. Interstellar
Prediction: $675m (US: $275m)

Is Christopher Nolan’s kingdom unassailable? Like Midas, does everything he touches turn to box office gold? It seems doubly that way after the success of The Dark Knight Rises, which, despite being not that great really (compared to its predecessor), made more than $1bn worldwide (like its predecessor). Inception cemented his reputation as a populist filmmaker of resounding intellect. Now that’s taken a bash with Rises (a pretty dumb movie, dressed in smart clothes), he needs to prove himself again. With a script from his brother, for a concept Spielberg was once attached to, this tale of freshly discovered wormholes holds much promise. And science fiction sells. My question would be regarding McConaughey’s box office appeal. Not that he needed him, but the presence of DiCaprio did no harm to Inception’s prospects. Can the one-time romantic comedy sloucher put bums on seats, complete with his lazy southern drawl?

6. The Amazing Spider-Man 2 
Prediction: $665m (US: $215m)

Sony had the virtue of the best of the Marvel superheroes, and they made good on him when Sam Raimi was aboard (the occasional hiccup in 3 aside). But the 2012 Marc Webb reboot was a mess; in script, design and visuals. It fell far short of its predecessors in the US, taking $150m less than the decade-old first installment. Which amounts to nearly $300m less, inflation-adjusted. That’s a clear sign of a shrinking franchise. And, while that’s not been so uncommon (see The Hobbit above), international has usually compensated. Spidey did, but not as heavily as one might expect. So I’m going to stay conservative on this one; the trailers suggest the makers are just as clueless in design terms, and as audience friendly as the Sinister Six are, they don’t appear to be approaching their array of villains with nearly enough panache.

7. The Lego Movie
Prediction: $650m (US: $255m)

Success for animations isn’t such a difficult bet to make, but then again I thought Turbo might be the big hit last year and I couldn’t have been more wrong. I expect this will be a big hit; there’s the readily recognisable brand for a start. There’s the duo behind it, Phil Lord and Chris Miller, who have hits with both animation (Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs) and live action (21 Jump Street); their self-aware sensibility is likely to make this just as much fun for the adults as the kids. And there are the genre riffs (including Will Arnett as Lego Batman). If this really takes off, add another $200m to that estimate.

8. Captain America: The Winter Soldier
Prediction: $610m (US: $225m)

The First Avenger kind of sucked, and the returns reflected that. I think that was the reason anyway, more than any doubt over a superhero proclaiming the might of the US of A. Aside from the rather forgotten Ed Norton Hulk, this is the weakest performance for a Marvel property, so there’s something to prove with the sequel. Thor: The Dark World tested the waters of post-Avengers Iron Man-free entities by celebrating significant gains (nearly $200m more worldwide) and, if the trailer is anything to go by, this should do likewise.

9. Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
Prediction: $605m (US: $200m)

Burton’s Apes reboot made roughly equal amounts at home and abroad, but Rise tipped the scales internationally for what has been a stop-start franchise of relatively home-grown appeal. Fox, which messed with Rupert Wyatt (fresh from a little British picture, and probably unprepared for big studio battles), was probably as surprised as anyone that it turned into a hit of nearly $500m WW. This wasn’t long after they tried to do for X-Men with Origins: Wolverine, making it all the more of a shock. An intelligent blockbuster, and one that succeeded in spite of featuring James Franco. Hopefully it has inspired the studio to keep with chancy plotting this time out; it looks like the movie will continue to favour the ape perspective, since none of the humans are big star names.

10. Rio 2
Prediction: $560m (US: $120m)

Fox/Blue Sky has capitalised on the late March/early April period to release animated movies that might otherwise be engulfed by the big boys (Pixar, DreamWorks) during the summer months. Epic certainly suffered from arriving in late May last year.  Rio couldn’t even come close to the Ice Age franchise, but at nearly half a billion worldwide it made more than enough to warrant a sequel. I probably have a blind spot for Blue Sky’s features’ popularity since I haven’t rated any as all that; if anything Rio was a little more involving than the Ice Ages. This may experience the kind of audience growth that the likes of Ice Age, Shrek and Despicable Me did between first and second outings, in which case expect about $700m, but I’m guessing there’ll be a merely comfortable increase.

11. X-Men: Days of Future Past
Prediction: $460m (US: £150m)

The only way X-Men would have cried out for the return of Bryan Singer is if Brett Ratner had threatened to a comeback instead. The one thing this series needs to get away from is a safe pair of hands. Witness The Wolverine, a serviceable but forgettable version of a tale set to wow everyone when Darren Aronofsky was attached (and then James Mangold journeyman-ed it into being). Matthew Vaughn was a breath of fresh air to First Class, and any notion that the absence of Wolverine adversely affected it was at least marginally quashed by the disinterest in The Wolverine in the States (were grosses now diminish with each successive entry). The Wolverine did decent business internationally, but hardly stunning. But this is a series that Fox will hold on for dear life to, and they’ve got a neat alternate future twist this time that allows the combination of First Class and veteran performers in one movie. It doesn’t look bad, but it doesn’t look like anything to get excited about. Since Marvel has got a grip of its own movies, the lost sheep (Spidey, X-Men) have looked increasingly lacklustre.

12. Godzilla
Prediction: $450m (US: $130m)

I’m as doubtful about this as I was about Pacific Rim. More than 15 years ago, a previous Hollywood incarnation of the beast was widely seen as a failure despite racking up nearly $400m worldwide. Rim staggered over the $400m mark, accompanied by complete indifference in the US. So a big monster move has that to compete with, along with a tarnished view of the big lizard following the Emmerich movie (I never thought it was all that bad, but I’m not a Godzilla devotee). There’s a great deal of positivity towards this from movie geeks already, mainly due to the respect for the character that seems to have been carried into the project right down to the design. And because Gareth Edwards acquitted himself with the micro-budget Monsters. Of course, there was slobbering anticipation for Pacific Rim too.

13. Guardians of the Galaxy
Prediction: $425 (US: $145m)

This is another one I’m tepid about. Marvel knows full well it’s a risk, so credit to them for taking it. A vast fantasy feature with a talking raccoon and a barely talking tree man. I’m up for it being a crazy, likable mess of a concoction, even if it doesn’t hit the spot with mainstream audiences. My big question mark concerns James Gunn, whose directorial work has been shonky at best. If this one takes off it opens the Marvel floodgates to all sorts of possibilities. If it doesn’t, they’ll likely be retrenching.

14. Big Hero 6
Prediction: $400m (US: $175m)

Disney’s major animated feature for late-2014 isn’t yet another reimagined fairytale. It’s… a Marvel movie? Shades of The Incredibles? Not really, but as the title suggests this is a super team affair. The question is how much the cutesy Disney elements can combine with a more traditional superhero format. I wouldn’t bet against it, but like Wreck-It Ralph ($471m) it’s a question mark until it hits big.

15. Night at the Museum 3
Prediction: $315m (US: $120m)

Like the inevitable National Treasure 3, this comes along by virtue of economic averages rather than discernable demand. 2009’s Battle of the Smithsonian was received equally less enthusiastically than the original by both US and International audiences (it made just over $150m less). It looks like Fox still think they can wring out one more hit (hey, a trilogy will sell in the bargain bins). Expect another $100m drop.

16. Transcendence
Prediction: $310m (US: $105m)

There’s the Nolan factor (by association; former cinematographer Wally Pfister makes his directorial debut) and there’s the Depp factor (but his only sure things of late have been Cap’n Jack). And there’s a premise that sounds like it might have looked vaguely original in the ‘60s, but even then that’s a stretch. There’s also the variable reception to original sci-fi. You may get a Gravity, but more common have been reasonable (but not necessarily cost-justifying) performances of late (see Pacific Rim, Oblivion, Elysium, After Earth).

17. Mr Peabody and Sherman
Prediction: $300m (US: $105m)

Originally planned for 2013, this could be another DreamWorks underperformer. The trailers make it look like it’s sacrificing a distinctive premise (Mr Peabody’s a genius eccentric dog, and first appeared in the ‘60s TV The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show) for trying to hit every big CGI animation yardstick in the desperate hope that audiences will think it’s generic enough to be a big hit (which it might be). Which is a shame. Possibly this year’s Turbo (but since I called that as a hit, this one will probably storm the castle). The March release date may be its salvation (last year’s The Croods).

18. Expendables 3
Prediction: $300m (US: $90m)

These Stallone-driven assemblies of the known and not-so-known action legends of yesteryear (and the Stat) seem to be guaranteed earners. At this stage in his career the news that Harrison Ford is appearing is about as exciting as the news that Bruce Willis is not. But there are plenty of names to actually stir a modicum of interest. Top of the heap is one Mel Gibson, following Van Damme last movie and out to prove the villain may be the only real galvanising force to contend with here. But there’s also Wesley Snipes, Antonio Banderas (both former Stallone co-stars) and… Kelsey Grammar? Red Hill director Patrick Hughes may attempt to make the Stallone-script seem less moribund than it will no doubt be.

19. Malificent
Prediction: $280m (US: $100m)

The trailer for this “spin-off” concerning the Sleeping Beauty villainess was expectedly an identikit, colour-corrected gloomy fairy tale affair. Angelina Jolie looks the part, which I suppose is half the battle when that’s the only idea any one had in the first place. Effects man turned director Robert Stromberg is just the latest example of studios lacking the sense to test someone out on something that doesn’t cost and arm and a leg. But why does Disney expect anyone to show up? What’s the hook? The latest Snow White and the Huntsman-esque escapade, and probably doing slightly less business. 

20. Jupiter Ascending
Prediction: $280m (US: $80m)

The Wachowskis can never be bet against, but they’ve been doing their best since The Matrix to show that their whacky (Speed Racer) or lofty (Cloud Atlas) notions are far from a solid investment. This seems to be an attempt to strike a blow for bankability, with a space opera-y sounding tale of galaxy queens and benign mercenaries, but it looks like it lacks the giddy energy of Luc Besson’s The Fifth Element. Without the vital humorous spark (Channing Tatum and Mila Kunis?) the campiness could just fall flat. Another original sci-fi/fantasy that may get the bean counters questioning such properties.


In a sentence:

21. Edge of Tomorrow ($275m, US: $80m)

It’s Tom, now in his sixth decade but still larking about like a rambunctious schoolboy in an expensive sci-fi already being hailed as a Groundhog Day rip-off, without enough to distinguish it from Source Code.

22. Exodus ($270m, US: $100m)

With a cast so white you’d think Cecil B DeMille was back making Biblical epics, I’m suspicious that the only movies that are really going to tap the religious ticket are ones made by religious moviemakers (Like Mad Mel).

23. Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit ($250m, US: $110m)

Paramount must really love Chris Pine, but Jack Ryan’s never really been a hot ticket internationally.

24. Gone Girl ($245m, US: $105m)

Fincher’s notoriously expensive (Dragon Tattoo may not break even), so this Ben “Boring” Affleck thriller will have to really hit the spot to succeed (i.e. do a lot better than Dragon Tattoo).

25. Divergent ($225m, US: $100m)

Everyone’s after the next Young Adult break-out hit, but even given the Summit/Lionsgate relative hot touch I’m going to guess moderate enough to guarantee sequels but not a next Hunger Games.

26. Tammy ($225m, US: $135m)

Melissa McCarthy had two $100m+ hits in the US in 2013; there’s no reason to think this road movie comedy with Susan Sarandon as her mum won’t follow course.

27. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles ($215m, US: $75m)

I don’t know who wants to see these Turtles, since the original movies were shite, but I didn’t countenance the resurgence of Transformers either.

28. Resident Evil 6 ($215m, US: $45m)

I’m not even sure auteur Paul W S Anderson has started making this yet, but in “eye-popping 3D” it’s most likely quality proof.

29. 300: Rise of an Empire ($215m, US: $70m)

No one really thought this was a good idea, hence it took the prequel so long to come together.

30. The Judge ($205m, US: $95m)

Robert Downey Jr first non-Sherlock, non-Stark dramatic role in five years; I want to see him as Robert Duvall’s son, but a lot here depends on the quality of the script.

31-50

31. 22 Jump Street ($200m, US: $110m)
32. Sin City: A Dame to Kill For ($195m, US: $95m)
33.  Sex Tape ($190m, US: $95m
34. The Other Woman ($185m, US: $90m)
35. Fury ($175m, US: $85m)
36. Noah ($175m, US: $90m)
37. Blended ($170m, US: $80m)
38. Annie ($165m, US: $95m)
39. The Equalizer ($165m, US: $80m)
40. Alexander and the Terrible, No Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day ($160m, US: $75m)

41. Into the Woods ($165m, US: $80m)
42. The Reluctant Professor ($150m, US: $65m)
43. Pompeii ($145m, US: $60m)
44. Robocop ($145m, US: $75m)
45. Non-Stop ($145m, US: $70m)
46. Horrible Bosses 2 ($145m, US: $85m)
47. Hercules ($140m, US: $75m)
48. Muppets Most Wanted ($135m, US: $75m)
49. Dumb and Dumber To ($125m, US: $70m)
50. Neighbors ($115m, US: $75m)

Under the radar:

A Million Ways to Die in the West ($115m, US: $75m)
3 Days to Kill ($95m, US: $40m)
Vampire Academy ($85m, US: $35m)
A New York Winter’s Tale ($85m, US: $45m)
The Nut Job ($85m, US: $45m)
The Interview ($85m, US: $55m)
The Maze Runner ($75m, US: $35m)
St Vincent Van Nys ($75m, US: $40m)
Jersey Boys ($75m, US: $45m)
Sabotage ($70m, US: $35m)
Chef ($65m, US: $35m)

My 2013 scorecard 

(Top position: actual, below: my pick) (totals: Worldwide/United States)

1. Iron Man 3 1.215/409m
(3) WW: $750-900m US: $330-370m

2. Despicable Me 2 921/368m (still in release)
(12) WW: $470-550m US: $160-220m

3. The Hunger Games: Catching Fire 832/408m (still in release)
(4) WW: $750-850m US: $360-430m

4. Fast & Furious 6 789/239m
(11) WW: $520-600m US: $170-200m

5. The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug 760/233m (still in release)
(1) WW: $1bn - $1.3bn US: $300m - $340m

6. Monsters University 744/269m
(8) WW: $450m - $575m US: $170m - $220m

7. Gravity 670/256m (still in release)
(-) WW: $70m - $300m, US: $60m - $140m

8. Man of Steel 668/291m
(2) WW: $750m - $1.1bn US: $300m - $475m

9. Frozen 644/302m (still in release)
(13) WW: $450m -$600m US: $200m - $230m

10. Thor: The Dark World 631/204m (still in release)
(10) WW: $500m - $600m US: $200m - $240m

11. The Croods 588/187m
(26) WW: $180m - $400m US: $70m - $150m

12. World War Z
(9) WW: $450m - $570m US: $200m - $230m

11. Oz The Great and Powerful
(23) WW: $180m - $400m US: $60m - $170m

12. Star Trek Into Darkness
(16) WW: $420m - $500m US: $230m - $270m

14. The Wolverine
(18)  WW: $350m - $450m US: $160m - $200m

15. Pacific Rim
(31) WW: $175m - $280m US: $70m - $135m

16. G.I. Joe: Retaliation
(27) WW: $220m - $290m US: $90m - $130m

18. Now You See Me
(-) WW: $70m - $135m, US: $45m - $85m

19. The Hangover Part III
(7) WW: $550m - $620m US: $220m - $250m

20. The Great Gatsby
(43) WW: $75m - $200m US: $50m - $85m

Others in my Top 20:

21. The Smurfs 2
(15) WW: $450m - $550m US: $85m - $130m

22. A Good Day to Die Hard
(17) WW: $350m - $450m US: $120m - $140m

26. Turbo
(6) WW: $600m - $700m US: $250m - $300m

29. The Lone Ranger
(5) WW: $650m - $900m US: $220m - $300m

37. White House Down
(19) WW: $275m - $325m US: $150m - $175m

63. The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones

(20) WW: $200m - $350m US: $70m - $160m

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

She writes Twilight fan fiction.

Vampire Academy (2014)
My willingness to give writer Daniel Waters some slack on the grounds of early glories sometimes pays off (Sex and Death 101) and sometimes, as with this messy and indistinct Young Adult adaptation, it doesn’t. If Vampire Academy plods along as a less than innovative smart-mouthed Buffy rip-off that might be because, if you added vampires to Heathers, you would probably get something not so far from the world of Joss Whedon. Unfortunately inspiration is a low ebb throughout, not helped any by tepid direction from Daniel’s sometimes-reliable brother Mark and a couple of hopelessly plankish leads who do their best to dampen down any wit that occasionally attempts to surface.

I can only presume there’s a never-ending pile of Young Adult fiction poised for big screen failure, all of it comprising multi-novel storylines just begging for a moment in the Sun. Every time an adaptation crashes and burns (and the odds are that they will) another one rises, hydra-like, hoping…

Well, we took a vote. Predator’s cooler, right?

The Predator (2018)
(SPOILERS) Is The Predator everything you’d want from a Shane Black movie featuring a Predator (or Yautja, or Hish-Qu-Ten, apparently)? Emphatically not. We've already had a Shane Black movie featuring a Predator – or the other way around, at least – and that was on another level. The problem – aside from the enforced reshoots, and the not-altogether-there casting, and the possibility that full-on action extravaganzas, while delivered competently, may not be his best foot forward – is that I don't think Black's really a science-fiction guy, game as he clearly was to take on the permanently beleaguered franchise. He makes The Predator very funny, quite goofy, very gory, often entertaining, but ultimately lacking a coherent sense of what it is, something you couldn't say of his three prior directorial efforts.

Right! Let’s restore some bloody logic!

It Couldn't Happen Here (1987)
(SPOILERS) "I think our film is arguably better than Spiceworld" said Neil Tennant of his and Chris Lowe's much-maligned It Couldn't Happen Here, a quasi-musical, quasi-surrealist journey through the English landscape via the Pet shop Boys' "own" history as envisaged by co-writer-director Jack Bond. Of course, Spiceworld could boast the presence of the illustrious Richard E Grant, while It Couldn't Happen Here had to settle for Gareth Hunt. Is its reputation deserved? It's arguably not very successful at being a coherent film (even thematically), but I have to admit that I rather like it, ramshackle and studiously aloof though it is.

Never compare me to the mayor in Jaws! Never!

Ghostbusters (2016)
(SPOILERS) Paul Feig is a better director than Ivan Reitman, or at very least he’s savvy enough to gather technicians around him who make his films look good, but that hasn’t helped make his Ghostbusters remake (or reboot) a better movie than the original, and that’s even with the original not even being that great a movie in the first place.

Along which lines, I’d lay no claims to the 1984 movie being some kind of auteurist gem, but it does make some capital from the polarising forces of Aykroyd’s ultra-geekiness on the subject of spooks and Murray’s “I’m just here for the asides” irreverence. In contrast, Feig’s picture is all about treating the subject as he does any other genre, be it cop, or spy, or romcom. There’s no great affection, merely a reliably professional approach, one minded to ensure that a generous quota of gags (on-topic not required) can be pumped out via abundant improv sessions.

So there’s nothing terribly wrong with Ghostbusters, but aside from …

Dude, you're embarrassing me in front of the wizards.

Avengers: Infinity War (2018)
(SPOILERS) The cliffhanger sequel, as a phenomenon, is a relatively recent thing. Sure, we kind of saw it with The Empire Strikes Back – one of those "old" movies Peter Parker is so fond of – a consequence of George Lucas deliberately borrowing from the Republic serials of old, but he had no guarantee of being able to complete his trilogy; it was really Back to the Future that began the trend, and promptly drew a line under it for another decade. In more recent years, really starting with The MatrixThe Lord of the Rings stands apart as, post-Weinstein's involvement, fashioned that way from the ground up – shooting the second and third instalments back-to-back has become a thing, both more cost effective and ensuring audiences don’t have to endure an interminable wait for their anticipation to be sated. The flipside of not taking this path is an Allegiant, where greed gets the better of a studio (split a novel into two movie parts assuming a…

My pectorals may leave much to be desired, Mrs Peel, but I’m the most powerful man you’ve ever run into.

The Avengers 2.23: The Positive-Negative Man
If there was a lesson to be learned from Season Five, it was not to include "man" in your title, unless it involves his treasure. The See-Through Man may be the season's stinker, but The Positive-Negative Man isn't far behind, a bog-standard "guy with a magical science device uses it to kill" plot. A bit like The Cybernauts, but with Michael Latimer painted green and a conspicuous absence of a cool hat.

The possibilities are gigantic. In a very small way, of course.

The Avengers 5.24: Mission… Highly Improbable
With a title riffing on a then-riding-high US spy show, just as the previous season's The Girl from Auntie riffed on a then-riding-high US spy show, it's to their credit that neither have even the remotest connection to their "inspirations" besides the cheap gags (in this case, the episode was based on a teleplay submitted back in 1964). Mission… Highly Improbable follows in the increasing tradition (certainly with the advent of Season Five and colour) of SF plotlines, but is also, in its particular problem with shrinkage, informed by other recent adventurers into that area.

I think World War II was my favourite war.

Small Soldiers (1998)
An off-peak Joe Dante movie is still one chock-a-block full of satirical nuggets and comic inspiration, far beyond the facility of most filmmakers. Small Soldiers finds him back after a six-year big screen absence, taking delirious swipes at the veneration of the military, war movies, the toy industry, conglomerates and privatised defence forces. Dante’s take is so gleefully skewed, he even has big business win! The only problem with the picture (aside from an indistinct lead, surprising from a director with a strong track record for casting juveniles) is that this is all very familiar.

Dante acknowledged Small Soldiers was basically a riff on Gremlins, and it is. Something innocuous and playful turns mad, bad and dangerous. On one level it has something in common with Gremlins 2: The New Batch, in that the asides carry the picture. But Gremlins 2 was all about the asides, happy to wander off in any direction that suited it oblivious to whether the audience was on …

Bring home the mother lode, Barry.

Beyond the Black Rainbow (2010)

If Panos Cosmatos’ debut had continued with the slow-paced, tripped-out psychedelia of the first hour or so I would probably have been fully on board with it, but the decision to devolve into an ‘80s slasher flick in the final act lost me.

The director is the son of George Pan Cosmatos (he of The Cassandra Crossing and Cobra, and in name alone of Tombstone, apparently) and it appears that his inspiration was what happened to the baby boomers in the ‘80s, his parents’ generation. That element translates effectively, expressed through the extreme of having a science institute engaging in Crowley/Jack Parsons/Leary occult quests for enlightenment in the ‘60s and the survivors having become burnt out refugees or psychotics by the ‘80s. Depending upon your sensibilities, the torturously slow pace and the synth soundtrack are positives, while the cinematography managed to evoke both lurid early ‘80s cinema and ‘60s experimental fare. 

Ultimately the film takes a …

Anything can happen in Little Storping. Anything at all.

The Avengers 2.22: Murdersville
Brian Clemens' witty take on village life gone bad is one of the highlights of the fifth season. Inspired by Bad Day at Black Rock, one wonders how much Murdersville's premise of unsettling impulses lurking beneath an idyllic surface were set to influence both Straw Dogs and The Wicker Mana few years later (one could also suggest it premeditates the brand of backwoods horrors soon to be found in American cinema from the likes of Wes Craven and Tobe Hooper).