Skip to main content

Whatever you’re thinking, rethink it.

Homefront
(2013)

The Stath only wants to raise his daughter in peace and quiet, but the ubiquitous James Franco has other ideas in this Sylvester Stallone-scripted yarn (based on Chuck Logan’s novel).  That’s life all over, isn’t? There you are, merrily going about your daily business, and suddenly, from out of nowhere, Franco appears, hell-bent on bringing you down. What a drag. As you’d expect from Stallone in wordsmith mode, Homefront is a watchword in unsubtlety. Thoroughly proud of the slew of clichés that fuel it, there is precious little interest in logic. Instead Sly concentrates on building towards a succession of bone crunching altercations for Statham, on which level the picure more than delivers.


This is Stallone’s first non-Rambo/Rocky/Expendables script in more than a decade, although he initially intended it as an outing for his monosyllabic ‘Nam vet. Perhaps Logan’s status as a veteran piqued Stallone’s interest, albeit the lead character is an ex-undercover cop in both novel and movie. The Stath, Stallone’s Expendables buddy, is Phil Broker, who, following the death of his wife, moves with daughter Maddy (Izabela Vidovic) to a small Louisiana town. He probably should have moved a whole state away from his old job, as before long it comes back to haunt him. Not helping matters any is his decision to keep whacking great files evidencing his former life unsecured in his basement. When he comes to the attention of local meth dealer Gator (Franco) the latter sees an opportunity to expand his business, by shopping Phil to the biker gang he infiltrated (shades of Sons of Anarchy, but only vaguely). You can tell life’s been stressful for Phil of late. In the two years since he quit his job he’s gone from Revolver-style long hair to a big baldy.


And here's another chance for the Stath to show off his paternal chops, following Safe. He makes a better stab at it than his complete lack of an attempt to pull off an American accent (probably for the best, really). If kid’s role begins promisingly (giving the school bully a bloody nose, an encounter that trigger everything else), she quickly falls prey to stand child-in-peril plotting. Phil’s path is just as familiar, not looking for a fight yet not backing down when danger comes calling.


A savage Stath beat down is often a lot of fun to behold, and director Gary Fleder shoots crisply and edits cleanly, ensuring the action is well defined. Sometimes he overplays the obvious, intercutting gathering biker vengeance with an adorable birthday party for Maddy. He’s also unable to make the OTT finale convincing, but he’s most likely only translating what’s on the page. Fleder’s big screen outings are rarer and rarer, and he has never lived up to the promise of his debut Things to Do in Denver When You’re Dead. He ought to be making more movies, though; as solid journeymen directors go, he’s one of the better ones. Whether it’s a dust up at a petrol station or a three-against-one while bound with zip ties, the action is expertly presented for Maximum Stath.


The most interesting part of Homefront, for reasons both good and bad, is the supporting cast. Kate Bosworth, almost unrecognisably wan as Gator’s tweaker sister, is a convincingly yokely yokel. Clancy Brown isn’t given nearly enough screen time as the local sheriff but it’s good just to have him on board (you can never have enough Clancy Brown). Less effective is Winona Ryder, who was convincing as the wife of a hit man in The Iceman but here is unable to sell us the idea that she’d have even the most peripheral of underworld connections.


Then there’s the ubiquitous Franco, who might just have delivered if he was playing a weasely, out-of-his-depth, lowlife who wants to play with the big boys. Unfortunately, he’s supposed to be a genuine badass, out-of-his-depth, lowlife who wants to play with the big boys. Fleder seems aware of this; when he shoots the actor’s first scene, taking an iron bar to some meth heads, it’s from below in an attempt to give Franco an imposing presence. It doesn’t work. He’s about as threatening as a ripe banana. We want to see him get his from the Stath, obviously, but Gator never becomes a feasible adversary. He even takes care of the Stath cat, rather than disposing of it (“I want my kid’s cat back” isn’t quite Jodie Foster’s “Give me back my dog!” in The Brave, but it’s in the same general ballpark).


You know exactly what you’re getting with a Jason Statham movie.  Even Hummingbird, an attempt to broaden his palate, falls back on tried-and-tested action eventually. Homefront doesn’t have enough fun with its trappings to stand out, but it’s occasionally rousing. You don’t really want the Stathto test new territory lest he stumbles and falls, so it will be interesting to see how he fares in the upcoming Wild Card (based on a William Goldman screenplay, and previously made as Heat with Burt Reynolds) and being the butt of Melissa McCarthy’s jokes in Spy.


**1/2

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

She writes Twilight fan fiction.

Vampire Academy (2014)
My willingness to give writer Daniel Waters some slack on the grounds of early glories sometimes pays off (Sex and Death 101) and sometimes, as with this messy and indistinct Young Adult adaptation, it doesn’t. If Vampire Academy plods along as a less than innovative smart-mouthed Buffy rip-off that might be because, if you added vampires to Heathers, you would probably get something not so far from the world of Joss Whedon. Unfortunately inspiration is a low ebb throughout, not helped any by tepid direction from Daniel’s sometimes-reliable brother Mark and a couple of hopelessly plankish leads who do their best to dampen down any wit that occasionally attempts to surface.

I can only presume there’s a never-ending pile of Young Adult fiction poised for big screen failure, all of it comprising multi-novel storylines just begging for a moment in the Sun. Every time an adaptation crashes and burns (and the odds are that they will) another one rises, hydra-like, hoping…

Our very strength incites challenge. Challenge incites conflict. And conflict... breeds catastrophe.

The MCU Ranked Worst to Best

Why would I turn into a filing cabinet?

Captain Marvel (2019)
(SPOILERS) All superhero movies are formulaic to a greater or lesser degree. Mostly greater. The key to an actually great one – or just a pretty good one – is making that a virtue, rather than something you’re conscious of limiting the whole exercise. The irony of the last two stand-alone MCU pictures is that, while attempting to bring somewhat down-the-line progressive cachet to the series, they’ve delivered rather pedestrian results. Of course, that didn’t dim Black Panther’s cultural cachet (and what do I know, swathes of people also profess to loving it), and Captain Marvel has hit half a billion in its first few days – it seems that, unless you’re poor unloved Ant-Man, an easy $1bn is the new $700m for the MCU – but neither’s protagonist really made that all-important iconic impact.

My name is Dr. King Schultz, this is my valet, Django, and these are our horses, Fritz, and Tony.

Django Unchained (2012)
(MINOR SPOILERS) Since the painful misstep of Grindhouse/Death Proof, Quentin Tarantino has regained the higher ground like never before. Pulp Fiction, his previous commercial and critical peak, has been at very least equalled by the back-to-back hits of Inglourious Basterds and Django Unchained. Having been underwhelmed by his post Pulp Fiction efforts (albeit, I admired his technical advances as a director in Kill Bill), I was pleasantly surprised by Inglourious Basterds. It was no work of genius (so not Pulp Fiction) by any means, but there was a gleeful irreverence in its treatment of history and even to the nominal heroic status of its titular protagonists. Tonally, it was a good fit for the director’s “cool” aesthetic. As a purveyor of postmodern pastiche, where the surface level is the subtext, in some ways he was operating at his zenith. Django Unchained is a retreat from that position, the director caught in the tug between his all-important aesthetic pr…

Can you float through the air when you smell a delicious pie?

Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018)
(SPOILERS) Ironically, given the source material, think I probably fell into the category of many who weren't overly disposed to give this big screen Spider-Man a go on the grounds that it was an animation. After all, if it wasn’t "good enough" for live-action, why should I give it my time? Not even Phil Lord and Christopher Miller's pedigree wholly persuaded me; they'd had their stumble of late, although admittedly in that live-action arena. As such, it was only the near-unanimous critics' approval that swayed me, suggesting I'd have been missing out. They – not always the most reliable arbiters of such populist fare, which made the vote of confidence all the more notable – were right. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse is not only a first-rate Spider-Man movie, it's a fresh, playful and (perhaps) surprisingly heartfelt origins story.

Stupid adult hands!

Shazam! (2019)
(SPOILERS) Shazam! is exactly the kind of movie I hoped it would be, funny, scary (for kids, at least), smart and delightfully dumb… until the final act. What takes place there isn’t a complete bummer, but right now, it does pretty much kill any interest I have in a sequel.

I have discovered the great ray that first brought life into the world.

Frankenstein (1931)
(SPOILERS) To what extent do Universal’s horror classics deserved to be labelled classics? They’re from the classical Hollywood period, certainly, but they aren’t unassailable titans that can’t be bettered – well unless you were Alex Kurtzman and Chris Morgan trying to fashion a Dark Universe with zero ingenuity. And except maybe for the sequel to the second feature in their lexicon. Frankenstein is revered for several classic scenes, boasts two mesmerising performances, and looks terrific thanks to Arthur Edeson’s cinematography, but there’s also sizeable streak of stodginess within its seventy minutes.

Only an idiot sees the simple beauty of life.

Forrest Gump (1994)
(SPOILERS) There was a time when I’d have made a case for, if not greatness, then Forrest Gump’s unjust dismissal from conversations regarding its merits. To an extent, I still would. Just not nearly so fervently. There’s simply too much going on in the picture to conclude that the manner in which it has generally been received is the end of the story. Tarantino, magnanimous in the face of Oscar defeat, wasn’t entirely wrong when he suggested to Robert Zemeckis that his was a, effectively, subversive movie. Its problem, however, is that it wants to have its cake and eat it.

Do not mention the Tiptoe Man ever again.

Glass (2019)
(SPOILERS) If nothing else, one has to admire M Night Shyamalan’s willingness to plough ahead regardless with his straight-faced storytelling, taking him into areas that encourage outright rejection or merciless ridicule, with all the concomitant charges of hubris. Reactions to Glass have been mixed at best, but mostly more characteristic of the period he plummeted from his must-see, twist-master pedestal (during the period of The Village and The Happening), which is to say quite scornful. And yet, this is very clearly the story he wanted to tell, so if he undercuts audience expectations and leaves them dissatisfied, it’s most definitely not a result of miscalculation on his part. For my part, while I’d been prepared for a disappointment on the basis of the critical response, I came away very much enjoying the movie, by and large.

Just make love to that wall, pervert!

Seinfeld 2.10: The Statue
The Premise
Jerry employs a cleaner, the boyfriend of an author whose book Elaine is editing. He leaves the apartment spotless, but Jerry is convinced he has made off with a statue.