Skip to main content

Life teaches you how to live it if you live long enough.

Amy
(2015)

Asif Kapadia’s Senna was one of the best features of 2011, documentary or otherwise, and Amy has received similarly universal critical plaudits, a regular on the year’s Best… lists and award nominee, so expectations were high. I guess it must just be me, then, because I wasn’t overly impressed, as distinctly put together as Amy is.


I don’t think my not being a fan is the issue; I wasn’t a fan of Ayrton Senna, but Kapadia’s documentary was compelling throughout, perhaps because it had drive (ahem). With Amy, we are presented a familiar story of fame gone awry, which isn’t to belittle the tragedy when anyone dies young, but it’s mainly Kapadia’s stylistic decisions that lend the film any fascination in the first instance. When that effect wears off – the choice to use archive and personal footage, supplemented by interview soundtracks (no talking heads) and performances (Winehouse’s lyrics appear on screen to emphasise the mirroring of her life in her art) – the piece begins to feel over-extended and even indulgent.


Kapadia commented that his documentary was about those who did nothing to stem Winehouse’s collapse, although he makes it clear her capacity for substance abuse was flourishing before the unforgiving lens of fame took its toll. Coming out in a particularly unflattering light are her father (showing up with a documentary crew when his daughter is seeking respite in St Lucia) and obviously her husband (suggested to be using her to fuel his own habit). Childhood friends, in contrast, are most affecting in their responses, genuinely grieving a lost friend they could do little for.


Charted are Winehouse’s bulimia, alcoholism, addiction to heroin and crack cocaine, flirtations with rehab, big success with Back to Black, self-sabotage of tour dates and brief redemptive collaboration with Tony Bennett. The media tornado that surrounded her understandably gets particularly short shrift, although it’s perhaps a little flimsy to point the finger at cherry picked one-liners from talk show hosts (Jay Leno, Graham Norton – less so the vituperative Frankie Boyle) as evidence of the cruelty waged upon on her; it isn’t as if she wouldn’t have been one of a dozen different targets for a put-down in any such routine, which rather moves the focus from her to the eviscerating effect of media self-feeding generally. Also notable is her father has come out saying the doc is unfair, and Kapadia’s team have cited objectivity as defence; slightly absurd since, whatever the ins and outs of her father’s culpability in encouraging Winehouse’s apparent determination to auto-destruct, one thing Amy most definitely is not is objective; it’s very keenly trained on marking out heroes, villains, and passive bystanders by seemingly just letting the footage speak for itself.


I don’t doubt any fan of Winehouse will lap up Amy, since it’s a rich source of unseen/ unheard footage and provides an effective visual scrapbook of her career while offering ample sight of her charisma (during moments of sobriety), but I came away feeling my at best peripheral knowledge of the singer hadn’t really been embellished with anything of substance. Her life as recounted is pretty much what you might have expected; a sad story of excess, but not an especially diverting one.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No matter how innocent you are, or how hard you try, they’ll find you guilty.

The Wrong Man (1956) (SPOILERS) I hate to say it, but old Truffaut called it right on this one. More often than not showing obeisance to the might of Hitchcock during his career-spanning interview, the French critic turned director was surprisingly blunt when it came to The Wrong Man . He told Hitch “ your style, which has found its perfection in the fiction area, happens to be in total conflict with the aesthetics of the documentary and that contradiction is apparent throughout the picture ”. There’s also another, connected issue with this, one Hitch acknowledged: too much fidelity to the true story upon which the film is based.

He is a brigand and a lout. Pay him no serious mention.

The Wind and the Lion (1975) (SPOILERS) John Milius called his second feature a boy’s-own adventure, on the basis of the not-so-terrified responses of one of those kidnapped by Sean Connery’s Arab Raisuli. Really, he could have been referring to himself, in all his cigar-chomping, gun-toting reactionary glory, dreaming of the days of real heroes. The Wind and the Lion rather had its thunder stolen by Jaws on release, and it’s easy to see why. As polished as the picture is, and simultaneously broad-stroke and self-aware in its politics, it’s very definitely a throwback to the pictures of yesteryear. Only without the finger-on-the-pulse contemporaneity of execution that would make Spielberg and Lucas’ genre dives so memorable in a few short years’ time.

He’s so persistent! He always gets his man.

Speed (1994) (SPOILERS) It must have been a couple of decades since I last viewed Speed all the way through, so it’s pleasing to confirm that it holds up. Sure, Jan de Bont’s debut as a director can’t compete with the work of John McTiernan, for whom he acted as cinematographer and who recommended de Bont when he passed on the picture, but he nevertheless does a more than competent work. Which makes his later turkeys all the more tragic. And Keanu and Sandra Bullock display the kind of effortless chemistry you can’t put a price tag on. And then there’s Dennis Hopper, having a great old sober-but-still-looning time.

Another case of the screaming oopizootics.

Doctor Who Season 14 – Worst to Best The best Doctor Who season? In terms of general recognition and unadulterated celebration, there’s certainly a strong case to be made for Fourteen. The zenith of Robert Holmes and Philip Hinchcliffe’s plans for the series finds it relinquishing the cosy rapport of the Doctor and Sarah in favour of the less-trodden terrain of a solo adventure and underlying conflict with new companion Leela. More especially, it finds the production team finally stretching themselves conceptually after thoroughly exploring their “gothic horror” template over the course of the previous two seasons (well, mostly the previous one).

But everything is wonderful. We are in Paris.

Cold War (2018) (SPOILERS) Pawel Pawlikowski’s elliptical tale – you can’t discuss Cold War without saying “elliptical” at least once – of frustrated love charts a course that almost seems to be a caricature of a certain brand of self-congratulatorily tragic European cinema. It was, it seems “ loosely inspired ” by his parents (I suspect I see where the looseness comes in), but there’s a sense of calculation to the progression of this love story against an inescapable political backdrop that rather diminishes it.

The game is rigged, and it does not reward people who play by the rules.

Hustlers (2019) (SPOILERS) Sold as a female Goodfellas – to the extent that the producers had Scorsese in mind – this strippers-and-crime tale is actually a big, glossy puff piece, closer to Todd Phillips as fashioned by Lorene Scarfia. There are some attractive performances in Hustlers, notably from Constance Wu, but for all its “progressive” women work male objectification to their advantage posturing, it’s incredibly traditional and conservative deep down.

How would Horatio Alger have handled this situation?

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1998) (SPOILERS) Gilliam’s last great movie – The Zero Theorem (2013) is definitely underrated, but I don’t think it’s that underrated – Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas could easily have been too much. At times it is, but in such instances, intentionally so. The combination of a visual stylist and Hunter S Thompson’s embellished, propulsive turn of phrase turns out, for the most part, to be a cosmically aligned affair, embracing the anarchic abandon of Raoul Duke and Doctor Gonzo’s Las Vegas debauch while contriving to pull back at crucial junctures in order to engender a perspective on all this hedonism. Would Alex Cox, who exited stage left, making way for the Python, have produced something interesting? I suspect, ironically, he would have diluted Thompson in favour of whatever commentary preoccupied him at the time (indeed, Johnny Depp said as much: “ Cox had this great material to work with and he took it and he added his own stuff to it ”). Plus

What do they do, sing madrigals?

The Singing Detective (2003) Icon’s remake of the 1986 BBC serial, from a screenplay by Dennis Potter himself. The Singing Detective fares less well than Icon’s later adaptation of Edge of Darkness , even though it’s probably more faithful to Potter’s original. Perhaps the fault lies in the compression of six episodes into a feature running a quarter of that time, but the noir fantasy and childhood flashbacks fail to engage, and if the hospital reality scans better, it too suffers eventually.

That’s what people call necromancer’s weather.

The Changes (1975) This adaptation of Peter Dickinson’s novel trilogy carries a degree of cult nostalgia cachet due to it being one of those more “adult” 1970s children’s serials (see also The Children of the Stones , The Owl Service ). I was too young to see it on its initial screening – or at any rate, too young to remember it – but it’s easy to see why it lingered in the minds of those who did. Well, the first episode, anyway. Not for nothing is The Changes seen as a precursor to The Survivors in the rural apocalypse sub-genre – see also the decidedly nastier No Blade of Grass – as following a fairly gripping opener, it drifts off into the realm of plodding travelogue.

They literally call themselves “Decepticons”. That doesn’t set off any red flags?

Bumblebee  (2018) (SPOILERS) Bumblebee is by some distance the best Transformers movie, simply by dint of having a smattering of heart (one might argue the first Shia LaBeouf one also does, and it’s certainly significantly better than the others, but it’s still a soulless Michael Bay “machine”). Laika VP and director Travis Knight brings personality to a series that has traditionally consisted of shamelessly selling product, by way of a nostalgia piece that nods to the likes of Herbie (the original), The Iron Giant and even Robocop .