The Nice
Guys
(2016)
(SPOILERS) The
strong reputation of an artist can be a two-edged sword. It rightly results in
anticipation for a new offering, but conversely can lead to greater
disappointment when they fail to live up to past form. I had tempered
expectations for Iron Man Three, expecting
a watered-down, Marvel-isation of its author’s imprint, yet came away thrilled
by just how much of a Shane Black movie it turned out to be. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang arrived as a
fully-formed, instant classic, but I still knew I’d need several viewings to take
it all in. The Nice Guys may also require
further digestion. There are elements
here that occasionally suggest Black may be a little too inclined to rest on familiar
tropes, but how you do you separate out the indulgent ones from those you look for
and relish when they recur? Which is to say, The Nice Guys is my current film of the year, even if it isn’t
quite unalloyed perfection. By year’s end, and several revisits, it might well have
revealed itself as such.
Black is
operating in his element here, siphoning that preferred mismatched buddy
pairing, one capable, one comic, or medleys of the same, as Ryan Gosling (PI
and former cop Holland March, although there’s absolutely nothing in his
demeanour or behaviour to suggest he was ever a trained police operative) and
Russell Crowe (enforcer Jackson Healy) team up to solve the mystery of missing
Amelia Kutner (Margaret Qualley, best known to the five people who watch it – the
rest are really missing out – as the
daughter in The Leftovers).
Amelia’s
disappearance is somehow linked to the death of porn star Misty Mountains, a
movie called How Do You Like My Car, Big
Boy? that went up in smoke (“So you’re
telling me you made a porno where the plot is the point?”), and a
distinctive couple of heavies (of course, it’s a Shane Black movie) who are
nameless but memorably essayed by Beau Knapp (Blue Face, with a thing for
killing fish) and Keith David (Older Guy – this is the credits talking). And
then there’s Amelia’s mother (Kim Basinger), a Justice Department official
claiming her daughter’s gone all crazy-paranoid on her. Before long, March and
Healy are elbow deep in bodies (the vast majority of them at others’ hands), and
that’s before hit man John Boy (Matt Bomer) – The
Waltons reference is inevitable and well-played – is called in to take them
out.
Crowe and
Gosling have a marvellous rapport, as strong in its own way as Val Kilmer and Robert
Downey Jr’s in Kiss Kiss, but the more
striking in their different outlooks and appearances. So Gosling is close-ish
to Downey Jr, and Crowe to Kilmer, except that March is unrepentantly cowardly,
mercenary and incompetent in a manner that makes Harry Lockhart look like
Sherlock Holmes. Healy, meanwhile, is supremely sure of himself in action, but
doesn’t have the brains of PI Gay Perry. Which is to say, in summary, that as a
team March and Healy get by more on luck and happy coincidence than any notable
talent for detection or bringing perpetrators to justice.
Crowe’s at
his most affable and enjoyable in years, an actor who hasn’t exactly indulged
his talent for comedy of late (the last was A
Good Year, and playing Hugh Grant isn’t really his forte) but takes to the laughs
like a duck to water as the burly, beefy Healy. His penchant for protecting the
innocent, and the setting of the Californian movie world, and the presence of Kim Basinger, occasionally echo L.A. Confidential (although not too
much, Healy is a very different kettle of fists to Bud White), a reminder that
there was good cause to make a fuss about the actor once upon a time.
Gosling is
a riot, enthusiastically embracing every lowdown, unworthy aspect of March,
complete with high-pitched screaming whenever he’s in pain or danger (or unable
to scream at all, in one memorable, Lou Costello-styled interlude with a
corpse). Healy’s chief redeeming feature is his devotion to daughter Holly
(Angourie Rice), a better detective than the dubious duo put together.
Holly is played
note-perfectly by Rice, the latest in a line of smarter-than-feasible Black
minors. If some of his favourite devices are subdued this time – he largely resists
the Christmas setting (it’s there at the epilogue), his persistent backdrop of
choice – the junior protagonist is an element that goes back Last Boy Scout (or The Monster Squad, even). Holly is consistently used by Black – as
with all his juvenile characters bar Long
Kiss Goodnight; I’ll excuse him responsibility for Last Action Hero – in a manner that reverses the de facto annoying
child of Hollywood movies.
However, there
are aspects of the context that made me a little uneasy this time, and also the
feeling that Black might just be falling back on what comes easiest. Ty
Simpkins (who appears in the opening scene) showed up for one act in Iron Man Three, and made a perfect
complement to Tony Stark. Holly appears and keeps bobbing up, to her father’s
increasing exasperation, even armed with familiar barbs (her dad is “a fuck up”, which is exactly the term
Bruce Willis’ vituperative daughter use in Boy
Scout). The smart-mouthed, resourceful Nancy Drew/Hardy Boy kid is maybe in
danger of being a bit over-frequented, to the extent of it becoming the crutch
wagging the dog; Black gets away with it because he’s a master scenarist and wordsmith,
but if he keeps on this course, it will eventually reach a stage of “Not again,
Shane.”
But Black is
evidently operating a level of commentary here designed to justify his
inclusion; the concern is, he seems a tad confused about what he’s trying to
say tonally, even if it’s expressed more clearly in his characters’ moral
stances. When we first see Healy, he’s warning off a guy preying on a 13-year-old
girl, which given the ‘70s setting may or may not be a conscious echo of
Polanski (it seems unlikely it didn’t occur to Black). This sets the tone for a
picture in which kids are saying, doing, or going places they shouldn’t, from
the kid on the block who offers to show the sleuths his dick (for money, obviously)
to a conversation about anal sex where Holly corrects a porn actress on her
grammar. March sounds off about kids today at one point, and yet he’s part of
the problem – a well-meaning but lousy dad who drinks and smokes too much and
gets his daughter to drive when he’s too blotto to.
Black revels
in the push-pull struggle between his lead characters acting, or coming up
short at being, the shining knight and doting father, and the base yuks to be
had from kids spouting obscenities. The former probably comes from his love of
the pulp genre, and the morally indefatigable private eyes of ‘40s noir,
themselves standing on some rarefied plane in judgement of the cesspool around
them. This noir aspect also feeds into the preference for labyrinthine
plotting, where (particularly with something like The Big Sleep) the thing is not solving the mystery but what
transpires along the way.
So the
opening scene, after the fact, seems like an elaborate commentary on the film
to come, and its own artifice, in being a movie about a moviemaking town in
which a movie is the MacGuffin (which our heroes don’t actually know is a
MacGuffin until a considerable way into the proceedings). Misty Mountains
(Murielle Telio) careers through Ty Simpkins house (in a shot that turns out to
be typical of the sudden, random, but often useful violence occurring in the
picture) and ends up spread-eagled, a bloodied nude tableau, one part a
meditation on sex and death and one part the fantasy springing from the mind of
an 13-year-old boy, or the mind of the eternally 13-year-old Shane Black; I was
half expecting it to turn out to be a dream sequence, as if the Coen brothers
had turned all lascivious for a second there.
There’s a
degree of self-consciousness versus what comes naturally to the formulation of The Nice Guys, such that the grownup
Shane/March will later to admit to, hey, writing this no-hands, in an insanely buzzing
dream sequence. He echoes Simpkins covering the porn star’s dignity in a
later moment, where March does likewise with Amelia’s exposed thigh. This is
the same Black, don’t forget, who apologises for accidentally pissing over
corpses because he knows it’s bad, but he can’t help but find it raucously
funny.
The Nice Guys is set in a decade of movies where runaway
teenagers got involved in no good things connected to the movies (Night Moves, Hardcore), a decade whose movies wore its transgressive, seedy
underbelly on their sleeves. Yet Holly passes through events with her sense of
right and wrong intact, her disarmingly unadulterated (non-movie) morals finding
her questioning Healy’s impulse to kill the bad guys (“Are you a bad person?”) The dichotomy operating in Black’s picture
(or pictures) mostly works, but there’s a nagging feeling that, to whatever relatively
innocuous degree (because this is a fiction, obviously) he’s perpetrating what
he’s preaching against, and as such that Holly would be more effective reined
in, a sense added to by her scene-stealing best friend, when John Boy makes a murderous
house call.
The
conspiracy plotline ultimately veers towards the “whatever”, but as noted, that
isn’t usually the make-or-break with Black’s kind of detective fiction Black. I
did wonder if the environmental theme, much more so than his musing on exposing
kids to sex and violence by exposing them to sex and violence, was a little too
calculated, however. Perhaps he’d been reminiscing about The Long Kiss Goodnight, and how he’d created a talking piece with
his pre 9/11 false flag incident(s). But the smog-heavy LA (with gas masked
protestors offering a tableau of poisoned bodies; quite reasonably, they’re
asked why they’re supposed to be dead from air pollution when they’re wearing
masks for protection), with car companies and government colluding to keep the
catalytic convertor from saving us all, seems rather small fry and tokenistic.
Maybe Black
is wryly commenting on the ongoing conspiracy of suppressed technology that
could help us all if only it didn’t stop the big companies making a buck or two
(“In five years we’ll all be driving
electric cars from Japan”), but The Nice
Guys’ corruption doesn’t linger in the mind the way Chinatown’s does. Still,
if, in true ‘70s fashion, the good guys don’t win, they don’t end up in the
doldrums either. Healy may have been driven to drink come the end, but March
has stopped, as if in recognition of the amended, initially sad note he wrote
on his hand (“You will… be happy”,
the “never” having been erased).
The Nice Guys is a very funny film, of course. That’s the
key to Black’s milieu; memorable characters projectile vomiting clever, witty,
crude, caustic dialogue in terribly violent situations. As noted, this one makes
a particular virtue of sudden, seemingly random chance or synchronicities,
which take the form of narrative punchlines. March falls into a clue at one
point (the aforementioned corpse), and the only time he attempts proper (movie)
detective work, he’s revealed to be barking up completely the wrong tree.
Although, by chance, and par for the course, they end up stumbling on the very
place they’re looking for.
The
violence is often hilarious (the death of henchmen, not at the hands of our
protagonists, but by truck or paving slabs, get some of the best laughs in the
picture; although spoiled by the trailers, they are surprisingly not spoiled in context), sometimes shocking
(Amelia waves down the very car with John Boy in, finding Black working his coincidence
formula both for and against our heroes), at other times both (at one point, a
woman in the house next door to Healy is randomly shot when one of the henchmen
misses his target).
The general
movie-going public have paid little attention to The Nice Guys, so it will have to settle for cult status. I’m
none-too-surprised, as I had doubts it would find a niche as summer
counterprogramming. Fortunately, while it may not be making Warner Bros a lot
of money (they’ll likely break even eventually), it isn’t so expensive as to
keep Black from making more movies he wants to make, with The Predator and Doc Savage
lined up to go in quick succession. Will The
Predator feature a juvenile sidekick? Will Doc Savage have his own Short Round?
Will they both be set at Christmas? Hopefully, after that double, Black will
return to the buddy crime genre. Maybe he should just go for broke next time,
and relegate the adults to purely sidekick status.
Agree? Disagree? Mildly or vehemently? Let me know in the comments below.
Comments
Post a comment