Crimson
Peak
(2015)
(SPOILERS) Oh,
Guillermo, Guillermo, whate’er has become of you? Perhaps Pan’s Labyrinth, with its resounding critical acclaim, was del Toro’s
creative (rather than crimson) peak, and he decided he didn’t need to strive so
manfully any more. Or perhaps the debacle of bumping himself off The Hobbit knocked the wind out of his
sails, so struggling to regain his previous form after all that lost time. Whatever
the root of his malaise, del Toro’s most recent two pictures have been
disappointments, ones unfortunately redolent of his early Hollywood ordeal Mimic. They’re examples of well-made
emptiness rather than rich with texture and resonance. Crimson Peak is better than Pacific
Rim, but that’s more down to performance than screenplay, and del Toro must
take (at least half of) the blame in both instances.
He co-wrote
Peak with Matthew Robbins, a contemporary
of the Hollywood movie brats whose best known and most ignominious directorial
credit is the sub-Spielberg slop *batteries
not included. Crimson Peak
couldn’t be accused of falling into schmaltz, far from it, but it continually
overplays its hand in a manner del Toro might argue is merely representative of
the tropes of gothic romance (a genre he was continually at pains to state it
belonged to, rather than horror, putting the picture’s financial failure at the
door of what he saw as misleading marketing, which conveniently skirts its more
fundamental shortcomings). Really, it just highlights a certain crudity of plot
and characterisation that will come as a shock to anyone only familiar with the
nuance of his Spanish language outings.
“The ghost is just a metaphor, for the past”
announces Mia Wasikowska’s budding writer, and the subsequent movie becomes a
barrage of too self-conscious displays of fictioneering, as del Toro sets out
his stall of text and genre within the text and genre itself. He runs through
the expected compendium of precisely devised patent del Toro gadgets, and clumsily
attempts to evoke era by dropping in references to Conan Doyle, spirit
photography, and assorted over-elaborate anecdotes and factoids that call this
out as otherwise unanchored in time and period.
I mentioned
the Peak in my Carol review, as del Toro is going for something similar to
Hitchcock and Scorsese in his emphasis on touch and sensation, but he ends up
nose-diving into unhinged melodrama and tonally excessive Grand Guignol (the
skull-splitting in a men’s room). It’s over-studied, and unconvincing in its
lavishness. You can see what he’s trying for, but there’s emptiness at Crimson Peak’s core.
One only
has to compare it to the archetype of motion picture gothic romance, Rebecca, where the house is imbued with a
sense of character no veneer of modern production design can muster, where
there’s a genuine sense of the uncanny and a haunting atmosphere the actual spooks in Peak can’t begin to match, and where the characters betray palpable
passions, fears and simmering emotions that render del Toro’s cock-riding and
incestuous liaisons flagrantly attention-seeking.
And yet,
del Toro has assembled three-quarters of a fine cast. In the principal roles,
as the mysterious siblings who lure Edith Cushing (I know; alas, Cushing is
about as understated a nod as this gets) to the unreal edifice, are Tom
Hiddleston and Jessica Chastain, as Thomas and Lucille Sharpe. Or, more accurately,
Mia Wasikowska is playing Mrs de Winter, Hiddleston is Maxim, and Chastain illustrates
a particularly berserk incarnation of Mrs Danvers, with Allerdale Hall
substituting for Manderlay.
The
secrets, over-exerted, are much less effective, and thus so are the characters.
While the trio of leads are top-notch performers, they’re left inhabiting
caricatures. Edith seems to do what she does purely because she’s a piece on del
Toro’s chess table, while Thomas is suitably raffish but his essential
unreadability never translates as intriguing. Lucille, meanwhile, is plain insane,
and Chastain is clearly having absurdly camp fun, particularly when it comes to
running around, stabbing and slicing willy-nilly, in the blood-spurting third
act, but the overriding effect is rather pedestrian, as if del Toro has missed
the wood for the pastiche.
He’s even
borrowing for the miscast Charlie Hunnam, as Edith’s forlorn suitor. McMichael
is essentially Arbogast from Psycho,
something evident as soon as he arrives in England to set the Sharpes to
rights. Except del Toro and Robbins know we know this, and know Kubrick also
copied Hitch with the similarly haunted mansion and Scatman Crothers’ doomed
knight in shining armour in The Shining.
So instead, McMichael survives, just about. Hunnam’s face is far too
contemporary for this kind of fare, which is probably why he’s also been
cluelessly given lead duties in The Lost
City of Z and Knights of the Round
Table: King Arthur.
Talking of
clueless, I’m guessing del Toro will claim it was intentional that Allderdale
Hall and its environs fail to look or feel remotely like England; after all,
Manderlay was achieved entirely in Hollywood and the surrounding Californian countryside.
Unfortunately, the decision leaves Peak
further adrift, and with ghost designs we’re assured weren’t CG rendered, but look it thanks to post-production processes,
the whole tends to the mechanically undemanding. Much has been made of the
bodice-ripping sex scenes, but they aren’t anything all that eyebrow raising,
unless you happen to be taking tea with the vicar while watching.
If I make
it sound as if I didn’t enjoy the film, that’s not exactly the case; it’s just
disappointing that a director so talented should make something so middling for
the second time in a row. Crimson Peak
ought to have played a blinder. It can be a bad sign when a filmmaker opts to
up the ante of bloodshed, no matter how much he may adore it anyway, because it
may be in service of hiding a story that isn’t working. The picture’s third act
is really little more than an elaborate display of dismemberment and mutilation,
which is all very well, but Guillermo can do so much more. And, to an impartial
observer, it does make the movie read
as horror rather than gothic romance.
Agree? Disagree? Mildly or vehemently? Let me know in the comments below.
Comments
Post a Comment