Allied
(2016)
(SPOILERS) Just what is it that attracts
Robert Zemeckis to a movie? Now that his prospects for creating entirely unasked
for virtual landscapes have decisively dimmed, that is? The chance to work with
accomplished, Oscar-winning or nominated actors on distinguished screenplays
delving into intricate and rewarding subject matter? Or the opportunity to ransack
the material, seeking some kernel or glimmer of a reason to justify further
elaborate experimentation with some new technical trickery he has set his
sights on this time? Yes, it’s the latter. Allied
is a Notorious-esque WWII tale of
romantically-entangled spies and the suspicions that arise, not so much of fidelity
as loyalty to the winning side. Or, it’s the chance to give Brad a full virtual
chemical peel, and roll those decades right off him, the odd unflatteringly turkey
neck aside.
This CGI facial wash becomes the raison d’être of Allied (daring you
not to find its content as unequivocally dull as its title), so if you’re keen
to watch Brad in a not-quite uncanny valley state, but undeniably so very
rather off, this will be right up your street. Otherwise, you will most likely
find yourself left wanting. Zemeckis is working with less hyperbolic budgets
these days, but they still afford him the chance to dabble in his preferred composite
worlds, to as varying degrees of effectiveness as ever (honestly, his best work
with effects remains his ‘80s output, when he wasn’t trying so hard).
Marvel at the manner in which Brad apparently
lands his fighter plane and climbs out of it all in one shot (it’s that kind of
thing you’ll probably find was the clincher in Zemeckis deciding to direct the
picture)! Similar less-than-profound motivations likely went into the his
decision to make The Walk (the plot
is redundant thanks to the superior documentary, but just check out those
vertiginous ambulatory exploits) and Flight
(another plane crash, following Cast Away
– oh, goodie!) And so, looking back on his career, similarly perfunctory, unadorned
logic dictates his choices, post-Back to
the Future; Who Framed Roger Rabbit
(combine animation and live action), Death
Becomes Her (unleash T2-standard
CGI on a black comedy), Forrest Gump
(Zelig-style interpolating of the
lead character with news reel footage), Contact
(more of the same, and the chance to do a 2001
trip sequence) and the challenge of making a whole movie while taking a break
for Tom Hanks to get skinny (Cast Away
and What Lies Beneath). Which brings
us to his performance capture, decade-long pit.
So, if you’re trying to work out what Allied is about, scratching your head
but to no avail, that’s what it’s about. You might have spent much of your
viewing time hoping to be seduced and captivated by the romance between Brad’s
Canadian Intelligence Wing Commander Max Vatan and Marion Cotillard’s French
resistance fighter Marianne Beausejour, but to no avail. Brad’s playing elusive
and Marion coquettish, and nary a tremulous spark is curried betwixt them.
Suddenly, they’re in the throes of passion
and married and, Bob’s yer uncle, suspicion of Marianne’s true identity and
allegiances is announced. At which point, you’re hopefully thoroughly invested
in them being together and wishing it wasn’t true. But the fatal problem
besetting Zemeckis’ movie, beyond even that it mistakes sluggish for elegant
pacing (Zemeckis at his best is a master popcorn movie maker, but he’s not a debonair one, not in the sense of
mustering élan and glamour; such gestures feel manufactured in his molten hands),
is that you don’t care.
More than that, the problem is one of Steven
Knight’s screenplay. He has written some corkers in the past (Eastern Promises, Locke), but here the structure never allows for empathy or
investment. Cotillard is distant throughout (though more vital in her
performance than the pixel-personified Brad), and so there’s no real power to
her final sacrifice, or even her betrayal; this hasn’t been established as a
game of cat and mouse from the start, Ã la Joe
Esterhaz’s steamy thrillers (of which Jagged
Edge is the exemplar), so when Max is ushered to the SOE basement, assuming
a promotion is in the offing, it’s not so much a left turn as one that means
others are doing all the donkey work.
And his resultant attempts to clarify
matters, most notably during an excursion to France where he gets to “heroically”
blow some shit up (and Zemeckis gets that fighter shot in), might be regarded
as exposing his ineptitude (it follows his getting a pilot killed and sees him
recklessly pursuing his own agenda, so demolishing the Bond super-spy myth) but
is all ultimately on a hiding to nothing.
Which isn’t to say Knight and Zemeckis
don’t occasionally score. The opening in Casablanca, chock full of Nazis sporting
exotic uniform variants (a cossie for every country), makes the most of its
Canary Islands shoot, and if the relationship lacks something, there’s the
occasional burst of action to compensate as Max strangles a Hun in a phone
booth and he and Marianne mow down their targets at a party (I don’t know about
Marianne’s suggestion that actual French people wouldn’t be fooled by Brad’s
French accent, though; how about just actual people?) These scenes suggest
that, if Zemeckis would only get off his lauded perch and have some fun, he
could make something as unapologetic as his ‘80s fare, complete with Spielbergian
cartoon Nazis. Apart from that, though, commendably, the decision not to pull
punches as to Marianne’s identity is at least something.
Simon McBurney, who’s making something of a
supporting player name for himself as a spymaster, has a first class scene deep
in a London basement as the Special Operations Executive man with bad news, and
Matthew Goode scores as Max’s disfigured one-time colleague, abandoned in a
nursing home. Jared Harris is also entirely formidable as Max’s superior, and
Mike Leigh’s missus, Marion Bailey, walks off with the loathsome Nazi agent
garland for her one scene standoff with Brad; Brad may bring the bullet, but
she wins the acting award (that said, Anton Lesser barely registers in a
comparable role, and his demise is off screen).
Other choices just seem odd, such as
staging a party during an air raid, with apparent ambivalence towards the
blackout. And the attempt at poetic panache as Marianne gives birth during
another air raid falls entirely flat. Then there’s everyone seeming to be on drugs,
which is all the rage in WWII lore of late, it seems (see Blitzed, on Hitler’s mashed Third Reich). With that and lesbians
flaunting themselves freely, it’s amazing what an unfettered and tolerant era
the war was. No wonder people get nostalgic for it.
Of which, what is with WWII being in vogue
again? And particularly with Brad leading the charge (Inglorious Basterds, Fury,
Allied). We’ve got Dunkirk coming up, and the recently
announced Atlantic Wall with Bradley
Cooper (fast becoming a facsimile of himself). Perhaps Hollywood is laying the
foundations for encouraging an appreciative attitude toward a forthcoming
conflict (if Russia’s out, maybe China will do), one that can be viewed as a
similarly “just” war, and prep us with a host of ready material? Or it could
just be the usual warped barometer, that knowing these movies can do well, they’ll keep on trying
until they hit a sporadic, occasional jackpot.
Allied didn’t come cheap (enough), and its failure adds to the stack of
Paramount underachievers this year. Brad might wring another 10 years of
“youthful” stardom by having his features doctored each movie, but only if he picks
his projects more judiciously. This has about as much cachet as the majority of
failed star epic romance pictures, proving how difficult a genre it is to get
right. Brad’s oft compared to Robert Redford, and he too came a cropper with
such fare occasionally. Allied might
be Pitt’s Havana.
Agree? Disagree? Mildly or vehemently? Let me know in the comments below.
Comments
Post a Comment