The Neon Demon
(2016)
(SPOILERS) I found the first hour of The Neon Demon mesmerising, an elliptical,
synth-driven fever dream and tonal cousin to Beyond the Black Rainbow, ostensibly charting the seductive and
destructive path to success in the superficial world of modelling but possibly
being about something very much more than that. By the end, however, it had diminished
somewhat in my estimation, its cool, retro poise reframed by the most OTT,
Grand Guignol, head-on charge. I was left with a shrug, rather than the rapt
sense of having been fed through a wringer of revelation. And that’s even with
Nicolas Winding Refn’s film being over-ripe for interpretation, so loaded with subtext
it’s tantamount to a conspiracy theorist’s wet dream.
I suppose the full-on left turn the picture
takes shouldn’t have been a surprise. Refn is as wilfully perverse a filmmaker
as his fellow countryman Lars von Trier, but whereas I find von Trier’s work consistently
unpalatable, in the vomiting-up-eyeballs sense, Refn’s a different kettle of strange
fish, a wilful warper of genre and expectation, one who lacks the true, innate,
sublime weirdness of a David Lynch, but for all that creates transfixing,
immersive environments that seem to pull back the hood on unnerving and inherently
arcane people, characters, landscapes and realms. I saw it rather snobbily
suggested that Only Once Forgives was
a litmus test for fans of Drive,
sorting those who mistake its relatively commercial furrow from true Refn-ites.
Such a view would apply to The Neon Demon
and then some, in that case.
It’s possible that the last 20 minutes will
send you running for the (Hollywood) hills, but the most extreme necrophile
scene in a mainstream movie since Bad
Timing (I’m guessing on that, actually, as I don’t make a habit of seeking
them out) and a slow-mo, post-cannibalistic sexy shower, followed by
self-immolation via a pair of scissors on the set of a bad Pirelli calendar
photo shoot because “I need to get her
out of me” come across as escalation in aid of shock value, rather than adding
anything we haven’t already absorbed thematically. So the industry feeds on its
own, sucking up the young and innocent and spewing them out in a tangle of body
parts. So it’s a hotbed of exploitation. Colour me unfazed.
On the other hand, is Jena Malone a
refashioned, less jingle-jangle Jimmy Savile (perhaps surprisingly embodied in
the otherwise dismal latest “season” of Sherlock;
surprisingly, since Steven Moffat isn’t exactly known for his keen sense of the
topical, unless it’s through cringe-making pop culture references). This aspect
- intertwining the fashion industry with occult acts and iconography – makes The Neon Demon more arresting, demanding
of attention, but the full-blooded excess at the end rather blunts the
incrementally more unsettling dis-ease of the world Jesse finds herself in and
quickly comes to adopt. It’s the suggestive versus the in the face.
The former is there long before Keanu
references the “Real Lolita shit” in
Room 214; Christina Hendricks’ agent has no qualms about signing an underage
girl (“Honey, people believe what they
are told”) and the procedure for facilitating this is well-rehearsed. Anyone
familiar with the gist of Pizzagate (“Fake News” or otherwise, in which case it
simply joins the fake news touted by daily the mainstream media) would find it easy
to draw parallels with a movie where the ingénue is asked “Are you food or sex?” and her allure is referred to in terms of “Who wants sour milk when you can get fresh
meat?” The Neon Demon looks as if
it is going a very specific way prior to the third act’s overkill, that Elle will
wrest the mantle of vehement bitch from those she threatened and who despise
her; instead, the model who can “keep
her down” is the one who thrives on plastic surgery, so hollowed out and
corrupted that she is readily fuelled/topped up by the raw essence of youth.
Refn has selected his cast eclectically. Elle
Fanning (Jesse), replacing a scheduling-conflicted Carey Mulligan, has the kind
of detached, porcelain mask of a younger Nicole Kidman, such that her transformation
from naïf takes little suspension of disbelief (of course, there’s the question
of how much she really is that in the
first place, and how much it’s calculated; why are her parents out of the picture, and what are we to make of comments
such as “I’m not as helpless as I look”
and “I am dangerous”?)
Jena Malone (Ruby), a fantastic actress, essays
the sympathetic/predatory guide turned scorned Lady Bathory with aplomb, while
Abbey Lee (Sarah) is a revelation as the soulless, synthetic automaton who will
do whatever it takes to stay in the game (Lee hails from the catwalk world, so
has probably seen a thing or two). If Bella Heathcote is less impactful, that’s
the intent of the part. Together, they make three witches (or points on a
triangle), luring a Macbeth to her destruction.
And there’s strong support from Keanu
Reeves in The Gift mode (Sam Raimi’s
one) as a psychopathic hotelier and Alessandro Nivola (Robert Sarno), effortlessly
confident as a fashionista who cuts short Karl Gusman’s protestations at being
attracted to what’s inside Elle rather than without, although not so much that
he’ll consume her (“I think if she wasn’t
beautiful, that you wouldn’t even have stopped to look”), and Dexter’s Desmond Harrington (Jack) looking
every inch the delusional, coked-up photographer (let’s hope he didn’t go
method). There is, of course, a direct link between the adulated movers of the
fashion and film worlds, both of whom will have a starlet begging to compromise
herself under the banner of art (particularly European-flavoured art).
The star, though, is Refn’s distended, oppressively
womb-like world, cosseted by Cliff Martinez’ pulsing score. Natasha Braier’s
cinematography is of a piece with Refn’s previous form for intensely saturated
hues, indicating that he’s very much leading his collaborators by the hand. Martinez
said the first half of the movie was a Valley
of the Dolls-style melodrama and the second half a Texas Chainsaw Massacre-style horror. I can certainly see the
former, the latter somewhat less so, except in the most obvious narrative cue.
In some respects, it’s closer to The Wicker Man; Jesse becomes an
offering, sustenance in maintaining a corrupted system (Sarah’s cachet is
revitalised by consumption of her victim’s essence, Jack being struck by her
the way he and Sarno were by Jesse earlier), Ruby’s skyclad rites following the
burial of their victim (at this point, I considered the picture might be
revealing itself as really all about her, but it is much about Sarah,
particularly in her responses to the rise of Jesse and how precisely it impugns
her own worth).
But going back to the cryptic and occult
under- and overtones, there are the references to The Shining (Room 214, red rum, the menstrual tide), the Giger-esque
first photo shoot by Jack (at least, it reminded me of his cover for Debbie
Harry’s solo album, rather than Baphomet). Mirrors and pyramids, and swastikas, abound, and
those who have a field day suggesting Kubrick devoted his career to exposing
the Illuminati will surely see The Neon
Demon picking up where he left off.
Being one for conspiratorial fare, I was
unimpressed by a highly prurient Vigilant Citizen piece on the picture’s
possible themes, clearly basing its view of “an indulgent celebration from people who revel in darkness” on its
distaste for the content rather than attending to what it’s saying; you’d have
to be incredibly blinkered to come away with that message (“It actually attempts to make everything
cool, trendy and fashionable”: really? Anyone reacting to it that way is probably is looking to get sectioned. Or go spirit cooking). It’s mostly that Refn,
being an unmalleable, crazy Dane, doesn’t feel the need to lead his narratives
by the nose with Hollywood Moral Framing 101. It’s still pretty unmistakable
who’s bad here, though.
All of which is well and good, but I must
admit I was hoping for something either more off-kilter or more enigmatic.
Perhaps Refn’s bluntness shouldn’t have surprised me, but it certainly didn’t altogether
satisfy, and is preceded by a section where I began to feel a slight ponderous
tone setting up shop. Nevertheless, if you have the stomach, this is a strange,
bewitching movie, one that is fascinating and though-provoking for all its
flaws. It’s also a strong runner-up to Zoolander
2 in the list of 2016 modelling movies that culminate with diabolical human
sacrifices.
Agree? Disagree? Mildly or vehemently? Let me know in the comments below.