The Shape of Water
(2017)
(SPOILERS) The faithful would have you believe it never went
away, but it’s been a good decade since Guillermo del Toro’s mojo was in full
effect, and his output since (or lack thereof: see the torturous wilderness
years of At the Mountains of Madness
and The Hobbit), reflected through
the prism of his peak work Pan’s
Labyrinth, bears the hallmarks of a serious qualitative tumble. He put his
name to stinker TV show The Strain,
returned to movies with the soulless Pacific
Rim and fashioned flashy but empty gothic romance Crimson Peak (together his weakest pictures, and I’m not forgetting
Mimic). The Shape of Water only seems to underline what everyone has been
saying for years, albeit previously confined to his Spanish language pictures: that
the smaller and more personal they are, the better. If his latest is at times a
little too wilfully idiosyncratic,
it’s also a movie where you can nevertheless witness it’s creator’s creativity
flowing untrammelled once more.
Del Toro called The
Shape of Water “a fairy tale for
difficult times”, before adding that it was “an antidote for cynicism, a variation on Beauty and the Beast where the beast remains the beast”.
Accordingly, like a fairy tale, the picture requires a divorce from the rigours
of logic to fully engage. Otherwise, applying such scrutiny, one would understandably
question why Elisa (Sally Hawkins, radiant) opts to wait an interminable amount
of time upon rescuing Amphibian Man (Doug Jones, gilly and great) before dragging
him down the docks and releasing him to safety. It would, after all, have saved
a whole lot of grief, pain, suffering and (possibly) lives. The answer is that
she has the hots for him, silly, such that Elisa walks through the movie as a naïf,
an Edward Scissorhands or an Amélie existing
in a different world to everyone else (or most people else), not merely because
she is mute (although that signifiers her as a freak, a misfit, along with the
variously sexually, racially and culturally disenfranchised with whom she forms
bonds) but because she sees the world with untarnished eyes. Which is not to
say she’s an innocent (hence her daily bathtub masturbation habit), but that
she is unspoiled by the cruelty and intolerance of society around her. When
with her friends, Giles (Richard Jenkins) and Zelda (Octavia Spencer), she
finds islands of solace, mutual acceptance of difference and differences.
As with Pan’s
Labyrinth, del Toro’s magical realist, fairy tale construct is realised
through the contrast of opposites. Elisa and Zelda are menial cleaning staff at
a top-secret government facility, the one where Gillman is delivered and
promptly chews off a couple of fingers of his military captor Strickland
(Michael Shannon, playing classic Michael Shannon, which is to say, a raging,
bug-eyed psycho). The place is austere, foreboding and always on high
security, but within its confines a form of unlikely romance develops as Elisa
sneaks hardboiled eggs – reeking too much of symbolism to be labelled symbolic
– to her scaly friend and playing him tunes. These Amazonian reptile men really
dig vinyl.
Del Toro has made out that Strickland is set up as the
formidable villain only to allow his vulnerability/oppressed state ultimately show
through, which the director argues has been a consistent trait in his pictures.
While that may be the case thematically, and viscerally (Strickland walks
around with two increasingly festering and gangrenous reattached fingers to
remind us of how deeply corrupted and depraved he is, so depraved he washes his
hands before he goes to the toilet),
the mere fact of casting Shannon announces something less interesting and
nuanced. Now, if del Toro had succeeded in persuading us to root for Strickland’s
success, for fear of the consequences from those who oppress him, while
simultaneously wanting the same for our protagonists, that would have been something
to shout about. As it is, almost everything laid at his door, from his wanton
cruelty towards Abe Sapien, to seeing others as types, affording them barely
human standing, to finding himself attracted to Elisa (established as a variant
on his need for control – she can’t talk back – but coming across as an unnecessary
and unlikely addition to his roster of already sufficiently over-stocked
creepiness), even his candy-popping habit, lends him a two-dimensional villainy
that showing his home life does nothing to allay.
Which means Strickland is an entirely effective and
formidable presence (even if he’s very slow on the uptake – the scene in which
Elisa is staring him down before signing “Fuck
you” would have seen her found out by anyone even incrementally brighter –
to the extent that he needs to be fed the missing pieces of the puzzle, rather
than deducing himself) but not a very interesting one, particular when it comes
to his third act rampage. No one else, certainly not General Hoyt (Nick Searcy
from Justified), and definitely not his
nominal colleagues Fleming (David Hewlett) and Dr Hoffstetler (Michael
Stuhlbarg), occupies that space.
As a consequence, the activities at the facility aren’t as
diverting once Elisa has broken Amphibian Man out in a marvellously tense heist
sequence, aided by Zelda and Hoffstetler. The latter turns out to be a Soviet
agent with a heart, the antithesis of Strickland doing everything his country
asks for him and still getting hauled over coals for his single failure (Stuhlbarg
is great, although you can’t help thinking the character was short changed
somewhere along the way). Del Toro makes it clear that, in their zest to
dispose of the beast, both sides have missed out on the biggest scientific
breakthrough they might ever encounter, entirely because they failed to see the
wood for the trees (or rather, the creature’s endless rejuvenation ability for
his perceived uselessness as a subject in unmanned space flights).
Elisa’s fantasia of escapism, nourished by Dan Laustsen’s enchanted
cinematography and an idealised setting (an expanse of a hideaway above a
glorious classical cinema) frequently put me in mind of Amélie,
although the accompanying Alexandre Desplat score and del Toro’s tone-juggling
never quite cohere the way the giddily quirky Jean-Pierre Jeunet and composer Yann
Tiersen did. The obsession with musicals is cute but a little over-cooked,
complete with a de rigueur gay neighbour to indulge her doting (that Giles
rises above such stereotypes is almost entirely down to Jenkins’ endearing
performance; that and some amusing business with wigs).
Del Toro was frank about the number of balls he was
juggling, noting that, of all the various elements making up the movie, what “works for the musical also has to work
tonally for the melodrama, the comedy and the thriller”. This is as much true of the screenplay as the
execution. While The Shape of Water
never loses its thread, it’s in danger of becoming too accommodating during
these interludes, like a movie bore letting loose with no one whispering in his
ear when to stop. Nevertheless, Hawkins is so entirely commanding that you’re
willing to suspend disbelief in anything she does, and she’s a large part of
why the most whimsical elements get a free pass.
While the mixing up of genres is quite audacious, the actual
content of those elements is contrastingly quite conventional, such that when
Elisa is suddenly transported into a musical, now with voice, it seems like an
inevitability, one del Toro just about pulls off. Not because I felt her
dancing with a fish man carried the danger of conveying Putting on the Ritz-type mirth à la
Young Frankenstein, but because it
feels very much a calculation of where this del Toro’s musically-enthused scenario
will end up, as uncynical as his intentions may be. You can’t fault him for
challenging himself, though, and credit is particularly due for pulling off a
mature love story, one conveyed largely without words, straying into territory
– notably sex – he has avoided hitherto, without the prurience that frequently
accompanies such fare.
There are other signposted elements; as soon as we see the placing
of Elisa’s scars, we know they will have a bearing on the movie’s outcome. So
too, the checklist of gender/race/prejudice issues is perhaps a little
schematic in conception (the physically disabled, a black woman, a gay man, a
communist), but rarely feels so in execution (del Toro has always been better
on screen than on the page). Giles’ subplot suggests the director has been
consuming Mad Men box sets at some
point, while the sad encounter with the bartender leads to the reveal that the
latter is both homophobic and racist and
makes revolting green pies. If Hoffstetler is a good Commie, it doesn’t alter
the fact that the Soviets generally are still the bad guys (hardly bucking the
current cinematic trend). The only surprise in this scenario isn’t one for a
director who always identifies with the monster; the happily ever after comes
with the caveat that Elisa must transform for the creature, rather than the
creature for her (but wait, didn’t Shrek
pull of that trick nearly two decades ago? Maybe not such a game changer after
all).
There’s also a sense occasionally that del Toro is striving
too hard for Edward Scissorhands-esque
naivety and not quite succeeding, simply because del Toro isn’t Tim Burton (or isn’t
who Tim Burton was, at any rate). This
is why the violence frequently feels jarring and out of step, gratuitous even,
the horror geek unable to get out of the way of his romance. Where Pan’s Labyrinth was entirely germane and
of-a-piece, juxtaposing the brutality of Nazi reality with the escape/mirroring
thereof through fantasy, here the elements are a little more calculated and
thus less effective/integrated. You can see the wheels and levers at work, much
as in one of the director’s intricately-designed clockwork devices. Del Toro is
always one to encourage the dark, and he’s in sharp focus whenever something
nasty is transpiring; however much he may want us to swoon with a submerged
bathroom love scene, what really gets him going is Gillman subsequently
eviscerating a cat (the filmmaker joins the recently infamous ranks of the
Coens and Wes Anderson for inflicting unnecessary aggression on felines
everywhere) or Strickland dragging Hoffstetler around by the bullet hole in his
cheek.
What of The Shape of
Water’s chances come Oscar night? If it takes the big prize, it will be a
rare fantasy to go home showered in glory. It wouldn’t be my pick of those I’ve
seen thus far (that would be Three
Billboards outside Ebbing, Missouri) – although I’d go to bat for Hawkins
over favourite Frances McDormand for Best Actress – but for all that I don’t
think it’s as perfectly conceived and completed as Pan’s Labyrinth, a picture that seemed to spring into existence fully
formed, it would be my runner up. It’s a picture that, like Three Billboards, boasts the fascination
that comes with a distinctive voice, and in del Toro’s case is a welcome
reminder that the voice can be just as distinctive as ever it was when it
forsakes the big payday.
Agree? Disagree? Mildly or vehemently? Let me know in the comments below.
Comments
Post a Comment