Skip to main content

Right! Let’s restore some bloody logic!

It Couldn't Happen Here
(1987)

(SPOILERS) "I think our film is arguably better than Spiceworld" said Neil Tennant of his and Chris Lowe's much-maligned It Couldn't Happen Here, a quasi-musical, quasi-surrealist journey through the English landscape via the Pet shop Boys' "own" history as envisaged by co-writer-director Jack Bond. Of course, Spiceworld could boast the presence of the illustrious Richard E Grant, while It Couldn't Happen Here had to settle for Gareth Hunt. Is its reputation deserved? It's arguably not very successful at being a coherent film (even thematically), but I have to admit that I rather like it, ramshackle and studiously aloof though it is.


LoweWhere are you going?
Serial KillerI'm going there, but I like it here, wherever it is.

do think liking Actually, the album from the majority of the tracks are lifted – only Shopping and Heart don't appear; the latter single benefited from a Jack Bond promo video that helped push it to Number One – is pretty much essential to enjoying the picture, however. Also featured are five tracks from debut album Please (all from the first side, although that's probably mostly explained by four of them having been singles) and Always On My Mind, which is probably the film's biggest claim to fame. 


Serial KillerI had a girlfriend once who use to sing on the radio. Every time she used to walk under a bridge, you couldn't hear her sing. Oh, she was a beautiful girl. A beautiful girl. When I first met her, she'd just been to a psychoanalyst. Yes, "It didn't do any good" she said. I asked her why. She said, "I'm a Nymphomaniac you see and I only get turned on by Jewish cowboys". "I'm so sorry" I said. "Let me introduce myself. My name is Bucky Goldstein".

When it was decided to release the track as a single (it became the 1987 Christmas Number One) "a whole new scene was written for the film so that it could be included. That's why the dialogue's so corny in that scene. Joss Ackland ends up quoting What Have I Done to Deserve This? It's hilarious". Well… I wouldn't go that far, but Ackland certainly isn't underplaying at all. Its straightforwardness as a promo is definitely a virtue, however: Chris drives, Neil sings, Ackland gurns in the back seat (it isn't identical, as the video version is edited down).


Other tracks are used literally or haphazardly; Hit Music pipes up briefly on the radio before a newsflash warns of Ackland’s killer ("The stranger has been known to masquerade as a priest"), about to become a passenger (he presumably offs the female hitchhiker Chris has stopped for). 


Suburbia hardly gets a look in – oddly, since it's such an evocative, visual track – playing while Neil buys some non-saucy postcards. Love Comes Quickly turns up in a transport café accompanying… well, a waitress (Carmen Du Sautoy of the Garden, Brooke-Taylor and Oddie's short-lived Astronauts) squeezing sleazily past a guy at a juke box as Neil and Chris order a lavish meal (Tennant requests a 1942 Chateau de la tour). 


The juxtaposition is cute, but the content random; Neil Dickson's pilot – he was Biggles in the previous year's dud of the same name, which is an amusing reference but a curious one for a character presence that is far beyond an extended joke  – is at a table, Gareth Hunt appears in his third guise, apparently a part work of Neil and Chris' Uncle Dredge, with vent's doll presenting a discourse on the film's ostensible theme, of which more in a bit. I wondered if Hunt was supposed to be an approximation of a doll, what with his slicked-down, Paul Darrow hair. 


The subsequent Rent is a properly choreographed number, Neil picking it on the café juke box and the wall lifting away; it isn't particularly noteworthy, except that it's the kind of thing you'd expect from an MTV promo yet set to a relatively down-tempo track. It's a Sin (the Disco Mix) also gets dancers, more effectively if entirely obviously, as Neil and Chris as boys enter a theatre and witness nuns dancing in their frillies. 


Opportunities (Let's Make Lots of Money) plays as Chris, escaping Aunty Vi's, fills a TARDIS-like suitcase with such essential items as a whale lilo. West End Girls is part-delivered by rappers X-Posse as Neil and Chris trudge by (the former takes up the miming). What Have I Done to Deserve This? (which had a fine promo video in its own right) is by far the most slipshod offering, with Neil on the phone to mum Babs Windsor, the latter miming Dusty Springfield in the least convincing manner.


Two of the best uses of tracks are examples of pervading, patented PSB melancholia, however. The title song "probably" Neil's favourite track on the album, shorn of its actual content (about a friend of Tennant's diagnosed with AIDS) becomes a broader meditation on the state of a decaying nation as envisaged by Bond, first delivered over the opening credits as Neil gazes across the Clacton-On-Sea beachfront and again later as Neil Dickson's Milton-quoting cabbie (lots of car journeys here) – Kim Newman considered the Milton/ Tennant pairing the height of hubris on Tennant's part, even though it's Bond's conceit – drives them through a long tunnel towards their destination (a rather ho-hum finale as Neil sings ho-hum One More Chance to a dancefloor of ballroom dancers). If Bond fails to make the most of many of the tracks' potential – which given how cinematic their first couple of albums are, is something of a black mark – It Couldn't Happen Here, with its lush orchestral arrangement by Angelo Badalamenti really does become the signature piece, when previously it was rather fazed by flashier album tracks. 


PilotI say, what an extraordinary idea. A world with no teacups.

Likewise, album closer King’s Cross ("It's about hopes being dashed") is probably the most inspired piece visually. It features a station, but not the titular one (Neil and Chris sit on a bench, but at Paddington), and random unexplained zookeepers with zebra face paint pushing an actual zebra into a carriage (is this why some think its Greenaway-esque?), and a workman covering a billboard with brickwork paper to match the brickwork behind it. 


There's also a woman (Dominique Barnes, who made an impression in the previous year's Sunday classic Brat Farrar) in her underwear (lots of underwear in the picture) who later fondles a snake on a train, and the bizarre sight of (her husband?) leaving the house in flames; in light of the King's Cross fire, there was doubt about whether to include the imagery: "That was very spooky. Jack Bond… asked the widow of someone who’d been killed and she said, 'You should leave it in' ".


PilotNumbers must add up. Two and two is four. Right! Let's restore some bloody logic!

Then there’s Two Divided By Zero, a Please track that's almost throwaway (albeit, it's the opener), but here is intrinsic to whatever thematic logic Bond is ruminating on. Neil and Chris are driving – obviously – as Dickinson's pilot, directed by the dummy in the control tower and ranting about the illogicality of the lyrics, strafes their car with bullets ("Ooo, I will miss you, Chrissy baby"). 


Is the subtext his world (WWI world) of ostensible clarity being pulled apart by new conceptions of existence, of which the PSB are promulgators, in their own casually indifferent way? "What about the logic?" he demands, having devoured WH Newton-Smith's A Structure of Time and struggling to digest "There would be no time… if there were no beings capable of reason". Even though "The dummy’s a blasted existentialist!", he obeys its instructions to destroy the PSB; in the transport café earlier, the dummy was offering a discourse on the nature of time as a logical state, while the pilot played a handheld video game first announcing "Two divided by zero"


Uncle DredgeIt's only a laugh. No harm done.

Following such a path exploring the subjective experiencing of time explains the fractured reminiscences/realities experienced by the PSB (are they playing brothers here? It seems like it). We begin with Neil talking about being thrown out of Aunty Vi's boarding house as a kid, where we could find "Uncle Dredge and his terrible jokes and ventriloquist's dummy" Whom we quickly meet, courtesy of Babs and Gareth respectively, the latter running through a grating bygone music hall entertainer spiel during breakfast as Babs dotes over Chris, but adult Chris (which is particularly amusing, Lowe being his typically implacable self as Babs promises him a "nice little cuddle tonight"), until he tips his breakfast over her ("Chris darling. What have I done to deserve this?" – Babs' performance is typically immoderate) and flees.


Tennant's comment "No wonder the audience wanted their money back with that bloody dummy going on and on about the nature of time" is front-ended but so meta that it could equally sum up the critics' response to the picture (if they'd actually paid to see it). Apparently, the PSB made general suggestions to Bond but gave him a free hand, which is probably why, although they don't jar with the content for the most part, it doesn't strongly reflect them, aside from the Catholic guilt percolating the first part of the picture. What are we to make of Ackland as priest/killer (and killer disguised as priest)? I suspect it’s as understated as the priest being blind, and pursuing small boys. 


Those pieces that aren't diving in and out of their own history or discussing time itself vaguely seem to be exploring entertainment as a means of distorting reality, in particular bygone end-of-pier entertainment (Neil goes to a fortune teller, revealed as Chris; both appear in a saucy Victorian mutoscope romp with Babs). There have been comparisons to Jarman, Greenway, Fellini, while the working title was A Hard Day's Shopping. I was put in mind variously of Ken Russell meets Carry On meets The Entertainer (Tennant mentions Russell but in the context of the film's reception; "It was like a Ken Russell film; there's no more unfashionable filmmaker today"). 


The seaside setting is redolent of the same year’s ('50s set) Wish You Were Here, while the nods to contemporary concerns ("Nowadays all you get is your hooligans and your bike gangs and your politicians"), courtesy of Hunt's shopkeeper  – "All they really want is a week away from the wife" he says of visiting politicians – suggests the cinema of the then lustrous Palace Pictures, whose Scandal was released less than a year after It Couldn't Happen Here went wide (well…) It also featured Nothing Can Be Proved, sung by Dusty and penned by the PSB. 


But Gareth seeing saucy seaside postcards come to life and nude bathers through his binoculars finds him channelling Benny Hill by way of the Carry On…-killing '70s nudie pics. And just the presence of Babs announces the broad canvas approach to the arts; Bond isn't being elitist; all modes of entertainment are equally valid. 


Later, en route to their final number, the boys travel though a battlefield suggesting The Bedsitting Room meets Alex Cox. The scene exemplifies Bond's approach, whereby unsubtle juxtapositions (the limo contrasted with decaying architecture) are relayed via all-purpose tracking shots.


TennantEver since I was a child, the comic and the hostile seemed to go hand in hand.

The picture undoubtedly has a sense of humour (it was co-written by James Dillon, a production designer who, I’m guessing, has a fairly robust funny bone, having worked on The Goodies (LWT) and The Mighty Boosh), but except for moments of exaggeration for effect, it's very much a low-key, dry PSB sense of humour, pre- their '90s detour into over-designed tour outfits and intentionally cheesy computer graphics. 


As actors playing themselves, the duo display both their pop versions' strengths and weaknesses. They're not unlike Jay and Silent Bob or Reeves and Mortimer in that sense. Chris fares best because Lowe is mostly silent (and, as he has noted in interviews, he knows how to stand; further than that, though, an impassive expression is ideal for masking limited acting chops); occasionally, there's an inspired moment such as his dancing next to a broken-down car which has become an impromptu smoke machine, but mostly he does what he does in the group; hangs back and allows Neil to lead. And Tennant, like Reeves, shows he's a performer but no actor. Anyone who thinks his singing voice is thin will come away believing it to be positively beefy in comparison to this; during his voiceovers – which entirely don't gel, particularly when they amount to a recitation of lyrics – it's so flimsy it could blow away.


PilotLet's hear it for Acacia Avenue!

Still, there are moments where he raises a smile. Haggling with Dickinson's used car salesman (repeatedly asking "How much?" as the latter continues his patter regardless), or walking blithely into a phone box surrounded by football hooligans to call mum. The walk-off with zeros on their backs is also a nice touch ("Oy, got far to go, have you?" asks the dummy, getting in the last word and presumably meaning it in a never-ending, existential sense). And Dickinson is a consistent highlight throughout, in whichever persona, probably the performer – aside from Lowe – who seems to innately understand how to pitch himself to match the material.


Wikipedia has it that It Couldn’t Happen Here cost $4m, and I wonder that it was considered commercially viable on that basis (what can it have earned back, particularly as it's been out of circulation for decades and is in desperate need of a DVD/Blu-ray release?) On release, the aforementioned Kim Newman complained "The Pet Shop Boys indulge themselves by using their songs as an interminable, excruciating non-narrative ramble through rainy modern England… Probably the most difficult to sit through film of the year" (The Virgin Film Yearbook Vol 8), while Elaine Paterson in Time Out was as scathing: "Director Bond’s attempt at a narrative stringing together of the Pet Shop Boys' themes is witless, aimless and pretentious. If this sickbag of kitsch communicates anything, it's the anguish of a young aesthete on discovering that flying ducks still adorn the walls of his mother's house”.


So, It Couldn't Happen Here: better than Spiceworld? Well, yeah, but the comparison seems to characterise Spiceworld as some sort of abhorrence rather than fairly inoffensive, disposable fluff. Bond throws in some interesting ideas – pretentious, maybe, but so what, there was a lot of it about in British cinema at the time – but he doesn't do enough to make them stick, or the songs. Yet it's a very watchable film; I suspect it was interminable for Newman partly because he didn't much like the tunes. At the time – prior to its reception – the PSB mooted making another and Bond, an arty director who had been relegated to South Bank Shows, was keen. Maybe they should just have gone for the whole hog and signed up unfashionable Ken (he was still making diverting, if wildly variable, movies at that point). Perhaps the Boys should venture back into cinema for a belated sequel, like Bill & Ted. I'm sure Chris is still good at standing, and if anything, Neil's voice has only got higher. 


Agree? Disagree? Mildly or vehemently? Let me know in the comments below.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

She writes Twilight fan fiction.

Vampire Academy (2014)
My willingness to give writer Daniel Waters some slack on the grounds of early glories sometimes pays off (Sex and Death 101) and sometimes, as with this messy and indistinct Young Adult adaptation, it doesn’t. If Vampire Academy plods along as a less than innovative smart-mouthed Buffy rip-off that might be because, if you added vampires to Heathers, you would probably get something not so far from the world of Joss Whedon. Unfortunately inspiration is a low ebb throughout, not helped any by tepid direction from Daniel’s sometimes-reliable brother Mark and a couple of hopelessly plankish leads who do their best to dampen down any wit that occasionally attempts to surface.

I can only presume there’s a never-ending pile of Young Adult fiction poised for big screen failure, all of it comprising multi-novel storylines just begging for a moment in the Sun. Every time an adaptation crashes and burns (and the odds are that they will) another one rises, hydra-like, hoping…

We’re not owners here, Karen. We’re just passing through.

Out of Africa (1985)
I did not warm to Out of Africa on my initial viewing, which would probably have been a few years after its theatrical release. It was exactly as the publicity warned, said my cynical side; a shallow-yet-bloated, awards-baiting epic romance. This was little more than a well-dressed period chick flick, the allure of which was easily explained by its lovingly photographed exotic vistas and Robert Redford rehearsing a soothing Timotei advert on Meryl Streep’s distressed locks. That it took Best Picture only seemed like confirmation of it as all-surface and no substance. So, on revisiting the film, I was curious to see if my tastes had “matured” or if it deserved that dismissal. 

My name is Dr. King Schultz, this is my valet, Django, and these are our horses, Fritz, and Tony.

Django Unchained (2012)
(MINOR SPOILERS) Since the painful misstep of Grindhouse/Death Proof, Quentin Tarantino has regained the higher ground like never before. Pulp Fiction, his previous commercial and critical peak, has been at very least equalled by the back-to-back hits of Inglourious Basterds and Django Unchained. Having been underwhelmed by his post Pulp Fiction efforts (albeit, I admired his technical advances as a director in Kill Bill), I was pleasantly surprised by Inglourious Basterds. It was no work of genius (so not Pulp Fiction) by any means, but there was a gleeful irreverence in its treatment of history and even to the nominal heroic status of its titular protagonists. Tonally, it was a good fit for the director’s “cool” aesthetic. As a purveyor of postmodern pastiche, where the surface level is the subtext, in some ways he was operating at his zenith. Django Unchained is a retreat from that position, the director caught in the tug between his all-important aesthetic pr…

Rejoice! The broken are the more evolved. Rejoice.

Split (2016)
(SPOILERS) M Night Shyamalan went from the toast of twist-based filmmaking to a one-trick pony to the object of abject ridicule in the space of only a couple of pictures: quite a feat. Along the way, I’ve managed to miss several of his pictures, including his last, The Visit, regarded as something of a re-locating of his footing in the low budget horror arena. Split continues that genre readjustment, another Blumhouse production, one that also manages to bridge the gap with the fare that made him famous. But it’s a thematically uneasy film, marrying shlock and serious subject matter in ways that don’t always quite gel.

Shyamalan has seized on a horror staple – nubile teenage girls in peril, prey to a psychotic antagonist – and, no doubt with the best intentions, attempted to warp it. But, in so doing, he has dragged in themes and threads from other, more meritable fare, with the consequence that, in the end, the conflicting positions rather subvert his attempts at subversion…

If you could just tell me what those eyes have seen.

Alita: Battle Angel (2019)
(SPOILERS) Robert Rodriguez’ film of James Cameron’s at-one-stage-planned film of Yukito Kishiro’s manga Gunnm on the one hand doesn’t feel overly like a Rodriguez film, in that it’s quite polished, so certainly not of the sort he’s been making of late – definitely a plus – but on the other, it doesn’t feel particularly like a Jimbo flick either. What it does well, it mostly does very well – the action, despite being as thoroughly steeped in CGI as Avatar – but many of its other elements, from plotting to character to romance, are patchy or generic at best. Despite that, there’s something likeable about the whole ludicrously expensive enterprise that is Alita: Battle Angel, a willingness to be its own kind of distinctive misfit misfire.

Mountains are old, but they're still green.

Roma (2018)
(SPOILERS) Roma is a critics' darling and a shoe-in for Best Foreign Film Oscar, with the potential to take the big prize to boot, but it left me profoundly indifferent, its elusive majesty remaining determinedly out of reach. Perhaps that's down to generally spurning autobiographical nostalgia fests – complete with 65mm widescreen black and white, so it's quite clear to viewers that the director’s childhood reverie equates to the classics of old – or maybe the elliptical characterisation just didn't grab me, but Alfonso Cuarón's latest amounts to little more than a sliver of substance beneath all that style.

Life is like a box of timelines. You feel me?

Russian Doll Season One
(SPOILERS) It feels like loading the dice to proclaim something necessarily better because it’s female-driven, but that’s the tack The Hollywood Reporter took with its effusive review of Russian Doll, suggesting “although Nadia goes on a similar journey of self-discovery to Bill Murray’s hackneyed reporter in Groundhog Day, the fact that the show was created, written by and stars women means that it offers up a different, less exploitative and far more thoughtful angle” (than the predominately male-centric entries in the sub-genre). Which rather sounds like Rosie Knight changing the facts to fit her argument. And ironic, given star Natasha Lyonne has gone out of her way to stress the show’s inclusive message. Russian Dollis good, but the suggestion that “unlike its predecessors (it) provides a thoughtfulness, authenticity and honesty which makes it inevitable end (sic) all the more powerful” is cobblers.

We’re looking for a bug no one’s seen before. Some kind of smart bug.

Starship Troopers (1997)
(SPOILERS) Paul Verhoeven’s sci-fi trio of Robocop, Total Recall and Starship Troopers are frequently claimed to be unrivalled in their genre, but it’s really only the first of them that entirely attains that rarefied level. Discussion and praise of Starship Troopers is generally prefaced by noting that great swathes of people – including critics and cast members – were too stupid to realise it was a satire. This is a bit of a Fight Club one, certainly for anyone from the UK (Verhoeven commented “The English got it though. I remember coming out of Heathrow and seeing the posters, which were great. They were just stupid lines about war from the movie. I thought, ‘Finally someone knows how to promote this.’”) who needed no kind of steer to recognise what the director was doing. And what he does, he does splendidly, even if, at times, I’m not sure he entirely sustains a 129-minute movie, since, while both camp and OTT, Starship Troopers is simultaneously required t…

Even after a stake was driven through its heart, there’s still interest.

Prediction 2019 Oscars
Shockingly, as in I’m usually much further behind, I’ve missed out on only one of this year’s Best Picture nominees– Vice isn’t yet my vice, it seems – in what is being suggested, with some justification, as a difficult year to call. That might make for must-see appeal, if anyone actually cared about the movies jostling for pole position. If it were between Black Panther and Bohemian Rhapsody (if they were even sufficiently up to snuff to deserve a nod in the first place), there might be a strange fascination, but Joe Public don’t care about Roma, underlined by it being on Netflix and stillconspicuously avoided by subscribers (if it were otherwise, they’d be crowing about viewing figures; it’s no Bird Box, that’s for sure).

You use a scalpel. I prefer a hammer.

Mission: Impossible - Fallout (2018)
(SPOILERS) The latest instalment of the impossibly consistent in quality Mission: Impossible franchise has been hailed as the best yet, and with but a single dud among the sextet that’s a considerable accolade. I’m not sure it's entirely deserved – there’s a particular repeated thematic blunder designed to add some weight in a "hero's validation" sense that not only falls flat, but also actively detracts from the whole – but as a piece of action filmmaking, returning director Christopher McQuarrie has done it again. Mission: Impossible – Fallout is an incredible accomplishment, the best of its ilk this side of Mad Max: Fury Road.