Skip to main content

Apparently, they all got it in a movie theatre.

Outbreak
(1995)

(SPOILERS) One thing in Outbreak’s favour: it’s unashamedly Hollywood. Contagion might fool the unwitting movie peruser into believing it’s based on real, hard science, but Outbreak is so intent on throwing the kitchen sink of all-star moviemaking tics and tropes into the mix that it’s hard to take seriously. Even as it’s flourishing an Ebola-esque virus fully equipped to make you queasy (it’s interesting that Wolfgang Peterson is much less reticent that Steven Soderbergh in respect of the horror elements, even though this is a much bigger production. Perhaps because Peterson’s a much more imaginative director). Outbreak isn’t a good movie by any stretch, but at least it’s having a bit of fun with its clichés.

Sam: Shall I cough on you, George?

I well remember the lead in to Outbreak’s release, because it was a case of two competing movies with the same subject matter. Until, that is, its competitor, who actually had the edge in terms of development time and “legitimacy”, fell apart. The origins of both productions were Richard Preston’s The Hot Zone, charting the 1989 Ebola outbreak, but if you’re looking for culprits there… Well, the proximity of the US military to such manifestations of a previously unknown disease is notable. But blame nature, if it fits your worldview better. And talking of worldviews, it seems Preston’s novel, arriving helpfully when it did, “continued to fuel the emerging diseases campaign”. Don’t take my word for it, Wiki says so. Some would call that propaganda. The “filovirus” bogeyman is, after all, singularly responsible for instilling virus fear like no other, owing to its reported nastiness.

Crisis in the Hot Zone was set to star Robert Redford and Jodie Foster, directed by Sir Ridders (then just plain Ridders). For me, masquerading under the delusion that I might one day see a Ridley Scott movie of the standard of Alien or Blade Runner again, this was something to look forward to. Something to root for. As Linda Obst recounts “We… had the better package and we had the better script”. Adding insult to injury, that dastardly Peterson tried to poach Redford (he had to settle for his diminutive All the President’s Men co-star).

I don’t doubt that, with such star wattage on board, Crisis in the Hot Zone would have been very Hollywood in its own way – as in, burdened by egregious character arcs – but it was nevertheless expressly trading under the “based on a true story” banner. As noted, Outbreak features its own Ebola-like virus – one that even ends in an “a” – called Motaba, causing the expected mushy symptoms – a Preston invention that has caught on, joining a veritable throng of inventions in the field – and subsequent death. It’s also, like Ebola, found in the African jungle. Outbreak doesn’t just stick to treating this infection, though. It boasts a cartload of other paraphernalia, or manure, to spread on top. Some of which is more effective – or should that just be less ineffective – than others.

Dr Iwabi: He believes that the gods were woken from their sleep by the men cutting down the trees, where no man should be. And the gods got angry. This… is a punishment.

Chief among these is the conspiracy plotline ushered in with the prologue set in 1967, wherein young Donald Sutherland (Major General McClintock) and young Morgan Freeman (Brigadier General Ford) oversee the torching of an army camp infected with Motaba. Now, it’s quite evident from the narrative that Motaba has been uncovered by nature. Indeed, the creed recited by the local medicine man is explicitly designed to reinforce the official story, to make sure we don’t doubt its authenticity. The underlying case, though, is of a deadly infection surfacing amid a company of US soldiers, a deadly infection that is preserved by the military – solitary bad eggs in the ranks, naturally – as a bioweapon. It isn’t difficult to read between the cause-and-effect lines here, which don’t involve a simian scapegoat. I should stress that by this, I don’t mean to suggest screenwriters Laurence Dworet and Robert Roy Pool were consciously placing the truth in plain sight, but rather that the correlatives bear a marked resemblance to those in the real world.

McClintock: We are at war, Billy. Everybody is at war.

We don’t have a bioengineered “virus” here – we’ll have to wait for The X-Files or Resident Evil for that – but we do have the virus stock-in-trade used to explain all sorts of allopathic attitudes. Namely, that it has mutated. And most of all, its trump card, that it has mutated in such a manner as to become airborne. Nowhere is safe! This elicits the one roundly esteemed sequence in the movie – whose reception was, generally, less than overwhelmingly positive, just as box office was decent but unspectacular – as Motaba becomes airborne in a crowded cinema. With a sure flourish, Peterson follows the virus’ path from its victim’s expellant, through the air and into other unsuspecting popcorn-munching patrons (leading to an unintentionally telling line about how we’re fed our facts: “Apparently, they all got it in a movie theatre”).

Outbreak announces its authenticity via a quote from Joshua Lederberg Phd (see, you’re buying it already): “The single biggest threat to man’s continued domination of the planet is the virus”. Lederberg, lest we get carried away with feting the man’s “insight” was a flagrant eugenicist – sorry, “euphenicist” – and advocate for cloning and genetic engineering to “improve” humans (basically, he’s your classic transhumanist). Anyone who moans that eugenics has been unfairly maligned, “a negatively viewed term” is immediately inviting opprobrium. Or a Nobel Prize. Take your pick: “He expected that euphenics would be more effective than traditional eugenic practices like sexual sterilisation, but he intended for the goals to be the same”.

So when Lederberg warns of the threat of the virus, is he really issuing a code, that the threat of the virus – a product of Pasteur-promoted scientific theory – will inevitably produce vaccines against it, and those vaccines themselves may be a – targeted, of course – threat to man’s continued domination of the planet. There’s so much you can achieve with them, after all, particularly as eugenicist, or euphenicist. Such as forced sterilisation. Or outright culling. Lederberg was, after all coming to the fore at a time when he was forced to acknowledge traditional – explicit – language would not win widespread approval outside his peer group, so what better way to disguise his true beliefs than rebranding them? When an esteemed establishment scientist voices concerns about “the biological impact of space exploration” (see also The Andromeda Strain), ten to one there’s something’s fishy about them. That’s even before you realise he was the president of the Rockefeller University (you know, JD and his allopathic, oil-based utopia).

Ford: We have to defend ourselves against the other maniacs who are developing biological weapons.

But back to the plot. Outbreak suffers the malaise of most modern blockbusters in that it never knows when it has enough. Which inevitably means that, for all the entertainment value of individual parts and performances, it eventually becomes a chore. But even during the third act heroics – Dustin doing manly things takes some swallowing, almost as much believing he’s both a colonel and a virologist – there are occasional memorable vignettes. Besides the military machinations, we have Sam Daniels (Hoffman) going through a divorce from Dr Roberta Keough (Rene Russo during peak romantic interest period: Mel, Clint, Costner, Travolta, Pierce… Dustin). We have Patrick Dempsey, looking as if he’s escaped from The Lost Boys, as an animal testing lab guy trying to sell the infected monkey (those damn apes!) and getting infected himself (there’s a great moment on a plane with a wayward child and an infected cookie… Peterson doesn’t go there, alas). There’s martial law in Cedar Creek, where the outbreak occurs and where Operation Clean Sweep is planned in order to contain the virus and (nefariously) hide its existence. JT Walsh is also wheeled on for a classic piece of scene stealing as the White House Chief of Staff, laying out the consequences of making a bad decision.

Then there are the infected. Beside Dempsey’s Jimbo Scott collapsing after his girlfriend greets him at the airport and gratuitously tongues him, pet-store owner Rudy Alvarez (Daniel Chodos) topples through his fish tank. A hospital technician gets all sick at the cinema and Peterson is so over-the-top with the point of view and patrons’ recoiling responses that it’s unintentionally funny. The seriousness of events is continually underlined by hyperbole, whereby “It looks like a bomb went off inside” (Dempsey) and “The whole damn town’s infected!

And because there have to be consequences, someone has to die and someone has to be on death’s door. The former would be Kevin Spacey (as Lieutenant Colonel Schuler) in his game-changing year, back when everyone aside from Anthony Rapp wanted to work with him (I know, a quarter of a century changes a lot). He’s already identifiably pigeonholed as pithy and acidic in sense of humour (gleefully going into gory detail of Ebola with new man Cuba Gooding Jr’s Major Salt), but he also gets to show off his chops in his death scene (“I’m so scared”). This means death’s door falls to Russo’s Keough, spurring Sam’s action-man heroics.

Sam: A serious punch for a very serious nose.

This heroism involves manipulating a small child into putting herself within biting/scratching/mauling distance of the infected monkey, showing us what a good utilitarian egg Sam is. It’s actually a very good sequence, perhaps the best in the picture, but it comes in the middle a slew of fairly stand-issue helicopter pursuit dramatics that seriously underwhelm the third act. Although – take note, all those serving their country, or Hippocratic oath – Outbreak does at least conclude with a paean not to genocide a population just so as to follow orders. Which obviously, would not happen in real life.

McClintock: You hope to make general one day?
Briggs: Yes, sir.
McClintock: Well, you wont.

Dustin is watchable, but this kind of role isn’t his forte. Both Freeman and Sutherland are exactly as you’d expect (authoritative and evil respectively). Cuba Gooding Jr is precisely as unfulfilled as ever he was when he wasn’t in Boyz n the Hood or Jerry Maguire. If the outbreak itself is daft, it’s notable that it brings to mind something far more disturbing than a fictional epidemic. For it’s an inescapable realisation that a notable selection of the principle cast have gone on to various degrees of #MeToo approbation. One might even call it… an outbreak (Spacey, Hoffman, Gooding Jr, Freeman).

Sam: General, with all due respect, fuck you, sir.

Outbreak has taken a bit of a beating for being less plausible than Contagion (the implication being the erroneous one that Contagion is plausible in anything other than a predictive programming sense of the word). Certainly, the magical way in which Motaba is isolated and photographed is a turn up for the books. Mainly though, it suffers from typical blockbuster bloat. Peterson’s Hollywood track record was patchy in the extreme, however popular his movies were intermittently. I see that, like Paul Verhoeven, he has now returned to make movies in Europe. If nothing else, though, the plandemic has ensured Outbreak is one of his most seen pictures. That should be taken as entirely what it is, not a compliment.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mondo bizarro. No offence man, but you’re in way over your head.

The X-Files 8.7: Via Negativa I wasn’t as down on the last couple of seasons of The X-Files as most seemed to be. For me, the mythology arc walked off a cliff somewhere around the first movie, with only the occasional glimmer of something worthwhile after that. So the fact that the show was tripping over itself with super soldiers and Mulder’s abduction/his and Scully’s baby (although we all now know it wasn’t, sheesh ), anything to stretch itself beyond breaking point in the vain hope viewers would carry on dangling, didn’t really make much odds. Of course, it finally snapped with the wretched main arc when the show returned, although the writing was truly on the wall with Season 9 finale The Truth . For the most part, though, I found 8 and 9 more watchable than, say 5 or 7. They came up with their fair share of engaging standalones, one of which I remembered to be Via Negativa .

You have done well to keep so much hair, when so many’s after it.

Jeremiah Johnson (1972) (SPOILERS) Hitherto, I was most familiar with Jeremiah Johnson in the form of a popular animated gif of beardy Robert Redford smiling and nodding in slow zoom close up (a moment that is every bit as cheesy in the film as it is in the gif). For whatever reason, I hadn’t mustered the enthusiasm to check out the 1970s’ The Revenant until now (well, beard-wise, at any rate). It’s easy to distinguish the different personalities at work in the movie. The John Milius one – the (mythic) man against the mythic landscape; the likeably accentuated, semi-poetic dialogue – versus the more naturalistic approach favoured by director Sydney Pollack and star Redford. The fusion of the two makes for a very watchable, if undeniably languorous picture. It was evidently an influence on Dances with Wolves in some respects, although that Best Picture Oscar winner is at greater pains to summon a more sensitive portrayal of Native Americans (and thus, perversely, at times a more patr

I tell you, it saw me! The hanged man’s asphyx saw me!

The Asphyx (1972) (SPOILERS) There was such a welter of British horror from the mid 60s to mid 70s, even leaving aside the Hammers and Amicuses, that it’s easy to lose track of them in the shuffle. This one, the sole directorial effort of Peter Newbrook (a cameraman for David Lean, then a cinematographer), has a strong premise and a decent cast, but it stumbles somewhat when it comes to taking that premise any place interesting. On the plus side, it largely eschews the grue. On the minus, directing clearly wasn’t Newbrook’s forte, and even aided by industry stalwart cinematographer Freddie Young (also a go-to for Lean), The Aspyhx is stylistically rather flat.

You’re a disgrace, sir... Weren’t you at Harrow?

Our Man in Marrakesh aka Bang! Bang! You’re Dead (1966) (SPOILERS) I hadn’t seen this one in more than three decades, and I had in mind that it was a decent spy spoof, well populated with a selection of stalwart British character actors in supporting roles. Well, I had the last bit right. I wasn’t aware this came from the stable of producer Harry Alan Towers, less still of his pedigree, or lack thereof, as a sort of British Roger Corman (he tried his hand at Star Wars with The Shape of Things to Come and Conan the Barbarian with Gor , for example). More legitimately, if you wish to call it that, he was responsible for the Christopher Lee Fu Manchu flicks. Our Man in Marrakesh – riffing overtly on Graham Greene’s Our Man in Havana in title – seems to have in mind the then popular spy genre and its burgeoning spoofs, but it’s unsure which it is; too lightweight to work as a thriller and too light on laughs to elicit a chuckle.

My Doggett would have called that crazy.

The X-Files 9.4: 4-D I get the impression no one much liked Agent Monica Reyes (Annabeth Gish), but I felt, for all the sub-Counsellor Troi, empath twiddling that dogged her characterisation, she was a mostly positive addition to the series’ last two years (of its main run). Undoubtedly, pairing her with Doggett, in anticipation of Gillian Anderson exiting just as David Duchovny had – you rewatch these seasons and you wonder where her head was at in hanging on – made for aggressively facile gender-swapped conflict positions on any given assignment. And generally, I’d have been more interested in seeing how two individuals sympathetic to the cause – her and Mulder – might have got on. Nevertheless, in an episode like 4-D you get her character, and Doggett’s, at probably their best mutual showing.

A ship is the finest nursery in the world.

A High Wind in Jamaica (1965) (SPOILERS) An odd one, this, as if Disney were remaking The Swiss Family Robinson for adults. One might perhaps have imagined the Mouse House producing it during their “Dark Disney” phase. But even then, toned down. After all, kids kidnapped by pirates sounds like an evergreen premise for boy’s own adventuring (more girl’s own here). The reality of Alexander Mackendrick’s film is decidedly antithetical to that; there’s a lingering feeling, despite A High Wind in Jamaica ’s pirates largely observing their distance, that things could turn rather nasty (and indeed, if Richard Hughes’ 1929 novel  had been followed to the letter, they would have more explicitly). 

You know what I sometimes wish? I sometimes wish I were ordinary like you. Ordinary and dead like all the others.

Séance on a Wet Afternoon (1964) (SPOILERS) Bryan Forbes’ adaptation of Mark McShane’s 1961’s novel has been much acclaimed. It boasts a distinctive storyline and effective performances from its leads, accompanied by effective black-and-white cinematography from Gerry Turpin and a suitably atmospheric score from John Barry. I’m not sure Forbes makes the most of the material, however, as he underlines Séance on a Wet Afternoon ’s inherently theatrical qualities at the expense of its filmic potential.

Isn’t it true, it’s easier to be a holy man on the top of a mountain?

The Razor’s Edge (1984) (SPOILERS) I’d hadn’t so much a hankering as an idle interest in finally getting round to seeing Bill Murray’s passion project. Partly because it seemed like such an odd fit. And partly because passion isn’t something you tend to associate with any Murray movie project, involving as it usually does laidback deadpan. Murray, at nigh-on peak fame – only cemented by the movie he agreed to make to make this movie – embarks on a serious-acting-chops dramatic project, an adaptation of W Somerset Maugham’s story of one man’s journey of spiritual self-discovery. It should at least be interesting, shouldn’t it? A real curio? Alas, not. The Razor’s Edge is desperately turgid.

The best thing in the world for the inside of a man or a woman is the outside of a horse.

Marnie (1964) (SPOILERS) Hitch in a creative ditch. If you’ve read my Vertigo review, you’ll know I admired rather than really liked the picture many fete as his greatest work. Marnie is, in many ways, a redux, in the way De Palma kept repeating himself in the early 80s only significantly less delirious and… well, compelling. While Marnie succeeds in commanding the attention fitfully, it’s usually for the wrong reasons. And Hitch, digging his heels in as he strives to fashion a star against public disinterest – he failed to persuade Grace Kelly out of retirement for Marnie Rutland – comes entirely adrift with his leads.

Schnell, you stinkers! Come on, raus!

Private’s Progress (1956) (SPOILERS) Truth be told, there’s good reason sequel I’m Alright Jack reaps the raves – it is, after all, razor sharp and entirely focussed in its satire – but Private’s Progress is no slouch either. In some respects, it makes for an easy bedfellow with such wartime larks as Norman Wisdom’s The Square Peg (one of the slapstick funny man’s better vehicles). But it’s also, typically of the Boulting Brothers’ unsentimental disposition, utterly remorseless in rebuffing any notions of romantic wartime heroism, nobility and fighting the good fight. Everyone in the British Army is entirely cynical, or terrified, or an idiot.