Skip to main content

Now, stop stealing things, do your fucking homework and find some decent friends.

Hillbilly Elegy
(2020)

(SPOILERS) A danger with fashioning Oscar bait is that it can be instantly called out for undisguised cynicism and thus immediately ignored. That appears to be the fate of Hillbilly Elegy, in which Ron Howard further evidences his journeyman “versatility” with a tale of rednecks – sorry, mountainfolk – and their trials and tribulations. Well, apart from regular nominee Glenn Close and her prosthetic ankle tits.

JD: You’re a shitty mom, and so are you.

I reference the redneck slur intentionally; it’s implicit in this adaptation of JD Vance’s 2016 memoir that his recall for a summer internship interview is the consequence of taking offence at its use during a dinner. The staff are evidently concerned about appearing prejudiced and thus trip over themselves not to be called out. If we applied that metric to the oeuvre of Little Ronnie Howard, it would be demanding equal status for the intensely average, imperceptible talent troughing out mediocrity year after year. It does, after all, have its place. It even wins Oscars.

JD: You’re a good Terminator.

And to be completely fair, I’ve enjoyed a few of Howard’s movies (Splash, Ransom, Rush, Solo: A Star Wars Story), but I was aware as far back as Willow that he wasn’t nearly as versatile as he’d like to be. Hillbilly Elegy is closer to the wheelhouse, in inorganically heart-warming terms, of his early hit Parenthood. But where that movie was content to serve as a lightweight soufflé of observational comedy, he’s here straining for something more profound. When Little Ronnie tries for profound, the results can be outright disastrous (A Beautiful Mind). He avoids that this time, fortunately, but take away the hillbilly sheen (if you can call it that) and you’ve seen this story many times before. In the 80s, Hillbilly Elegy would probably have starred Debra Winger or Meryl Streep and featured a score of similarly indecent uplift as the one by Hans Zimmer and David Fleming.

I hadn’t realised going in this was an autobiographical tale, and I suspect the critical mauling it received is less about the film’s overall quality or the Little Ronnie factor than its status – albeit, unarguably watered down and shorn of any overt politics by dyed-in-the-wool liberal Howard – as a conservative-leaning piece (“Gainful employment was cramping her styleis uttered at one point, aimed as a barb at mom). JD (played equally strongly by Owen Asztalos and Gabriel Basso as adolescent and adult versions respectively) reflects on his Ohio upbringing with sister Lindsay (Haley Bennett) and a drug addict mum Bev (Amy Adams). Hard-nosed but decent matriarch gran Mamaw (Close) lives just down the street and Papaw (Bo Hopkins) up it a little way. Told in flashbacks, the picture gradually apprises us of how JD made his way to Yale through the Rock of Gibraltar that was his Mamaw and her southwards-extending bosom.

Mamaw: Cause we’re hill people, honey. We respect our dead.

And as far as that goes, it’s reasonably engaging. The problem is Adams. Or Adams’ character. Hers is an overfamiliar type: the hopeless addict (albeit the coda informs us Bev has been sober six years at the time of release). Most prolifically, it characterised Nic Cage’s Oscar grab Leaving Las Vegas. Invariably, empathy only extends so far in such dramatic rehearsals; they may accurately reflect the character’s struggle, but more crucially, they make for an increasingly tiresome viewing experience. Adams is immensely talented, but this druggy schtick became old quickly in Sharp Objects and rather recalls Meryl in Ironweed /Postcards from the Edge mode. Suffering may, within reason, win you Oscars, but it can also put the Academy right off you.

JD is called upon to return home after Bev ODs, which annoyingly coincides with his need to get that aforementioned summer internship in order to pay his way through uni. Episodes of mom’s historic train-wreck behaviour pile up as testimony towards her current state. This is accompanied by a mostly unsuccessful – because there isn’t much to it – thread of family history detective work in terms of her causative emotional traumas. Close successfully chews the scenery and spits it out, her fright perm and glasses somewhat resembling Robin Williams in drag, and it’s an effective performance (which didn’t win her a Golden Globe).

Mamaw: Kiss my ruby-red asshole.

In the end though, you can’t help but shrug. All very commendable, and nice that the main parties have sorted out their lives, and surely a positive that Hollywood doesn’t have licence to mock hillbillies. But at least there might have been something to discuss, whichever way you fall on it, if the movie offered a sampling of the memoir’s outspokenness. Hillbilly Elegy falls squarely into the indifference that characterises Howard at his most consistent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe the dingo ate your baby.

Seinfeld 2.9: The Stranded The Premise George and Elaine are stranded at a party in Long Island, with a disgruntled hostess.

Nanobots aren’t just for Christmas.

No Time to Die (2021) (SPOILERS) You know a Bond movie is in trouble when it resorts to wholesale appropriation of lines and even the theme song from another in order to “boost” its emotional heft. That No Time to Die – which previewed its own title song a year and a half before its release to resoundingly underwhelmed response, Grammys aside – goes there is a damning indictment of its ability to eke out such audience investment in Daniel Craig’s final outing as James (less so as 007). As with Spectre , the first half of No Time to Die is, on the whole, more than decent Bond fare, before it once again gets bogged down in the quest for substance and depth from a character who, regardless of how dapper his gear is, resolutely resists such outfitting.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

Big things have small beginnings.

Prometheus (2012) Post- Gladiator , Ridley Scott opted for an “All work and no pondering” approach to film making. The result has been the completion of as many movies since the turn of the Millennium as he directed in the previous twenty years. Now well into his seventies, he has experienced the most sustained period of success of his career.  For me, it’s also been easily the least-interesting period. All of them entirely competently made, but all displaying the machine-tooled approach that was previously more associated with his brother.

Beer is for breakfast around here. Drink or begone.

Cocktail (1988) (SPOILERS) When Tarantino claims the 1980s (and 1950s) as the worst movie decade, I’m inclined to invite him to shut his butt down. But should he then flourish Cocktail as Exhibit A, I’d be forced to admit he has a point. Cocktail is a horrifying, malignant piece of dreck, a testament to the efficacy of persuasive star power on a blithely rapt and undiscerning audience. Not only is it morally vacuous, it’s dramatically inert. And it relies on Tom’s toothy charms to a degree that would have any sensitive soul rushed to the A&E suffering from toxic shock (Tom’s most recently displayed toothy charms will likely have even his staunchest devotees less than sure of themselves, however, as he metamorphoses into your favourite grandma). And it was a huge box office hit.

Isn’t sugar better than vinegar?

Femme Fatale (2002) (SPOILERS) Some have attempted to rescue Femme Fatale from the dumpster of critical rejection and audience indifference with the claim that it’s De Palma’s last great movie. It isn’t that by a long shot, but it might rank as the last truly unfettered display of his obsessions and sensibilities, complete with a ludicrous twist – so ludicrous, it’s either a stroke of genius or mile-long pile up.

It's something trying to get out.

The Owl Service (1969-70) I may have caught a glimpse of Channel 4’s repeat of  The Owl Service  in 1987, but not enough to stick in the mind. My formative experience was Alan Garner’s novel, which was read several years earlier during English lessons. Garner’s tapestry of magical-mythical storytelling had an impact, with its possession theme and blending of legend with the here and now. Garner depicts a Britain where past and present are mutable, and where there is no safety net of objective reality; life becomes a strange waking dream. His fantasy landscapes are both attractive and disturbing; the uncanny reaching out from the corners of the attic.  But I have to admit that the themes of class and discrimination went virtually unnoticed in the wake of such high weirdness. The other Garner books I read saw young protagonists transported to fantasy realms. The resonance of  The Owl Service  came from the fragmenting of the rural normal. When the author notes that he neve

Who’s got the Figgy Port?

Loki (2021) (SPOILERS) Can something be of redeemable value and shot through with woke (the answer is: Mad Max: Fury Road )? The two attributes certainly sound essentially irreconcilable, and Loki ’s tendencies – obviously, with new improved super-progressive Kevin Feige touting Disney’s uber-agenda – undeniably get in the way of what might have been a top-tier MCU entry from realising its full potential. But there are nevertheless solid bursts of highly engaging storytelling in the mix here, for all its less cherishable motivations. It also boasts an effortlessly commanding lead performance from Tom Hiddleston; that alone puts Loki head and shoulders above the other limited series thus far.

These are not soda cans you asked me to get for you.

The Devil’s Own (1997) (SPOILERS) Naturally, a Hollywood movie taking the Troubles as a backdrop is sure to encounter difficulties. It’s the push-pull of wanting to make a big meaningful statement about something weighty, sobering and significant in the real world and bottling it when it comes to the messy intricacies of the same. So inevitably, the results invariably tend to the facile and trite. I’m entirely sure The Devil’s Own would have floundered even if Harrison Ford hadn’t come on board and demanded rewrites, but as it is, the finished movie packs a lot of talent to largely redundant end.

Did you not just hand over a chicken to someone?

The Father (2020) (SPOILERS) I was in no great rush to see The Father , expecting it to be it to be something of an ordeal in the manner of that lavishly overpraised euthanasia-fest Amour. As with the previous Oscars, though, the Best Picture nominee I saw last turned out to be the best of the bunch. In that case, Parasite , its very title beckoning the psychic global warfare sprouting shoots around it, would win the top prize. The Father , in a year of disappointing nominees, had to settle for Best Actor. Ant’s good, naturally, but I was most impressed with the unpandering manner in which Florian Zeller and Christopher Hampton approached material that might easily render one highly unstuck.