Skip to main content

Some scientist bred a very special plant to produce a very special oil.

The Day of the Triffids
(1981)

1981 was a banner year for BBC science fiction. Doctor Who had taken delivery of a new burgundy coat – and hat, scarf, troos, and, er, shirts adorned with question marks on the collars – and then a cricket blazer. On top of which, a rare season of vintage repeats was shown. Blake’s 7 went out in a blaze of glory. The Hitch-Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy latest incarnation was on television. Robert Holmes’ The Nightmare Man haunted a Scottish island. And the BBC gave John Wyndham’s novel the adaptation it deserved, twenty years after the last one and thirty after initial publication. The book and its ilk were rather dismissively characterised by Brian Aldiss as “cosy catastrophes”, not entirely fair and even less so of the TV version, although it’s easy also to see why the description has stuck. Douglas Livingston’s serial, directed by Ken Hannam, is better than anyone probably could have hoped for, and ought to be the first port of call to anyone who might be erroneously poised to reach for the 1961 film, or even more erroneously for the rotten 2009 version.

Bill: Just give us a sting, wait a few days, and they’ve got everything they need to live. That doesn’t take very much intelligence

As a kid, I recall only ever seeing the first episode (and seeing it twice at that, with the repeat screening too). I found it quite disturbing – probably why I may not have seen the entire thing – and what with that and Michael Strogoff, there seemed to be an awful lot of blind protagonists stumbling around on TV. When I first revisited the serial on DVD, it struck me that my reaction wasn’t simply down to child’s eyes; it very much is stark and unforgiving in its approach. Yes, you might argue there’s a degree of cosiness in Episode Five, once Bill Masen (John Duttine) eventually reunites with Jo (Emma Relph). But there’s an awful lot of unremitting bleakness to get there. And the respite is short lived, since it’s via an ellipsis to place them in trouble’s way once again. I rather think Margaret Attwood’s rebuke of Aldiss’ swipe was appropriate, referencing Wyndham’s military service: “one might as well call World War II… a ‘cosy’ war because not everyone died in it”.

Indeed, as The Day of the Triffids unfolds, you could only really label it cosy or comforting to the extent that any survivor has it good, relatively speaking. Wyndham and Livingstone don’t shirk dealing with the rude facts of the survivalist’s dilemma, even if he loads the balance in favour of tough choices being the right ones. To run with Aldiss’ take, you’d be required to include I am Legend (any iteration), or any zombie movie sanctuary (before it gets overrun): any place where a group of humans enjoys the remnants of a fallen civilisation (such as the department store in Dawn of the Dead). Wyndham is actually commendably upfront in tackling the challenges of this stricken society, pitting utilitarian ideals against survival-of-the-fittest and every-man-for-himself before concluding that, well, there’s no easy – or cosy – answer.

John: There’ll be people you thought butter wouldn’t melt killing each other for a scrap of food.

Coker (Maurice Colbourne) is righteously indignant at the refusal of remnants of the armed forces and a coterie of the sighted to help as many as they can. He proceeds to sabotage their plans to escape the city, forcing various of their number into service aiding the urban blind. But his labours too come undone when they succumb to an unidentified plague (notably, no sighted appear to fall ill). We’ve already seen that, in their desperation, the blind are more than willing to brutalise the sighted few (as Stephen Yardley’s John forewarns). And that there are any number of bastards – in some respects including Coker, whose Isle of Wight colony amalgamates something of the motives of Beadley (David Swift) from the second episode – who will self-appoint themselves to lead this ruined world and make very bad decisions.

Bill: He’s right. And he’s wrong. I don’t think there is anyone who’s going to come over the horizon and clear this mess up.

Later, Coker sets out how it will be to Christian splinter leader Miss Durant at her Wiltshire retreat. That a failure to draw the line and make tough choices about who they can effectively aid will be the death of them. And so it comes to pass. In the final episode, we also reencounter psychopath Torrance (Gary Olsen), intent on establishing a militarised feudal society. Whatever the nature of the group that arises from the ashes, Wyndham and Livingstone seem to be saying, there will inevitably be those who prioritise dictating the rules, which will inevitably mean the rest are required to submit to them (while also implicitly suggesting the self-sufficient familial unit is doomed to failure).

Undoubtedly, Wyndham and Livingstone arrange the narrative so that we completely sympathise with Bill taking off and opting for that self-sufficient family unit, rather than trying to reform the world. But at the same time, they have made it clear that The Day of the Triffids’ premise presents an impossible conundrum for anyone trying to do the right, or most moral, thing in every situation. And the open ending suggests, per Aldiss, there won’t really be much that’s cosy about even a “lightly” martial future on the Isle of Wight – or failing that, the less strict Channel Islands – since you’re still stuck with the rules, fair and foul, of a budding society.

The early episodes (1-4) of the serial are the strongest, mostly due to the verisimilitude that accompanies a city environment hanging on a knife edge; once sanitation and supply lines collapse, it’s only a matter of time before health also takes a tumble. And the overwhelming, immediate chaos is especially unnerving, from blind grasping for the sighted (like zombies: the Episode Two climax with Bill and Jo trapped in a car), to armed would-be despots taking pot shots (then there’s the gang of football chanters, led by a sighted man, embracing the new lawlessness and all set to rape a girl). This is a grim, remorseless vision (a small consolation that John Hollis is cast as nice guy Alf, though: Alf ROCKS).

The Day of the Triffids counts as probably Wyndham’s most influential work, certainly with regard to apocalypse fiction. It precedes the zombie cycle, and despite that subgenre’s conspicuous absence of venomous vegetables, it undoubtedly influences it. Not least in the lead character’s malaise. There’s 28 Days Later – protagonist awakes from a coma to a devastated world – and The Walking Dead – protagonist awakes from a coma to a devastated world – and also the relentless misery of Blindness nursing the vulnerability/predatory implications of sudden mass-scale blindness. And then there’s Bird Box.

Jo: We didn’t create the comet.
Bill: Was it a comet? Do you know how many satellites were going round up there? How many weapons? Or what was in the weapons? They never told us. They never asked us. I suppose one of these weapons had been specially constructed to emit a radiation that our eyes couldn’t stand. Something that would burn out the optic nerve.
Jo: Something like that couldn’t blind the whole world.
Bill: Suppose there was an accident. This weapon would be meant to operate at very low levels, so that it only blinded the people they wanted to blind. But after the accident, it went off so far up that anyone on Earth could receive direct radiation from it. What about the mysterious disease? Where did that come from? We were walking on a tightrope for a hell of a long time. Sooner or later, a foot had to slip.

One might cynically suggest the really cosiness inherent in The Day of the Triffids is the idea that something could actually go wrong, something that might play out beyond the grasp of the prescribing control structure – one Wyndham hints is there, or was, however loosely – devoted as it is to rolling out staged disasters and planned resets. While The Day of the Triffids offers two apparently unconnected events – the carnivorous Triffids and the meteor shower – that hasten the downfall of society, the implication is that neither is remotely random. The Triffids, it is alluded, are the product of genetic modification, and as we should know, GMOs are entirely inimical to a thriving society and economy. They will consume it, given a chance (Bill relates to us that vegetable oil boasting extraordinary properties appeared on the market in 1961, whereby, when added to petroleum, it produced energy saving results of more than thirty percent; it turns out this oil derives from Triffids, thought to be the results of strange Russian experiments. We might be encouraged to infer from this the disruptive action of a superpower, an insidious Cold War tactic).

So on the one hand, there is a scientific advance that proves deadly to mankind, and on the other, a meteor shower that may not have been a meteor shower, but rather EMFs leaving anyone who watched it blind. Not a million miles from the rays now invited into our homes, rays that have documented warfare applications (Wyndham proposed military satellites seven years before Russia – if you believe the official accounts – sent one up. This came off the back of a literary history of the satellite beginning with Edward Everett Hale’s The Brick Moon in 1869, followed by Jules Verne’s 1879 The Begum’s Fortune. Of course, Arthur C Clarke “predicted” them for the current age in 1945). In Wyndham’s account, then, the source of the apocalypse is mooted to be out-of-control technology. And whether they were intended as harmful or otherwise, both serve explicitly to aid a depopulation agenda.

With a view to such conspiratorial musing, I wondered in passing if Wyndham had any connection to other predictive-programming science-fiction luminaries via the Fabian Society or the Tavistock Institute. Tor comments of Wyndham’s sudden late bloom (after serveral unsuccessful pre-war works) “It’s as if, although he was so reclusive, in the 1950s he was plugged in to the world’s subconscious fears and articulated them one by one in short, amazingly readable novels, which became huge worldwide bestsellers”. That reclusive side suggests he had no great affiliations. but it’s notable that, like George Orwell, he worked for the Ministry of Information during WWII (prior to joining the army). More distinctly, in terms of doorstepping, Wyndham also lived at the Quaker Penn Club in Tavistock Square for almost forty years. And you know where the Tavistock Institute gets its name.

Jo: Do we tell them that the world was wonderfully clever but so wicked t had to be destroyed? Or do we tell them it destroyed itself by accident?

Whether or not that’s indication of anything beyond the circumstantial, it’s notable that many of the author’s works could loosely be seen to fall into that sphere, even if merely by dint of positioning minds towards an apocalyptic scenario within their lifetimes. And arguably, one might more coherently single out Wyndham’s wartime experiences as the predominate influence on his dystopian apocalypse fiction. His canvas also featured environmental disaster (caused by aliens, though: The Kraken Wakes) and themes of eugenics (The Chrysalids). Is Chocky a transhumanist AI avatar (genderless, advanced, apparently benign, brainwashing the young)? We also meet an advanced elite who see fellow humans as lesser vassals in The Midwich Cuckoos.

Bill: I’ve never seen a Triffid climb the side of a building.

The Day of the Triffids holds up remarkably well. The Triffid designs are superb – they look remarkably convincing, and it was a wise decision not to attempt too much dexterity. The only occasion, besides use of miniatures, where they’re a little fake is the lack of splattering juices when they’re shotgunned. Bill’s zap gun is also a bit naff. And while I’m finding fault, I don’t really care for the theme music or title design; the former is rather sub-Children of the Stones. Duttine is very good in the lead. Colbourne always is. Relph is fine, if a bit Joanna Lumley-ish and unable to make all her dialogue sound convincing. I should probably emphasise that I haven’t gone near the recent Blu-ray release as I don’t fancy all that filmised video (luckily, I didn’t even realise it was available until I’d begun rewatching the DVD).

On reflection, perhaps Aldiss was right after all. As grim as it is, just now The Day of the Triffids manages to look fairly cosy as catastrophes go. At least it allows for the possibility of rebuilding afresh. Technocratic nightmares only get worse and worse.



















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who’s got the Figgy Port?

Loki (2021) (SPOILERS) Can something be of redeemable value and shot through with woke (the answer is: Mad Max: Fury Road )? The two attributes certainly sound essentially irreconcilable, and Loki ’s tendencies – obviously, with new improved super-progressive Kevin Feige touting Disney’s uber-agenda – undeniably get in the way of what might have been a top-tier MCU entry from realising its full potential. But there are nevertheless solid bursts of highly engaging storytelling in the mix here, for all its less cherishable motivations. It also boasts an effortlessly commanding lead performance from Tom Hiddleston; that alone puts Loki head and shoulders above the other limited series thus far.

Here’s Bloody Justice for you.

Laughter in Paradise (1951) (SPOILERS) The beginning of a comedic run for director-producer Mario Zampa that spanned much of the 1950s, invariably aided by writers Michael Pertwee and Jack Davies (the latter went on to pen a spate of Norman Wisdom pictures including The Early Bird , and also comedy rally classic Monte Carlo or Bust! ) As usual with these Pertwee jaunts, Laughter in Paradise boasts a sparky premise – renowned practical joker bequeaths a fortune to four relatives, on condition they complete selected tasks that tickle him – and more than enough resultant situational humour.

Damn prairie dog burrow!

Tremors (1990) (SPOILERS) I suspect the reason the horror comedy – or the sci-fi comedy, come to that – doesn’t tend to be the slam-dunk goldmine many assume it must be, is because it takes a certain sensibility to do it right. Everyone isn’t a Joe Dante or Sam Raimi, or a John Landis, John Carpenter, Edgar Wright, Christopher Landon or even a Peter Jackson or Tim Burton, and the genre is littered with financial failures, some of them very good failures (and a good number of them from the names mentioned). Tremors was one, only proving a hit on video (hence six sequels at last count). It also failed to make Ron Underwood a directing legend.

You nicknamed my daughter after the Loch Ness Monster?

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 (2012) The final finale of the Twilight saga, in which pig-boy Jacob tells Bella that, “No, it's not like that at all!” after she accuses him of being a paedo. But then she comes around to his viewpoint, doubtless displaying the kind of denial many parents did who let their kids spend time with Jimmy Savile or Gary Glitter during the ‘70s. It's lucky little Renesmee will be an adult by the age of seven, right? Right... Jacob even jokes that he should start calling Edward, “Dad”. And all the while they smile and smile.

It’ll be like living in the top drawer of a glass box.

Someone’s Watching Me! (1978) (SPOILERS) The first of a pair of TV movies John Carpenter directed in the 1970s, but Someone’s Watching Me! is more affiliated, in genre terms, to his breakout hit ( Halloween ) and reasonably successful writing job ( The Eyes of Laura Mars ) of the same year than the also-small-screen Elvis . Carpenter wrote a slew of gun-for-hire scripts during this period – some of which went on to see the twilight of day during the 1990s – so directing Someone’s Watching Me! was not a given. It’s well-enough made and has its moments of suspense, but you sorely miss a signature Carpenter theme – it was by Harry Sukman, his penultimate work, the final being Salem’s Lot – and it really does feel very TV movie-ish.

Somewhere out there is a lady who I think will never be a nun.

The Sound of Music (1965) (SPOILERS) One of the most successful movies ever made – and the most successful musical – The Sound of Music has earned probably quite enough unfiltered adulation over the years to drown out the dissenting voices, those that denounce it as an inveterately saccharine, hollow confection warranting no truck. It’s certainly true that there are impossibly nice and wholesome elements here, from Julie Andrews’ career-dooming stereotype governess to the seven sonorous children more than willing to dress up in old curtains and join her gallivanting troupe. Whether the consequence is something insidious in its infectious spirit is debatable, but I’ll admit that it manages to ensnare me. I don’t think I’d seen the movie in its entirety since I was a kid, and maybe that formativeness is a key brainwashing facet of its appeal, but it retains its essential lustre just the same.

I’m just glad Will Smith isn’t alive to see this.

The Tomorrow War (2021) (SPOILERS). Not so much tomorrow as yesterday. There’s a strong sense of déjà vu watching The Tomorrow War , so doggedly derivative is it of every time-travel/alien war/apocalyptic sci-fi movie of the past forty years. Not helping it stand out from the pack are doughy lead Chris Pratt, damned to look forever on the beefy side no matter how ripped he is and lacking the chops or gravitas for straight roles, and debut live-action director Chris McKay, who manages to deliver the goods in a serviceably anonymous fashion.

As in the hokey kids’ show guy?

A Beautiful Day in the Neighbourhood (2019) (SPOILERS) I don’t think Mr Rogers could have been any creepier had Kevin Spacey played him. It isn’t just the baggage Tom Hanks brings, and whether or not he’s the adrenochrome lord to the stars and/or in Guantanamo and/or dead and/or going to make a perfectly dreadful Colonel Tom Parker and an equally awful Geppetto; it’s that his performance is so constipated and mannered an imitation of Mr Rogers’ genuineness that this “biopic” takes on a fundamentally sinister turn. His every scene with a youngster isn’t so much exuding benevolent empathy as suggestive of Chitty Chitty Bang Bang ’s Child Catcher let loose in a TV studio (and again, this bodes well for Geppetto). Extend that to A Beautiful Day in the Neighbourhood ’s conceit, that Mr Rogers’ life is one of a sociopathic shrink milking angst from his victims/patients in order to get some kind of satiating high – a bit like a rejuvenating drug, on that score – and you have a deeply unsettli

What's a movie star need a rocket for anyway?

The Rocketeer (1991) (SPOILERS) The Rocketeer has a fantastic poster. One of the best of the last thirty years (and while that may seem like faint praise, what with poster design being a dying art – I’m looking at you Marvel, or Amazon and the recent The Tomorrow War – it isn’t meant to be). The movie itself, however, tends towards stodge. Unremarkable pictures with a wide/cult fanbase, conditioned by childhood nostalgia, are ten-a-penny – Willow for example – and in this case, there was also a reasonably warm critical reception. But such an embrace can’t alter that Joe Johnston makes an inveterately bland, tepid movie director. His “feel” for period here got him The First Avenger: Captain America gig, a bland, tepid movie tending towards stodge. So at least he’s consistent.

Why don't we go on a picnic, up the hill?

Invaders from Mars (1986) (SPOILERS) One can wax thematical over the number of remakes of ’50s movies in the ’80s – and ’50s SF movies in particular – and of how they represent ever-present Cold War and nuclear threats, and steadily increasing social and familial paranoias and disintegrating values. Really, though, it’s mostly down to the nostalgia of filmmakers for whom such pictures were formative influences (and studios hoping to make an easy buck on a library property). Tobe Hooper’s version of nostalgia, however, is not so readily discernible as a John Carpenter or a David Cronenberg (not that Cronenberg could foment such vibes, any more than a trip to the dental hygienist). Because his directorial qualities are not so readily discernible. Tobe Hooper movies tend to be a bit shit. Which makes it unsurprising that Invaders from Mars is a bit shit.