Skip to main content

He’s probably paranoid, high-strung, doesn’t like daylight. You know, has a lot of crumbs in his beard, if he has a beard.

Godzilla vs. Kong
(2021)

(SPOILERS) I’d like to report I had a blast with Godzilla vs. Kong. It’s lighter on its oversized, city-stomping feet than its slog of a MonsterVerse predecessor, Godzilla: King of the Monsters, and there are flashes of visual inspiration along with several engaging core ideas (which, to be fair, the series had already laid the seeds for). But this sequel still stumbles in its chief task: assembling an engaging, lively story that successfully integrates both tiny humans and towering titans.

Ilene: The myths say that their ancestors fought each other in a great war.

Kong: Skull Island has fared best in this regard, even if that’s still rather damning it with faint praise. Adam Wingard is directing from a screenplay by Max Borenstein (all prior Monsterverse entries, so there’s at least some continuity of concept, for what that’s worth) and Eric Pearson (currently a go-to Marvel guy, especially for uncredited rewrites; I’m guessing the funny lines here are his). I can’t say I’ve followed Wingard’s career devotedly, but I liked The Guest, and you can see the R-rated guy just about behaving himself here, and also someone less slavish to genre and more eager to have fun than Michael Dougherty (punctuating the picture with tracks from The Hollies, Elvis and Judas Priest makes for a distinctive and sometimes surprising touch). It sounds as if he had an influence on the screenplay, but evidently not to the extent of Dougherty (who won a credit for both King of the Monsters and this). The question remains as to who suffused Godzilla vs. Kong with conspiracy lore – Borenstein’s been doing the interviews round, and the ones I’ve glanced at are dull and unrevealing – but it sounds like Wingard had input into the writing of the action and the depiction of the Hollow Earth.

Madison: Godzilla left us in peace. You provoked him into war.

Action-wise, I can readily see why Godzilla vs. Kong has been positively received; it more than does the business, if massive monster smackdowns are your thing. And I don’t underestimate the logistics of designing this kind of over-sized mayhem, even more so managing to invest the viewer in it. Such spectacle largely hasn’t worked for me thus far, not in Transformers and not in the MonsterVerse, but Wingard at least makes his spats spatially coherent, however logistically absurd. The picture’s punctuated by several substantial set pieces prior to the big showdown, with a Godzilla attack, then Kong vs Godzilla at sea, before the antagonists finally join forces to defeat Mechagodzilla. Attempting to string a plot together that facilitates this is expectedly hit and miss; you have two dangerous – but sympathetic – monsters who through contrivance must be positioned at loggerheads (see also Batman v Superman), and you have to get the humans involved in a way that offers larger motivation.

Bernie: That’s robot Godzilla!

Understandably then, this is varyingly successful in plot terms. Having Godzilla’s attacks misconstrued as his reverting to gnarly type when he’s actually responding to the activities of the Apex Cybernetics is reasonably effective. Less so is the proposal to locate Hollow Earth’s power source, the one the that will give Apex Cybernetics the means of defeating Godzilla; send Kong down there and like salmon spawning or pigeons homing, he will find it. I can see no reason why Dr Nathan Lind (Alexander Skarsgård) would assume Kong would know it was there or that he needed to head there (it would be a bit like suggesting salmon or pigeons would instinctively make for the Sun). But I also know I should resist analysing this too much (those Kongs are pretty advanced, construction-capable apes to build a throne room, and axes from dead Godzillas, along with the Hollow Earth equivalent of palm scanners for their doors, provided you also give them a push).

Nathan: Looks like Round Two goes to Kong.

The action occasionally amuses – Kong ripping a winged creature’s head off and drinking the green blood from its skull (“That’s gross”); Kong resetting his dislocated shoulder against a Hong Kong skyscraper; Kong leaping from an exploding ship in a pose that appears to be copied from John McClane’s jump from the roof of Nakatomi Plaza in Die Hard. Godzilla blasting a hole through to the Hollow Earth, and he and Kong exchanging greetings through it. Mostly, though, the insurmountable hurdle is how obvious it is to the eye that this is all CGI. So few directors are able or have been able to blur this line – Spielberg, Michael Bay, Roland Emmerich, whatever you think of the merits of their respective movies – that it’s simply par for the course, but you know it is possible to do better.

Bernie: I’m just saying Greenpeace wishes, is all I’m saying.

I mean, the effects are by no means bad for this kind of thing, but there’s a cumulatively suffocating effect from all these pixels, such that you’re unsure which has more CGI, the Hollow Earth or the surface, the latter lit as it is by artificially skies and synthetic lens flare. I’ll come to the picture’s explicit conspiracy material shortly, but this kind of thing, and its prevalence in Hollywood fare, puts one in mind of loveable Bill Gates’ project to block out the Sun (you know to halt that nasty Global Warming business Greta’s handlers have been doing so much to promote); predictive programming to prepare us for unnatural skies ahead (in contrast to the natural ones you can see currently, when they aren’t obscured with chemtrails)?

Bernie: All right, Mad Hatter. Down the rabbit hole.

The principal disappointment here is that Wingard has essentially uber-surrealistic opportunities yet does very little with them. It’s hardly a sign of imagination, amusing as it is, to throw in a 2001 stargate homage when entering the Hollow Earth, and the depiction of the landscape once we arrive there is disappointingly mundane. Floaty Kong might have a flavour of Ang Lee’s Hulk but Wingard lacks the same eye for the uncanny (instead, we have to settle for – again, amusingly – a Looney Tunes locking of bemused eyes between Alexander Skarsgård and a passing Kong as gravity’s reversal effects take place in this new realm). I suspect Jordan Vogt-Roberts would have accomplished something more striking in that regard.

Mark: That podcast is filling your head with garbage.

Wingard at least handles the humans better this time, which as with my praise of Kong: Skull Island isn’t saying much, but it does put it streets ahead of Godzilla: King of the Monsters. Most boring man on Earth (or in its hollows) Kyle Chandler is barely in it this time, which is a blessed relief. Last week’s news Millie Bobby Brown is in it a lot, but fortunately she’s diluted, or overwhelmed, by the combined comic camaraderie of Madison’s pal Josh (Julian Dennison) and uber-conspiracy theorist Bernie (Brian Tyree Henry). The latter in particular is exactly what the humourless stodge of the series’ non-CGI characters needed, reeling off enough hot takes to rival Jerry Fletcher in Conspiracy Theory (the only other Hollywood movie that springs to mind in serving such a surfeit of examples).

Walter Simmons: I love crazy ideas. They make me rich.

Everyone else is largely forgettable and so lend the sense of a cast treading water. Skarsgård’s Hollow Earth theorist makes as little impression as the actor usually does when he’s in a “star” role. Rebecca Hall bafflingly – unless she has a very large mortgage – continues to show up in big-budget movies despite their doing her no favours at all. Demián Bichir is the tech empire villain you’ve seen a million times before and lacks the sufficient something to make him a half decent one. Generally, then, they could be worse, and have been – King of the Monsters – but they could be a lot better.

Josh: I just don’t think it’s a good idea looking for some secret weirdo off the Internet. I mean, we just had an assembly about this.

The part of Godzilla vs. Kong that succeeds in mustering interest – not enough, but nevertheless, it’s something – is the “soft disclosure”. Of course, it’s only disclosure if what is being disclosed is real, rather than the perpetuation of disinformation or (and this can’t be ruled out) filmmakers having a laugh since, in this case, the movie is expressly permeated with disparate conspiracy theories on account of Bernie’s character. There are numerous references here, but how coherent any of them are (in terms of the movie) remains open to debate. That may be the point, such that one is unable to sift through them with any confidence of pertinence. This is, after all, a series with a “benign” central agency named Monarch, also surely not coincidentally the name of the MKUltra mind-control programming technique (since the makers are evidently au fait with the conspirasphere). The entire MonsterVerse may be designed to elicit exactly the degree of credulous commentary found here.

Bernie: Tap or no tap?

Hollow Earth has featured in the series’ mythology since Kong: Skull Island, of course, and it’s here that the wait pays off. Provided, that is, you were eagerly awaiting a realm awash with the splendour of CGI. Obviously, Hollow Earth has featured prominently in movies before, most notably adaptations of Journey to the Centre of the Earth (the James Mason one and the Brendan Fraser 3D-fest) and At the Earth’s Core. Wingard may be referencing the latter, with its realm of Pellucidar, when Mahar-like flying creatures attack the Maia (Eiza González) and co as they attempt to raid the inner world’s fuel source. Mostly, though, we’re offered the “factual” – as in, not because he didn’t go, but because we don’t know how much of the accompanying claims can be trusted – Admiral Byrd expedition to Antarctica. At least, I’m assuming this is the opening credits’ 1926 Hollow Earth expedition, as Byrd first went in 1928. As per Byrd, Godzilla vs. Kong’s entrance to the Hollow Earth is via Antarctica. Science has, of course, debunked Hollow Earth.

Ilene: Kong bows to no one.

In tandem with this, we’re offered another suggestion of the Earth’s properties being other than we’re generally told, in this case via the dome that traps Kong and so sentences him to a simulated environment. Reflective of our simulated environment (The Truman Show)? You know, the one in which rockets are unable to break through the firmament because there’s no outer space? The movie does not, however, suggest a Flat Earth (and there’s definitely outer space – because how else would King Ghidorah have got here – and functioning satellites). Indeed, Hollow Earth models are shown as a globe within a globe.

Walter Simmons: Don’t worry, once the Hollow Earth sample is uploaded, our power troubles will be over.

The quest for Hollow Earth’s free energy supply is a curious one, as Apex Cybernetics can already boast an abundance of suppressed technology, including energy-producing ones. One wonders just how much juice Mechagodzilla needs if he runs down so quickly, since we’re informed of the HEAVs that “The anti-gravity engines alone produce enough charge to light up Vegas for a week”. This secret/advanced tech idea is a recurrent one, be it Tesla’s free wireless electricity or the Nazi Bell device and saucers. Here, Bernie marries it explicitly to the machinations of the Illuminati (rather limply personified in Simmons, it seems, as there are no other obvious candidates).

Bernie: I mean, the Illuminati running shadow economies all to fund a hidden colony for the Elite in case any of these governments and megacorporations accidentally hit the doomsday button.

Nevertheless, Bernie appears to have his suspicions confirmed on the very masonic Sublevel 33: “It’s a breakaway civilisation”. It’s unclear if he thinks this civilisation is based off-world or somewhere else on (or in) Earth, but the idea has been much mooted for decades (see Laura Eisenhower and her being offered a place on Mars, or Alternative 3). Bernie’s suggestion that they might “accidentally” wipe everyone out seems quaintly naïve in the face of global puppeteering, but the shadow economies mentioned link neatly with Catherine Austin Fitts and the missing $21 trillion (and doubtless then some).

For good measure, he also namechecks aliens, without feeling it incumbent to clarify. There is a “Maglev Shuttle to Roswell, New Mexico at 900 hrs” (of the type they hitch a ride in) and Bernie asserts that “Lizard people build all their facilities the same way” (the Illuminati therefore equated with such types). This is likely a necessary inclusion, in case – amid all the oversized reptiles and primates slugging it out – you thought Bernie was altogether sane and found yourself reaching for the bleach.

Josh: Oh, I drink tap water.
Bernie: Yeah, I kind of figured that.

Yes, Bernie’s an abundant source of conspiracy theories. These include the dangers of GMOs (although, the apple he points out appears to have been unfairly maligned) and fluoride (“They put in the water. Learned it from the Nazis”). However, Bernie and Madison appear agreed that it makes you “docile, easy to manipulate”. No mention of it being used to calcify the pineal gland? Bernie’s also particularly concerned about endemic surveillance tech, having discovered a radio transmitter in his toaster.

Josh: Oh! Yeah, I shower with bleach. No, what?

He announces “Spy dust is real, people” and that it is invisible to the naked eye. He’s evidently talking nanotech. As prevention against this “organic tracking technology”, he showers with bleach. Which struck me as a somewhat irresponsible insertion on the part of the filmmakers, given that, while Bernie is a “wild and wacky” conspiracy nut, he’s also established as conspicuously correct in his central thesis. Notable is that the conspiratorial angle is diluted here too; Bernie makes no mention of nanotech being spread via chemtrails, or the idea that this tech is designed to infuse our systems (and may result in conditions such as Morgellons).

Obviously, Godzilla vs. Kong was signed and sealed before the plandemic hatched, finishing production in early 2019 and subsequently having its release delayed from last November. So it’s interesting to note a couple of tiny pointers towards subsequent disarray. Bernie proffers “Hand sanitiser I made from my own garden” (so doubtless free from poisonous chemicals, and maybe from that spy dust too). More amusingly, if you substitute a certain “deadly pathogen” for our Monsterverse’s marauders, the posters on the walls of Madison’s biology class warning “Titans are everywhere. Stay awake” and “Stay Safe!” take on much more sinister proportions. And perhaps "Mask or no mask?" is the new "Tap or no tap?" (a whole range could apply there, up to an including the jab).

Bernie: Well, if there’s a corporate friendly term for “sacrifice pit”, I’d say we are in it.

Intentional or otherwise, Bernie and the juniors’ arrival at Sublevel 33 parallels the Hollow Earth discovery of the Kong temple. There, humans are picked off by low-flying Mahar types. Here. Bernie surveys a scene of extraneous body parts and tells Madison and Josh they’re in a sacrifice pit. Now, it’s evidently describing a pit to pit Mechagodzilla against opponents who will test his metal mettle, but it would be surprising, what with overt references to Elite practices and proclivities, if one weren’t expected to put two and two together and make more than good harmless spirit cooking.

Bernie: That’s Monster Zero. Ghidorah. They hardwired its DNA. Self-generating neural pathways capable of learning – it’s a living super computer.

The main deal in this (deep) underground (non-military) base is reserved for overt transhumanism, however. In an echo of Pacific Rim – also from Legendary Pictures, the sequel to which also had Pearson as an uncredited rewriter, while Steven S DeKnight, Uprising’s director, has said he’d like to link up the universes – humans control the giant robo-mech suits. Albeit with a genuine monster-ish component here, one that proceeds to override the human psionic interface (a bit like Robocop 2, then). Yes, this is a cautionary tale about the dangers of transhumanism, whilst imprinting upon the viewer that this new dawn is altogether inevitable.

Curiously, Godzilla vs. Kong finds the mammals and the reptiles, sworn enemies since V at very least, teaming up against the transhumanist agenda. And winning. Curious, since Legendary’s former CEO Thomas Tull – Chinese Wanda Group now owns the company – also founded Tulco LLC, which “uses artificial intelligence and other technologies to guide investing”. The assessment regarding Godzilla, that “They’re trying to replace him”, pretty much sums up the transhumanist agenda. A new, improved, augmented model; Apex’s creed is “to push past the limits of human potential” (“Robotics, the human mind, artificial intelligence”).

Walter Simmons: It’s not only Godzilla’s equal, but his superior.

In this regard, perhaps the most interesting reference Godzilla vs. Kong drops is to Rudolf Steiner. We see two Steiner publications on Bernie’s desk, with a picture of Emma Russell (Vera Farmiga) between them. I’m unsure Emma is significant in this regard, although one might suggest, given she awakened the Titans in a misplaced desire to heal the Earth from the damage inflicted by humans, that she is opposed to The Ahrimanic Deception and has taken heed Steiner’s warnings concerning The Incarnation of Ahriman (the two volumes present).

Nathan: “A sci-fi quack trading in fringe physics.”

Steiner, whom some consider an Elite agent per Blavatsky, presented the Ahrimanic influence as one that encouraged intellectual-materialist obsession and debasement (he set this in contrast to the other, Luciferic extreme, which attracted the false mystical, distracting one from a personal soul-ful purpose and experience of the divine). The significance of Steiner’s perspective in a movie that suggests established science is both very wrong about some fundamentals and the terminal direction in which its precepts are taking it should not be underestimated: “... it is of the utmost interest to Ahriman that people should perfect themselves in all our illusory modern science, but without knowing that it is illusion”. He went further still when he suggested that “... by intellectual or modern scientific reasoning today, one can prove anything and equally well prove its opposite”.

Bernie: I thought you said you were a hacker!
Josh: I said I took a HTML course at summer camp.
Bernie: HTML?
Josh: Yes.
Bernie: Was it a '90s camp?

Key to Steiner’s thesis on Ahriman was that the demonic being was shortly (in the early twenty-first century) to incarnate on Earth, in much the same way Lucifer had millennia previously. He is, if you like, Steiner’s Antichrist. The nature of Ahriman’s incumbent form is open for debate, but given the emphasis on materialism and the way in which Steiner stressed transhumanism as a very real concern for the future, the following is interesting:

Amid the perpetual stresses of war and other tribulations of the immediate future, the human mind will become very inventive in the domain of physical life. And through this very growth of inventiveness in physical life — which cannot be averted in any way or by any means — the bodily existence of a human individuality in whom Ahriman can incarnate will become possible and inevitable.

One interpretation of this is cloning, but another is that of Artificial Intelligence. You know, Thomas Tull’s bag. And that of Apex Cybernetics, who have only gone and created a robotic aberration to replace the organic original, and which relies for its embodiment on the fusion of man – via the neural network – or beast – King Ghodira’s DNA - and machine.

Bernie: It’s unfair. I really wanted to hear the rest of that speech.

So Godzilla vs. Kong may come across as a big dumb movie – and make no mistake, it is – but some of the influences that have finished up into the pot, no matter how ineptly it has been stirred, are far from daft. I’m grateful, if slightly surprised, that there was no end-credits tease for a further MonsterVerse instalment. Perhaps Legendary thought better after King of the Monsters underperformed; Godzilla vs. Kong looks as if it will suffer no such shortfall, though, so maybe we’ll get to see that breakaway civilisation yet.


Popular posts from this blog

I’m smarter than a beaver.

Prey (2022) (SPOILERS) If nothing else, I have to respect Dan Trachtenberg’s cynical pragmatism. How do I not only get a project off the ground, but fast-tracked as well? I know, a woke Predator movie! Woke Disney won’t be able to resist! And so, it comes to pass. Luckily for Prey , it gets to bypass cinemas and so the same sorry fate of Lightyear . Less fortunately, it’s a patience-testing snook cocking at historicity (or at least, assumed historicity), in which a young, pint-sized Comanche girl who wishes to hunt and fish – and doubtless shoot to boot – with the big boys gets to take on a Predator and make mincemeat of him. Well, of course , she does. She’s a girl, innit?

Just because you are a character doesn't mean that you have character.

Pulp Fiction (1994) (SPOILERS) From a UK perspective, Pulp Fiction ’s success seemed like a fait accompli; Reservoir Dogs had gone beyond the mere cult item it was Stateside and impacted mainstream culture itself (hard to believe now that it was once banned on home video); it was a case of Tarantino filling a gap in the market no one knew was there until he drew attention to it (and which quickly became over-saturated with pale imitators subsequently). Where his debut was a grower, Pulp Fiction hit the ground running, an instant critical and commercial success (it won the Palme d’Or four months before its release), only made cooler by being robbed of the Best Picture Oscar by Forrest Gump . And unlike some famously-cited should-have-beens, Tarantino’s masterpiece really did deserve it.

I’m the famous comedian, Arnold Braunschweiger.

Last Action Hero (1993) (SPOILERS) Make no mistake, Last Action Hero is a mess. But even as a mess, it might be more interesting than any other movie Arnie made during that decade, perhaps even in his entire career. Hellzapoppin’ (after the 1941 picture, itself based on a Broadway revue) has virtually become an adjective to describe films that comment upon their own artifice, break the fourth wall, and generally disrespect the convention of suspending disbelief in the fictions we see parading across the screen. It was fairly audacious, some would say foolish, of Arnie to attempt something of that nature at this point in his career, which was at its peak, rather than playing it safe. That he stumbled profoundly, emphatically so since he went up against the behemoth that is Jurassic Park (slotted in after the fact to open first), should not blind one to the considerable merits of his ultimate, and final, really, attempt to experiment with the limits of his screen persona.

Everyone creates the thing they dread.

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) (SPOILERS) Avengers: Age of Ultron ’s problem isn’t one of lack. It benefits from a solid central plot. It features a host of standout scenes and set pieces. It hands (most of) its characters strong defining moments. It doesn’t even suffer now the “wow” factor of seeing the team together for the first time has subsided. Its problem is that it’s too encumbered. Maybe its asking to much of a director to effectively martial the many different elements required by an ensemble superhero movie such as this, yet Joss Whedon’s predecessor feels positively lean in comparison. Part of this is simply down to the demands of the vaster Marvel franchise machine. Seeds are laid for Captain America: Civil War , Infinity Wars I & II , Black Panther and Thor: Ragnarok . It feels like several spinning plates too many. Such activity occasionally became over-intrusive on previous occasions ( Iron Man II ), but there are points in Age of Ultron whe

Poetry in translation is like taking a shower with a raincoat on.

Paterson (2016) (SPOILERS) Spoiling a movie where nothing much happens is difficult, but I tend to put the tag on in a cautionary sense much of the time. Paterson is Jim Jarmusch at his most inert and ambient but also his most rewardingly meditative. Paterson (Adam Driver), a bus driver and modest poet living in Paterson, New Jersey, is a stoic in a fundamental sense, and if he has a character arc of any description, which he doesn’t really, it’s the realisation that is what he is. Jarmusch’s picture is absent major conflict or drama; the most significant episodes feature Paterson’s bus breaking down, the English bull terrier Marvin – whom Paterson doesn’t care for but girlfriend Laura (Golshifteh Farahani) dotes on – destroying his book of poetry, and an altercation at the local bar involving a gun that turns out to be a water pistol. And Paterson takes it all in his stride, genial to the last, even the ruination of his most earnest, devoted work (the only disappoint

Death to Bill and Ted!

Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) (SPOILERS) The game of how few sequels are actually better than the original is so well worn, it was old when Scream 2 made a major meta thing out of it (and it wasn’t). Bill & Ted Go to Hell , as Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey was originally called, is one such, not that Excellent Adventure is anything to be sneezed at, but this one’s more confident, even more playful, more assured and more smartly stupid. And in Peter Hewitt it has a director with a much more overt and fittingly cartoonish style than the amiably pedestrian Stephen Herrick. Evil Bill : First, we totally kill Bill and Ted. Evil Ted : Then we take over their lives. My recollection of the picture’s general consensus was that it surpassed the sleeper hit original, but Rotten Tomatoes’ review aggregator suggests a less universal response. And, while it didn’t rock any oceans at the box office, Bogus Journey and Point Break did quite nicely for Keanu Reev

If you ride like lightning, you're going to crash like thunder.

The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) (SPOILERS) There’s something daringly perverse about the attempt to weave a serious-minded, generation-spanning saga from the hare-brained premise of The Place Beyond the Pines . When he learns he is a daddy, a fairground stunt biker turns bank robber in order to provide for his family. It’s the kind of “only-in-Hollywood” fantasy premise you might expect from a system that unleashed Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man and Point Break on the world. But this is an indie-minded movie from the director of the acclaimed Blue Valentine ; it demands respect and earnest appraisal. Unfortunately it never recovers from the abject silliness of the set-up. The picture is littered with piecemeal characters and scenarios. There’s a hope that maybe the big themes will even out the rocky terrain but in the end it’s because of this overreaching ambition that the film ends up so undernourished. The inspiration for the movie

This entire edifice you see around you, built on jute.

Jeeves and Wooster 3.3: Cyril and the Broadway Musical  (aka Introduction on Broadway) Well, that’s a relief. After a couple of middling episodes, the third season bounces right back, and that's despite Bertie continuing his transatlantic trip. Clive Exton once again plunders  Carry On, Jeeves  but this time blends it with a tale from  The Inimitable Jeeves  for the brightest spots, as Cyril Basington-Basington (a sublimely drippy Nicholas Hewetson) pursues his stage career against Aunt Agatha's wishes.

I think it’s pretty clear whose side the Lord’s on, Barrington.

Monte Carlo or Bust aka  Those Daring Young Men in Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) (SPOILERS) Ken Annakin’s semi-sequel to Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines tends to be rather maligned, usually compared negatively to its more famous predecessor. Which makes me rather wonder if those expressing said opinion have ever taken the time to scrutinise them side by side. Or watch them back to back (which would be more sensible). Because Monte Carlo or Bust is by far the superior movie. Indeed, for all its imperfections and foibles (not least a performance from Tony Curtis requiring a taste for comic ham), I adore it. It’s probably the best wacky race movie there is, simply because each set of competitors, shamelessly exemplifying a different national stereotype (albeit there are two pairs of Brits, and a damsel in distress), are vibrant and cartoonish in the best sense. Albeit, it has to be admitted that, as far as said stereotypes go, Annakin’s home side win

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.