Skip to main content

They want to destroy me. He wants me to stop singing what’s in my soul.

The United States vs. Billie Holiday

(SPOILERS) Well, full marks to Andra Day for that biopic rarity, a performance of a historical figure that feels naturalistic rather than studied or mannered (step forward, Rami Malek). Unfortunately, that doesn’t make the rest of Lee Daniel’s Billie Holiday biopic less than rambling biographical sludge. You’d have thought there was more than enough story to tell here – and the title The United States vs. Billie Holiday frames the proceedings with apparent intent – to avoid a simultaneously ludicrous and banal made-up love story, yet it forms the preponderance of the picture. Was this movie supposed to be about Holiday, or was it really about federal agent Jimmy Fletcher?

This is the first Daniels film I’ve seen since Precious; maybe I should have check out those inbetweeners, since The Paperboy sounds at very least gloriously awful, in a Razzies kind of way. Any thoughts that The United States vs. Billie Holiday might buck the trend of torpid true-life fare are soon dashed. It might even have been preferable had Daniels been stricter about adhering to the strung-together-incidents approach of the typical biopic, since the inventions and flights of fantasy (a heroine-induced flashback) are melodramatic miscues rather than the kind of deranged lunacy we might perversely relish from Baz Lurhmann, say (which is about the only reason to investigate his forthcoming Elvis movie, aside from Guantanamo Hanks).

The opening crawl sets the scene for potent and charged political content, with the 1937 anti-lynching bill failing to pass and the Federal Bureau of Narcotics out to nail Holiday for her signature tune, the lyrics of which describe lynching. But the picture immediately encounters problems attempting to make her more of an activist than she was. If you’re going to angle this as the (in his prime) Oliver Stone movie about Billie Holiday, then do that. Daniels and screenwriter Suzan-Lori Parks squander their opportunities for creating drama and tension and instead manufacture elements that douse the available sparks.

Garrett Hedlund’s profoundly racist Federal Bureau of Narcotics commissioner Harry J Anslinger might have been grist to Daniel’s case, but he’s hardly in it (and Hedlund doesn’t exactly ooze anything, even when looking stern or spouting bigotry). Instead, the government’s focus on Holiday is via narcotics agent Jimmy Fletcher, personified as gimlet-eyed bloc-of-wood Trevante Rhodes. Holiday somehow finds this charisma vacuum irresistible, and soon their relationship has swallowed up the lion’s share of the plot.

Inventing a love story for a biopic is neither that unusual nor necessarily a problem; it’s simply the old yardstick of whatever tells the chosen tale best. So yeah, if you want a tale about Fletcher, rather than Holiday, this move makes sense. But aside from the real Fletcher expressing guilt for his part in Holiday’s persecution and demise, the kid-gloves approach to character, to the point of repurposing him as something of a hero who intentionally spoiled evidence in one of her court cases and was even there for her on her death bed, seems rather odd. I might give Daniels some credit were there a whiff of chemistry or passion between these two, but the over-polished subplot hangs on like a limp lettuce waiting for the waste-disposal unit.

Inevitably, Daniels puts the emphasis on Holiday’s suffering – it seems the real singer was not one to let the negatives overwhelm her – with her being knocked around, framed, suffering the psychological effects of formative traumas and a duck to the water of substance abuse; that’s the narrative that sells in Hollywood, so showing a soul who was also able to fly would have been antithetical to the intended finger-waved lesson. The consequence is a picture that falls in line, with little to distinguish itself beyond the lead performance.

It’s curious too where Daniels exercises restraint. He includes Holiday stripping when arrested, yet leaves out her piece-de-resistance act-of-defiance pissing on the floor. Tallulah Bankhead (Natasha Lyonne) features, but their affair is merely alluded to. Daniels seems more intent on fabricating his own “lively” Holiday milieu of kindly federal beaus, flamboyant entourage (Miss Lawrence) and equally flamboyant interviewers (Leslie Jordan, very amusing). Occasionally, a scene takes on its own life (Fletcher expresses his condolences at a memorial service Holiday is attending; “It was her dog! Her dog died!” wails Da’Vine Joy Randolph’s Roslyn). But it’s the exception.

Day’s The United States vs. Billie Holiday performance has received a deserved Oscar nomination, but she seems to be trailing the pack. Not as far behind as Vanessa Kirby, but still odds-against. One need not star in a hit film about a drug-addicted singer-performer to waltz off with the statuette (see Renée Zellweger last year), but the relative novice to the field tends to receive recognition in the supporting categories rather than the lead. Viola Davis’ frantic mugging, Frances McDormand’s elder and hip-shooting Academy statesperson and Carey Mulligan’s Charles-Bronson-in-diapers turns all seem more likely bets. I’d also have suggested Daniels was in no danger of troubling the Academy for Best Director nominations now or in future, but he’s already received one. And if Tom Hooper can win a directing Oscar, anyone can.

Popular posts from this blog

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 1 (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Is this supposed to be me? It’s grotesque.

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022) (SPOILERS) I didn’t hold out much hope for The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent being more than moderately tolerable. Not so much because its relatively untested director and his co-writer are mostly known in the TV sphere (and not so much for anything anyone is raving about). Although, it has to be admitted, the finished movie flourishes a degree of digital flatness typical of small-screen productions (it’s fine, but nothing more). Rather, due to the already over-tapped meta-strain of celebs showing they’re good sports about themselves. When Spike Jonze did it with John Malkovich, it was weird and different. By the time we had JCVD , not so much. And both of them are pre-dated by Arnie in Last Action Hero (“ You brought me nothing but pain ” he is told by Jack Slater). Plus, it isn’t as if Tom Gormican and Kevin Etten have much in the way of an angle on Nic; the movie’s basically there to glorify “him”, give or take a few foibles, do

All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies.

Watership Down (1978) (SPOILERS) I only read Watership Down recently, despite having loved the film from the first, and I was immediately impressed with how faithful, albeit inevitably compacted, Martin Rosen’s adaptation is. It manages to translate the lyrical, mythic and metaphysical qualities of Richard Adams’ novel without succumbing to dumbing down or the urge to cater for a broader or younger audience. It may be true that parents are the ones who get most concerned over the more disturbing elements of the picture but, given the maturity of the content, it remains a surprise that, as with 2001: A Space Odyssey (which may on the face of it seem like an odd bedfellow), this doesn’t garner a PG certificate. As the makers noted, Watership Down is at least in part an Exodus story, but the biblical implications extend beyond Hazel merely leading his fluffle to the titular promised land. There is a prevalent spiritual dimension to this rabbit universe, one very much

What’s so bad about being small? You’re not going to be small forever.

Innerspace (1987) There’s no doubt that Innerspace is a flawed movie. Joe Dante finds himself pulling in different directions, his instincts for comic subversion tempered by the need to play the romance plot straight. He tacitly acknowledges this on the DVD commentary for the film, where he notes Pauline Kael’s criticism that he was attempting to make a mainstream movie; and he was. But, as ever with Dante, it never quite turns out that way. Whereas his kids’ movies treat their protagonists earnestly, this doesn’t come so naturally with adults. I’m a bona fide devotee of Innerspace , but I can’t help but be conscious of its problems. For the most part Dante papers over the cracks; the movie hits certain keynotes of standard Hollywood prescription scripting. But his sensibility inevitably suffuses it. That, and human cartoon Martin Short (an ideal “leading man” for the director) ensure what is, at first glance just another “ Steven Spielberg Presents ” sci-fi/fantas

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

Whacking. I'm hell at whacking.

Witness (1985) (SPOILERS) Witness saw the advent of a relatively brief period – just over half a decade –during which Harrison Ford was willing to use his star power in an attempt to branch out. The results were mixed, and abruptly concluded when his typically too late to go where Daniel Day Lewis, Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro had gone before (with at bare minimum Oscar-nominated results) – but not “ full retard ” – ended in derision with Regarding Henry . He retreated to the world of Tom Clancy, and it’s the point where his cachet began to crumble. There had always been a stolid quality beneath even his more colourful characters, but now it came to the fore. You can see something of that as John Book in Witness – despite his sole Oscar nom, it might be one of Ford’s least interesting performances of the 80s – but it scarcely matters, or that the screenplay (which won) is by turns nostalgic, reactionary, wistful and formulaic, as director Peter Weir, in his Hollywood debu

Get away from my burro!

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) (SPOILERS) The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is beloved by so many of the cinematic firmament’s luminaries – Stanley Kubrick, Sam Raimi, , Paul Thomas Anderson and who knows maybe also WS, Vince Gilligan, Spike Lee, Daniel Day Lewis; Oliver Stone was going to remake it – not to mention those anteriorly influential Stone Roses, that it seems foolhardy to suggest it isn’t quite all that. There’s no faulting the performances – a career best Humphrey Bogart, with director John Huston’s dad Walter stealing the movie from under him – but the greed-is-bad theme is laid on a little thick, just in case you were a bit too dim to get it yourself the first time, and Huston’s direction may be right there were it counts for the dramatics, but it’s a little too relaxed when it comes to showing the seams between Mexican location and studio.

If that small woman is small enough, she could fit behind a small tree.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 2 (SPOILERS) I can’t quite find it within myself to perform the rapturous somersaults that seem to be the prevailing response to this fourth run of the show. I’ve outlined some of my thematic issues in the Volume 1 review, largely borne out here, but the greater concern is one I’ve held since Season Two began – and this is the best run since Season One, at least as far my failing memory can account for – and that’s the purpose-built formula dictated by the Duffer Brothers. It’s there in each new Big Bad, obviously, even to the extent that this is the Big-Bad-who-binds-them-all (except the Upside Down was always there, right?) And it’s there with the resurgent emotional beats, partings, reunions and plaintively stirring music cues. I have to be really on board with a movie or show to embrace such flagrantly shameless manipulation, season after season, and I find myself increasingly immune.