Skip to main content

He spurned me like a strumpet in the street.

The Ten Commandments
(1956)

(SPOILERS) Stodge of biblical proportions. Sometimes during The Ten Commandments, you’ll feel like you’re spending those forty interminable years in the wilderness yourself (luckily consisting of no more than a line of narration in this four-hour epic). The common response to Cecil B DeMille’s final grand spectacle is that it’s overblown, old-style entertainment, worthwhile in spite of its delusions of importance and reverence. Unfortunately, however, the movie is more often dramatically stolid, even to the extent of presenting literal tableaux, and sometimes with accompanying narration at that. The picture obviously did the trick – audiences flocked to it in droves – but this is far from nimble storytelling.

This version is still preferable to Sir Ridders atheistic but reluctantly veering towards miracles in the end Exodus: Gods and Kings a few years back. Although, that picture had (relative) brevity in its favour. While DeMille is much more reverent – as well as creative with his sources, spreading his net much wider than the “Holy Scriptures” – I was most struck how, rather than presenting the trials and tribulations of Chuck Heston’s reluctant prophet Moses, the director is far more engaged by the pharaonic dynasty, always eager to cut back to whatever it is Set I (Cedric Hardwicke), Rameses II (Yul Brynner) or Nefertiti (Anne Baxter) are up to. Even when Ramases’ hopes are finally dashed and Moses and co are safely on the other side of the Red Sea, Cecil can’t resist returning to the disconsolate and divided Rameses and Nefertiti in the throne room.

DeMille had been at this a long time (more than forty years, just not so much in the Hollywood wilderness), and he knew his way around a Bible story (his first run at The Ten Commandments was thirty-three years earlier). Unfortunately, if he had an idiosyncratic take on being a devout Episcopalian – he ran several mistresses, was a pre-Tarantino foot fetishist and was possessed by violent predilections – The Ten Commandments is nevertheless enormously portentous and consumed with self-worth. And simultaneously, for all the pomp, curiously plain and lacking in atmosphere. DeMille hits The Bible with the bullet of thudding literalism, such that even during the plagues – very truncated and disappointingly so, both given the budget and it being the real meat of the deal – the apocalyptic crescendo is reduced to some offscreen wailing as the Angel of Death passes by (I liked the sinister smoke creeping across the floor of the palace, however).

The visual effects stand up reasonably well. At times, in conjunction with the Technicolor lighting, they can be quite impressive: There are grand clouds in perma-residence on Mount Sinai, and the parting of the Red Sea remains a set-piece triumph. But there are also acres of blue screen (Moses pulls back a curtain to reveal the building work going on beyond it). And while the sets are obviously vast, the awe is somewhat reined in when they’re evidently in a studio/on the lot.

This kind of material, by nature of its remit, demands two complementary elements to etch itself in the memory. The set piece (see the Ben-Hur chariot race) and the eccentric performance. Stick Peter Ustinov in a sword-and-sandals romp, and you’re away. There’s no one quite on his level here. Heston is fine in a macho-oakish way, delivering the cod-Biblical lines with exactly the unnuanced didacticism you’d expect. He sports increasingly natty coiffuring as Moses greys and wigs out, though. Brynner is suitably antagonist but also as one-note as Moses, which makes for a rather hollow centre to a rather hollow picture (not that Christian Bale and Joel Edgerton were remotely preferable. At least these two seem like adults and carry a modicum of mock-period-friendly gravitas).

There’s not much to be said for Debra Paget (Lilia), Yvonne De Carlo (Sephora) and John Derek (Joshua) either. Vincent Price is memorably nefarious until Moses runs him through. Edward G Robinson, as Egyptian collaborator and troublemaker Dathan, gets to be provocative (he’s having a particularly good time when we get to the golden calf, having happened upon a leopard skin during their travels). Joshua has much more screen time than Aaron, who was also dealt short shrift in Gods and Kings. He’s played by John Carradine, though; as a member of the Ordo Templi Orientis and one of the Bundy Drive Boys, what with the alleged satanic acts they got up to, it’s possibly for the best he wasn’t front and centre as a representative of God. Hardwicke does his best as Seti I, but the dialogue only occasionally rises to the task at hand.

The main plaudits are reserved for Baxter’s Nefertiti. And not just for her surprisingly prevalent nipples. Baxter won an Oscar for The Razor’s Edge, but she’d made the biggest splash as the titular All About Eve. There, she was picked for her resemblance to Claudette Colbert (originally cast in the Bette Davis role). Colbert had played for DeMille, of course, in The Sign of the Cross and Cleopatra, and it would be surprising if the director hadn’t had the same resemblance in mind when he plumbed for Baxter here. She’s wonderfully scheming and minxish throughout, making up somewhat for the inertia of the men either side, both spurning the fellow she fancies (Moses) and deriding the chap with whom she abides (Rameses).

There’s nary a sniff of the commandments until the last quarter of an hour, probably because they sound impressive but aren’t that interesting visually, even when inscribed by God (we’re spared Moses chiselling out the second set). It goes without saying that you wouldn’t really get away with this laborious approach again. A fair few tried it, but there needed to be something extra to ensure audiences’ changing appetites were whetted. The chariot race in Ben-Hur can still stand proudly against any modern-day visceral action sequence (many would argue the rest of the movie can be happily skipped), while Spartacus had Stanley Kubrick as an increasingly dissatisfied director for hire yet bringing the material a level of variation in theme and content often missed with such a canvas.

I don’t know how possible it is to make a decent Biblical epic. Another atheist, Darren Aronofsky, failed with Noah but scattered in a few interesting ideas. Mel had a mega hit with his torture-porn take The Passion of the Christ. I suspect you need an angle, but you can’t be going around insulting your core audience either. Ridders didn’t understand that with Exodus: Gods and Kings. DeMille, who explicitly linked the captivity and Egyptian tyranny to the scourge of communism and “the awful experience of totalitarianism, both fascist and communist”, did, but his passion for The Ten Commandments' spectacle and scale was far greater than his acumen for telling a gripping story.


Popular posts from this blog

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 1 (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Is this supposed to be me? It’s grotesque.

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022) (SPOILERS) I didn’t hold out much hope for The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent being more than moderately tolerable. Not so much because its relatively untested director and his co-writer are mostly known in the TV sphere (and not so much for anything anyone is raving about). Although, it has to be admitted, the finished movie flourishes a degree of digital flatness typical of small-screen productions (it’s fine, but nothing more). Rather, due to the already over-tapped meta-strain of celebs showing they’re good sports about themselves. When Spike Jonze did it with John Malkovich, it was weird and different. By the time we had JCVD , not so much. And both of them are pre-dated by Arnie in Last Action Hero (“ You brought me nothing but pain ” he is told by Jack Slater). Plus, it isn’t as if Tom Gormican and Kevin Etten have much in the way of an angle on Nic; the movie’s basically there to glorify “him”, give or take a few foibles, do

All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies.

Watership Down (1978) (SPOILERS) I only read Watership Down recently, despite having loved the film from the first, and I was immediately impressed with how faithful, albeit inevitably compacted, Martin Rosen’s adaptation is. It manages to translate the lyrical, mythic and metaphysical qualities of Richard Adams’ novel without succumbing to dumbing down or the urge to cater for a broader or younger audience. It may be true that parents are the ones who get most concerned over the more disturbing elements of the picture but, given the maturity of the content, it remains a surprise that, as with 2001: A Space Odyssey (which may on the face of it seem like an odd bedfellow), this doesn’t garner a PG certificate. As the makers noted, Watership Down is at least in part an Exodus story, but the biblical implications extend beyond Hazel merely leading his fluffle to the titular promised land. There is a prevalent spiritual dimension to this rabbit universe, one very much

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

Whacking. I'm hell at whacking.

Witness (1985) (SPOILERS) Witness saw the advent of a relatively brief period – just over half a decade –during which Harrison Ford was willing to use his star power in an attempt to branch out. The results were mixed, and abruptly concluded when his typically too late to go where Daniel Day Lewis, Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro had gone before (with at bare minimum Oscar-nominated results) – but not “ full retard ” – ended in derision with Regarding Henry . He retreated to the world of Tom Clancy, and it’s the point where his cachet began to crumble. There had always been a stolid quality beneath even his more colourful characters, but now it came to the fore. You can see something of that as John Book in Witness – despite his sole Oscar nom, it might be one of Ford’s least interesting performances of the 80s – but it scarcely matters, or that the screenplay (which won) is by turns nostalgic, reactionary, wistful and formulaic, as director Peter Weir, in his Hollywood debu

Get away from my burro!

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) (SPOILERS) The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is beloved by so many of the cinematic firmament’s luminaries – Stanley Kubrick, Sam Raimi, , Paul Thomas Anderson and who knows maybe also WS, Vince Gilligan, Spike Lee, Daniel Day Lewis; Oliver Stone was going to remake it – not to mention those anteriorly influential Stone Roses, that it seems foolhardy to suggest it isn’t quite all that. There’s no faulting the performances – a career best Humphrey Bogart, with director John Huston’s dad Walter stealing the movie from under him – but the greed-is-bad theme is laid on a little thick, just in case you were a bit too dim to get it yourself the first time, and Huston’s direction may be right there were it counts for the dramatics, but it’s a little too relaxed when it comes to showing the seams between Mexican location and studio.

If that small woman is small enough, she could fit behind a small tree.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 2 (SPOILERS) I can’t quite find it within myself to perform the rapturous somersaults that seem to be the prevailing response to this fourth run of the show. I’ve outlined some of my thematic issues in the Volume 1 review, largely borne out here, but the greater concern is one I’ve held since Season Two began – and this is the best run since Season One, at least as far my failing memory can account for – and that’s the purpose-built formula dictated by the Duffer Brothers. It’s there in each new Big Bad, obviously, even to the extent that this is the Big-Bad-who-binds-them-all (except the Upside Down was always there, right?) And it’s there with the resurgent emotional beats, partings, reunions and plaintively stirring music cues. I have to be really on board with a movie or show to embrace such flagrantly shameless manipulation, season after season, and I find myself increasingly immune.

What’s so bad about being small? You’re not going to be small forever.

Innerspace (1987) There’s no doubt that Innerspace is a flawed movie. Joe Dante finds himself pulling in different directions, his instincts for comic subversion tempered by the need to play the romance plot straight. He tacitly acknowledges this on the DVD commentary for the film, where he notes Pauline Kael’s criticism that he was attempting to make a mainstream movie; and he was. But, as ever with Dante, it never quite turns out that way. Whereas his kids’ movies treat their protagonists earnestly, this doesn’t come so naturally with adults. I’m a bona fide devotee of Innerspace , but I can’t help but be conscious of its problems. For the most part Dante papers over the cracks; the movie hits certain keynotes of standard Hollywood prescription scripting. But his sensibility inevitably suffuses it. That, and human cartoon Martin Short (an ideal “leading man” for the director) ensure what is, at first glance just another “ Steven Spielberg Presents ” sci-fi/fantas