Skip to main content

It says this room is five feet longer on the inside than it is on the outside.

You Should Have Left
(2020)

(SPOILERS) I’m always interested to see a new David Koepp movie – yes, even his misfiring comedies – since they tend to be much more engaging than his writer-for-hire work. You Should Have Left finds him back in the horror zone, where he eked out his first big hit in 1999 (Stir of Echoes, which was unfairly eclipsed by The Sixth Sense’s behemoth box office). Koepp duly knows his way around unsettling atmospheres and creepy moments, but You Should Have Left’s overfamiliarity ultimately scuppers it.

And that overfamiliarity can be found in the director’s own filmography. Stephen King adaptation Secret Window (SPOILER) depicted protagonist Johnny Depp holed up in a cabin retreat and eventually revealed as the culprit behind the murders taking place. You Should Have Left depicts protagonist Kevin Bacon holed up in a Welsh retreated and eventually revealed as the culprit behind a murder that has, many years later, instigated the untoward goings-on.

One might wonder quite why Koepp was inspired to adapt Daniel Kehlmann’s 2016 novella, then. Anything to get back in the game after Mortdecai left an unholy stink, perhaps (yes, I quite liked it, but most did not). It appears the germ came from wanting to collaborate with Bacon on another scary movie and a cheap one (it’s a Blumhouse picture, so of course it is). Then came the “fraught marital relationship” between Bacon’s retired banker Theo and much younger starlet wife Susanna (Amanda Seyfried); the novella came into play at Bacon’s suggestion (Koepp demurred at making Theo a screenwriter per the original, which would have allied it even more with Secret Window).

And the domestic side is well sketched out. The underlying tension between Theo and Susanna is playfully and then increasingly fractiously portrayed. Bacon and Seyfried make this work, even if I half expected Bacon to launch into an ingratiating pitch for EE Mobile every few minutes. Most impressive is Avery Essex as daughter Ella, however, never striking a duff note. They’re largely it, cast-wise (when Susanna leaves, it’s just Theo and Ella for a significant stretch).

If only Theo had watched The Owl Service, he’d know visiting Wales is never a good idea. Cue cryptic locals (Colin Blumenau’s shopkeeper, in particular), local legends (“The devil builds the tower to collect the souls, and God destroys it”) and increasingly sinister incidents at the house. Nightmares and scrawled warnings (“LEAVE. YOU SHOULD LEAVE NOW”) fuel encounters with spooky and disorientating corridors and geography. There’s the old favourite of the ominous Lynchian picture featuring an open door on the wall, and the discovery that the house is bigger on the inside than the outside.

Koepp is in confident territory, and some of his choices – the self-help meditation tape Theo is listening to that is doing nothing to ease his state of mind – are especially effective. Unfortunately, while he starts from a strong position with the domestic arrangement, he can’t distract from the underlying staleness of the plot. It’s never in any doubt that, when Theo and Ella leave the house on foot in the middle of the night, they’re destined to loop back there again. Likewise, the surprise would have been if Theo wasn’t culpable. You Should Have Left to often feels like Koepp repeating himself, rather than doing what he does best, inventing.





Popular posts from this blog

Abandon selective targeting. Shoot everything.

28 Weeks Later (2007) (SPOILERS) The first five minutes of 28 Weeks Later are far and away the best part of this sequel, offering in quick succession a devastating moral quandary and a waking nightmare, immortalised on the screen. After that, while significantly more polished, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo reveals his concept to be altogether inferior to Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s, falling back on the crutches of gore, nihilism, and disengaging and limiting shifts of focus between characters in whom one has little investment in the first place.

The Bible never said anything about amphetamines.

The Color of Money (1986) (SPOILERS) I tend to think it’s evident when Scorsese isn’t truly exercised by material. He can still invest every ounce of the technical acumen at his fingertips, and the results can dazzle on that level, but you don’t really feel the filmmaker in the film. Which, for one of his pictures to truly carry a wallop, you need to do. We’ve seen quite a few in such deficit in recent years, most often teaming with Leo. The Color of Money , however, is the first where it was out-and-out evident the subject matter wasn’t Marty’s bag. He needed it, desperately, to come off, but in the manner a tradesman who wants to keep getting jobs. This sequel to The Hustler doesn’t linger in the mind, however good it may be, moment by moment.

Captain, he who walks in fire will burn his feet.

The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1973) (SPOILERS) Ray Harryhausen returns to the kind of unadulterated fantasy material that made Jason and the Argonauts such a success – swords & stop motion, if you like. In between, there were a couple of less successful efforts, HG Wells adaptation First Men in the Moon and The Valley of the Gwangi (which I considered the best thing ever as a kid: dinosaur walks into a cowboy movie). Harryhausen’s special-effects supremacy – in a for-hire capacity – had also been consummately eclipsed by Raquel Welch’s fur bikini in One Million Years B.C . The Golden Voyage of Sinbad follows the expected Dynamation template – blank-slate hero, memorable creatures, McGuffin quest – but in its considerable favour, it also boasts a villainous performance by nobody-at-the-time, on-the-cusp-of-greatness Tom Baker.

If this were a hoax, would we have six dead men up on that mountain?

The X-Files 4.24: Gethsemane   Season Four is undoubtedly the point at which the duff arc episodes begin to amass, encroaching upon the decent ones for dominance. Fortunately, however, the season finale is a considerable improvement’s on Three’s, even if it’s a long way from the cliffhanger high of 2.25: Anasazi .

My hands hurt from galloping.

Ghostbusters: Afterlife (2021) (SPOILERS) Say what you like about the 2016 reboot, at least it wasn’t labouring under the illusion it was an Amblin movie. Ghostbusters 3.5 features the odd laugh, but it isn’t funny, and it most definitely isn’t scary. It is, however, shamelessly nostalgic for, and reverential towards, the original(s), which appears to have granted it a free pass in fan circles. It didn’t deserve one.

Your desecration of reality will not go unpunished.

2021-22 Best-of, Worst-of and Everything Else Besides The movies might be the most visible example of attempts to cling onto cultural remnants as the previous societal template clatters down the drain. It takes something people really want – unlike a Bond movie where he kicks the can – to suggest the model of yesteryear, one where a billion-dollar grosser was like sneezing. You can argue Spider-Man: No Way Home is replete with agendas of one sort or another, and that’s undoubtedly the case (that’s Hollywood), but crowding out any such extraneous elements (and they often are) is simply a consummate crowd-pleaser that taps into tangible nostalgia through its multiverse take. Of course, nostalgia for a mere seven years ago, for something you didn’t like anyway, is a symptom of how fraught these times have become.

I’ve heard the dancing’s amazing, but the music sucks.

Tick, Tick… Boom! (2021) (SPOILERS) At one point in Tick, Tick… Boom! – which really ought to have been the title of an early ’90s Steven Seagal vehicle – Andrew Garfield’s Jonathan Larson is given some sage advice on how to find success in his chosen field: “ On the next, maybe try writing about what you know ”. Unfortunately, the very autobiographical, very-meta result – I’m only surprised the musical doesn’t end with Larson finishing writing this musical, in which he is finishing writing his musical, in which he is finishing writing his musical… – takes that acutely literally.

Out of my way, you lubberly oaf, or I’ll slit your gullet and shove it down your gizzard!

The Princess and the Pirate (1944) (SPOILERS) As I suggested when revisiting The Lemon Drop Kid , you’re unlikely to find many confessing to liking Bob Hope movies these days. Even Chevy Chase gets higher approval ratings. If asked to attest to the excruciating stand-up comedy Hope, the presenter and host, I doubt even diehards would proffer an endorsement. Probably even fewer would admit to having a hankering for Hope, were they aware of, or further still gave credence to, alleged MKUltra activities. But the movie comedy Hope, the fourth-wall breaking, Road -travelling quipster-coward of (loosely) 1939-1952? That Hope’s a funny guy, mostly, and many of his movies during that period are hugely inventive, creative comedies that are too easily dismissed under the “Bob Hope sucks” banner. The Princess and the Pirate is one of them.

Who gave you the crusade franchise? Tell me that.

The Star Chamber (1983) (SPOILERS) Peter Hyams’ conspiracy thriller might simply have offered sauce too weak to satisfy, reining in the vast machinations of an all-powerful hidden government found commonly during ’70s fare and substituting it with a more ’80s brand that failed to include that decade’s requisite facile resolution. There’s a good enough idea here – instead of Charles Bronson, it’s the upper echelons of the legal system resorting to vigilante justice – but The Star Chamber suffers from a failure of nerve, repenting its premise just as it’s about to dig into the ramifications.

You’re going to make me drop a donkey.

Encanto (2021) (SPOILERS) By my estimation, Disney brand pictures are currently edging ahead of the Pixars. Not that there’s a whole lot in it, since neither have been at full wattage for a few years now. Raya and the Last Dragon and now Encanto are collectively just about superior to Soul and Luca . Generally, the animation arm’s attempts to take in as much cultural representation as they possibly can, to make up for their historic lack of woke quotas, has – ironically – had the effect of homogenising the product to whole new levels. So here we have Colombia, renowned the world over for the US’s benign intervention in their region, not to mention providing the CIA with subsistence income, beneficently showered with gifts from the US’s greatest artistic benefactor.