Skip to main content

Now all we’ve got to do is die.

Without Remorse
(2021)

(SPOILERS) Without Remorse is an apt description of the unapologetic manner in which Amazon/Paramount have perpetrated this crime upon any audiences foolish enough to think there was any juice left in the Tom Clancy engine. There certainly shouldn’t have been, not after every attempt was made to run it dry in The Sum of All Our Fears and then the stupidly titled Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit. A solo movie of sometime Ryan chum John Clark’s exploits has been mooted awhile now, and two more inimitable incarnations were previously encountered in the forms of Willem Dafoe and Liev Schreiber. Like Chris Pine in Shadow Recruit, however, diminishing returns find Michael B Jordan receiving the short straw and lead one to the conclusion that, if Jordan is indeed a “star”, he’s having a hell of a job proving it.

On this evidence, Jordan’s exactly who he appeared to be at first sight: a talented actor who proved highly affecting when given sensitive, layered roles that allowed him to show his range left bereft once he bulked up and attempted to flex his muscles in paper-thin headline parts. Sound familiar? Look no further than a Christian Bale in Terminator Salvation. There’s a certain type of character actor unable to operate effectively in these star roles, no matter how much they’re repurposed. They need something or someone else to support them, be that a bat cape or Sly Stallone. Jordan is indistinct in Stefano Sollima’s largely indistinct, putrid green-washed picture – it could be another Matrix instalment – so he at least isn’t out of place. Unfortunately, the only time he makes an impression is when he decides to reveal his steroidally ripped bod, and you wonder if this is really the kind of physique – that of a human battering ram – suited to a nimble Navy SEAL.

It’s interesting to note the various production-hell versions mooted for Without Remorse over the span of nigh-on thirty years. Keanu. Milius. McQuarrie. Hardy. Goldsman (good grief). It’s understandable there was never a plan for a Dafoe solo movie, but wouldn’t that have been grand? It goes without saying that Clancy’s novel bears no relation to the final film, any more than Shadow Recruit looks like anything Clancy had in mind for Jack Ryan. But if you have a good, or even not so good, brand, why not use that licence to mutilate it beyond recognition?

So we have the increasingly overrated Taylor Sheridan, with Will Staples, offering a complete reboot, whereby John and his SEAL team are in Syria – you know, a “justified” conflict – only to become unsettled when they happen upon Russian military. Before long, John’s entire team, and his missus, are taken out, and John vows to become a one-man killing machine, eliminating the perps and getting to the bottom of some highly nefarious but also highly uninvolving conspiracy.

Cue John, in the celebrated and much – and rightly – ridiculed moment of pouring petrol over a car, lighting the petrol and then stepping into the car – somehow without burning himself in the process – in order to interrogate a damn Russkie. If the entire movie had maintained this Steven Segal level of nonsense machismo, perhaps Without Remorse would have a bona-fide lure. Instead, it persists in an indifferently sub-Gerard Butler manner, attempting to try one’s patience and largely succeeding. There are numerous additional action sequences, including a downed, flooded plane and a besieged apartment complex in Murmansk, but they’re singularly indiscriminate and tedious in execution. John drops through a skylight (without opening it) but he’s no Batman. Or even Dick Tracy.

Amid the mechanical action tedium, an explanation is offered for a century of manufactured East-West antagonism, which I guess constitutes a form of soft disclosure. Or is it just Biden-era predictive programming? Guy Pearce tells us “A big country needs big enemies. The best enemy we ever had was the Soviet Union. Our fear of them unified our people. Gave us purpose. The problem, John, is half this country thinks the other half is its enemy because they have no one else to fight. We give them a real enemy. One with the power to threaten their lives, their freedom. Freedoms you take for granted”. And some of that is accurate (although the internal feuding part is as manufactured as everything else).

Without Remorse culminates in John setting up a multinational counter-terrorism team, called Rainbow for personal reasons (something to do with possibly the least affecting familial slaughter ever). You know, for the sequel that simply will not happen. No one here is remotely plausible in their parts. When Jordan isn’t flexing or glowering in monotonous fashion, he’s giving you cause to ponder his fifteen stages of chin, so goodness knows how he’ll be if he ever gets porky. Jodie Turner-Smith looking very silly in an officer’s hat, but probably no sillier than Jamie Bell’s heroin-chic CIA officer, as these things go. Bell’s the red herring, except to anyone who has ever seen a movie where Guy Pearce isn’t the lead. In which case, he’s obviously the villain.

Without Remorse stood no more chance of working than Shadow Recruit, simply because Paramount had no idea of how to adapt an intensely Republican author’s material in a way that made him palatable and acceptable to its own “sensibilities”, all the while embracing furious and unapologetically wanton destruction. It’s appropriate that it ended up streaming, because it feels entirely like a straight-to-video movie of yesterday. Although those often ended up marginally more entertaining.


Popular posts from this blog

Abandon selective targeting. Shoot everything.

28 Weeks Later (2007) (SPOILERS) The first five minutes of 28 Weeks Later are far and away the best part of this sequel, offering in quick succession a devastating moral quandary and a waking nightmare, immortalised on the screen. After that, while significantly more polished, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo reveals his concept to be altogether inferior to Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s, falling back on the crutches of gore, nihilism, and disengaging and limiting shifts of focus between characters in whom one has little investment in the first place.

The Bible never said anything about amphetamines.

The Color of Money (1986) (SPOILERS) I tend to think it’s evident when Scorsese isn’t truly exercised by material. He can still invest every ounce of the technical acumen at his fingertips, and the results can dazzle on that level, but you don’t really feel the filmmaker in the film. Which, for one of his pictures to truly carry a wallop, you need to do. We’ve seen quite a few in such deficit in recent years, most often teaming with Leo. The Color of Money , however, is the first where it was out-and-out evident the subject matter wasn’t Marty’s bag. He needed it, desperately, to come off, but in the manner a tradesman who wants to keep getting jobs. This sequel to The Hustler doesn’t linger in the mind, however good it may be, moment by moment.

Captain, he who walks in fire will burn his feet.

The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1973) (SPOILERS) Ray Harryhausen returns to the kind of unadulterated fantasy material that made Jason and the Argonauts such a success – swords & stop motion, if you like. In between, there were a couple of less successful efforts, HG Wells adaptation First Men in the Moon and The Valley of the Gwangi (which I considered the best thing ever as a kid: dinosaur walks into a cowboy movie). Harryhausen’s special-effects supremacy – in a for-hire capacity – had also been consummately eclipsed by Raquel Welch’s fur bikini in One Million Years B.C . The Golden Voyage of Sinbad follows the expected Dynamation template – blank-slate hero, memorable creatures, McGuffin quest – but in its considerable favour, it also boasts a villainous performance by nobody-at-the-time, on-the-cusp-of-greatness Tom Baker.

If this were a hoax, would we have six dead men up on that mountain?

The X-Files 4.24: Gethsemane   Season Four is undoubtedly the point at which the duff arc episodes begin to amass, encroaching upon the decent ones for dominance. Fortunately, however, the season finale is a considerable improvement’s on Three’s, even if it’s a long way from the cliffhanger high of 2.25: Anasazi .

My hands hurt from galloping.

Ghostbusters: Afterlife (2021) (SPOILERS) Say what you like about the 2016 reboot, at least it wasn’t labouring under the illusion it was an Amblin movie. Ghostbusters 3.5 features the odd laugh, but it isn’t funny, and it most definitely isn’t scary. It is, however, shamelessly nostalgic for, and reverential towards, the original(s), which appears to have granted it a free pass in fan circles. It didn’t deserve one.

Your desecration of reality will not go unpunished.

2021-22 Best-of, Worst-of and Everything Else Besides The movies might be the most visible example of attempts to cling onto cultural remnants as the previous societal template clatters down the drain. It takes something people really want – unlike a Bond movie where he kicks the can – to suggest the model of yesteryear, one where a billion-dollar grosser was like sneezing. You can argue Spider-Man: No Way Home is replete with agendas of one sort or another, and that’s undoubtedly the case (that’s Hollywood), but crowding out any such extraneous elements (and they often are) is simply a consummate crowd-pleaser that taps into tangible nostalgia through its multiverse take. Of course, nostalgia for a mere seven years ago, for something you didn’t like anyway, is a symptom of how fraught these times have become.

I’ve heard the dancing’s amazing, but the music sucks.

Tick, Tick… Boom! (2021) (SPOILERS) At one point in Tick, Tick… Boom! – which really ought to have been the title of an early ’90s Steven Seagal vehicle – Andrew Garfield’s Jonathan Larson is given some sage advice on how to find success in his chosen field: “ On the next, maybe try writing about what you know ”. Unfortunately, the very autobiographical, very-meta result – I’m only surprised the musical doesn’t end with Larson finishing writing this musical, in which he is finishing writing his musical, in which he is finishing writing his musical… – takes that acutely literally.

Out of my way, you lubberly oaf, or I’ll slit your gullet and shove it down your gizzard!

The Princess and the Pirate (1944) (SPOILERS) As I suggested when revisiting The Lemon Drop Kid , you’re unlikely to find many confessing to liking Bob Hope movies these days. Even Chevy Chase gets higher approval ratings. If asked to attest to the excruciating stand-up comedy Hope, the presenter and host, I doubt even diehards would proffer an endorsement. Probably even fewer would admit to having a hankering for Hope, were they aware of, or further still gave credence to, alleged MKUltra activities. But the movie comedy Hope, the fourth-wall breaking, Road -travelling quipster-coward of (loosely) 1939-1952? That Hope’s a funny guy, mostly, and many of his movies during that period are hugely inventive, creative comedies that are too easily dismissed under the “Bob Hope sucks” banner. The Princess and the Pirate is one of them.

Who gave you the crusade franchise? Tell me that.

The Star Chamber (1983) (SPOILERS) Peter Hyams’ conspiracy thriller might simply have offered sauce too weak to satisfy, reining in the vast machinations of an all-powerful hidden government found commonly during ’70s fare and substituting it with a more ’80s brand that failed to include that decade’s requisite facile resolution. There’s a good enough idea here – instead of Charles Bronson, it’s the upper echelons of the legal system resorting to vigilante justice – but The Star Chamber suffers from a failure of nerve, repenting its premise just as it’s about to dig into the ramifications.

You’re going to make me drop a donkey.

Encanto (2021) (SPOILERS) By my estimation, Disney brand pictures are currently edging ahead of the Pixars. Not that there’s a whole lot in it, since neither have been at full wattage for a few years now. Raya and the Last Dragon and now Encanto are collectively just about superior to Soul and Luca . Generally, the animation arm’s attempts to take in as much cultural representation as they possibly can, to make up for their historic lack of woke quotas, has – ironically – had the effect of homogenising the product to whole new levels. So here we have Colombia, renowned the world over for the US’s benign intervention in their region, not to mention providing the CIA with subsistence income, beneficently showered with gifts from the US’s greatest artistic benefactor.