Skip to main content

Now all we’ve got to do is die.

Without Remorse

(SPOILERS) Without Remorse is an apt description of the unapologetic manner in which Amazon/Paramount have perpetrated this crime upon any audiences foolish enough to think there was any juice left in the Tom Clancy engine. There certainly shouldn’t have been, not after every attempt was made to run it dry in The Sum of All Our Fears and then the stupidly titled Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit. A solo movie of sometime Ryan chum John Clark’s exploits has been mooted awhile now, and two more inimitable incarnations were previously encountered in the forms of Willem Dafoe and Liev Schreiber. Like Chris Pine in Shadow Recruit, however, diminishing returns find Michael B Jordan receiving the short straw and lead one to the conclusion that, if Jordan is indeed a “star”, he’s having a hell of a job proving it.

On this evidence, Jordan’s exactly who he appeared to be at first sight: a talented actor who proved highly affecting when given sensitive, layered roles that allowed him to show his range left bereft once he bulked up and attempted to flex his muscles in paper-thin headline parts. Sound familiar? Look no further than a Christian Bale in Terminator Salvation. There’s a certain type of character actor unable to operate effectively in these star roles, no matter how much they’re repurposed. They need something or someone else to support them, be that a bat cape or Sly Stallone. Jordan is indistinct in Stefano Sollima’s largely indistinct, putrid green-washed picture – it could be another Matrix instalment – so he at least isn’t out of place. Unfortunately, the only time he makes an impression is when he decides to reveal his steroidally ripped bod, and you wonder if this is really the kind of physique – that of a human battering ram – suited to a nimble Navy SEAL.

It’s interesting to note the various production-hell versions mooted for Without Remorse over the span of nigh-on thirty years. Keanu. Milius. McQuarrie. Hardy. Goldsman (good grief). It’s understandable there was never a plan for a Dafoe solo movie, but wouldn’t that have been grand? It goes without saying that Clancy’s novel bears no relation to the final film, any more than Shadow Recruit looks like anything Clancy had in mind for Jack Ryan. But if you have a good, or even not so good, brand, why not use that licence to mutilate it beyond recognition?

So we have the increasingly overrated Taylor Sheridan, with Will Staples, offering a complete reboot, whereby John and his SEAL team are in Syria – you know, a “justified” conflict – only to become unsettled when they happen upon Russian military. Before long, John’s entire team, and his missus, are taken out, and John vows to become a one-man killing machine, eliminating the perps and getting to the bottom of some highly nefarious but also highly uninvolving conspiracy.

Cue John, in the celebrated and much – and rightly – ridiculed moment of pouring petrol over a car, lighting the petrol and then stepping into the car – somehow without burning himself in the process – in order to interrogate a damn Russkie. If the entire movie had maintained this Steven Segal level of nonsense machismo, perhaps Without Remorse would have a bona-fide lure. Instead, it persists in an indifferently sub-Gerard Butler manner, attempting to try one’s patience and largely succeeding. There are numerous additional action sequences, including a downed, flooded plane and a besieged apartment complex in Murmansk, but they’re singularly indiscriminate and tedious in execution. John drops through a skylight (without opening it) but he’s no Batman. Or even Dick Tracy.

Amid the mechanical action tedium, an explanation is offered for a century of manufactured East-West antagonism, which I guess constitutes a form of soft disclosure. Or is it just Biden-era predictive programming? Guy Pearce tells us “A big country needs big enemies. The best enemy we ever had was the Soviet Union. Our fear of them unified our people. Gave us purpose. The problem, John, is half this country thinks the other half is its enemy because they have no one else to fight. We give them a real enemy. One with the power to threaten their lives, their freedom. Freedoms you take for granted”. And some of that is accurate (although the internal feuding part is as manufactured as everything else).

Without Remorse culminates in John setting up a multinational counter-terrorism team, called Rainbow for personal reasons (something to do with possibly the least affecting familial slaughter ever). You know, for the sequel that simply will not happen. No one here is remotely plausible in their parts. When Jordan isn’t flexing or glowering in monotonous fashion, he’s giving you cause to ponder his fifteen stages of chin, so goodness knows how he’ll be if he ever gets porky. Jodie Turner-Smith looking very silly in an officer’s hat, but probably no sillier than Jamie Bell’s heroin-chic CIA officer, as these things go. Bell’s the red herring, except to anyone who has ever seen a movie where Guy Pearce isn’t the lead. In which case, he’s obviously the villain.

Without Remorse stood no more chance of working than Shadow Recruit, simply because Paramount had no idea of how to adapt an intensely Republican author’s material in a way that made him palatable and acceptable to its own “sensibilities”, all the while embracing furious and unapologetically wanton destruction. It’s appropriate that it ended up streaming, because it feels entirely like a straight-to-video movie of yesterday. Although those often ended up marginally more entertaining.


Popular posts from this blog

Lieutenant, you run this station like chicken night in Turkey.

Assault on Precinct 13 (1976) (SPOILERS) You can’t read a review of Assault on Precinct 13 with stumbling over references to its indebtedness – mostly to Howard Hawks – and that was a preface for me when I first caught it on Season Three of BBC2’s Moviedrome (I later picked up the 4Front VHS). In Precinct 13 ’s case, it can feel almost like an attempt to undercut it, to suggest it isn’t quite that original, actually, because: look. On the other hand, John Carpenter was entirely upfront about his influences (not least Hawks), and that he originally envisaged it as an outright siege western (rather than an, you know, urban one). There are times when influences can truly bog a movie down, if it doesn’t have enough going for it in its own right. That’s never the case with Assault on Precinct 13 . Halloween may have sparked Carpenter’s fame and maximised his opportunities, but it’s this picture that really evidences his style, his potential and his masterful facility with music.

The wolves are running. Perhaps you would do something to stop their bite?

The Box of Delights (1984) If you were at a formative age when it was first broadcast, a festive viewing of The Box of Delights  may well have become an annual ritual. The BBC adaptation of John Masefield’s 1935 novel is perhaps the ultimate cosy yuletide treat. On a TV screen, at any rate. To an extent, this is exactly the kind of unashamedly middle class-orientated bread-and-butter period production the corporation now thinks twice about; ever so posh kids having jolly adventures in a nostalgic netherworld of Interwar Britannia. Fortunately, there’s more to it than that. There is something genuinely evocative about Box ’s mythic landscape, a place where dream and reality and time and place are unfixed and where Christmas is guaranteed a blanket of thick snow. Key to this is the atmosphere instilled by director Renny Rye. Most BBC fantasy fare doe not age well but The Box of Delights is blessed with a sinister-yet-familiar charm, such that even the creakier production decisi

White nights getting to you?

Insomnia (2002) (SPOILERS) I’ve never been mad keen on Insomnia . It’s well made, well-acted, the screenplay is solid and it fits in neatly with Christopher Nolan’s abiding thematic interests, but it’s… There’s something entirely adequateabout it. It isn’t pushing any kind of envelope. It’s happy to be the genre-bound crime study it is and nothing more, something emphasised by Pacino’s umpteenth turn as an under-pressure cop.

We got two honkies out there dressed like Hassidic diamond merchants.

The Blues Brothers (1980) (SPOILERS) I had limited awareness of John Belushi’s immense mythos before  The Blues Brothers arrived on retail video in the UK (so 1991?) My familiarity with SNL performers really began with Ghostbusters ’ release, which meant picking up the trail of Jake and Elwood was very much a retrospective deal. I knew Animal House , knew Belushi’s impact there, knew 1941 (the Jaws parody was the best bit), knew Wired was a biopic better avoided. But the minor renaissance he, and they, underwent in the UK in the early ’90s seemed to have been initiated by Jive Bunny and the Mastermixers, of all things; Everybody Needs Somebody was part of their That Sounds Good to Me medley, the first of their hits not to make No.1, and Everybody ’s subsequent single release then just missed the Top Ten. Perhaps it was this that hastened CIC/Universal to putting the comedy out on video. Had the movie done the rounds on UK TV in the 80s? If so, it managed to pass me by. Even bef

Maybe he had one too many peanut butter and fried banana sandwiches.

3000 Miles to Graceland (2001) (SPOILERS) The kind of movie that makes your average Tarantino knockoff look classy, 3000 Miles to Graceland is both aggressively unpleasant and acutely absent any virtues, either as a script or a stylistic exercise. The most baffling thing about it is how it attracted Kevin Costner and Kurt Russell, particularly since both ought to have been extra choosy at this point, having toplined expensive bombs in the previous half decade that made them significantly less bankable names. And if you’re wondering how this managed to cost the $62m reported on Wiki, it didn’t; Franchise Pictures, one of the backers, was in the business of fraudulently inflating budgets .

I dreamed about a guy in a dirty red and green sweater.

A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) (SPOILERS) I first saw A Nightmare on Elm Street a little under a decade after its release, and I was distinctly underwhelmed five or so sequels and all the hype. Not that it didn’t have its moments, but there was an “It’ll do” quality that reflects most of the Wes Craven movies I’ve seen. Aside from the postmodern tease of A New Nightmare – like Last Action Hero , unfairly maligned – I’d never bothered with the rest of the series, in part because I’m just not that big a horror buff, but also because the rule that the first is usually the best in any series, irrespective of genre, tends to hold out more often than not. So now I’m finally getting round to them, and it seemed only fair to start by giving Freddy’s first another shot. My initial reaction holds true.

He must have eaten a whole rhino horn!

Fierce Creatures (1997) (SPOILERS) “ I wouldn’t have married Alyce Faye Eicheberger and I wouldn’t have made Fierce Creatures.” So said John Cleese , when industrial-sized, now-ex gourmand Michael Winner, of Winner’s Dinners , Death Wish II and You Must Be Joking! fame (one of those is a legitimate treasure, but only one) asked him what he would do differently if he could live his life again. One of the regrets identified in the response being Cleese’s one-time wife (one-time of two other one-time wives, with the present one mercifully, for John’s sake, ongoing) and the other being the much-anticipated Death Fish II , the sequel to monster hit A Fish Called Wanda. Wanda was a movie that proved all Cleese’s meticulous, focus-group-tested honing and analysis of comedy was justified. Fierce Creatures proved the reverse.

How do you melt somebody’s lug wrench?

Starman (1984) (SPOILERS) John Carpenter’s unlikely SF romance. Unlikely, because the director has done nothing before or since suggesting an affinity for the romantic fairy tale, and yet he proves surprisingly attuned to Starman ’s general vibes. As do his stars and Jack Nitzsche, furnishing the score in a rare non-showing from the director-composer. Indeed, if there’s a bum note here, it’s the fairly ho-hum screenplay; the lustre of Starman isn’t exactly that of making a silk purse from a sow’s ear, but it’s very nearly stitching together something special from resolutely average source material.

You absolute horror of a human being.

As Good as it Gets (1997) (SPOILERS) James L Brooks’ third Best Picture Oscar nomination goes to reconfirm every jaundiced notion you had of the writer-director-producer’s capacity for the facile and highly consumable, low-cal, fast-food melodramatic fix with added romcom lustre. Of course, As Good as it Gets was a monster hit, parading as it does Jack in a crackerjack, attention-grabbing part. But it’s a mechanical, suffocatingly artificial affair, ponderously paced (a frankly absurd 139 minutes) and infused with glib affirmations and affections. Naturally, the Academy lapped that shit up, because it reflects their own lack of depth and perception (no further comment is needed than Titanic winning the big prize for that year).

Remember. Decision. Consequence.

Day Break (2006) (SPOILERS) Day Break is the rare series that was lucky to get cancelled. And not in a mercy-killing way. It got to tell its story. Sure, apparently there were other stories. Other days to break. But would it have justified going there? Or would it have proved tantalising/reticent about the elusive reason its protagonist has to keep stirring and repeating? You bet it would. Offering occasional crumbs, and then, when it finally comes time to wrap things up, giving an explanation that satisfies no one/is a cop out/offers a hint at some nebulous existential mission better left to the viewer to conjure up on their own. Best that it didn’t even try to go there.