Skip to main content

Well, it must be terribly secret, because I wasn't even aware I was a member.

The Brotherhood of the Bell
(1970)

(SPOILERS) No, not Joseph P Farrell’s book about the Nazi secret weapons project, but rather a first-rate TV movie in the secret-society ilk of later flicks The Skulls and The Star Chamber. Only less flashy and more cogent. Glenn Ford’s professor discovers the club he joined 22 years earlier is altogether more hardcore than he could have ever imagined – not some student lark – when they call on the services he pledged. David Karp’s adaptation of his novel, The Brotherhood of the Bell is so smart in its twists and turns of plausible deniability, you’d almost believe he had insider knowledge.

Patterson: Two men are dead… because I bought a lie. A lie that you can get something for nothing.

Professor Andrew Patterson (Ford) is first seen attending an initiation ceremony for Philip (Robert Pine), the newest member of St George’s College’s Brotherhood of the Bell. The initiation room is conspicuous in its garish regalia, complete with centrepiece bell (notably, perhaps a sign of its TV origins, there are no costuming requirements or humiliating rituals involved). Also in attendance is the man who inducted Andrew all those years ago, Chad Harmon (Dean Jagger, in the Frank Langella part). Before they go their separate ways, Harmon gives Patterson an envelope containing instructions from the Bell (we have already gathered that the society demands “Obedience. Absolute obedience. If and when called upon… you must comply. Whatever is asked of you, for that bill may become due tomorrow or in twenty years. Or never. It will be an act of fealty of loyalty to the Brotherhood of the Bell”).

Philip: You know, it just occurred to me that we’re part of the Establishment now.
Patterson: Not part. The Establishment.

At this point, Andrew represents a knowledgeable old hand about Bell matters. Indeed, there’s a rise and fall in his realisation of the Bell’s reach versus his naivety in believing he can actually do anything whatsoever to combat them. He confirms that, as part of the Bell, Philip can have “Anything a man could get with money, privilege and the best connections”, yet has told himself he’s taken no such favours: “Are you truly so ignorant of what the Bell has done for you?” Harmon asks later, before advising that Patterson’s father’s rise to the status of millionaire businessman who never lost a bid, contract or negotiation, and Patterson receiving every option, fellowship and post on his career path, were not a matter of good fortune or luck.

Harmon: You were given the assignment and the means. Do it Andrew. Do it. And be grateful more isn’t asked of you.

And yet, Patterson is essentially informing Philip that he is now a member of the Elite. In this aspect, the society both reflects and diverges from traditional masonry, since the favours of the club are acknowledged but only truly understood on a rarefied level. Patterson’s task is to ensure Dr Konstanin Horvathy (Eduard Franz) declines the position of Dean of the College of Linguistics offered to him, or Patterson will release a file to his country’s embassy naming all those who assisted his defection two years before. Patterson blanches at a blackmailing bid that could potentially result in more than thirty deaths (as it transpires, Horvathy will commit suicide; in the novel, the focus is on sexual blackmail, but this TV fare was perhaps limited in such scurrilousness. Hence it was nominated for two Primetime Emmys).

Patterson: I know the Brothers of the Bell will punish me. You see, they have unlimited powers.
Harry: Forgive me, Andy. I don’t think unlimited powers are so easily used these days. Not by governments or organisations.

He confronts Harmon, initially sympathetic but soon stressing that Patterson has no choice in the matter (“This discussion is becoming burdensome. You have already broken one of our rules by discussing this assignment with me”). So Patterson does what he is told and he is left conscience stricken by the consequences. While it is feasible that Patterson could delude himself that his membership will never touch him, it is much less so that he seems to think anything he can do will possibly be to any positive end. Again, there’s the argument that he knows this but will have to do it anyway because his conscience permits no other path. But we’re also shown his behaviour is increasingly paranoid and not entirely rational.

Harry: I never took you to see any man.
Patterson: You’re a damn liar, Harry.

Before long, he is reeling around, accusing everyone of being members of the Bell. However, they don’t need to be and more than likely are not; he goes for help from his father-in-law Harry (Maurice Evans), for example, who misleads him and then denies all knowledge. Harry is probably just doing as he’s told, and fearful of the consequences. All that’s necessary is that influence is placed upon such individuals, so they step in line with the coordinated effort. Karp ensures the paranoia is maintained at such a pitch that the degree of complicity of those involved is never entirely clear (Doctor Fielder – William Smithers – is revealed as innocent, having earlier been harangued by Patterson for letting him go from his job).

Patterson: You were given to me just like everything else. No, I have to give you back, and I don’t care. I just don’t. I don’t want you anymore.

This is perhaps most interesting on a personal level. Patterson tells wife Vivian (Rosemary Forsyth) about his guilt and membership, and notably and believably, her first response to his suggestion of going to the police is non-confrontational (“But you can’t do that. You said they had a rule about keeping silent”). In the course of events, he gives her a hard time for attempting to live her life as normal and is generally less than sympathetic, even after she has shot a neighbour she thinks is an intruder (“I paid. Do you want me to pay for the rest of my life?”) And yet, there is a lurking possibility that he is right, that his marriage to a much younger (by almost thirty years) wife isn’t really real at all. It’s at moments like this, and thanks to a suitably unsettling Jerry Goldsmith score, that The Brotherhood of the Bell takes on the air of a bona-fide horror movie, as if Patterson has strayed to the other side of the fearful mirror: of Rosemary’s Baby, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Stepford Wives.

Harmon: No Andy, you won’t be speaking louder and louder. In fact, I am certain we will be hearing less and less from you as time goes on.

Also entirely believably, in a manner not dissimilar to nation-state leaders who fail to toe the party line regarding plandemics and then mysteriously die, Patterson’s life begins unspooling as soon as he fights the power. He loses his job (“Oh, I think they’d dismiss 41 people to cover my dismissal”) and his father comes under investigation (“I’m up to my neck in accountants, and lawyers, and federal tax agents”). His wife leaves him, and then he’s fooled into going on a talk show where he is ritually humiliated (at a point where the light shed on his case had already dwindled).

Harmon: Well, any time 40,000 people can keep a secret for 22 years, I would consider that something of a miracle.

Along the way, Patterson’s sanity is impugned (“How many does it take for me to be committed?”), and any Federal interest in his case is averted (“Just what the hell did you tell Shephard?” he asks Harry; Agent Shephard is played by Dabney Coleman, whom I readily admit failing to recognise without his tache. Of course, it would be quite easy to believe a superior would lean on Shephard to drop the case anyway). Harmon offers the kind of soundbite that could easily be snatched from real world headlines (“Well, it must be terribly secret, because I wasn’t even aware I was a member”), while Vivian can’t believe he’s still attempting to tell his story: “Is there anyone left in the civilised world who hasn’t heard of the Bell?” (for which, one might substitute the Illuminati, or the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, or any readily debunkable conspiracy theory).

TV Show Audience Member: This organisation is well known to every black man, woman and child… This is the white power structure of the United Racial States of America.

The TV show appearance is perhaps the most telling part of the movie. Bart Harris (William Conrad, the narrator of so many actual TV shows’ introductions) persuades Patterson to appear, the latter having got cold feet, and then proceeds to slaughter him. He butters Patterson up with outrageous lies (“Because if you tell the truth, this TV lens will show it. But nothing shows up a phoney quicker either than the TV lens, professor”). Then, once Patterson has told his story, various “cranks” are brought on to couch Patterson’s views as just another crazy conspiracy. There’s Marc Hannibal decrying institutional racism, and Virginia Gilmore claiming Patterson is in fact Abraham Warsaw and “really a Jew”: “It’s an organisation of secret, international Jewry”.

Harris: Ding-a-ling!

Then, in a move that understandably has Patterson attempting to throttle Harris as one of the Brotherhood, Bart takes the piss by suggesting the Bell is actually “The underground Catholic organisation formed by the secret college of cardinals in Rome. Formed to seize political, economic and religious control of the United States of America”. Before “revealing” that the professor is an idiot “like all idiots who stumbled out of that stupid red box and proclaim conspiracy everywhere you look!

Harris: Do you dumb-dumbs really believe what I told you?

This is a carefully sculpted distinction, and contrasts with, say, Henry Makow; the movie explicitly suggests pinpointing a specific group or race as culpable for the enslavement of humanity – well, it’s not calling it that precisely – is to miss the point entirely; that kind of thinking is exactly what they want you to think (Makow, as a proponent of “the Phoenicians”, would be one of them, in those terms). Promulgate confusion and false targets. Misdirection is key. Indeed, one might wonder that Karp doesn’t take aim at Luciferians or Satanists; perhaps because he believes they’re too close to the truth. Primetime TV might also be a reason.

Patterson: Come with me and you’ll be free of the Brotherhood.

The Brotherhood of the Bell concludes in a very TV movie-ish place. In other words, it offers hope. It might be, with all the attention focussed on Patterson, that the Bell wouldn’t choose to arrange an accident (although, as noted above, that hasn’t stopped untimely demises of African leaders lately). They could very easily have him committed, though. The scene in the subway tunnel would, in an actual cinema release – see The Parallax View – surely have spelled Patterson’s freeze-frame demise. Instead, we leave with the idea that he has succeeded in persuading “someone else to stand up”, and there is some hope. Yeah, right.

In terms of the reach of the Bell, it might be tempting simply to swap in freemasonry as a whole, since it is an easy means of ensuring any member, as an isolated cog in the chain, will simply do their bit, no questions asked. But Karp is evidently offering more of a mix and match for the Bush clan’s Yale Skull and Bones Society (he offers no explicit requirement that they work through lower-level freemasonic ties in larger society either, but it wouldn’t be a stretch to construe this). The implication is clear, though: this is an elite lodge, the elite of the (known) elite. Yet even there, most members will remain oblivious of its reach through everyday life. Compartmentalisation is key to success.

Burns: Tell me about this secret society you belong to.

The Brotherhood of the Bell was shown as a CBS Thursday Night Movie. As noted it was – perhaps surprisingly; perhaps the Bell didn’t catch the screening, or perhaps they liked the deniability of the fictionalising publicity – Emmy nominated for writing and direction. Director Paul Wendkos worked mostly in TV but also dabbled in movies at this time (including Satanic body-swap movie The Mephisto Waltz). His work is first rate, enhanced by a superb unnerving Jerry Goldsmith score that makes you think you might be beaten over the head by insidious goings-on at any moment. David Karp adapted his novel 1952 The Brotherhood of Velvet previously for a 1958 Studio One episode.

Harmon: All I’m saying is that the existence of a super-secret organisation, the kind of white Anglo-Saxon mafia of rich influential men, is a bit lurid for my taste.

It’s a long time since I saw The Star Chamber, but I recall it being similarly in-over-your-head, if on a much more trad Hollywood (the group of judges are more vigilante than Illuminati, but they induce similarly paranoiac effects). As for The Skulls, and Rob Cohen’s claim “I knew a lot about the secret societies” of Harvard, one might perhaps believe him, given the public allegations against him. It’s no wonder Wendkos and Karp’s picture has gained a lot of traction in recent years, taken for a legitimate, unsensational examination of the circles within circles of secret societies; it’s refreshingly un-Hollywood. It’s a wonder The Brotherhood of the Bell got made at all.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe he had one too many peanut butter and fried banana sandwiches.

3000 Miles to Graceland (2001) (SPOILERS) The kind of movie that makes your average Tarantino knockoff look classy, 3000 Miles to Graceland is both aggressively unpleasant and acutely absent any virtues, either as a script or a stylistic exercise. The most baffling thing about it is how it attracted Kevin Costner and Kurt Russell, particularly since both ought to have been extra choosy at this point, having toplined expensive bombs in the previous half decade that made them significantly less bankable names. And if you’re wondering how this managed to cost the $62m reported on Wiki, it didn’t; Franchise Pictures, one of the backers, was in the business of fraudulently inflating budgets .

We’re looking into a possible pattern of nationwide anti-Catholic hate crimes.

Vampires aka John Carpenter’s Vampires (1998) (SPOILERS) John Carpenter limps less-than-boldly onward, his desiccated cadaver no longer attentive to the filmic basics of quality, taste, discernment, rhyme or reason. Apparently, he made his pre-penultimate picture to see if his enthusiasm for the process truly had drained away, and he only went and discovered he really enjoyed himself. It doesn’t show. Vampires is as flat, lifeless, shoddily shot, framed and edited as the majority of his ’90s output, only with a repellent veneer of macho bombast spread on top to boot.

I dreamed about a guy in a dirty red and green sweater.

A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) (SPOILERS) I first saw A Nightmare on Elm Street a little under a decade after its release, and I was distinctly underwhelmed five or so sequels and all the hype. Not that it didn’t have its moments, but there was an “It’ll do” quality that reflects most of the Wes Craven movies I’ve seen. Aside from the postmodern tease of A New Nightmare – like Last Action Hero , unfairly maligned – I’d never bothered with the rest of the series, in part because I’m just not that big a horror buff, but also because the rule that the first is usually the best in any series, irrespective of genre, tends to hold out more often than not. So now I’m finally getting round to them, and it seemed only fair to start by giving Freddy’s first another shot. My initial reaction holds true.

I must remind you that the scanning experience is usually a painful one.

Scanners (1981) (SPOILERS) David Cronenberg has made a career – albeit, he may have “matured” a little over the past few decades, so it is now somewhat less foregrounded – from sticking up for the less edifying notions of evolution and modern scientific thought. The idea that regress is, in fact, a form of progress, and unpropitious developments are less dead ends than a means to a state or states as yet unappreciated. He began this path with some squeam-worthy body horrors, before genre hopping to more explicit science fiction with Scanners , and with it, greater critical acclaim and a wider audience. And it remains a good movie, even as it suffers from an unprepossessing lead and rather fumbles the last furlong, cutting to the chase when a more measured, considered approach would have paid dividends.

You seem particularly triggered right now. Can you tell me what happened?

Trailers The Matrix Resurrections   The Matrix A woke n ? If nothing else, the arrival of The Matrix Resurrections trailer has yielded much retrospective back and forth on the extent to which the original trilogy shat the bed. That probably isn’t its most significant legacy, of course, in terms of a series that has informed, subconsciously or otherwise, intentionally or otherwise, much of the way in which twenty-first century conspiracy theory has been framed and discussed. It is however, uncontested that a first movie that was officially the “best thing ever”, that aesthetically and stylistically reinvigorated mainstream blockbuster cinema in a manner unseen again until Fury Road , squandered all that good will with astonishing speed by the time 2003 was over.

We got two honkies out there dressed like Hassidic diamond merchants.

The Blues Brothers (1980) (SPOILERS) I had limited awareness of John Belushi’s immense mythos before  The Blues Brothers arrived on retail video in the UK (so 1991?) My familiarity with SNL performers really began with Ghostbusters ’ release, which meant picking up the trail of Jake and Elwood was very much a retrospective deal. I knew Animal House , knew Belushi’s impact there, knew 1941 (the Jaws parody was the best bit), knew Wired was a biopic better avoided. But the minor renaissance he, and they, underwent in the UK in the early ’90s seemed to have been initiated by Jive Bunny and the Mastermixers, of all things; Everybody Needs Somebody was part of their That Sounds Good to Me medley, the first of their hits not to make No.1, and Everybody ’s subsequent single release then just missed the Top Ten. Perhaps it was this that hastened CIC/Universal to putting the comedy out on video. Had the movie done the rounds on UK TV in the 80s? If so, it managed to pass me by. Even bef

Remember. Decision. Consequence.

Day Break (2006) (SPOILERS) Day Break is the rare series that was lucky to get cancelled. And not in a mercy-killing way. It got to tell its story. Sure, apparently there were other stories. Other days to break. But would it have justified going there? Or would it have proved tantalising/reticent about the elusive reason its protagonist has to keep stirring and repeating? You bet it would. Offering occasional crumbs, and then, when it finally comes time to wrap things up, giving an explanation that satisfies no one/is a cop out/offers a hint at some nebulous existential mission better left to the viewer to conjure up on their own. Best that it didn’t even try to go there.

Maybe I’m a heel who hates guys who hate heels.

Crimewave (1985) (SPOILERS) A movie’s makers’ disowning it doesn’t necessarily mean there’s nothing of worth therein, just that they don’t find anything of worth in it. Or the whole process of making it too painful to contemplate. Sam Raimi’s had a few of those, experiencing traumas with Darkman a few years after Crimewave . But I, blissfully unaware of such issues, was bowled over by it when I caught it a few years after its release (I’d hazard it was BBC2’s American Wave 2 season in 1988). This was my first Sam Raimi movie, and I was instantly a fan of whoever it was managed to translate the energy and visual acumen of a cartoon to the realm of live action. The picture is not without its problems – and at least some of them directly correspond to why it’s so rueful for Raimi – but that initial flair I recognised still lifts it.

I admit it. I live in a highly excited state of overstimulation.

Videodrome (1983) (SPOILERS) I’m one of those who thinks Cronenberg’s version of Total Recall would have been much more satisfying than the one we got (which is pretty good, but flawed; I’m referring to the Arnie movie, of course, not the Farrell). The counter is that Videodrome makes a Cronenberg Philip K Dick adaptation largely redundant. It makes his later Existenz largely redundant too. Videodrome remains a strikingly potent achievement, taking the directors thematic obsessions to the next level, one as fixated on warping the mind as the body. Like many Cronenbergs, it isn’t quite there, but it exerts a hold on the viewer not dissimilar to the one slowly entwining its protagonist Max Renn (James Woods).

White nights getting to you?

Insomnia (2002) (SPOILERS) I’ve never been mad keen on Insomnia . It’s well made, well-acted, the screenplay is solid and it fits in neatly with Christopher Nolan’s abiding thematic interests, but it’s… There’s something entirely adequateabout it. It isn’t pushing any kind of envelope. It’s happy to be the genre-bound crime study it is and nothing more, something emphasised by Pacino’s umpteenth turn as an under-pressure cop.