Skip to main content

Blimey, Sour Crout!

Two-Way Stretch
(1960)

(SPOILERS) Did Ronnie Barker have Peter Sellers’ Dodger Lane in mind when he approached the role of Norman Stanley Fletcher? They’re both very much the resigned con versed in pulling the wool over the eyes of the warders yet forced to contend with a hard-case nemesis. Sellers is very good in Two-Way Stretch, but as with the later The Wrong Arm of the Law (also from the pens of John Warren and Len Heath), he’s upstaged by the magnificence that is Lionel Jeffries.

Sour Crout: Basket weaving. I’ll get you baskets a weaving, don’t you worry.

Jeffries’ comedic high point might be Sergeant Major Sidney McGregor in Michael Winner classic – yes, reallyYou Must Be Joking! a few years later. That one was co-written by Alan Hackney of Private’s Progress and I’m Alright Jack, and he also contributes here, which may explain why it’s a notch above The Wrong Arm of the Law. Jeffries is another Sidney in this, Prison Officer Sidney “Sour” Crout, and he’s a vision of splenetic authoritarianism unleashed, spitting his orders at the top of his lungs and over pronouncing his every gesture (including a hilariously cartoonish quavering salute).

Dodger Lane, Lennie “The Dip” Price (Bernard Cribbins, also later of The Wrong Arm of the Law) and Jelly Knight (David Lodge) live a luxurious locked-up life in HM Prison Huntley, with all the contraband they could wish for, easy non-rigorous duties, a kindly pushover CPO Jenkins (George Woodbridge) and a rehabilitation-minded Prison Governor Horatio Bennett (Maurice Denham). The latter of whom is even more interested in the welfare of his prize marrows than the men’s. It’s something of a shock, then, when Jenkins retires and Sour Crout is installed in his place, fully intent on enforcing a rigorous and exacting regime. This is even more of a bind as the trio’s old partner in crime, the delightfully named Soapy Stevens (Wilfrid Hyde-White in one of his career-defining turns), has concocted a scheme to rob a sheikh of his diamonds (£2m worth) while they are still incarcerated. This presents them with a perfect alibi but also the thorny problem of achieving this with Crout bearing down on them.

Dodger: Don’t panic! Just remember what the poet said. If you can keep your ‘ead while all about you are doing their nuts, you’re a better man than I am, Gunga Din.

As with The Wrong Arm of the Law – where crooks and coppers must collaborate against a greater enemy, an antipodean one – Two-Way Stretch boasts an irresistible premise. And like the later The Italian Job, when it comes to the robbery itself, it is pulled off relatively hitch-free. Obviously, though, the criminal element can’t be seen to get away with it, so there’s a last-minute snag (nevertheless, like Charlie Croker, Dodger has an idea, as seen in the final scene). Much of the mid-section of the movie – Crout arrives on the prison premises at about the half-hour mark – comprises compromised attempts to hatch an exit plan from the nick.

The introduction has successfully established all the main players, with Soapy paying regular visits in the guise of a vicar keen on the recuperation of the three shortly to be released inmates ex- of his parish (on the day after the robbery). We also meet accomplices Mrs Price (Irene Handl on especially toothless form) – “Three years you’ve been in here now, and never once have you tried to escape” she scolds son Lennie – and Dodger’s intended Ethel (the utterly awesome Liz Fraser). Soapy isn’t entirely trusted by the trio, on account of his having an alibi for their last job (we also learn he “tried to flog a couple of aircraft carriers”, although it’s unclear if this was the same crime).

Inevitably, Crout’s attempts to curtail the trio’s endeavours fall foul of his boss. First, he sets them to work in the stone quarry, until some over-applied dynamite results in the destruction of Bennett’s prize marrow. Then he discovers a tunnel being dug under the yard during some strenuous PT; coming up in Bennett’s prize roses does even less for his reputation. Eventually, they hit on using a Black Maria and smuggling themselves out that way (Soapy’s presence as the driver increasingly encourages Crout’s suspicions: “Aven’t I seen you somewhere before?”)

Ethel: Looking forward to coming out?
Dodger: No, I decided I’d like to stay here for the rest of my life.
Ethel: But I thought you didn’t like it here?

Admittedly, Jeffries is largely out of the picture during the heist scenes, but this is more than made up for by Handl and Fraser. You could argue at the logistics of ensuring the army-escorted van stops precisely under the manhole necessary for the job to succeed, but that’s part of the fun with these escapades. The only thing missing is Sid James to respond to Fraser’s pleas for help with her broken-down car: “I’m so glad you stopped. I don’t seem to be sparking properly” (ra-ha-ha) and “I do hope it’s not my big end” (ra-ha-ha)

Sour Crout: Soapy Stevens! You’re hiding him, aren’t you?

Crout engineers the transition from hopeless disaster – picking a fight with a coterie of reverends he accuses of being in on it with Soapy, whom he recognises at the station – to elation when he catches Stevens. And the search of the trio’s train by the Law leads to the classic “I must say, you’ve got the perfect alibi” (unfortunately, Lennie has already been precariously dispatched to the train’s roof with the loot).

It’s the balance of cast members that makes a movie like this sing. Jeffries and Sellers are perfect counterweights, but without the necessary support structure, the picture would be pretty bare. Cribbins is in cultivated innocent mode (“Ere’s a nasty evil little face I’ve not met before” observes Crout). Hyde-White is believably wily and over-confident (not so convincing when trying not to be posh, though). Denham and Woodbridge are commendably oblivious (you feel for poor Jenkins having to return the parting gift of a pocket watch when he discovers they swiped it from the Governor, such that his merriment on learning who his replacement is much earned: “Oh yes, sir. I know him. And tell the lads I wish them the very best of luck!”)

There are numerous amusing incidentals of prison life. Mrs Price trying to smuggle in a “home perm kit” (a bag full of prison-break tools) – and including a file in Jenkins’ leaving cake. The men habitually swiping all the Governor’s cigarettes whenever they’re in his office. The various prison pets, including a messenger pigeon – “Make it? ’E’ll walk it!” – and pet cat Strangeways (of whom we never learn the fate, once Crout has banished him). Also notable are Beryl Reid as a Women’s Institute visitor, Thorley Walters and John Wood as army officers, and Warren Mitchell as a tailoring inmate (“Touch of the Terry-Thomas, sir” he comments of a horrendously spangly waistcoat).

Director Robert Day’s debut was the rather wonderful The Green Man. This was his first and only time working with Sellers, and it was a testing experience. The actor caused four days of delays, refusing to show on set following arguments and listening to “this cadre of people around him that would say one thing, and I was advising him to go in another direction. And finally he came around”. Such behaviour ultimately led to the debacle of Casino Royale, of course, and Day characterised such antics as a symptom of his success:

Peter Sellers was extremely neurotic and at the core very insecure. He was really best at impersonating characters, rather than being a good actor. Two-Way Stretch was really early in his working career. Halfway through the movie he was given a “star” complex. The film people felt he was up and coming.

It's easy to see where Day was coming from with regard to Seller’s range, since he was generally better at, and more comfortable, with caricatures – even soft caricatures as here – than attempting seriously stretching thespian manoeuvres.

Dodger: When you knock off any money, lads never put it on the Stock Exchange. I’ll tell you that for nothing.

By the time Two-Way Stretch came out, the “gentle” British comedy of Ealing and the Boultings had hit its peak, and the decline would manifest increasingly as the new decade progressed (come its mid-point, they were effectively a thing of the past, and You Must Be Joking! can be put down to the hip and happening Winner more than its retro flavour). There’s no sign of that here, though. Comedies like this come with a readily identifiable complement of stars and faces, and at this point, and really up until collaborating with Kubrick, Sellers fitted seamlessly into their number. A word too for Ken Jones’ jauntily-louche theme tune, the perfect accompaniment to proceedings.

Popular posts from this blog

I’m smarter than a beaver.

Prey (2022) (SPOILERS) If nothing else, I have to respect Dan Trachtenberg’s cynical pragmatism. How do I not only get a project off the ground, but fast-tracked as well? I know, a woke Predator movie! Woke Disney won’t be able to resist! And so, it comes to pass. Luckily for Prey , it gets to bypass cinemas and so the same sorry fate of Lightyear . Less fortunately, it’s a patience-testing snook cocking at historicity (or at least, assumed historicity), in which a young, pint-sized Comanche girl who wishes to hunt and fish – and doubtless shoot to boot – with the big boys gets to take on a Predator and make mincemeat of him. Well, of course , she does. She’s a girl, innit?

Just because you are a character doesn't mean that you have character.

Pulp Fiction (1994) (SPOILERS) From a UK perspective, Pulp Fiction ’s success seemed like a fait accompli; Reservoir Dogs had gone beyond the mere cult item it was Stateside and impacted mainstream culture itself (hard to believe now that it was once banned on home video); it was a case of Tarantino filling a gap in the market no one knew was there until he drew attention to it (and which quickly became over-saturated with pale imitators subsequently). Where his debut was a grower, Pulp Fiction hit the ground running, an instant critical and commercial success (it won the Palme d’Or four months before its release), only made cooler by being robbed of the Best Picture Oscar by Forrest Gump . And unlike some famously-cited should-have-beens, Tarantino’s masterpiece really did deserve it.

I’m the famous comedian, Arnold Braunschweiger.

Last Action Hero (1993) (SPOILERS) Make no mistake, Last Action Hero is a mess. But even as a mess, it might be more interesting than any other movie Arnie made during that decade, perhaps even in his entire career. Hellzapoppin’ (after the 1941 picture, itself based on a Broadway revue) has virtually become an adjective to describe films that comment upon their own artifice, break the fourth wall, and generally disrespect the convention of suspending disbelief in the fictions we see parading across the screen. It was fairly audacious, some would say foolish, of Arnie to attempt something of that nature at this point in his career, which was at its peak, rather than playing it safe. That he stumbled profoundly, emphatically so since he went up against the behemoth that is Jurassic Park (slotted in after the fact to open first), should not blind one to the considerable merits of his ultimate, and final, really, attempt to experiment with the limits of his screen persona.

Death to Bill and Ted!

Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) (SPOILERS) The game of how few sequels are actually better than the original is so well worn, it was old when Scream 2 made a major meta thing out of it (and it wasn’t). Bill & Ted Go to Hell , as Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey was originally called, is one such, not that Excellent Adventure is anything to be sneezed at, but this one’s more confident, even more playful, more assured and more smartly stupid. And in Peter Hewitt it has a director with a much more overt and fittingly cartoonish style than the amiably pedestrian Stephen Herrick. Evil Bill : First, we totally kill Bill and Ted. Evil Ted : Then we take over their lives. My recollection of the picture’s general consensus was that it surpassed the sleeper hit original, but Rotten Tomatoes’ review aggregator suggests a less universal response. And, while it didn’t rock any oceans at the box office, Bogus Journey and Point Break did quite nicely for Keanu Reev

Everyone creates the thing they dread.

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) (SPOILERS) Avengers: Age of Ultron ’s problem isn’t one of lack. It benefits from a solid central plot. It features a host of standout scenes and set pieces. It hands (most of) its characters strong defining moments. It doesn’t even suffer now the “wow” factor of seeing the team together for the first time has subsided. Its problem is that it’s too encumbered. Maybe its asking to much of a director to effectively martial the many different elements required by an ensemble superhero movie such as this, yet Joss Whedon’s predecessor feels positively lean in comparison. Part of this is simply down to the demands of the vaster Marvel franchise machine. Seeds are laid for Captain America: Civil War , Infinity Wars I & II , Black Panther and Thor: Ragnarok . It feels like several spinning plates too many. Such activity occasionally became over-intrusive on previous occasions ( Iron Man II ), but there are points in Age of Ultron whe

Poetry in translation is like taking a shower with a raincoat on.

Paterson (2016) (SPOILERS) Spoiling a movie where nothing much happens is difficult, but I tend to put the tag on in a cautionary sense much of the time. Paterson is Jim Jarmusch at his most inert and ambient but also his most rewardingly meditative. Paterson (Adam Driver), a bus driver and modest poet living in Paterson, New Jersey, is a stoic in a fundamental sense, and if he has a character arc of any description, which he doesn’t really, it’s the realisation that is what he is. Jarmusch’s picture is absent major conflict or drama; the most significant episodes feature Paterson’s bus breaking down, the English bull terrier Marvin – whom Paterson doesn’t care for but girlfriend Laura (Golshifteh Farahani) dotes on – destroying his book of poetry, and an altercation at the local bar involving a gun that turns out to be a water pistol. And Paterson takes it all in his stride, genial to the last, even the ruination of his most earnest, devoted work (the only disappoint

If you ride like lightning, you're going to crash like thunder.

The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) (SPOILERS) There’s something daringly perverse about the attempt to weave a serious-minded, generation-spanning saga from the hare-brained premise of The Place Beyond the Pines . When he learns he is a daddy, a fairground stunt biker turns bank robber in order to provide for his family. It’s the kind of “only-in-Hollywood” fantasy premise you might expect from a system that unleashed Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man and Point Break on the world. But this is an indie-minded movie from the director of the acclaimed Blue Valentine ; it demands respect and earnest appraisal. Unfortunately it never recovers from the abject silliness of the set-up. The picture is littered with piecemeal characters and scenarios. There’s a hope that maybe the big themes will even out the rocky terrain but in the end it’s because of this overreaching ambition that the film ends up so undernourished. The inspiration for the movie

This entire edifice you see around you, built on jute.

Jeeves and Wooster 3.3: Cyril and the Broadway Musical  (aka Introduction on Broadway) Well, that’s a relief. After a couple of middling episodes, the third season bounces right back, and that's despite Bertie continuing his transatlantic trip. Clive Exton once again plunders  Carry On, Jeeves  but this time blends it with a tale from  The Inimitable Jeeves  for the brightest spots, as Cyril Basington-Basington (a sublimely drippy Nicholas Hewetson) pursues his stage career against Aunt Agatha's wishes.

I think it’s pretty clear whose side the Lord’s on, Barrington.

Monte Carlo or Bust aka  Those Daring Young Men in Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) (SPOILERS) Ken Annakin’s semi-sequel to Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines tends to be rather maligned, usually compared negatively to its more famous predecessor. Which makes me rather wonder if those expressing said opinion have ever taken the time to scrutinise them side by side. Or watch them back to back (which would be more sensible). Because Monte Carlo or Bust is by far the superior movie. Indeed, for all its imperfections and foibles (not least a performance from Tony Curtis requiring a taste for comic ham), I adore it. It’s probably the best wacky race movie there is, simply because each set of competitors, shamelessly exemplifying a different national stereotype (albeit there are two pairs of Brits, and a damsel in distress), are vibrant and cartoonish in the best sense. Albeit, it has to be admitted that, as far as said stereotypes go, Annakin’s home side win

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.