Skip to main content

Oh shit! Maybe his head just got loose and fell off. What do you want from me?

Q – The Winged Serpent
(1982)

(SPOILERS) In which an ancient Aztec god dupes a significant portion of the American – nay, global –population into inaction and so exacerbates mass depopulation. Decapitation optional. It’s curious how a letter can be appropriated and so become almost exclusively associated with one thing. X has obviously had several variants (rays, Files, certificates), but prior to QAnon, the seventeenth letter was probably most identified with tips, Spike Milligan or an abbreviated question. And also, trailing the pack by some considerable distance, this: Q – The Winged Serpent

Commissioner McConnell: You are talking about the incarnation of some ancient Aztec god, and it’s my duty to kill it. Now, it’s much easier to think of killing a bird than a god.

It’s curious that Larry Cohen, exploitation movie maestro par excellence, should have fixated on an incarnation of Quetzalcoatl (Q) in quite this form. As much as we can trust officially approved histories, it’s said the earliest depiction of the Aztec deity was as an actual snake, but not, to my understanding, one with wings that flapped around snatching human victims before sucking their flesh off. Q was a feathered serpent, and like all Aztec deities, he was to some degree associated with honorific human sacrifice (but in some traditions was said to oppose it). Generally, it seems that, rather than a winged serpent, he was a “serpent of precious feathers” yet allegorically the “wisest of men”. He was the Aztec god of wind and air and learning, patron god of the priesthood, creator deity contributing to mankind’s inception, and also represented a priestly title and was associated with Venus, the morning star (which might lend itself to Luciferian connotations).

It seems Quetzalcoatl developed human characteristics as his worship progressed. Coming into the mix are Christ associations (virgin birth in some traditions), and from this we are eventually led into the Cortes idea, that he was greeted/worshipped as the return of Quetzalcoatl (possibly Spanish propaganda, possibly simply that he was being recognised as a returning priest of similar name). Apparently, the one-time president of the Mormon church suggested "we can come to no other conclusion than that Quetzalcoatl and Christ are the same being". So, if one were inclined to draw a line between Quetzalcoatl and QAnon, there’s a ready-made Trump/Q/saviour narrative there. I’m unsure the serpent connotations would generally be embraced, however.

In Cohen’s telling, Q has been prayed back into existence by an Aztec cult ritually murdering willing victims (including Bruce Carradine). Detective Shepard (David Carradine) and Sergeant Powell (Richard Roundtree) are investigating this at the same time a winged (featherless) lizard creature builds a nest at the top of the Chrysler Building when it isn’t flapping about the city in aforesaid manner plucking unlucky, less willing victims. Invariably with assorted splatter on passers-by below. It isn’t long before the remarkably credulous Shepard has connected the dots between the two spates of murders. Meanwhile, Michael Moriarty’s small-time crook Jimmy Quinn happens upon the nest following a diamond heist gone wrong and eventually offers up the location of the beast in return for a full amnesty (“Yeah, didn’t Ford pardon Nixon for anything and everything? I’m just asking for a Nixon-like pardon”).

Detective Shepard: It wouldn’t be the first time in history a monster was mistaken for a god. I guess that’s why I have to kill it. If you can kill it it’s not a god, just a god old-fashioned monster.

Kim Newman in Nightmare Movies has it that this style of ungodly deity is key to Cohen’s oeuvre (“Detective Shepard’s problem with the distinction between God and Monster is Cohen’s most recurrent theme"). And indeed, “the director generally interprets godhood as an urge to smite multitudes”. It’s easy to plum for such positions when plundering a religion favouring human sacrifice, something Cohen identifies: “They give themselves to the gods willingly” notes Shepard, with an arch “Nowadays, all we have to do is take the wafer and drink the wine. That’s what I call civilised”. There’s even a philosophical treatise on the subject of the divine: “What else is God but an invisible force we fear? For centuries, we’ve tried to make it into our image… Perhaps it’s only our vanity… The figure of that serpent keeps turning up all the time… Perhaps at one time, the whole world was covered with these kinds of birds and then they became extinct”.

Let’s not get carried away, though. Cohen’s designs are less than high-minded as a whole. It’s simply that he dances to his own tune, so all sorts of ideas and ruminations can end up in the mix. “I would hardly call him the John Cassavetes of exploitation movies, but he does have a certain raw, visceral, realistic style” said Joe Dante. Alex Cox when presenting Moviedrome – the first time I saw Q – called Cohen “a true guerrilla filmmaker” and Q “a combination of a slasher movie and King Kong”. He added “Cohen has very bad taste, but he knows how to keep a story moving” and has a “nice eye for detail and a perverse sense of humour”. Newman also made the monster movie comparison, referencing a “split level world that is part King Kong and part Mean Streets”.

I haven’t seen many of Cohen’s other directorial efforts (only The Ambulance springs to mind), but it’s definitely the sense of humour here that most appeals. That and the attempt at genre mashup. Looking for the head of a victim, Shepard is dismissive about its state of disrepair (“D’you ever drop a cantaloupe from forty stories?”) The monster animation is expectedly rough and ready, and there’s some hilarious model work of falling Q victims. Shepard’s boss ponders “that thing could fly miles into New York City every day. And it would do that, of course, you know, because New York is famous for good eating” (not a great distance from there to Predator 2).

The cast are also good value. Carradine, from a long line of degenerates, was a pal of Cohen’s and delivers the downbeat cop with aplomb. Roundtree definitely gets a short straw, and Q claws. Candy Clark is Quinn’s had-enough girlfriend. Moriarty takes the main honours though, particularly on form when it comes to his deal (“Get Rupert down here, with his arm around me” he requests, alluding to the Murdoch empire). Cohen referred to the performance as “Oscar worthy, I think, in this picture”.

Q – The Winged Serpent has been called Cohen’s signature film, and he waxed warmly about it on Trailers from Hell, telling of how they film “88 stories above the street with no net” and “nobody fell off the Chrysler Building, which was the most amazing thing”. They also fired machine guns within worrying distance of the UN Building, lending itself to headlines of the “Film crew terrorises downtown New York” variety. He made it in typically gung-ho style, shooting for eighteen days beginning the day after he was fired from I, the Jury.

Cohen also, of course, had a more mainstream profile as a writer (Best Seller, Body Snatchers, Guilty as Sin, Phone Booth, Cellular) and suggested Godzilla (1998) was an outrageous rip off of Q. He might have a point there. He was sanguine, however, since Dean Devlin went on to buy his Cellular screenplay, perhaps as atonement. Q – The Winged Serpent is cheerfully unfinessed, something you could never say of a Roland Emmerich movie. But then, Larry Cohen wouldn’t have it any other way.


Popular posts from this blog

Abandon selective targeting. Shoot everything.

28 Weeks Later (2007) (SPOILERS) The first five minutes of 28 Weeks Later are far and away the best part of this sequel, offering in quick succession a devastating moral quandary and a waking nightmare, immortalised on the screen. After that, while significantly more polished, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo reveals his concept to be altogether inferior to Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s, falling back on the crutches of gore, nihilism, and disengaging and limiting shifts of focus between characters in whom one has little investment in the first place.

The Bible never said anything about amphetamines.

The Color of Money (1986) (SPOILERS) I tend to think it’s evident when Scorsese isn’t truly exercised by material. He can still invest every ounce of the technical acumen at his fingertips, and the results can dazzle on that level, but you don’t really feel the filmmaker in the film. Which, for one of his pictures to truly carry a wallop, you need to do. We’ve seen quite a few in such deficit in recent years, most often teaming with Leo. The Color of Money , however, is the first where it was out-and-out evident the subject matter wasn’t Marty’s bag. He needed it, desperately, to come off, but in the manner a tradesman who wants to keep getting jobs. This sequel to The Hustler doesn’t linger in the mind, however good it may be, moment by moment.

Captain, he who walks in fire will burn his feet.

The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1973) (SPOILERS) Ray Harryhausen returns to the kind of unadulterated fantasy material that made Jason and the Argonauts such a success – swords & stop motion, if you like. In between, there were a couple of less successful efforts, HG Wells adaptation First Men in the Moon and The Valley of the Gwangi (which I considered the best thing ever as a kid: dinosaur walks into a cowboy movie). Harryhausen’s special-effects supremacy – in a for-hire capacity – had also been consummately eclipsed by Raquel Welch’s fur bikini in One Million Years B.C . The Golden Voyage of Sinbad follows the expected Dynamation template – blank-slate hero, memorable creatures, McGuffin quest – but in its considerable favour, it also boasts a villainous performance by nobody-at-the-time, on-the-cusp-of-greatness Tom Baker.

If this were a hoax, would we have six dead men up on that mountain?

The X-Files 4.24: Gethsemane   Season Four is undoubtedly the point at which the duff arc episodes begin to amass, encroaching upon the decent ones for dominance. Fortunately, however, the season finale is a considerable improvement’s on Three’s, even if it’s a long way from the cliffhanger high of 2.25: Anasazi .

My hands hurt from galloping.

Ghostbusters: Afterlife (2021) (SPOILERS) Say what you like about the 2016 reboot, at least it wasn’t labouring under the illusion it was an Amblin movie. Ghostbusters 3.5 features the odd laugh, but it isn’t funny, and it most definitely isn’t scary. It is, however, shamelessly nostalgic for, and reverential towards, the original(s), which appears to have granted it a free pass in fan circles. It didn’t deserve one.

Your desecration of reality will not go unpunished.

2021-22 Best-of, Worst-of and Everything Else Besides The movies might be the most visible example of attempts to cling onto cultural remnants as the previous societal template clatters down the drain. It takes something people really want – unlike a Bond movie where he kicks the can – to suggest the model of yesteryear, one where a billion-dollar grosser was like sneezing. You can argue Spider-Man: No Way Home is replete with agendas of one sort or another, and that’s undoubtedly the case (that’s Hollywood), but crowding out any such extraneous elements (and they often are) is simply a consummate crowd-pleaser that taps into tangible nostalgia through its multiverse take. Of course, nostalgia for a mere seven years ago, for something you didn’t like anyway, is a symptom of how fraught these times have become.

I’ve heard the dancing’s amazing, but the music sucks.

Tick, Tick… Boom! (2021) (SPOILERS) At one point in Tick, Tick… Boom! – which really ought to have been the title of an early ’90s Steven Seagal vehicle – Andrew Garfield’s Jonathan Larson is given some sage advice on how to find success in his chosen field: “ On the next, maybe try writing about what you know ”. Unfortunately, the very autobiographical, very-meta result – I’m only surprised the musical doesn’t end with Larson finishing writing this musical, in which he is finishing writing his musical, in which he is finishing writing his musical… – takes that acutely literally.

Out of my way, you lubberly oaf, or I’ll slit your gullet and shove it down your gizzard!

The Princess and the Pirate (1944) (SPOILERS) As I suggested when revisiting The Lemon Drop Kid , you’re unlikely to find many confessing to liking Bob Hope movies these days. Even Chevy Chase gets higher approval ratings. If asked to attest to the excruciating stand-up comedy Hope, the presenter and host, I doubt even diehards would proffer an endorsement. Probably even fewer would admit to having a hankering for Hope, were they aware of, or further still gave credence to, alleged MKUltra activities. But the movie comedy Hope, the fourth-wall breaking, Road -travelling quipster-coward of (loosely) 1939-1952? That Hope’s a funny guy, mostly, and many of his movies during that period are hugely inventive, creative comedies that are too easily dismissed under the “Bob Hope sucks” banner. The Princess and the Pirate is one of them.

Who gave you the crusade franchise? Tell me that.

The Star Chamber (1983) (SPOILERS) Peter Hyams’ conspiracy thriller might simply have offered sauce too weak to satisfy, reining in the vast machinations of an all-powerful hidden government found commonly during ’70s fare and substituting it with a more ’80s brand that failed to include that decade’s requisite facile resolution. There’s a good enough idea here – instead of Charles Bronson, it’s the upper echelons of the legal system resorting to vigilante justice – but The Star Chamber suffers from a failure of nerve, repenting its premise just as it’s about to dig into the ramifications.

You’re going to make me drop a donkey.

Encanto (2021) (SPOILERS) By my estimation, Disney brand pictures are currently edging ahead of the Pixars. Not that there’s a whole lot in it, since neither have been at full wattage for a few years now. Raya and the Last Dragon and now Encanto are collectively just about superior to Soul and Luca . Generally, the animation arm’s attempts to take in as much cultural representation as they possibly can, to make up for their historic lack of woke quotas, has – ironically – had the effect of homogenising the product to whole new levels. So here we have Colombia, renowned the world over for the US’s benign intervention in their region, not to mention providing the CIA with subsistence income, beneficently showered with gifts from the US’s greatest artistic benefactor.