Skip to main content

Damn prairie dog burrow!

Tremors
(1990)

(SPOILERS) I suspect the reason the horror comedy – or the sci-fi comedy, come to that – doesn’t tend to be the slam-dunk goldmine many assume it must be, is because it takes a certain sensibility to do it right. Everyone isn’t a Joe Dante or Sam Raimi, or a John Landis, John Carpenter, Edgar Wright, Christopher Landon or even a Peter Jackson or Tim Burton, and the genre is littered with financial failures, some of them very good failures (and a good number of them from the names mentioned). Tremors was one, only proving a hit on video (hence six sequels at last count). It also failed to make Ron Underwood a directing legend.

Burt Gummer: What have you people got against being prepared?

Perhaps because he didn’t really have the sensibility. Like many a once-bright big-screen hope, he’s now carving out a regular gig helming TV shows, and it was one of those genre blends that really did for him. Sci-fi comedy The Adventures of Pluto Nash, no less. After Tremors, which was tooled as an R-rated movie then hastily reconfigured as PG-13 (you can tell, although it was allegedly for language rather than the copious violence), he scored big with another desert-set comedy, City Slickers. And then floundered about uncertainly for the rest of the 1990s. Supernatural comic fantasy (uh-oh) Hearts and Souls bombed. So did speechwriter romcom Multiplicity. Mighty Joe Young did middling business (and cost a lot). It’s no surprise Underwood gave up. Ruben Fleischer’s career – which also started on a horror comedy – looked to be charting a similar trajectory until Venom. And who knows, in the wake of Uncharted, he may resume said trajectory.

Burt Gummer: I wouldn’t give you a gun if it was World War III!

Tremors originated with Brent Maddock and SS Wilson, who earned the screenplay credit and continued their association with the first three sequels. They developed the plot with pal Underwood, the Graboids eventually replacing their land sharks at his suggestion. Maddock and Wilson had previously scored big with the not-at-all racist Short Circuit movies and *batteries not included. And less so with everyone’s once-favourite TV dad turned Ghost Dad (Wild Wild West would be the real killer for them, though). You get a sense of their comedic territory, and when you look at some of the other quirky mid-budget fare that failed to catch a break thereafter – Lake Placid, Arachnophobia, Eight Legged FreaksTremors’ deft touch becomes all the more impressive. They blamed the marketing for the movie’s failure; certainly, I only heard of it the weekend of its US release (but was instantly graboided with a hankering to see it).

Burt Gummer: A few household chemicals in the proper proportions.

Underwood’s flair for the action and effects is definitely part of the formula for success. The budget was low, but the creature props look great, and the Jaws approach of “suggest don’t show” (until you do, at which point, it’s much better than Bruce) works effectively for the early kills. And indeed, for anything requiring someone or something to be sucked into or dragged across the ground.

Valentine McKee: Can you fly, you sucker? Can you fly?

As important, though, are the characters. And Fred Ward and Kevin Bacon make a supremely likeable couple of handymen, Earl Bass and Valentine McKee, on the verge of leaving Perfection, Nevada for good… until they find they can’t, owing to the Graboid incursion. Ward had a stellar 1990, with this and Miami Blues (less so Henry & June, perhaps, but it was nevertheless a trio of leads, and thus a level of success he wouldn’t have a sniff of again; I say success, it’s surely no coincidence that neither three were hits and he wasn’t exactly in demand for main protagonist duties after that). His easy-going earthiness makes a great foil for Bacon’s wirier hotshot (check out Ward’s early reaction to Bacon finally hitting a nail). The latter, naturally, has a love interest (Finn Carter’s grad science Student Rhonda, most notable for how shamelessly the makers ensure she loses her trousers), towards whom he must overcome his own particular hang ups about perfection (geddit).

Burt Gummer: Broke into the wrong goddamn rec room, didn’t you, you bastard!

There’s also Michael Gross, ex of Family Ties and providing a rare legit survivalist hero in the movies as Burt Gummer; he’d return to the role in all six sequels and the 2003 TV series, which is some dedication. Or desperation. Probably the most satisfying scene revolves around the carnage he and equally survivalist wife Heather (Reba McEntire) unleash on a hapless Graboid that bursts into their basement. As if it needs stressing, there are no concerns about conservation voiced here (something that would perversely blight Jurassic Park a few years later, and prevent it from having any real bite).

The writers have some fun with possible causes of the menace: “mutations caused by radiation”, the government built “a big surprise for the Russians”, and “I vote for outer space. No way these are local boys”. Meanwhile, Rhonda asserts there’s “nothing like it in the fossil record” (it being Caederus Mexicana). Which seems strange. Has she never encountered a Mongolian Death Worm?

Earl Bass: People? Hell, National Geographic.

Also present is genre favourite Victor Wong (to be seen in Big Trouble in Little China and Prince of Darkness in the previous few years), Ariana Richards (Jurassic Park) and Robert Jayne (stoner Johnny Applegate in the same year’s forgotten gem Meet the Applegates). Tremors builds with a sure pace and knows its territory, laying down a siege while killing off a few additional, assorted dispensable characters. There are just enough Graboids (four) that the threat delivers gradations of risk-reward along the way. And at just over ninety minutes, the movie also knows not to avoid bloat. It’s easy to see why Tremors has earned such cult appeal; there are even unapologetic advocates of some, if not all, of the sequels.


Popular posts from this blog

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

If I do nothing else, I will convince them that Herbert Stempel knows what won the goddam Academy Award for Best goddam Picture of 1955. That’s what I’m going to accomplish.

Quiz Show (1994) (SPOILERS) Quiz Show perfectly encapsulates a certain brand of Best Picture nominee: the staid, respectable, diligent historical episode, a morality tale in response to which the Academy can nod their heads approvingly and discerningly, feeding as it does their own vainglorious self-image about how times and attitudes have changed, in part thanks to their own virtuousness. Robert Redford’s film about the 1950s Twenty-One quiz show scandals is immaculately made, boasts a notable cast and is guided by a strong screenplay from Paul Attanasio (who, on television, had just created the seminal Homicide: Life on the Streets ), but it lacks that something extra that pushes it into truly memorable territory.

Other monks will meet their deaths here. And they too will have blackened fingers. And blackened tongues.

The Name of the Rose (1986) (SPOILERS) Umberto Eco wasn’t awfully impressed by Jean Jacques-Annaud’s adaptation of his novel – or “ palimpsest of Umberto Eco’s novel ” as the opening titles announce – to the extent that he nixed further movie versions of his work. Later, he amended that view, calling it “ a nice movie ”. He also, for balance, labelled The Name of the Rose his worst novel – “ I hate this book and I hope you hate it too ”. Essentially, he was begrudging its renown at the expense of his later “ superior ” novels. I didn’t hate the novel, although I do prefer the movie, probably because I saw it first and it was everything I wanted from a medieval Sherlock Holmes movie set in a monastery and devoted to forbidden books, knowledge and opinions.

You ever heard the saying, “Don’t rob the bank across from the diner that has the best donuts in three counties”?

2 Guns (2013) (SPOILERS) Denzel Washington is such a reliable performer, that it can get a bit boring. You end up knowing every gesture or inflection in advance, whether he’s playing a good guy or a bad guy. And his films are generally at least half decent, so you end up seeing them. Even in Flight (or perhaps especially in Flight ; just watch him chugging down that vodka) where he’s giving it his Oscar-nominatable best, he seems too familiar. I think it may be because he’s an actor who is more effective the less he does. In 2 Guns he’s not doing less, but sometimes it seems like it. That’s because the last person I’d ever expect blows him off the screen; Mark Wahlberg.

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.

Say hello to the Scream Extractor.

Monsters, Inc. (2001) (SPOILERS) I was never the greatest fan of Monsters, Inc. , even before charges began to be levelled regarding its “true” subtext. I didn’t much care for the characters, and I particularly didn’t like the way Pixar’s directors injected their own parenting/ childhood nostalgia into their plots. Something that just seems to go on with their fare ad infinitum. Which means the Pixars I preferred tended to be the Brad Bird ones. You know, the alleged objectivist. Now, though, we learn Pixar has always been about the adrenochrome, so there’s no going back…

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

In a few moments, you will have an experience that will seem completely real. It will be the result of your subconscious fears transformed into your conscious awareness.

Brainstorm (1983) (SPOILERS) Might Brainstorm have been the next big thing – a ground-breaking, game-changing cinematic spectacle that had as far reaching consequences as Star Wars (special effects) or Avatar (3D) – if only Douglas Trumbull had been allowed to persevere with his patented “Showscan” process (70mm film photographed and projected at 60 frames per second)? I suspect not; one only has to look at the not-so-far-removed experiment of Ang Lee with Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk , and how that went down like a bag of cold sick, to doubt that any innovation will necessarily catch on (although Trumbull at least had a narrative hinge on which to turn his “more real than real” imagery, whereas Lee’s pretty much boiled down to “because it was there”). Brainstorm ’s story is, though, like its title, possibly too cerebral, too much concerned with the consciousness and touting too little of the cloyingly affirmative that Bruce Rubin inevitably brings to his screenplays. T

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.