Skip to main content

Evolution has its dead ends.

Resident Evil: Apocalypse

(SPOILERS) Well, that takes some doing. Resident Evil: Apocalypse is discernibly inferior to its less-than-stellar predecessor in almost every respect. Most of all, though, it’s absolutely horridly directed by debut feature helmer Alexander Witt. There’s zero sense of understanding of the frame or how a picture is edited together on display, leading to a disjointed, fractured mess even without the typically disjointed, fractured mess of a Paul WS Anderson screenplay. The strangest thing is that Witt was no ingenue on the directing front; he was an established second-unit director and DP, extending all the way back to Speed. Perhaps everything he shoots for second unit is conceived as a disjointed mess, only to have form when combined with the named director’s work… hence the devasting combination of double the deficits in Apocalypse.

Either way, Witt hasn’t helmed a picture since, so he either realised he sucked at putting one together or… No, that’s the best I can come up with it. Apocalypse fills us in on the Raccoon City fallout before catching up with Milla’s Alice. Cue MKUltra close-ups of eyeballs and lazy use of variable shutter speeds. Witt has no concept of building a scene, let alone a movie. Hence the blunderingly extravagant stunt where Alice leaps through a church window on a motorbike for no discernible reason, in so doing saving new characters including cop Jill Valentine (Sienne Guillory decked out determinedly like a computer game avatar).

Valentine being bona fide from the games, Guillory will return in later sequels, as will Oded Fehr (best known for The Mummys) as Carlos Olivera. Thomas Kretschmann is the main villain, but he’s so unrepentantly and unremarkably mean, there’s little much moustache-twirling fun to be had from him. Jared Harris is the wheelchair-bound dad who developed the T-virus for noble purposes (isn’t it always the way?) and is striving to get his daughter safely out of the city. Also on hand are Mike Epps, Sandrine Holt and Iain Glen, the latter paving the way for a larger role beginning in the third movie.

One might suggest it’s a blessed relief that Apocalypse opts for a tangible Big Bad this time – rather than a CGI one – but when that tangible Big Bad turns out to be a lumbering buffoon, a knock-off of every Alien/Venom fanboy’s wet dreams in features and with all the presence of a foe from a late 80s/early 90s Terminator/Robocop ripoff starring Dolph or Jean Claude, one would probably be wide of the mark. Nemesis may hearken from the games, but that doesn’t make him any good. The idea that he doesn’t kill harmless targets (Epps’ LJ) is maybe funny once, but the rest of the time, you’re wondering how he got through the admittedly non-existent quality control.

There are some zombie dogs, so Anderson obviously thought they were successful last time (to be fair, they were, probably because they aren’t CGI). There are also some demon cannibal zombie kids, which is always edifying. Although, I was increasingly given cause to wonder if these zombies really actually eat anyone, since we invariably see victims return with a few chunks removed but no one wholly or even mostly devoured.

Mainly, however, I was struck by the thought that Apocalypse is almost a parody of bad action movies. That it did decent business (making more money than its predecessor) suggests there’s good reason for producers to be cynical about undiscerning audiences when it comes to the horror genre.

On a thematic level, we see urban centres overrun and “sanitised”, while the Elite barricade themselves in, waiting for the horrors they have unleashed to blow over. There’s much in the way of genetic mutation (Alice’s “infected on a massive level”), such that by the end she’s causing nosebleeds with her psi abilities, but little one could say was directly transhumanist; this narrative is more focussed on population control, while Alice herself is revealed as absent of freedom of choice and action, despite her superhuman status. The old favourites of satellite and nuke cons are present and correct, such that Army of the Dead would borrow the scorched-earth countdown device recently.

Resident Evil: Apocalypse is wretched and risible; when a ninety-minute movie feels looooong, you know something is very seriously wrong. Fortunately, salvation, or rather Extinction, would be just around the corner.


Popular posts from this blog

Maybe the dingo ate your baby.

Seinfeld 2.9: The Stranded The Premise George and Elaine are stranded at a party in Long Island, with a disgruntled hostess.

Nanobots aren’t just for Christmas.

No Time to Die (2021) (SPOILERS) You know a Bond movie is in trouble when it resorts to wholesale appropriation of lines and even the theme song from another in order to “boost” its emotional heft. That No Time to Die – which previewed its own title song a year and a half before its release to resoundingly underwhelmed response, Grammys aside – goes there is a damning indictment of its ability to eke out such audience investment in Daniel Craig’s final outing as James (less so as 007). As with Spectre , the first half of No Time to Die is, on the whole, more than decent Bond fare, before it once again gets bogged down in the quest for substance and depth from a character who, regardless of how dapper his gear is, resolutely resists such outfitting.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

Just a little whiplash is all.

Duel (1971) (SPOILERS) I don’t know if it’s just me, but Spielberg’s ’70s efforts seem, perversely, much more mature, or “adult” at any rate, than his subsequent phase – from the mid-’80s onwards – of straining tremulously for critical acceptance. Perhaps because there’s less thrall to sentiment on display, or indulgence in character exploration that veered into unswerving melodrama. Duel , famously made for TV but more than good enough to garner a European cinema release the following year after the raves came flooding in, is the starkest, most undiluted example of the director as a purveyor of pure technical expertise, honed as it is to essentials in terms of narrative and plotting. Consequently, that’s both Duel ’s strength and weakness.

These are not soda cans you asked me to get for you.

The Devil’s Own (1997) (SPOILERS) Naturally, a Hollywood movie taking the Troubles as a backdrop is sure to encounter difficulties. It’s the push-pull of wanting to make a big meaningful statement about something weighty, sobering and significant in the real world and bottling it when it comes to the messy intricacies of the same. So inevitably, the results invariably tend to the facile and trite. I’m entirely sure The Devil’s Own would have floundered even if Harrison Ford hadn’t come on board and demanded rewrites, but as it is, the finished movie packs a lot of talent to largely redundant end.

Ours is the richest banking house in Europe, and we’re still being kicked.

The House of Rothschild (1934) (SPOILERS) Fox’s Rothschild family propaganda pic does a pretty good job presenting the clan as poor, maligned, oppressed Jews who fought back in the only way available to them: making money, lots of lovely money! Indeed, it occurred to me watching The House of Rothschild , that for all its inclusion of a rotter of a Nazi stand-in (played by Boris Karloff), Hitler must have just loved the movie, as it’s essentially paying the family the compliment of being very very good at doing their very best to make money from everyone left, right and centre. It’s thus unsurprising to learn that a scene was used in the anti-Semitic (you might guess as much from the title) The Eternal Jew .

You are not brought upon this world to get it!

John Carpenter  Ranked For anyone’s formative film viewing experience during the 1980s, certain directors held undeniable, persuasive genre (SF/fantasy/horror genre) cachet. James Cameron. Ridley Scott ( when he was tackling genre). Joe Dante. David Cronenberg. John Carpenter. Thanks to Halloween , Carpenter’s name became synonymous with horror, but he made relatively few undiluted movies in that vein (the aforementioned, The Fog , Christine , Prince of Darkness (although it has an SF/fantasy streak), In the Mouth of Madness , The Ward ). Certainly, the pictures that cemented my appreciation for his work – Dark Star , The Thing – had only a foot or not at all in that mode.

Sleep well, my friend, and forget us. Tomorrow you will wake up a new man.

The Prisoner 13. Do Not Forsake Me Oh My Darling We want information. In an effort to locate Professor Seltzman, a scientist who has perfected a means of transferring one person’s mind to another person’s body, Number Two has Number Six’s mind installed in the body of the Colonel (a loyal servant of the Powers that Be). Six was the last person to have contact with Seltzman and, if he is to stand any chance of being returned to his own body, he must find him (the Village possesses only the means to make the switch, they cannot reverse the process). Awaking in London, Six encounters old acquaintances including his fiancée and her father Sir Charles Portland (Six’s superior and shown in the teaser sequence fretting over how to find Seltzman). Six discovers Seltzman’s hideout by decoding a series of photographs, and sets off to find him in Austria. He achieves this, but both men are captured and returned to the Village. Restoring Six and the Colonel to their respective bodie

Isn’t sugar better than vinegar?

Femme Fatale (2002) (SPOILERS) Some have attempted to rescue Femme Fatale from the dumpster of critical rejection and audience indifference with the claim that it’s De Palma’s last great movie. It isn’t that by a long shot, but it might rank as the last truly unfettered display of his obsessions and sensibilities, complete with a ludicrous twist – so ludicrous, it’s either a stroke of genius or mile-long pile up.

He tasks me. He tasks me, and I shall have him.

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) (SPOILERS) I don’t love Star Trek , but I do love Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan . That probably isn’t just me, but a common refrain of many a non-devotee of the series. Although, it used to apply to The Voyage Home (the funny one, with the whales, the Star Trek even the target audience for Three Men and a Baby could enjoy). Unfortunately, its high regard has also become the desperate, self-destructive, song-and-verse, be-all-and-end-all of the overlords of the franchise itself, in whichever iteration, it seems. This is understandable to an extent, as Khan is that rare movie sequel made to transcendent effect on almost every level, and one that stands the test of time every bit as well (better, even) as when it was first unveiled.