Skip to main content

He’ll regret it to his dying day, if ever he lives that long.

The Quiet Man

(SPOILERS) The John Wayne & John Ford film for those who don’t like John Wayne & John Ford films? The Quiet Man takes its cues from Ford’s earlier How Green Was My Valley in terms of, well less Anglophile and Hibernophile and Cambrophile nostalgia respectively for past times, climes and heritage, as Wayne’s pugilist returns to his family seat and stirs up a hot bed of emotions, not least with Maureen O’Hara’s red-headed hothead. The result is a very likeable movie, for all its inculcated Oirishness and studied eccentricity.

Michaeleen: Saints preserve us, what do they feed you Irishmen on in Pittsburg?

Ford is as fast and loose as Hitchcock with his cuts between studio and location – Wayne vocally disapproved – but there’s an infectious energy to Frank Nugent’s screenplay (from a Maurice Walsh story) that clearly inspired both director and cast. Maureen O’Hara cited The Quiet Man as her favourite movie, and her incipiently apoplectic Mary Kate Danaher is an absolute delight. Most of the cast are, actually, from Barry Fitzgerald’s prerequisite local drunk Michaeleen Flynn, to Victor McLaglen’s overbearingly oafish Red Danaher (Mary Kate’s brother, somehow more than twice her age).

Sean: If you say three, mister, you’ll never hear the man count to ten.

Red’s the source of much of the conflict owing to his taking offence at Widow Tillane – Mildred Natwick, wonderful; she’d service a similar role a few years later in The Trouble with Harry – selling the old family farm to Wayne’s Sean Thornton, a property Red had his eye on. Thus, he’s none too happy when Sean also expresses his wish to court his sister. And less happy still when he’s hoodwinked into approving the union on the basis that the Widow Tillane will reciprocate his desire to marry once the intervening woman – Mary Kate – is out of the picture (obviously, all comes right between them in the end).

Red: So the IRA’s in this too, huh?

Ford’s affinity for the IRA is also alive and jovially well, and the local clergy are an entirely unscrupulous bunch, preceding Father Ted by some four decades in that regard. When they aren’t approving subterfuge and betting, they’re persuading a man who forswears fighting, for entirely scrupulous moral reasons, to enter a round of fisticuffs in the name of “honour”. Of course, it might have helped matters had Sean just been honest with Mary in the first place, told her he didn’t want a punch up with Red on the basis that he once killed a man in the ring, but there’d be no drama if movie characters acted sensibly (notably, ex-boxers feature in three Best Picture Oscar nominees in three consecutive years – this, From Here to Eternity and On the Waterfront – and two based a crucial plot point on killing a man in the ring, resolved through proving the man’s mettle by returning to the ways of violence. Hurrah for Hollywood!)

Fishwoman: Here’s a good stick, to beat the lovely lady.

Not that you aren’t fully on board with Sean giving Red what for, come the final reel. Indeed, you rather wish he’d succeeded in laying him out cold. The best part of The Quiet Man is the knowingness – because it’s Irish – with which all of this plays out. Wayne played the straight man (he said it was hard – he should have tried it more often) and a carnival of caricatures whirl affectionately around him, “A bold sinful man”. Along with a surfeit of sparkling lines. I’ve never been a big fan of either Wayne or Ford, but the star fits this kind of role like a swaggering glove, and there’s something irresistible about the confection. It’s striking and distracting how Sean is found chain smoking throughout, though. All you can think when he first kisses Mary Kate is how she fell for the overpowering taste of stale fag ash.

Michaeleen: It’s Homeric. That’s what it is. Homeric.

The picture runs several thematic points around values, Sean having enough money to see the filthy stuff as irrelevant, and enough distaste – through killing a man for it – to have perspective on what it won’t buy. Mary Kate, in contrast, clings to the tradition and vision of the home she wants and the way she will obtain it. There are equal parts chauvinism and reactions to the same (Sean heroically drags his wayward wife five miles across town at the end, with the upshot that she cooks him supper; this doesn’t, however, come across as backward, mainly because it gives her exactly what she wants. She doesn’t even stick around for the dust up). There’s also copious celebration of inebriation and sex rites. Good, hearty values.

Michaeleen: Buttermilk? The Borgias would do better.

The Quiet Man arrived in a year lacking the most illustrious of Best Picture Oscar competition, High Noon aside. Somehow, a slightly rubbish Chuck Heston movie won. This one has gained most of the longevity, however. It likely isn’t far from anyone’s list of five most memorable Ford films, and probably comfortably in the top five of most of them. It is, basically, to repeat my introductory paragraph, very likeable. In a very The Irish R.M. blarney-kissed way. And scenically – at least, when it’s boasting the actual outdoors – it’s also rather pretty. It is thus readily evident why The Quiet Man fosters such rose-tinted reverence.

Popular posts from this blog

Ziggy smokes a lot of weed.

Moonfall (2022) (SPOILERS) For a while there, it looked as if Moonfall , the latest and least-welcomed – so it seems – piece of apocalyptic programming from Roland Emmerich, might be sending mixed messages. Fortunately, we need not have feared, as it turns out to be the same pedigree of disaster porn we’ve come to expect from the director, one of the Elite’s most dutiful mass-entertainment stooges, even if his lustre has rather dimmed since the glory days of 2012.

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

What’s so bad about being small? You’re not going to be small forever.

Innerspace (1987) There’s no doubt that Innerspace is a flawed movie. Joe Dante finds himself pulling in different directions, his instincts for comic subversion tempered by the need to play the romance plot straight. He tacitly acknowledges this on the DVD commentary for the film, where he notes Pauline Kael’s criticism that he was attempting to make a mainstream movie; and he was. But, as ever with Dante, it never quite turns out that way. Whereas his kids’ movies treat their protagonists earnestly, this doesn’t come so naturally with adults. I’m a bona fide devotee of Innerspace , but I can’t help but be conscious of its problems. For the most part Dante papers over the cracks; the movie hits certain keynotes of standard Hollywood prescription scripting. But his sensibility inevitably suffuses it. That, and human cartoon Martin Short (an ideal “leading man” for the director) ensure what is, at first glance just another “ Steven Spielberg Presents ” sci-fi/fantas

All I saw was an old man with a funky hand, that’s all I saw.

The Blob (1988) (SPOILERS) The 1980s effects-laden remake of a ’50s B-movie that couldn’t. That is, couldn’t persuade an audience to see it and couldn’t muster critical acclaim. The Fly was a hit. The Thing wasn’t, but its reputation has since soared. Like Invaders from Mars , no such fate awaited The Blob , despite effects that, in many respects, are comparable in quality to the John Carpenter classic – and are certainly indebted to Rob Bottin for bodily grue – and surehanded direction from Chuck Russell. I suspect the reason is simply this: it lacks that extra layer that would ensure longevity.

Are you telling me that I should take my daughter to a witch doctor?

The Exorcist (1973) (SPOILERS) Vast swathes have been written on The Exorcist , duly reflective of its cultural impact. In a significant respect, it’s the first blockbuster – forget Jaws – and also the first of a new kind of special-effects movie. It provoked controversy across all levels of the socio-political spectrum, for explicit content and religious content, both hailed and denounced for the same. William Friedkin, director of William Peter Blatty’s screenplay based on Blatty’s 1971 novel, would have us believe The Exorcist is “ a film about the mystery of faith ”, but it’s evidently much more – and less – than that. There’s a strong argument to be made that movies having the kind of seismic shock on the landscape this one did aren’t simply designed to provoke rumination (or exultation); they’re there to profoundly influence society, even if largely by osmosis, and when one looks at this picture’s architects, such an assessment only gains in credibility.

I work for the guys that pay me to watch the guys that pay you. And then there are, I imagine, some guys that are paid to watch me.

The Day of the Dolphin (1973) (SPOILERS) Perhaps the most bizarre thing out of all the bizarre things about The Day of the Dolphin is that one of its posters scrupulously sets out its entire dastardly plot, something the movie itself doesn’t outline until fifteen minutes before the end. Mike Nichols reputedly made this – formerly earmarked for Roman Polanski, Jack Nicholson and Sharon Tate, although I’m dubious a specific link can be construed between its conspiracy content and the Manson murders - to fulfil a contract with The Graduate producer Joseph Levine. It would explain the, for him, atypical science-fiction element, something he seems as comfortable with as having a hairy Jack leaping about the place in Wolf .

You ever heard the saying, “Don’t rob the bank across from the diner that has the best donuts in three counties”?

2 Guns (2013) (SPOILERS) Denzel Washington is such a reliable performer, that it can get a bit boring. You end up knowing every gesture or inflection in advance, whether he’s playing a good guy or a bad guy. And his films are generally at least half decent, so you end up seeing them. Even in Flight (or perhaps especially in Flight ; just watch him chugging down that vodka) where he’s giving it his Oscar-nominatable best, he seems too familiar. I think it may be because he’s an actor who is more effective the less he does. In 2 Guns he’s not doing less, but sometimes it seems like it. That’s because the last person I’d ever expect blows him off the screen; Mark Wahlberg.

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Part I (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

That, my lad, was a dragon.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013) (SPOILERS) It’s alarming how quickly Peter Jackson sabotaged all the goodwill he amassed in the wake of The Lord of the Rings trilogy. A guy who started out directing deliciously deranged homemade horror movies ended up taking home the Oscar for a fantasy movie, of all genres. And then he blew it. He went from a filmmaker whose naysayers were the exception to one whose remaining cheerleaders are considered slightly maladjusted. The Desolation of Smaug recovers some of the territory Jackson has lost over the last decade, but he may be too far-gone to ever regain his crown. Perhaps in years to come The Lord of the Rings trilogy will be seen as an aberration in his filmography. There’s a cartoonishness to the gleeful, twisted anarchy on display in his earlierr work that may be more attuned to the less verimilitudinous aspects of King Kong and The Hobbit s. The exceptions are his female-centric character dramas, Heavenly Creat

Gizmo caca!

Gremlins (1984) I didn’t get to see Gremlins at the cinema. I wanted to, as I had worked myself into a state of great anticipation. There was a six-month gap between its (unseasonal) US release and arrival in the UK, so I had plenty of time to devour clips of cute Gizmo on Film ’84 (the only reason ever to catch Barry Norman was a tantalising glimpse of a much awaited movie, rather than his drab, colourless, reviews) and Gremlins trading cards that came with bubble gum attached (or was it the other way round?). But Gremlins ’ immediate fate for many an eager youngster in Britain was sealed when, after much deliberation, the BBFC granted it a 15 certificate. I had just turned 12, and at that time an attempt to sneak in to see it wouldn’t even have crossed my mind. I’d just have to wait for the video. I didn’t realise it then (because I didn’t know who he was as a filmmaker), but Joe Dante’s irrepressible anarchic wit would have a far stronger effect on me than the un