Skip to main content

He’ll regret it to his dying day, if ever he lives that long.

The Quiet Man
(1952)

(SPOILERS) The John Wayne & John Ford film for those who don’t like John Wayne & John Ford films? The Quiet Man takes its cues from Ford’s earlier How Green Was My Valley in terms of, well less Anglophile and Hibernophile and Cambrophile nostalgia respectively for past times, climes and heritage, as Wayne’s pugilist returns to his family seat and stirs up a hot bed of emotions, not least with Maureen O’Hara’s red-headed hothead. The result is a very likeable movie, for all its inculcated Oirishness and studied eccentricity.

Michaeleen: Saints preserve us, what do they feed you Irishmen on in Pittsburg?

Ford is as fast and loose as Hitchcock with his cuts between studio and location – Wayne vocally disapproved – but there’s an infectious energy to Frank Nugent’s screenplay (from a Maurice Walsh story) that clearly inspired both director and cast. Maureen O’Hara cited The Quiet Man as her favourite movie, and her incipiently apoplectic Mary Kate Danaher is an absolute delight. Most of the cast are, actually, from Barry Fitzgerald’s prerequisite local drunk Michaeleen Flynn, to Victor McLaglen’s overbearingly oafish Red Danaher (Mary Kate’s brother, somehow more than twice her age).

Sean: If you say three, mister, you’ll never hear the man count to ten.

Red’s the source of much of the conflict owing to his taking offence at Widow Tillane – Mildred Natwick, wonderful; she’d service a similar role a few years later in The Trouble with Harry – selling the old family farm to Wayne’s Sean Thornton, a property Red had his eye on. Thus, he’s none too happy when Sean also expresses his wish to court his sister. And less happy still when he’s hoodwinked into approving the union on the basis that the Widow Tillane will reciprocate his desire to marry once the intervening woman – Mary Kate – is out of the picture (obviously, all comes right between them in the end).

Red: So the IRA’s in this too, huh?

Ford’s affinity for the IRA is also alive and jovially well, and the local clergy are an entirely unscrupulous bunch, preceding Father Ted by some four decades in that regard. When they aren’t approving subterfuge and betting, they’re persuading a man who forswears fighting, for entirely scrupulous moral reasons, to enter a round of fisticuffs in the name of “honour”. Of course, it might have helped matters had Sean just been honest with Mary in the first place, told her he didn’t want a punch up with Red on the basis that he once killed a man in the ring, but there’d be no drama if movie characters acted sensibly (notably, ex-boxers feature in three Best Picture Oscar nominees in three consecutive years – this, From Here to Eternity and On the Waterfront – and two based a crucial plot point on killing a man in the ring, resolved through proving the man’s mettle by returning to the ways of violence. Hurrah for Hollywood!)

Fishwoman: Here’s a good stick, to beat the lovely lady.

Not that you aren’t fully on board with Sean giving Red what for, come the final reel. Indeed, you rather wish he’d succeeded in laying him out cold. The best part of The Quiet Man is the knowingness – because it’s Irish – with which all of this plays out. Wayne played the straight man (he said it was hard – he should have tried it more often) and a carnival of caricatures whirl affectionately around him, “A bold sinful man”. Along with a surfeit of sparkling lines. I’ve never been a big fan of either Wayne or Ford, but the star fits this kind of role like a swaggering glove, and there’s something irresistible about the confection. It’s striking and distracting how Sean is found chain smoking throughout, though. All you can think when he first kisses Mary Kate is how she fell for the overpowering taste of stale fag ash.

Michaeleen: It’s Homeric. That’s what it is. Homeric.

The picture runs several thematic points around values, Sean having enough money to see the filthy stuff as irrelevant, and enough distaste – through killing a man for it – to have perspective on what it won’t buy. Mary Kate, in contrast, clings to the tradition and vision of the home she wants and the way she will obtain it. There are equal parts chauvinism and reactions to the same (Sean heroically drags his wayward wife five miles across town at the end, with the upshot that she cooks him supper; this doesn’t, however, come across as backward, mainly because it gives her exactly what she wants. She doesn’t even stick around for the dust up). There’s also copious celebration of inebriation and sex rites. Good, hearty values.

Michaeleen: Buttermilk? The Borgias would do better.

The Quiet Man arrived in a year lacking the most illustrious of Best Picture Oscar competition, High Noon aside. Somehow, a slightly rubbish Chuck Heston movie won. This one has gained most of the longevity, however. It likely isn’t far from anyone’s list of five most memorable Ford films, and probably comfortably in the top five of most of them. It is, basically, to repeat my introductory paragraph, very likeable. In a very The Irish R.M. blarney-kissed way. And scenically – at least, when it’s boasting the actual outdoors – it’s also rather pretty. It is thus readily evident why The Quiet Man fosters such rose-tinted reverence.


Popular posts from this blog

Doctors make the worst patients.

Coma (1978) (SPOILERS) Michael Crichton’s sophomore big-screen feature, and by some distance his best. Perhaps it’s simply that this a milieu known to him, or perhaps it’s that it’s very much aligned to the there-and-now and present, but Coma , despite the occasional lapse in this adaptation of colleague Robin Cook’s novel, is an effective, creepy, resonant thriller and then some. Crichton knows his subject, and it shows – the picture is confident and verisimilitudinous in a way none of his other directorial efforts are – and his low-key – some might say clinical – approach pays dividends. You might also call it prescient, but that would be to suggest its subject matter wasn’t immediately relevant then too.

Abandon selective targeting. Shoot everything.

28 Weeks Later (2007) (SPOILERS) The first five minutes of 28 Weeks Later are far and away the best part of this sequel, offering in quick succession a devastating moral quandary and a waking nightmare, immortalised on the screen. After that, while significantly more polished, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo reveals his concept to be altogether inferior to Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s, falling back on the crutches of gore, nihilism, and disengaging and limiting shifts of focus between characters in whom one has little investment in the first place.

I said I had no family. I didn’t say I had an empty apartment.

The Apartment (1960) (SPOILERS) Billy Wilder’s romcom delivered the genre that rare Best Picture Oscar winner. Albeit, The Apartment amounts to a rather grim (now) PG-rated scenario, one rife with adultery, attempted suicide, prostitution of the soul and subjective thereof of the body. And yet, it’s also, finally, rather sweet, so salving the darker passages and evidencing the director’s expertly judged balancing act. Time Out ’s Tom Milne suggested the ending was a cop out (“ boy forgives girl and all’s well ”). But really, what other ending did the audience or central characters deserve?

The Bible never said anything about amphetamines.

The Color of Money (1986) (SPOILERS) I tend to think it’s evident when Scorsese isn’t truly exercised by material. He can still invest every ounce of the technical acumen at his fingertips, and the results can dazzle on that level, but you don’t really feel the filmmaker in the film. Which, for one of his pictures to truly carry a wallop, you need to do. We’ve seen quite a few in such deficit in recent years, most often teaming with Leo. The Color of Money , however, is the first where it was out-and-out evident the subject matter wasn’t Marty’s bag. He needed it, desperately, to come off, but in the manner a tradesman who wants to keep getting jobs. This sequel to The Hustler doesn’t linger in the mind, however good it may be, moment by moment.

Your desecration of reality will not go unpunished.

2021-22 Best-of, Worst-of and Everything Else Besides The movies might be the most visible example of attempts to cling onto cultural remnants as the previous societal template clatters down the drain. It takes something people really want – unlike a Bond movie where he kicks the can – to suggest the model of yesteryear, one where a billion-dollar grosser was like sneezing. You can argue Spider-Man: No Way Home is replete with agendas of one sort or another, and that’s undoubtedly the case (that’s Hollywood), but crowding out any such extraneous elements (and they often are) is simply a consummate crowd-pleaser that taps into tangible nostalgia through its multiverse take. Of course, nostalgia for a mere seven years ago, for something you didn’t like anyway, is a symptom of how fraught these times have become.

You just threw a donut in the hot zone!

Den of Thieves (2018) (SPOILERS) I'd heard this was a shameless  Heat  rip-off, and the presence of Gerard Butler seemed to confirm it would be passable-at-best B-heist hokum, so maybe it was just middling expectations, even having heard how enthused certain pockets of the Internet were, but  Den of Thieves  is a surprisingly very satisfying entry in the genre. I can't even fault it for attempting to Keyser Soze the whole shebang at the last moment – add a head in a box and you have three 1995 classics in one movie – even if that particular conceit doesn’t quite come together.

This guy’s armed with a hairdryer.

An Innocent Man (1989) (SPOILERS) Was it a chicken-and-egg thing with Tom Selleck and movies? Did he consistently end up in ropey pictures because other, bigger big-screen stars had first dibs on the good stuff? Or was it because he was a resolutely small-screen guy with limited range and zero good taste? Selleck had about half-a-dozen cinema outings during the 1980s, one of which, the very TV, very Touchstone Three Men and a Baby was a hit, but couldn’t be put wholly down to him. The final one was An Innocent Man , where he attempted to show some grit and mettle, as nice-guy Tom is framed and has to get tough to survive. Unfortunately, it’s another big-screen TV movie.

Listen to the goddamn qualified scientists!

Don’t Look Up (2021) (SPOILERS) It’s testament to Don’t Look Up ’s “quality” that critics who would normally lap up this kind of liberal-causes messaging couldn’t find it within themselves to grant it a free pass. Adam McKay has attempted to refashion himself as a satirist since jettisoning former collaborator Will Ferrell, but as a Hollywood player and an inevitably socio-politically partisan one, he simply falls in line with the most obvious, fatuous propagandising.

Captain, he who walks in fire will burn his feet.

The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1973) (SPOILERS) Ray Harryhausen returns to the kind of unadulterated fantasy material that made Jason and the Argonauts such a success – swords & stop motion, if you like. In between, there were a couple of less successful efforts, HG Wells adaptation First Men in the Moon and The Valley of the Gwangi (which I considered the best thing ever as a kid: dinosaur walks into a cowboy movie). Harryhausen’s special-effects supremacy – in a for-hire capacity – had also been consummately eclipsed by Raquel Welch’s fur bikini in One Million Years B.C . The Golden Voyage of Sinbad follows the expected Dynamation template – blank-slate hero, memorable creatures, McGuffin quest – but in its considerable favour, it also boasts a villainous performance by nobody-at-the-time, on-the-cusp-of-greatness Tom Baker.

Archimedes would split himself with envy.

Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger (1977) (SPOILERS) Generally, this seems to be the Ray Harryhausen Sinbad outing that gets the short straw in the appreciation stakes. Which is rather unfair. True, Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger lacks Tom Baker and his rich brown voice personifying evil incarnate – although Margaret Whiting more than holds her own in the wickedness stakes – and the structure follows the Harryhausen template perhaps over scrupulously (Beverly Cross previously collaborated with the stop-motion auteur on Jason and the Argonauts , and would again subsequently with Clash of the Titans ). But the storytelling is swift and sprightly, and the animation itself scores, achieving a degree of interaction frequently more proficient than its more lavishly praised peer group.