Skip to main content

Here’s Bloody Justice for you.

Laughter in Paradise
(1951)

(SPOILERS) The beginning of a comedic run for director-producer Mario Zampa that spanned much of the 1950s, invariably aided by writers Michael Pertwee and Jack Davies (the latter went on to pen a spate of Norman Wisdom pictures including The Early Bird, and also comedy rally classic Monte Carlo or Bust!) As usual with these Pertwee jaunts, Laughter in Paradise boasts a sparky premise – renowned practical joker bequeaths a fortune to four relatives, on condition they complete selected tasks that tickle him – and more than enough resultant situational humour.

While Laughter in Paradise doesn’t quite reach the consistent peaks of the later The Naked Truth (1957), it distinguishes itself through the fortification of a benign moral centre. This is best illustrated by the rather touching plotline devoted to Agnes Russell (Fay Compton), introduced as a glowering, flinty disciplinarian set to dismiss maid Ethel (Charlotte Mitchell) when she hears the news of her £50,000 inheritance (£1.6m today). However, her task, to serve as a “domestic servant in a middle-class home” for a month, her bequeathal to be forfeited should she be dismissed or resign, brings about a change in her outlook as she realises what a right bag she has been. Lest this plotline sound too severe or melodramatic, it is noticeably buoyed by the presence of John Laurie as the “old” man she must attend to (Laurie was a mere stripling of 54 at the time).

Guy Middleton has the contrasting “doesn’t learn anything” subplot as Simon Russell. He’s essentially playing the Terry-Thomas part, had this been made half a decade later. Simon’s a shameless cad and bounder who thoroughly enjoys his roguish ways; when he’s told he must marry the first woman he speaks to following the reading of the will – he quickly defaults, since he doesn’t marry Audrey Hepburn’s cigarette girl – he’s entirely up for the challenge. Unfortunately for him, his slipperiness finds him telling his butler Benson (Mackenzie Ward) – another of the rules is that no one else is to be informed of the details of the challenges – who then surreptitiously sets him up with his niece Lucille (Beatrice Campbell). Come the conclusion, when the executor reveals there wasn’t, in fact, any money at all, everyone involved, having been improved by the experience, can see the funny side. Except for Simon. Until he realises how much this will put out Lucille, whereupon he too has a good chuckle.

Just like Agnes – who is fired from her job, but Laurie then shows up to take her out to dinner – George Cole’s Herbert Russell fails at his task. He’s a mild-mannered bank clerk tasked with standing up to his fearsome manager (Ronald Adam) by holding him up with a water pistol and procuring the keys to the bank for two minutes. Naturally, Herbert repeatedly bungles this, along the way having to deal with a stinker colleague (Michael Pertwee) while being encouraged by a sympathetic one (Mary Germaine); the final turn of events, however, whereby he walks in on an actual robbery, so foiling it, finds him promoted to branch manager and getting the girl.

Cole’s serial ineptitude parallels the best plot, in which Alastair Sim’s Deniston Russell must incarcerate himself for 28 days for a genuine crime. Naturally, this is easier said than done. Deniston is a writer of pulp crime fiction, which he has published under fifteen different pseudonyms (he lends Herbert The Bank Bandit as prep); his identity is unknown to fiancé Elizabeth (Joyce Grenfell), an “officer and a lady”, and her magistrate father Sir Charles (AE Matthews). Obviously, Elizabeth is entirely unsuited to Deniston; devoted secretary Sheila (Eleanor Summerfield) is, really, his ideal match. The various trials and tribulations he endures, culminating in a court appearance, lead Deniston to this happy realisation (he succeeds in his mission, but he has already admitted the outcome of events are reward enough prior to learning there is no inheritance).

The sequences in which Deniston attempts various thefts and criminal undertakings are highly amusing. These include probing the police for details of a suitable endeavour and trying, to no avail, to get pinched in a department store (when he is eventually stopped, it turns out he has already been pickpocketed of his purloined items). He eventually accomplishes the double whammy of throwing a brick through a shop window and hitting a policeman with his brolly – the latter, in casual-afterthought Sim style, is a delight – so ending up before Sir Charles, whom he insults to boost his sentence to the desired term.

There are numerous funny lines and plays on words in this subplot. Facing seemingly insurmountable odds at his task, he asks Simon if he can rob him: “I couldn’t possibly burgle somebody I didn’t know”. He allows his prospective family to believe he may be going undercover behind the Iron Curtain (behind bars) and relates that one of his book plots involves an entire football team being poisoned on the eve of the FA Cup final (“I’m afraid it was the goalkeeper’s daughter”). Deniston’s nom de plumes include one Gloria Trubshaw, while Sheila announces “I’m just longing to get on with Bloodlust” before offering the Sir Charles evidence of her employee’s credentials (“Here’s Bloody Justice for you”). Grenfell, having already appeared opposite Sim in several movies (including Hitchcock’s Stage Fright), is on fine form too as she scolds Deniston for being a “complete rotter to poor, darling daddikin”.

Pertwee and Davies, although they set the scheme up as wheeze on the part of Henry Russell (Hugh Griffith) – “I died flat broke!” – ensure no one involved is really going short. Both Denistion and Agnes are doing nicely for themselves, and Herbert has a secure job. Only Simon is a bit skint, but that’s because he keeps a butler and is an inveterate gambler, rather than any true hardship. The title’s a little on the self-satisfied side, it has to be admitted, one of those that might well put viewers off since its assuming enjoyment as a done deal. But Laughter in Paradise is highly enjoyable and frequently very funny, and further evidence of Michael Pertwee’s credentials as one of British cinema's best comic writers of that period.


Popular posts from this blog

Doctors make the worst patients.

Coma (1978) (SPOILERS) Michael Crichton’s sophomore big-screen feature, and by some distance his best. Perhaps it’s simply that this a milieu known to him, or perhaps it’s that it’s very much aligned to the there-and-now and present, but Coma , despite the occasional lapse in this adaptation of colleague Robin Cook’s novel, is an effective, creepy, resonant thriller and then some. Crichton knows his subject, and it shows – the picture is confident and verisimilitudinous in a way none of his other directorial efforts are – and his low-key – some might say clinical – approach pays dividends. You might also call it prescient, but that would be to suggest its subject matter wasn’t immediately relevant then too.

Abandon selective targeting. Shoot everything.

28 Weeks Later (2007) (SPOILERS) The first five minutes of 28 Weeks Later are far and away the best part of this sequel, offering in quick succession a devastating moral quandary and a waking nightmare, immortalised on the screen. After that, while significantly more polished, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo reveals his concept to be altogether inferior to Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s, falling back on the crutches of gore, nihilism, and disengaging and limiting shifts of focus between characters in whom one has little investment in the first place.

I said I had no family. I didn’t say I had an empty apartment.

The Apartment (1960) (SPOILERS) Billy Wilder’s romcom delivered the genre that rare Best Picture Oscar winner. Albeit, The Apartment amounts to a rather grim (now) PG-rated scenario, one rife with adultery, attempted suicide, prostitution of the soul and subjective thereof of the body. And yet, it’s also, finally, rather sweet, so salving the darker passages and evidencing the director’s expertly judged balancing act. Time Out ’s Tom Milne suggested the ending was a cop out (“ boy forgives girl and all’s well ”). But really, what other ending did the audience or central characters deserve?

The Bible never said anything about amphetamines.

The Color of Money (1986) (SPOILERS) I tend to think it’s evident when Scorsese isn’t truly exercised by material. He can still invest every ounce of the technical acumen at his fingertips, and the results can dazzle on that level, but you don’t really feel the filmmaker in the film. Which, for one of his pictures to truly carry a wallop, you need to do. We’ve seen quite a few in such deficit in recent years, most often teaming with Leo. The Color of Money , however, is the first where it was out-and-out evident the subject matter wasn’t Marty’s bag. He needed it, desperately, to come off, but in the manner a tradesman who wants to keep getting jobs. This sequel to The Hustler doesn’t linger in the mind, however good it may be, moment by moment.

Your desecration of reality will not go unpunished.

2021-22 Best-of, Worst-of and Everything Else Besides The movies might be the most visible example of attempts to cling onto cultural remnants as the previous societal template clatters down the drain. It takes something people really want – unlike a Bond movie where he kicks the can – to suggest the model of yesteryear, one where a billion-dollar grosser was like sneezing. You can argue Spider-Man: No Way Home is replete with agendas of one sort or another, and that’s undoubtedly the case (that’s Hollywood), but crowding out any such extraneous elements (and they often are) is simply a consummate crowd-pleaser that taps into tangible nostalgia through its multiverse take. Of course, nostalgia for a mere seven years ago, for something you didn’t like anyway, is a symptom of how fraught these times have become.

You just threw a donut in the hot zone!

Den of Thieves (2018) (SPOILERS) I'd heard this was a shameless  Heat  rip-off, and the presence of Gerard Butler seemed to confirm it would be passable-at-best B-heist hokum, so maybe it was just middling expectations, even having heard how enthused certain pockets of the Internet were, but  Den of Thieves  is a surprisingly very satisfying entry in the genre. I can't even fault it for attempting to Keyser Soze the whole shebang at the last moment – add a head in a box and you have three 1995 classics in one movie – even if that particular conceit doesn’t quite come together.

This guy’s armed with a hairdryer.

An Innocent Man (1989) (SPOILERS) Was it a chicken-and-egg thing with Tom Selleck and movies? Did he consistently end up in ropey pictures because other, bigger big-screen stars had first dibs on the good stuff? Or was it because he was a resolutely small-screen guy with limited range and zero good taste? Selleck had about half-a-dozen cinema outings during the 1980s, one of which, the very TV, very Touchstone Three Men and a Baby was a hit, but couldn’t be put wholly down to him. The final one was An Innocent Man , where he attempted to show some grit and mettle, as nice-guy Tom is framed and has to get tough to survive. Unfortunately, it’s another big-screen TV movie.

Listen to the goddamn qualified scientists!

Don’t Look Up (2021) (SPOILERS) It’s testament to Don’t Look Up ’s “quality” that critics who would normally lap up this kind of liberal-causes messaging couldn’t find it within themselves to grant it a free pass. Adam McKay has attempted to refashion himself as a satirist since jettisoning former collaborator Will Ferrell, but as a Hollywood player and an inevitably socio-politically partisan one, he simply falls in line with the most obvious, fatuous propagandising.

Captain, he who walks in fire will burn his feet.

The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1973) (SPOILERS) Ray Harryhausen returns to the kind of unadulterated fantasy material that made Jason and the Argonauts such a success – swords & stop motion, if you like. In between, there were a couple of less successful efforts, HG Wells adaptation First Men in the Moon and The Valley of the Gwangi (which I considered the best thing ever as a kid: dinosaur walks into a cowboy movie). Harryhausen’s special-effects supremacy – in a for-hire capacity – had also been consummately eclipsed by Raquel Welch’s fur bikini in One Million Years B.C . The Golden Voyage of Sinbad follows the expected Dynamation template – blank-slate hero, memorable creatures, McGuffin quest – but in its considerable favour, it also boasts a villainous performance by nobody-at-the-time, on-the-cusp-of-greatness Tom Baker.

Archimedes would split himself with envy.

Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger (1977) (SPOILERS) Generally, this seems to be the Ray Harryhausen Sinbad outing that gets the short straw in the appreciation stakes. Which is rather unfair. True, Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger lacks Tom Baker and his rich brown voice personifying evil incarnate – although Margaret Whiting more than holds her own in the wickedness stakes – and the structure follows the Harryhausen template perhaps over scrupulously (Beverly Cross previously collaborated with the stop-motion auteur on Jason and the Argonauts , and would again subsequently with Clash of the Titans ). But the storytelling is swift and sprightly, and the animation itself scores, achieving a degree of interaction frequently more proficient than its more lavishly praised peer group.