Skip to main content

What's a movie star need a rocket for anyway?

The Rocketeer

(SPOILERS) The Rocketeer has a fantastic poster. One of the best of the last thirty years (and while that may seem like faint praise, what with poster design being a dying art – I’m looking at you Marvel, or Amazon and the recent The Tomorrow War – it isn’t meant to be). The movie itself, however, tends towards stodge. Unremarkable pictures with a wide/cult fanbase, conditioned by childhood nostalgia, are ten-a-penny – Willow for example – and in this case, there was also a reasonably warm critical reception. But such an embrace can’t alter that Joe Johnston makes an inveterately bland, tepid movie director. His “feel” for period here got him The First Avenger: Captain America gig, a bland, tepid movie tending towards stodge. So at least he’s consistent.

I may be being a bit harsh. Honey, I Shrunk the Kids is sprightly and likeable, Jumanji over-CGI’d but moves along, and Jurassic Park III… has decent cinematography. But it’s The Rocketeer and Cap that tend to get singled out for praise, and I’m mystified why. The Rocketeer comes along – and to be fair, it shares less-than-hallowed company with the preceding Dick Tracy and subsequent The Shadow and The Phantom – as adaptions of or inspired by ’30s pulp/serials, yet having learned nothing from the energy, kineticism and palpable enthusiasm Spielberg brought to the similarly inspired-by Indiana Jones (and more specifically, Raiders of the Lost Ark).

Johnston only ever creates a cardboard, facsimile world, one that feels like a Hollywood movie set, rather than remotely lived in or vitalised. This faux-period sentimentality is only emphasised by a horrifyingly inert James Horner “hero” score, evoking everything you should be avoiding about the ’30s/’40s (“the best John Williams never did’ is EXACTLY why it’s so awful). Johnston and comic book artist/creator Dave Stevens – The Rocketeer movie lacks an iota of his style – also pushed for Bill Campbell in the lead role of Cliff Secord against studio objections, and the choice only serves to emphasise the movie’s lack of character.

Disney were right to be nervous about the picture’s prospects. Their attempt to do a Batman, Dick Tracy, had floundered in its massive tie-in campaign, on the basis that youngsters didn’t care for Warren Beatty and his stolid star turn, and weren’t really that interested in Madge acting either (the latter factor crosses all age ranges, of course). It scraped $100m (in the US) despite itself. I no longer have issues to hand, but I well recall Premiere magazine’s annual summer predictions suggesting The Rocketeer would be one of the big hits – Dying Young would be the biggest, ouch – to the tune of $140m or so, along with Regarding Henry and The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear (the latter did decent business, but nothing compared to Premiere’s tip). Johnston encountered problems with Disney, and said he never wanted to work with them again; the feeling may have been mutual.

The picture opens agreeably. Alan Arkin is immensely affable as Cliff’s mechanic pal Peevy Peabody, and the aerial sequences are decently shot (in particular, a Spielberg-esque moment where Cliff gets oil in his windshield and has to punch it out). Otherwise, though, the whole affair is so clean, so bland, so vanilla. Like Campbell himself (he’s also in the following year’s Francis Ford Coppola’s Bram Stoker’s Dracula, but you’ve quite understandably probably blanked him). It needed some Waldo Pepper-ing up. Or Raiders-ising.

When the Nazis eventually appear, there’s none of the ghoulish glee the Berg took in depicting them. They’re simply the costume department suiting up extras. Dalton has fun as Errol Flynn as a Nazi, (based on Charles Higham’s take on the actor), possibly the most in the picture apart from Jon Polito trying to persuade endangered crowds there’s nothing to be concerned about at the increasingly perilous air circus. It’s also a reminder that Dalton’s much better allowed villainous humour than suffering the straight-edged strain of 007. However, you never feel even he’s let off the leash the way he might have been (he’s much more enjoyable in the later Looney Tunes: Back in Action, riffing on his Bond to mirthful results).

There’s also Jennifer Connelly, graduating to lead love interest as Betty Page-inspired would-be starlet Jenny Blake. Ed Lauter as FBI. Paul Sorvino as a gangster who hates Nazis ("I may not make an honest buck, but I'm one-hundred-percent American"). William Sanderson, Margo Martindale and Clint Howard. Doubles for WC Fields and Clark Gable. Terry O’Quinn has fun in a couple of scenes as a retconned, peace-loving Howard Hughes, inventor of the rocket pack (Doc Savage claims this role in the comic book; perhaps a detour into Raiders-style arcana with Jack Parsons as its inventor would have added a much-needed frisson to the proceedings). Tiny Ron Taylor is wheeled on in some Dick Tracy makeup as Lothar. Unfortunately, he sticks out like a sore thumb, because Johnston has zero conception for the movie. Aside from Campbell, the cast is pretty peachy, but a visual stylist was needed to make The Rocketeer fly. Johnston is not that.

The Rocketeer’s flying effects are a mixed bag of green screen and harnesses. Johnston has a strong design element on his side in the helmet, but he never figures out a way to shoot his “hero” to make him cool, iconic; the poster does, of course. Ironically, Campbell criticised it as failing to lure in the kids. Disney too foolishly decided it was at fault for the movie fizzling, but if you build it, they will come. The picture struggled to open, nestling behind Dying Young in fourth place (in the top slots were Kevin Costner and Billy Crystal, in their second and third weeks respectively), crashing out of the Top Ten after a month. The summer generally being a bit of a bust was small consolation.

Nostalgia appeal for nostalgia appeal being what it is, though, along with the desire to milk any property with even a modicum of brand potential, Disney has been looking at sequelising (The Rocketeers – and yes, you guessed it, with a black female pilot as the lead). There was a computer-animated series on Disney Junior in 2019. Yeah, it slipped my notice too. I may be in the minority in my lack of enthusiasm for The Rocketeer, but I will say this: I wish I’d bought an original poster at the time. I’d proudly frame it, and hang it on the wall.

Popular posts from this blog

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

If I do nothing else, I will convince them that Herbert Stempel knows what won the goddam Academy Award for Best goddam Picture of 1955. That’s what I’m going to accomplish.

Quiz Show (1994) (SPOILERS) Quiz Show perfectly encapsulates a certain brand of Best Picture nominee: the staid, respectable, diligent historical episode, a morality tale in response to which the Academy can nod their heads approvingly and discerningly, feeding as it does their own vainglorious self-image about how times and attitudes have changed, in part thanks to their own virtuousness. Robert Redford’s film about the 1950s Twenty-One quiz show scandals is immaculately made, boasts a notable cast and is guided by a strong screenplay from Paul Attanasio (who, on television, had just created the seminal Homicide: Life on the Streets ), but it lacks that something extra that pushes it into truly memorable territory.

Other monks will meet their deaths here. And they too will have blackened fingers. And blackened tongues.

The Name of the Rose (1986) (SPOILERS) Umberto Eco wasn’t awfully impressed by Jean Jacques-Annaud’s adaptation of his novel – or “ palimpsest of Umberto Eco’s novel ” as the opening titles announce – to the extent that he nixed further movie versions of his work. Later, he amended that view, calling it “ a nice movie ”. He also, for balance, labelled The Name of the Rose his worst novel – “ I hate this book and I hope you hate it too ”. Essentially, he was begrudging its renown at the expense of his later “ superior ” novels. I didn’t hate the novel, although I do prefer the movie, probably because I saw it first and it was everything I wanted from a medieval Sherlock Holmes movie set in a monastery and devoted to forbidden books, knowledge and opinions.

You ever heard the saying, “Don’t rob the bank across from the diner that has the best donuts in three counties”?

2 Guns (2013) (SPOILERS) Denzel Washington is such a reliable performer, that it can get a bit boring. You end up knowing every gesture or inflection in advance, whether he’s playing a good guy or a bad guy. And his films are generally at least half decent, so you end up seeing them. Even in Flight (or perhaps especially in Flight ; just watch him chugging down that vodka) where he’s giving it his Oscar-nominatable best, he seems too familiar. I think it may be because he’s an actor who is more effective the less he does. In 2 Guns he’s not doing less, but sometimes it seems like it. That’s because the last person I’d ever expect blows him off the screen; Mark Wahlberg.

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.

Say hello to the Scream Extractor.

Monsters, Inc. (2001) (SPOILERS) I was never the greatest fan of Monsters, Inc. , even before charges began to be levelled regarding its “true” subtext. I didn’t much care for the characters, and I particularly didn’t like the way Pixar’s directors injected their own parenting/ childhood nostalgia into their plots. Something that just seems to go on with their fare ad infinitum. Which means the Pixars I preferred tended to be the Brad Bird ones. You know, the alleged objectivist. Now, though, we learn Pixar has always been about the adrenochrome, so there’s no going back…

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

In a few moments, you will have an experience that will seem completely real. It will be the result of your subconscious fears transformed into your conscious awareness.

Brainstorm (1983) (SPOILERS) Might Brainstorm have been the next big thing – a ground-breaking, game-changing cinematic spectacle that had as far reaching consequences as Star Wars (special effects) or Avatar (3D) – if only Douglas Trumbull had been allowed to persevere with his patented “Showscan” process (70mm film photographed and projected at 60 frames per second)? I suspect not; one only has to look at the not-so-far-removed experiment of Ang Lee with Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk , and how that went down like a bag of cold sick, to doubt that any innovation will necessarily catch on (although Trumbull at least had a narrative hinge on which to turn his “more real than real” imagery, whereas Lee’s pretty much boiled down to “because it was there”). Brainstorm ’s story is, though, like its title, possibly too cerebral, too much concerned with the consciousness and touting too little of the cloyingly affirmative that Bruce Rubin inevitably brings to his screenplays. T

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.