Skip to main content

It’s like paradise with little golden palm trees.

Working Girl

(SPOILERS) There’s something insidious and repellent at the heart of Mike Nichol’s big business Cinderella story, a How to Succeed at Business by Reading the Rags. Wall Street, for all that Gordon Gekko became a bad boys’ hero, had the good grace to say outright that greed was bad. Working Girl tells you it’s only bad when there isn’t a level gender playing field. And that, if there are only two women in the room, one of them has to go. But because it’s accompanied by that so-damn-aspirant, surging, uplifting Oscar-winning Carly Simon tune (Let the River Run), Working Girl encourages any objections to relapse into sharp relief.

Pauline Kael had it right when she observed “We’re supposed to be cheered by watching Tess become part of the establishment…” We’re supposed to be pulled along in the uplift of female empowerment, as long as it’s the right kind. But is there a right kind? Hollywood does its bit to support the cause, but what it’s really telling you is no good can come of such presumptions. Women in business break up families, not dutiful housewives (Fatal Attraction). But any significant level of power is itself dangerous (Aliens). There, and here, it takes the “good” woman to destroy the bad, or the bitch. So Sigourney Weaver’s Ellen Ripley must destroy the Alien Queen, and Melanie Griffith’s Tess McGill must destroy Sigourney Weaver’s Katherine Parker. Or be destroyed/devastated themselves.

Suiting this boom or bust are Working Girl’s opening stages. Tess starts off in a crummy office environment surrounded by scumbag co-workers (including Oliver Platt’s David Lutz, “a sleazoid pimp with a tiny dick” and Kevin Spacey’s Bob in arbitrage, a coke-snorting porn hound, so setting the scene for Spacey’s subsequent career, offscreen and on, attraction to Griffith notwithstanding). She gets splashed in the rain by passing cars. She – and all her female friends and co-workers – is also suffering from a BIG hair nightmare of the sort that was at least intentionally cartoonish in the same year’s Married to the Mob. If everyone resembles coke addicts, it sounds like most on set were (Griffith was called out by Nichols on the first day and made to pay the expenses for wasted time, since he stuck his neck out securing her the role). But don’t worry, we’ve got Carly Simon instructing you to hang on in there, along with sumptuous helicopter shots of the Statue of Liberty announcing your dreams can come true. Euphoric stuff.

Plus, Tess is miraculously – read annoyingly – ingenuous. Her entire repertoire of insights comes from a gluttonous diet of newspapers and magazines (“You read W?”), running the gamut of suggesting luncheon items to spotting potential business deals. It’s in the latter department that Katharine naturally tries to do her over. Griffith seemed ubiquitous in the late ’80s, but the truth was, a smattering of roles attracted a disproportionate amount of attention: Body Double, Something Wild and this. She received an Oscar nod for Working Girl, but I don’t really think it was warranted (only Joan Cusack and the earworm Simon song were, really. And the latter strictly relatively so).

I’m also doubtful the public were interested in her as a star attraction. For all the attention it received, and the star support from Weaver and Harrison Ford, the movie was only a modest hit. You’ll be hard pressed to find Griffith in a big success subsequently. Kael, with both the Brian De Palma and Jonathan Demme movies in mind, suggested Nichols was “trying to let a bit of tackiness into a big budget movie”. She may have been right; nothing speaks tacky like vacuuming topless, and Nichols, for all his and writer Kevin Wade’s virtue signalling (while ritually humiliating the other main female character), they’re very keen to put their leading lady in leery lingerie and suspenders.

But Kael’s also right that Nichols’ intention is something else. He makes Griffith an anodyne “cuddlebug”, divorcing her from the essential free-range sex of those previous roles, and shoehorning in the famous “I have a head for business and a bod for sin”, a trailer line rather than anything we actually believe of the character.

Griffith, with her sleepy coquettish squeak of a delivery, comes on like a quaaluded Monroe in a Horlicks factory. That kind of thing has a limited shelf life, and if it was perfectly utilised by Demme, here it’s rather a mismatch of packaging. She’s good at being out of it (tequila), but her delivery makes you assume everyone involved is humouring her. Which is surely exactly the point Nichols didn’t want to make. Tess’s success only serves to emphasise this is a fantasy, one with its Prince Charming (Ford) and wicked witch (Weaver). Come the end, Tess gets her crown and throne room (executive job and office). So maybe it was Griffith, or maybe the writing was already on the wall post-Crash for this kind of business fare. Two years later she’d be in stinker The Bonfire of the Vanities. Being a stinker didn’t help, but no longer being a hot topic was equally an issue.

Unlike Stone, Nichols and Wade have no interest in who gets crushed or left jobless by the acquisition that is key to Tess’s rise; big business and greed are good as long as you have scruples, but for how long? Tess is very nice to her secretary at the end, but perhaps we should see how she’s faring three months down the line. Weaver is aces, earning two nominations at that year’s Oscars (the other for Gorillas in the Mist), but while there’s a lot of canniness in Katherine’s ability to work the system (buttering up colleagues, pilfering proposals), there’s very little to suggest any actual acumen.

Which may make her an equal opportunities villain, but it means it’s easy to make the entire character a simple mockery, and therefore of women in the workplace, unless they’re bad Marilyn impersonators. Katherine’s ski trip accident is played for laughs, and then there are the strangely lecherous orderlies buzzing around her in hospital, who appear to have strayed in from a John Landis movie. The ultimate scouring comes from Griffith herself, resorting to shallow, petty body shaming as a victory lap (“Now get your bony ass out of my sight”), an insult then repeated by the menfolk, eager to get in on the act. It’s a more effective summary of the movie’s actual content than any Carly Simon warbling.

If Weaver is nevertheless a juggernaut as the conniving bitch, the question relating to the third party in this love triangle must be: Is this where Ford became boring? He was in his mid-forties when he made Working Girl, having just done some of his career-best work in back-to-back Peter Weir pictures, but the movie signals the beginning of his everyman phase, sinking into underplaying, sporting suits and straight haircuts (or occasionally “provocative” ones in Presumed Innocent). He’d be a normy in Frantic the same year, and even his subsequent action roles (Jack Ryan, Richard Kimble, the President) would be signalled by constipated quavering that would eventually devolve into sleep-inducing torpor.

I can believe Jack Trainer as a slightly dull businessman, but not as an effective romcom sparring partner. I mean, Ford’s fine, but that’s exactly the refrain that greeted much of his subsequent work. Middling. Okay. Not stretching himself. Complacent. Jack/Harrison is so decent, of course, his taking Tess’s clothes off – à la Vertigo – and sleeping in the same bed (!) are perfectly innocent (clearly more designed to create a tension than anything, and crudely so; I mean, what if he’d turned over so blissfully in his sleep while she was still there?). It would be that way for Ford until he got himself an earring and tried to drown Michelle (amusingly, an anecdote here has him tell of his chin scar resulting from a teen belief it would be “cool to have a pierced ear”; some things will never change).

This is really a movie to look for the rewards around the edges, though. I’ve mentioned Spacey and Platt, who would carve out a niche as the disreputable support or puffy sidekick, or both simultaneously. He’s in the same year’s Married to the Mob, along with Alec Baldwin, who is Tess’s trash-monkey, lingerie -buying boyfriend here. Yes, Tess swaps one Jack Ryan for another. And in stark contrast to Ford, Baldwin is hungry. You only need look at his selection of supporting parts during this period (Talk Radio, Married to the Mob, She’s Having a Baby, Beetlejuice, Great Balls of Fire!) and they stand as far more impressive than most of his subsequent star-player work.

Olympia Dukakis (recently departed) has a cameo as Tess’s personnel director, while Joan Cusack steals the entire movie with her unrestrained and hilarious come-ons: “Coffee, tea, me?” she asks Jack. Even Ford thinks she’s funny. It’s the only moment in the movie where he looks like he has a pulse. You can also spot David Duchovny at Tess’s birthday.

Working Girl received a mystifying Best Picture nomination (everything else in the line-up is way better). I’m all for elevating the status of romcoms, but this one isn’t nearly sharp enough to deserve the recognition. It’s curious too that the noms were so loaded in favour of names: the three actresses, Simon and Nichols. Nothing writing or technical (I mean, this was the year Big, that popular paean to paedophilia, received a Best Original Screenplay nomination). The Working Girl model wouldn’t go away, of course; such undiluted slavishness to corporate greed might be a no-no later, but couch it in a rite of passage and you could still have fun with the model (The Devil Wears Prada). Ah, the ’80s. Such simpler times.

Popular posts from this blog

What’s so bad about being small? You’re not going to be small forever.

Innerspace (1987) There’s no doubt that Innerspace is a flawed movie. Joe Dante finds himself pulling in different directions, his instincts for comic subversion tempered by the need to play the romance plot straight. He tacitly acknowledges this on the DVD commentary for the film, where he notes Pauline Kael’s criticism that he was attempting to make a mainstream movie; and he was. But, as ever with Dante, it never quite turns out that way. Whereas his kids’ movies treat their protagonists earnestly, this doesn’t come so naturally with adults. I’m a bona fide devotee of Innerspace , but I can’t help but be conscious of its problems. For the most part Dante papers over the cracks; the movie hits certain keynotes of standard Hollywood prescription scripting. But his sensibility inevitably suffuses it. That, and human cartoon Martin Short (an ideal “leading man” for the director) ensure what is, at first glance just another “ Steven Spielberg Presents ” sci-fi/fantas

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Part I (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

Ziggy smokes a lot of weed.

Moonfall (2022) (SPOILERS) For a while there, it looked as if Moonfall , the latest and least-welcomed – so it seems – piece of apocalyptic programming from Roland Emmerich, might be sending mixed messages. Fortunately, we need not have feared, as it turns out to be the same pedigree of disaster porn we’ve come to expect from the director, one of the Elite’s most dutiful mass-entertainment stooges, even if his lustre has rather dimmed since the glory days of 2012.

Whacking. I'm hell at whacking.

Witness (1985) (SPOILERS) Witness saw the advent of a relatively brief period – just over half a decade –during which Harrison Ford was willing to use his star power in an attempt to branch out. The results were mixed, and abruptly concluded when his typically too late to go where Daniel Day Lewis, Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro had gone before (with at bare minimum Oscar-nominated results) – but not “ full retard ” – ended in derision with Regarding Henry . He retreated to the world of Tom Clancy, and it’s the point where his cachet began to crumble. There had always been a stolid quality beneath even his more colourful characters, but now it came to the fore. You can see something of that as John Book in Witness – despite his sole Oscar nom, it might be one of Ford’s least interesting performances of the 80s – but it scarcely matters, or that the screenplay (which won) is by turns nostalgic, reactionary, wistful and formulaic, as director Peter Weir, in his Hollywood debu

Are you telling me that I should take my daughter to a witch doctor?

The Exorcist (1973) (SPOILERS) Vast swathes have been written on The Exorcist , duly reflective of its cultural impact. In a significant respect, it’s the first blockbuster – forget Jaws – and also the first of a new kind of special-effects movie. It provoked controversy across all levels of the socio-political spectrum, for explicit content and religious content, both hailed and denounced for the same. William Friedkin, director of William Peter Blatty’s screenplay based on Blatty’s 1971 novel, would have us believe The Exorcist is “ a film about the mystery of faith ”, but it’s evidently much more – and less – than that. There’s a strong argument to be made that movies having the kind of seismic shock on the landscape this one did aren’t simply designed to provoke rumination (or exultation); they’re there to profoundly influence society, even if largely by osmosis, and when one looks at this picture’s architects, such an assessment only gains in credibility.

Is this supposed to be me? It’s grotesque.

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022) (SPOILERS) I didn’t hold out much hope for The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent being more than moderately tolerable. Not so much because its relatively untested director and his co-writer are mostly known in the TV sphere (and not so much for anything anyone is raving about). Although, it has to be admitted, the finished movie flourishes a degree of digital flatness typical of small-screen productions (it’s fine, but nothing more). Rather, due to the already over-tapped meta-strain of celebs showing they’re good sports about themselves. When Spike Jonze did it with John Malkovich, it was weird and different. By the time we had JCVD , not so much. And both of them are pre-dated by Arnie in Last Action Hero (“ You brought me nothing but pain ” he is told by Jack Slater). Plus, it isn’t as if Tom Gormican and Kevin Etten have much in the way of an angle on Nic; the movie’s basically there to glorify “him”, give or take a few foibles, do

That, my lad, was a dragon.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013) (SPOILERS) It’s alarming how quickly Peter Jackson sabotaged all the goodwill he amassed in the wake of The Lord of the Rings trilogy. A guy who started out directing deliciously deranged homemade horror movies ended up taking home the Oscar for a fantasy movie, of all genres. And then he blew it. He went from a filmmaker whose naysayers were the exception to one whose remaining cheerleaders are considered slightly maladjusted. The Desolation of Smaug recovers some of the territory Jackson has lost over the last decade, but he may be too far-gone to ever regain his crown. Perhaps in years to come The Lord of the Rings trilogy will be seen as an aberration in his filmography. There’s a cartoonishness to the gleeful, twisted anarchy on display in his earlierr work that may be more attuned to the less verimilitudinous aspects of King Kong and The Hobbit s. The exceptions are his female-centric character dramas, Heavenly Creat

Gizmo caca!

Gremlins (1984) I didn’t get to see Gremlins at the cinema. I wanted to, as I had worked myself into a state of great anticipation. There was a six-month gap between its (unseasonal) US release and arrival in the UK, so I had plenty of time to devour clips of cute Gizmo on Film ’84 (the only reason ever to catch Barry Norman was a tantalising glimpse of a much awaited movie, rather than his drab, colourless, reviews) and Gremlins trading cards that came with bubble gum attached (or was it the other way round?). But Gremlins ’ immediate fate for many an eager youngster in Britain was sealed when, after much deliberation, the BBFC granted it a 15 certificate. I had just turned 12, and at that time an attempt to sneak in to see it wouldn’t even have crossed my mind. I’d just have to wait for the video. I didn’t realise it then (because I didn’t know who he was as a filmmaker), but Joe Dante’s irrepressible anarchic wit would have a far stronger effect on me than the un

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.