Skip to main content

It’s like paradise with little golden palm trees.

Working Girl
(1988)

(SPOILERS) There’s something insidious and repellent at the heart of Mike Nichol’s big business Cinderella story, a How to Succeed at Business by Reading the Rags. Wall Street, for all that Gordon Gekko became a bad boys’ hero, had the good grace to say outright that greed was bad. Working Girl tells you it’s only bad when there isn’t a level gender playing field. And that, if there are only two women in the room, one of them has to go. But because it’s accompanied by that so-damn-aspirant, surging, uplifting Oscar-winning Carly Simon tune (Let the River Run), Working Girl encourages any objections to relapse into sharp relief.

Pauline Kael had it right when she observed “We’re supposed to be cheered by watching Tess become part of the establishment…” We’re supposed to be pulled along in the uplift of female empowerment, as long as it’s the right kind. But is there a right kind? Hollywood does its bit to support the cause, but what it’s really telling you is no good can come of such presumptions. Women in business break up families, not dutiful housewives (Fatal Attraction). But any significant level of power is itself dangerous (Aliens). There, and here, it takes the “good” woman to destroy the bad, or the bitch. So Sigourney Weaver’s Ellen Ripley must destroy the Alien Queen, and Melanie Griffith’s Tess McGill must destroy Sigourney Weaver’s Katherine Parker. Or be destroyed/devastated themselves.

Suiting this boom or bust are Working Girl’s opening stages. Tess starts off in a crummy office environment surrounded by scumbag co-workers (including Oliver Platt’s David Lutz, “a sleazoid pimp with a tiny dick” and Kevin Spacey’s Bob in arbitrage, a coke-snorting porn hound, so setting the scene for Spacey’s subsequent career, offscreen and on, attraction to Griffith notwithstanding). She gets splashed in the rain by passing cars. She – and all her female friends and co-workers – is also suffering from a BIG hair nightmare of the sort that was at least intentionally cartoonish in the same year’s Married to the Mob. If everyone resembles coke addicts, it sounds like most on set were (Griffith was called out by Nichols on the first day and made to pay the expenses for wasted time, since he stuck his neck out securing her the role). But don’t worry, we’ve got Carly Simon instructing you to hang on in there, along with sumptuous helicopter shots of the Statue of Liberty announcing your dreams can come true. Euphoric stuff.

Plus, Tess is miraculously – read annoyingly – ingenuous. Her entire repertoire of insights comes from a gluttonous diet of newspapers and magazines (“You read W?”), running the gamut of suggesting luncheon items to spotting potential business deals. It’s in the latter department that Katharine naturally tries to do her over. Griffith seemed ubiquitous in the late ’80s, but the truth was, a smattering of roles attracted a disproportionate amount of attention: Body Double, Something Wild and this. She received an Oscar nod for Working Girl, but I don’t really think it was warranted (only Joan Cusack and the earworm Simon song were, really. And the latter strictly relatively so).

I’m also doubtful the public were interested in her as a star attraction. For all the attention it received, and the star support from Weaver and Harrison Ford, the movie was only a modest hit. You’ll be hard pressed to find Griffith in a big success subsequently. Kael, with both the Brian De Palma and Jonathan Demme movies in mind, suggested Nichols was “trying to let a bit of tackiness into a big budget movie”. She may have been right; nothing speaks tacky like vacuuming topless, and Nichols, for all his and writer Kevin Wade’s virtue signalling (while ritually humiliating the other main female character), they’re very keen to put their leading lady in leery lingerie and suspenders.

But Kael’s also right that Nichols’ intention is something else. He makes Griffith an anodyne “cuddlebug”, divorcing her from the essential free-range sex of those previous roles, and shoehorning in the famous “I have a head for business and a bod for sin”, a trailer line rather than anything we actually believe of the character.

Griffith, with her sleepy coquettish squeak of a delivery, comes on like a quaaluded Monroe in a Horlicks factory. That kind of thing has a limited shelf life, and if it was perfectly utilised by Demme, here it’s rather a mismatch of packaging. She’s good at being out of it (tequila), but her delivery makes you assume everyone involved is humouring her. Which is surely exactly the point Nichols didn’t want to make. Tess’s success only serves to emphasise this is a fantasy, one with its Prince Charming (Ford) and wicked witch (Weaver). Come the end, Tess gets her crown and throne room (executive job and office). So maybe it was Griffith, or maybe the writing was already on the wall post-Crash for this kind of business fare. Two years later she’d be in stinker The Bonfire of the Vanities. Being a stinker didn’t help, but no longer being a hot topic was equally an issue.

Unlike Stone, Nichols and Wade have no interest in who gets crushed or left jobless by the acquisition that is key to Tess’s rise; big business and greed are good as long as you have scruples, but for how long? Tess is very nice to her secretary at the end, but perhaps we should see how she’s faring three months down the line. Weaver is aces, earning two nominations at that year’s Oscars (the other for Gorillas in the Mist), but while there’s a lot of canniness in Katherine’s ability to work the system (buttering up colleagues, pilfering proposals), there’s very little to suggest any actual acumen.

Which may make her an equal opportunities villain, but it means it’s easy to make the entire character a simple mockery, and therefore of women in the workplace, unless they’re bad Marilyn impersonators. Katherine’s ski trip accident is played for laughs, and then there are the strangely lecherous orderlies buzzing around her in hospital, who appear to have strayed in from a John Landis movie. The ultimate scouring comes from Griffith herself, resorting to shallow, petty body shaming as a victory lap (“Now get your bony ass out of my sight”), an insult then repeated by the menfolk, eager to get in on the act. It’s a more effective summary of the movie’s actual content than any Carly Simon warbling.

If Weaver is nevertheless a juggernaut as the conniving bitch, the question relating to the third party in this love triangle must be: Is this where Ford became boring? He was in his mid-forties when he made Working Girl, having just done some of his career-best work in back-to-back Peter Weir pictures, but the movie signals the beginning of his everyman phase, sinking into underplaying, sporting suits and straight haircuts (or occasionally “provocative” ones in Presumed Innocent). He’d be a normy in Frantic the same year, and even his subsequent action roles (Jack Ryan, Richard Kimble, the President) would be signalled by constipated quavering that would eventually devolve into sleep-inducing torpor.

I can believe Jack Trainer as a slightly dull businessman, but not as an effective romcom sparring partner. I mean, Ford’s fine, but that’s exactly the refrain that greeted much of his subsequent work. Middling. Okay. Not stretching himself. Complacent. Jack/Harrison is so decent, of course, his taking Tess’s clothes off – à la Vertigo – and sleeping in the same bed (!) are perfectly innocent (clearly more designed to create a tension than anything, and crudely so; I mean, what if he’d turned over so blissfully in his sleep while she was still there?). It would be that way for Ford until he got himself an earring and tried to drown Michelle (amusingly, an anecdote here has him tell of his chin scar resulting from a teen belief it would be “cool to have a pierced ear”; some things will never change).

This is really a movie to look for the rewards around the edges, though. I’ve mentioned Spacey and Platt, who would carve out a niche as the disreputable support or puffy sidekick, or both simultaneously. He’s in the same year’s Married to the Mob, along with Alec Baldwin, who is Tess’s trash-monkey, lingerie -buying boyfriend here. Yes, Tess swaps one Jack Ryan for another. And in stark contrast to Ford, Baldwin is hungry. You only need look at his selection of supporting parts during this period (Talk Radio, Married to the Mob, She’s Having a Baby, Beetlejuice, Great Balls of Fire!) and they stand as far more impressive than most of his subsequent star-player work.

Olympia Dukakis (recently departed) has a cameo as Tess’s personnel director, while Joan Cusack steals the entire movie with her unrestrained and hilarious come-ons: “Coffee, tea, me?” she asks Jack. Even Ford thinks she’s funny. It’s the only moment in the movie where he looks like he has a pulse. You can also spot David Duchovny at Tess’s birthday.

Working Girl received a mystifying Best Picture nomination (everything else in the line-up is way better). I’m all for elevating the status of romcoms, but this one isn’t nearly sharp enough to deserve the recognition. It’s curious too that the noms were so loaded in favour of names: the three actresses, Simon and Nichols. Nothing writing or technical (I mean, this was the year Big, that popular paean to paedophilia, received a Best Original Screenplay nomination). The Working Girl model wouldn’t go away, of course; such undiluted slavishness to corporate greed might be a no-no later, but couch it in a rite of passage and you could still have fun with the model (The Devil Wears Prada). Ah, the ’80s. Such simpler times.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe he had one too many peanut butter and fried banana sandwiches.

3000 Miles to Graceland (2001) (SPOILERS) The kind of movie that makes your average Tarantino knockoff look classy, 3000 Miles to Graceland is both aggressively unpleasant and acutely absent any virtues, either as a script or a stylistic exercise. The most baffling thing about it is how it attracted Kevin Costner and Kurt Russell, particularly since both ought to have been extra choosy at this point, having toplined expensive bombs in the previous half decade that made them significantly less bankable names. And if you’re wondering how this managed to cost the $62m reported on Wiki, it didn’t; Franchise Pictures, one of the backers, was in the business of fraudulently inflating budgets .

I must remind you that the scanning experience is usually a painful one.

Scanners (1981) (SPOILERS) David Cronenberg has made a career – albeit, he may have “matured” a little over the past few decades, so it is now somewhat less foregrounded – from sticking up for the less edifying notions of evolution and modern scientific thought. The idea that regress is, in fact, a form of progress, and unpropitious developments are less dead ends than a means to a state or states as yet unappreciated. He began this path with some squeam-worthy body horrors, before genre hopping to more explicit science fiction with Scanners , and with it, greater critical acclaim and a wider audience. And it remains a good movie, even as it suffers from an unprepossessing lead and rather fumbles the last furlong, cutting to the chase when a more measured, considered approach would have paid dividends.

You seem particularly triggered right now. Can you tell me what happened?

Trailers The Matrix Resurrections   The Matrix A woke n ? If nothing else, the arrival of The Matrix Resurrections trailer has yielded much retrospective back and forth on the extent to which the original trilogy shat the bed. That probably isn’t its most significant legacy, of course, in terms of a series that has informed, subconsciously or otherwise, intentionally or otherwise, much of the way in which twenty-first century conspiracy theory has been framed and discussed. It is however, uncontested that a first movie that was officially the “best thing ever”, that aesthetically and stylistically reinvigorated mainstream blockbuster cinema in a manner unseen again until Fury Road , squandered all that good will with astonishing speed by the time 2003 was over.

We’re looking into a possible pattern of nationwide anti-Catholic hate crimes.

Vampires aka John Carpenter’s Vampires (1998) (SPOILERS) John Carpenter limps less-than-boldly onward, his desiccated cadaver no longer attentive to the filmic basics of quality, taste, discernment, rhyme or reason. Apparently, he made his pre-penultimate picture to see if his enthusiasm for the process truly had drained away, and he only went and discovered he really enjoyed himself. It doesn’t show. Vampires is as flat, lifeless, shoddily shot, framed and edited as the majority of his ’90s output, only with a repellent veneer of macho bombast spread on top to boot.

White nights getting to you?

Insomnia (2002) (SPOILERS) I’ve never been mad keen on Insomnia . It’s well made, well-acted, the screenplay is solid and it fits in neatly with Christopher Nolan’s abiding thematic interests, but it’s… There’s something entirely adequateabout it. It isn’t pushing any kind of envelope. It’s happy to be the genre-bound crime study it is and nothing more, something emphasised by Pacino’s umpteenth turn as an under-pressure cop.

Maybe I’m a heel who hates guys who hate heels.

Crimewave (1985) (SPOILERS) A movie’s makers’ disowning it doesn’t necessarily mean there’s nothing of worth therein, just that they don’t find anything of worth in it. Or the whole process of making it too painful to contemplate. Sam Raimi’s had a few of those, experiencing traumas with Darkman a few years after Crimewave . But I, blissfully unaware of such issues, was bowled over by it when I caught it a few years after its release (I’d hazard it was BBC2’s American Wave 2 season in 1988). This was my first Sam Raimi movie, and I was instantly a fan of whoever it was managed to translate the energy and visual acumen of a cartoon to the realm of live action. The picture is not without its problems – and at least some of them directly correspond to why it’s so rueful for Raimi – but that initial flair I recognised still lifts it.

Remember. Decision. Consequence.

Day Break (2006) (SPOILERS) Day Break is the rare series that was lucky to get cancelled. And not in a mercy-killing way. It got to tell its story. Sure, apparently there were other stories. Other days to break. But would it have justified going there? Or would it have proved tantalising/reticent about the elusive reason its protagonist has to keep stirring and repeating? You bet it would. Offering occasional crumbs, and then, when it finally comes time to wrap things up, giving an explanation that satisfies no one/is a cop out/offers a hint at some nebulous existential mission better left to the viewer to conjure up on their own. Best that it didn’t even try to go there.

You absolute horror of a human being.

As Good as it Gets (1997) (SPOILERS) James L Brooks’ third Best Picture Oscar nomination goes to reconfirm every jaundiced notion you had of the writer-director-producer’s capacity for the facile and highly consumable, low-cal, fast-food melodramatic fix with added romcom lustre. Of course, As Good as it Gets was a monster hit, parading as it does Jack in a crackerjack, attention-grabbing part. But it’s a mechanical, suffocatingly artificial affair, ponderously paced (a frankly absurd 139 minutes) and infused with glib affirmations and affections. Naturally, the Academy lapped that shit up, because it reflects their own lack of depth and perception (no further comment is needed than Titanic winning the big prize for that year).

You cut my head off a couple of dozen times.

Boss Level (2021) (SPOILERS) Lest you thought it was nigh-on impossible to go wrong with a Groundhog Day premise, Joe Carnahan, in his swaggering yen for overkill, very nearly pulls it off with Boss Level . I’m unsure quite what became of Carnahan’s early potential, but he seems to have settled on a sub-Tarantino, sub-Bay, sub-Snyder, sub-Ritchie butch bros aesthetic, complete with a tin ear for dialogue and an approach to plotting that finds him continually distracting himself, under the illusion it’s never possible to have too much. Of whatever it is he’s indulging at that moment.

I dreamed about a guy in a dirty red and green sweater.

A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) (SPOILERS) I first saw A Nightmare on Elm Street a little under a decade after its release, and I was distinctly underwhelmed five or so sequels and all the hype. Not that it didn’t have its moments, but there was an “It’ll do” quality that reflects most of the Wes Craven movies I’ve seen. Aside from the postmodern tease of A New Nightmare – like Last Action Hero , unfairly maligned – I’d never bothered with the rest of the series, in part because I’m just not that big a horror buff, but also because the rule that the first is usually the best in any series, irrespective of genre, tends to hold out more often than not. So now I’m finally getting round to them, and it seemed only fair to start by giving Freddy’s first another shot. My initial reaction holds true.