Skip to main content

Personally, I give him a nine on the buzzard scale.

Darkman
(1990)

(SPOILERS) “…the dark... what secrets does it hold?” Sam Raimi bursts into the mainstream, kind of, with a low-budget superhero movie that puts the big guns to shame. Certainly Batman, and the then-a-few-months-old damp squib of a Dick Tracy. Darkman’s exactly as ebullient, irresponsible and excessive as you’d expect from the director who had most recently given us an extraordinary antic sequel to his debut horror flick. For all that Darkman is messy and undisciplined, what shines through is its sheer exuberant energy. Why, it even makes Liam Neeson seem awake!

Peyton: God, what have I become?

Neeson plays scientist Peyton Westlake, fortuitously investigating means to produce artificial skin, as it turns out that’s precisely what he needs lots of when Larry Drake’s mobster torches him and his lab during a search for Westlake’s lawyer girlfriend Frances McDormand’s goods on the bribes no-good billionaire developer Strack is offering the city zoning commission to get his construction project through. Peyton’s a sheepish, sensitive sort, but that changes rather when he’s tortured, Robocop-style, by Durant (Drake) and his goons (including a particularly ghoulish Ted Raimi); in one of the picture’s particularly sickly humorous spots, peppered throughout, Jenny Agutter’s burns doctor grins as she sticks an enormous pin in Westlake (rotating like a knife-thrower’s assistant on a medical contraption) and describes how his nerves have been severed to prevent him feeling pain. However, this has the side effect of amplifying alienation, loneliness and augmenting strength: “Personally, I give him a nine on the buzzard scale”. It’s no wonder Peyton makes tracks moments later.

By all reports, Raimi’s efforts to retain his signature sense of humour were an uphill struggle; “It was such a conflicted time for Sam; I don’t think he wants to revisit it” suggested producer Robert Tappert in a Hollywood Reporter retrospective last year. Raimi had originally attempted to get the rights for The Shadow, made by Russell Mulcahy a few years later, so he channelled his ideas into a new superhero, one snapped up by Universal… who then didn’t leave well enough alone, because they didn’t, or refused to, understand the talent they had.

Problems extended from the screenplay on up (Tappert: There are 5,000 names on that script. It was constantly being rewritten. In hindsight, I am not sure it ever got better; it just incorporated more people’s pisses. The Coen brothers were not credited by the guild, but they were instrumental early on with building the structure. The idea sprung from Sam’s head, and Joel and Ethan coaxed him along that road).

Peyton: Now, the pink elephant, if you please.

While Neeson was perhaps surprisingly all on board (but then, who’d have believed he’d have devoted much of his later career to the role of hangdog action star?), Raimi’s cartoonish style (later the kind of thing that infuriated Gene Hackman on The Quick and the Dead) didn’t vibe with McDormand. Or editor David Stiven, who fled. Bud S Smith was brought in and cut Raimi’s longer cut down from two hours to 85 minutes, trying to remove “all the weird shit”; at the last moment Bob Murawski, Raimi’s current editor, re-edited the movie, putting nine minutes back in “that the preview audiences would recoil from, but that was what it was meant to do”. By which point, it was too late for Universal to do anything (chairman “Tom Pollock was seriously fucking furious”).

Darkman was Bill Pope’s feature debut as cinematographer – later to set trends on The Matrix – and he noted “I have a distinct memory of being told by our dolly grip on day 50-something that we were doing our first shot in the film where the camera didn’t move through space — and it was a 360-degree pan”. Certainly, the attempts to do for Raimi’s vision don’t carry in any noticeable way, thanks to their last-minute salvaging effort. And I hesitate to say it, but a Darkman closer to ninety minutes than two hours is probably a good thing, compressing its yo-yo energy.

Strack: What have you got, besides a little trouble with your complexion?

You can probably spot the bits they laced back in, though, since they’re the bits that stick in the mind. The “cracked” montages, as Westlake subjectively loses it, or at a fairground when does objectively ("Take the fucking elephant!") Every melodramatic touch verges on hilarity, and doubtless would have toppled over the brink had Bruce Campbell – the original choice but not a name – played him. “They took my hands!” Peyton exclaims, straight out of a Universal horror. He ricochets from glee in his destruction (“I told you everything” protests Raimi, head stuck up through a manhole in the path of oncoming traffic: “I like to pretend you didn’t” replies Westlake, just before Ted goes splat). As for running extra fast on the roof of a truck… There’s no way any “serious” exec would have let that through.

Peyton: I just need a little time.

McDormand suspected she played her female lead a little too emancipated for the part’s purposes, but you have to look at the kind of character Julie is, succumbing to Friels’ dubious charm while knowing he’s a louse (suggesting a means to ease the symptoms of her grief: “It’s called dancing”) and responding “Honestly, I don’t know” when Peyton asks if she could love him if he was “horribly hurt”. Raimi makes extra certain to show everything about Peyton’s attempts to woo Julie – composer Danny Elfman called it “sad romanticism” – is off, setting their reunion at a graveyard and following it up with the fairground trauma. The scenes are queasy and utterly wrong, emphasising Peyton as a delusional weirdo. Which he is.

The picture is suffused with hi-energy set pieces, and not only with the stunts of the stylishly clad – and effectively gruey-ly made up – Westlake jumping and leaping out of the way of explosions or hanging off a helicopter (some of the effects work isn’t so hot, but that kind of works for Darkman’s exploitation-y, comic-y vibe). There’s bags of inventiveness in the set ups too, particularly with the kind of madcap doppelganger interactions previously found in Innerspace and that year’s Total Recall. Nicholas Worth gets befuddled at apparently having stolen a briefcase full of money (a lady screams at seeing both his body on the roof of a car and Westlake’s version looking on from a bench). Drake, relishing every beat as a villain, finds himself facing himself (“Whose little boy are you?”), before getting caught in a revolving door with Westlake.

Indeed, Drake is also given the pre-credits scene, complete with cigar cutter used to indelicate purpose, to himself (“Three. I’ve got seven more points”). Anyone thinking this might have been a new dawn for hugely inventive studio movies would have been sorely mistaken, however. When Sam went full-on blockbuster for Spider-Man twelve years later, he mostly tied down the camera, and largely great as his trilogy is, he definitely lost something through obeying the rules (not least with For Love of the Game and Oz the Great and Powerful).

Peyton: I’m learning to live with a lot of things.

Sean Daniel, former Universal production president, suggested Darkman would not have opened at No. 1 without ‘Who is Darkman?’” Which may be true; it was certainly a top-notch ad campaign. Raimi’s movie didn’t quite knock Exorcist III off the top (the sequel fell all the way to No.6 in its second week), but it definitely announced itself in no uncertain terms. Darkman may only have made the Top 40 domestic releases for the year, but it came cheap, and did much better (relatively) than big hopefuls like Predator 2, Air America, Gremlins 2 and Robocop 2. Curiously, it has hardly aged at all either. It was cheap and cheerful at the time, and now, its stylistic efforts only count in its favour. Sam needs to dwell on the positives with this one.


Popular posts from this blog

What’s so bad about being small? You’re not going to be small forever.

Innerspace (1987) There’s no doubt that Innerspace is a flawed movie. Joe Dante finds himself pulling in different directions, his instincts for comic subversion tempered by the need to play the romance plot straight. He tacitly acknowledges this on the DVD commentary for the film, where he notes Pauline Kael’s criticism that he was attempting to make a mainstream movie; and he was. But, as ever with Dante, it never quite turns out that way. Whereas his kids’ movies treat their protagonists earnestly, this doesn’t come so naturally with adults. I’m a bona fide devotee of Innerspace , but I can’t help but be conscious of its problems. For the most part Dante papers over the cracks; the movie hits certain keynotes of standard Hollywood prescription scripting. But his sensibility inevitably suffuses it. That, and human cartoon Martin Short (an ideal “leading man” for the director) ensure what is, at first glance just another “ Steven Spielberg Presents ” sci-fi/fantas

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Part I (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

Is this supposed to be me? It’s grotesque.

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022) (SPOILERS) I didn’t hold out much hope for The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent being more than moderately tolerable. Not so much because its relatively untested director and his co-writer are mostly known in the TV sphere (and not so much for anything anyone is raving about). Although, it has to be admitted, the finished movie flourishes a degree of digital flatness typical of small-screen productions (it’s fine, but nothing more). Rather, due to the already over-tapped meta-strain of celebs showing they’re good sports about themselves. When Spike Jonze did it with John Malkovich, it was weird and different. By the time we had JCVD , not so much. And both of them are pre-dated by Arnie in Last Action Hero (“ You brought me nothing but pain ” he is told by Jack Slater). Plus, it isn’t as if Tom Gormican and Kevin Etten have much in the way of an angle on Nic; the movie’s basically there to glorify “him”, give or take a few foibles, do

Whacking. I'm hell at whacking.

Witness (1985) (SPOILERS) Witness saw the advent of a relatively brief period – just over half a decade –during which Harrison Ford was willing to use his star power in an attempt to branch out. The results were mixed, and abruptly concluded when his typically too late to go where Daniel Day Lewis, Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro had gone before (with at bare minimum Oscar-nominated results) – but not “ full retard ” – ended in derision with Regarding Henry . He retreated to the world of Tom Clancy, and it’s the point where his cachet began to crumble. There had always been a stolid quality beneath even his more colourful characters, but now it came to the fore. You can see something of that as John Book in Witness – despite his sole Oscar nom, it might be one of Ford’s least interesting performances of the 80s – but it scarcely matters, or that the screenplay (which won) is by turns nostalgic, reactionary, wistful and formulaic, as director Peter Weir, in his Hollywood debu

Are you telling me that I should take my daughter to a witch doctor?

The Exorcist (1973) (SPOILERS) Vast swathes have been written on The Exorcist , duly reflective of its cultural impact. In a significant respect, it’s the first blockbuster – forget Jaws – and also the first of a new kind of special-effects movie. It provoked controversy across all levels of the socio-political spectrum, for explicit content and religious content, both hailed and denounced for the same. William Friedkin, director of William Peter Blatty’s screenplay based on Blatty’s 1971 novel, would have us believe The Exorcist is “ a film about the mystery of faith ”, but it’s evidently much more – and less – than that. There’s a strong argument to be made that movies having the kind of seismic shock on the landscape this one did aren’t simply designed to provoke rumination (or exultation); they’re there to profoundly influence society, even if largely by osmosis, and when one looks at this picture’s architects, such an assessment only gains in credibility.

That, my lad, was a dragon.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013) (SPOILERS) It’s alarming how quickly Peter Jackson sabotaged all the goodwill he amassed in the wake of The Lord of the Rings trilogy. A guy who started out directing deliciously deranged homemade horror movies ended up taking home the Oscar for a fantasy movie, of all genres. And then he blew it. He went from a filmmaker whose naysayers were the exception to one whose remaining cheerleaders are considered slightly maladjusted. The Desolation of Smaug recovers some of the territory Jackson has lost over the last decade, but he may be too far-gone to ever regain his crown. Perhaps in years to come The Lord of the Rings trilogy will be seen as an aberration in his filmography. There’s a cartoonishness to the gleeful, twisted anarchy on display in his earlierr work that may be more attuned to the less verimilitudinous aspects of King Kong and The Hobbit s. The exceptions are his female-centric character dramas, Heavenly Creat

Gizmo caca!

Gremlins (1984) I didn’t get to see Gremlins at the cinema. I wanted to, as I had worked myself into a state of great anticipation. There was a six-month gap between its (unseasonal) US release and arrival in the UK, so I had plenty of time to devour clips of cute Gizmo on Film ’84 (the only reason ever to catch Barry Norman was a tantalising glimpse of a much awaited movie, rather than his drab, colourless, reviews) and Gremlins trading cards that came with bubble gum attached (or was it the other way round?). But Gremlins ’ immediate fate for many an eager youngster in Britain was sealed when, after much deliberation, the BBFC granted it a 15 certificate. I had just turned 12, and at that time an attempt to sneak in to see it wouldn’t even have crossed my mind. I’d just have to wait for the video. I didn’t realise it then (because I didn’t know who he was as a filmmaker), but Joe Dante’s irrepressible anarchic wit would have a far stronger effect on me than the un

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls… dyin’ time’s here!

Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (1985) Time was kind to Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome . As in, it was such a long time since I’d seen the “final chapter” of the trilogy, it had dwindled in my memory to the status of an “alright but not great” sequel. I’d half-expected to have positive things to say along the lines of it being misunderstood, or being able to see what it was trying for but perhaps failing to quite achieve. Instead, I re-discovered a massive turkey that is really a Mad Max movie in name only (appropriately, since Max was an afterthought). This is the kind of picture fans of beloved series tend to loathe; when a favourite character returns but without the qualities or tone that made them adored in the first place (see Indiana Jones in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull , or John McClane in the last two Die Hard s). Thunderdome stinks even more than the methane fuelling Bartertown. I hadn’t been aware of the origins of Thunderdome until recently, mainly because I was