Skip to main content

Personally, I give him a nine on the buzzard scale.

Darkman
(1990)

(SPOILERS) “…the dark... what secrets does it hold?” Sam Raimi bursts into the mainstream, kind of, with a low-budget superhero movie that puts the big guns to shame. Certainly Batman, and the then-a-few-months-old damp squib of a Dick Tracy. Darkman’s exactly as ebullient, irresponsible and excessive as you’d expect from the director who had most recently given us an extraordinary antic sequel to his debut horror flick. For all that Darkman is messy and undisciplined, what shines through is its sheer exuberant energy. Why, it even makes Liam Neeson seem awake!

Peyton: God, what have I become?

Neeson plays scientist Peyton Westlake, fortuitously investigating means to produce artificial skin, as it turns out that’s precisely what he needs lots of when Larry Drake’s mobster torches him and his lab during a search for Westlake’s lawyer girlfriend Frances McDormand’s goods on the bribes no-good billionaire developer Strack is offering the city zoning commission to get his construction project through. Peyton’s a sheepish, sensitive sort, but that changes rather when he’s tortured, Robocop-style, by Durant (Drake) and his goons (including a particularly ghoulish Ted Raimi); in one of the picture’s particularly sickly humorous spots, peppered throughout, Jenny Agutter’s burns doctor grins as she sticks an enormous pin in Westlake (rotating like a knife-thrower’s assistant on a medical contraption) and describes how his nerves have been severed to prevent him feeling pain. However, this has the side effect of amplifying alienation, loneliness and augmenting strength: “Personally, I give him a nine on the buzzard scale”. It’s no wonder Peyton makes tracks moments later.

By all reports, Raimi’s efforts to retain his signature sense of humour were an uphill struggle; “It was such a conflicted time for Sam; I don’t think he wants to revisit it” suggested producer Robert Tappert in a Hollywood Reporter retrospective last year. Raimi had originally attempted to get the rights for The Shadow, made by Russell Mulcahy a few years later, so he channelled his ideas into a new superhero, one snapped up by Universal… who then didn’t leave well enough alone, because they didn’t, or refused to, understand the talent they had.

Problems extended from the screenplay on up (Tappert: There are 5,000 names on that script. It was constantly being rewritten. In hindsight, I am not sure it ever got better; it just incorporated more people’s pisses. The Coen brothers were not credited by the guild, but they were instrumental early on with building the structure. The idea sprung from Sam’s head, and Joel and Ethan coaxed him along that road).

Peyton: Now, the pink elephant, if you please.

While Neeson was perhaps surprisingly all on board (but then, who’d have believed he’d have devoted much of his later career to the role of hangdog action star?), Raimi’s cartoonish style (later the kind of thing that infuriated Gene Hackman on The Quick and the Dead) didn’t vibe with McDormand. Or editor David Stiven, who fled. Bud S Smith was brought in and cut Raimi’s longer cut down from two hours to 85 minutes, trying to remove “all the weird shit”; at the last moment Bob Murawski, Raimi’s current editor, re-edited the movie, putting nine minutes back in “that the preview audiences would recoil from, but that was what it was meant to do”. By which point, it was too late for Universal to do anything (chairman “Tom Pollock was seriously fucking furious”).

Darkman was Bill Pope’s feature debut as cinematographer – later to set trends on The Matrix – and he noted “I have a distinct memory of being told by our dolly grip on day 50-something that we were doing our first shot in the film where the camera didn’t move through space — and it was a 360-degree pan”. Certainly, the attempts to do for Raimi’s vision don’t carry in any noticeable way, thanks to their last-minute salvaging effort. And I hesitate to say it, but a Darkman closer to ninety minutes than two hours is probably a good thing, compressing its yo-yo energy.

Strack: What have you got, besides a little trouble with your complexion?

You can probably spot the bits they laced back in, though, since they’re the bits that stick in the mind. The “cracked” montages, as Westlake subjectively loses it, or at a fairground when does objectively ("Take the fucking elephant!") Every melodramatic touch verges on hilarity, and doubtless would have toppled over the brink had Bruce Campbell – the original choice but not a name – played him. “They took my hands!” Peyton exclaims, straight out of a Universal horror. He ricochets from glee in his destruction (“I told you everything” protests Raimi, head stuck up through a manhole in the path of oncoming traffic: “I like to pretend you didn’t” replies Westlake, just before Ted goes splat). As for running extra fast on the roof of a truck… There’s no way any “serious” exec would have let that through.

Peyton: I just need a little time.

McDormand suspected she played her female lead a little too emancipated for the part’s purposes, but you have to look at the kind of character Julie is, succumbing to Friels’ dubious charm while knowing he’s a louse (suggesting a means to ease the symptoms of her grief: “It’s called dancing”) and responding “Honestly, I don’t know” when Peyton asks if she could love him if he was “horribly hurt”. Raimi makes extra certain to show everything about Peyton’s attempts to woo Julie – composer Danny Elfman called it “sad romanticism” – is off, setting their reunion at a graveyard and following it up with the fairground trauma. The scenes are queasy and utterly wrong, emphasising Peyton as a delusional weirdo. Which he is.

The picture is suffused with hi-energy set pieces, and not only with the stunts of the stylishly clad – and effectively gruey-ly made up – Westlake jumping and leaping out of the way of explosions or hanging off a helicopter (some of the effects work isn’t so hot, but that kind of works for Darkman’s exploitation-y, comic-y vibe). There’s bags of inventiveness in the set ups too, particularly with the kind of madcap doppelganger interactions previously found in Innerspace and that year’s Total Recall. Nicholas Worth gets befuddled at apparently having stolen a briefcase full of money (a lady screams at seeing both his body on the roof of a car and Westlake’s version looking on from a bench). Drake, relishing every beat as a villain, finds himself facing himself (“Whose little boy are you?”), before getting caught in a revolving door with Westlake.

Indeed, Drake is also given the pre-credits scene, complete with cigar cutter used to indelicate purpose, to himself (“Three. I’ve got seven more points”). Anyone thinking this might have been a new dawn for hugely inventive studio movies would have been sorely mistaken, however. When Sam went full-on blockbuster for Spider-Man twelve years later, he mostly tied down the camera, and largely great as his trilogy is, he definitely lost something through obeying the rules (not least with For Love of the Game and Oz the Great and Powerful).

Peyton: I’m learning to live with a lot of things.

Sean Daniel, former Universal production president, suggested Darkman would not have opened at No. 1 without ‘Who is Darkman?’” Which may be true; it was certainly a top-notch ad campaign. Raimi’s movie didn’t quite knock Exorcist III off the top (the sequel fell all the way to No.6 in its second week), but it definitely announced itself in no uncertain terms. Darkman may only have made the Top 40 domestic releases for the year, but it came cheap, and did much better (relatively) than big hopefuls like Predator 2, Air America, Gremlins 2 and Robocop 2. Curiously, it has hardly aged at all either. It was cheap and cheerful at the time, and now, its stylistic efforts only count in its favour. Sam needs to dwell on the positives with this one.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maybe he had one too many peanut butter and fried banana sandwiches.

3000 Miles to Graceland (2001) (SPOILERS) The kind of movie that makes your average Tarantino knockoff look classy, 3000 Miles to Graceland is both aggressively unpleasant and acutely absent any virtues, either as a script or a stylistic exercise. The most baffling thing about it is how it attracted Kevin Costner and Kurt Russell, particularly since both ought to have been extra choosy at this point, having toplined expensive bombs in the previous half decade that made them significantly less bankable names. And if you’re wondering how this managed to cost the $62m reported on Wiki, it didn’t; Franchise Pictures, one of the backers, was in the business of fraudulently inflating budgets .

I must remind you that the scanning experience is usually a painful one.

Scanners (1981) (SPOILERS) David Cronenberg has made a career – albeit, he may have “matured” a little over the past few decades, so it is now somewhat less foregrounded – from sticking up for the less edifying notions of evolution and modern scientific thought. The idea that regress is, in fact, a form of progress, and unpropitious developments are less dead ends than a means to a state or states as yet unappreciated. He began this path with some squeam-worthy body horrors, before genre hopping to more explicit science fiction with Scanners , and with it, greater critical acclaim and a wider audience. And it remains a good movie, even as it suffers from an unprepossessing lead and rather fumbles the last furlong, cutting to the chase when a more measured, considered approach would have paid dividends.

You seem particularly triggered right now. Can you tell me what happened?

Trailers The Matrix Resurrections   The Matrix A woke n ? If nothing else, the arrival of The Matrix Resurrections trailer has yielded much retrospective back and forth on the extent to which the original trilogy shat the bed. That probably isn’t its most significant legacy, of course, in terms of a series that has informed, subconsciously or otherwise, intentionally or otherwise, much of the way in which twenty-first century conspiracy theory has been framed and discussed. It is however, uncontested that a first movie that was officially the “best thing ever”, that aesthetically and stylistically reinvigorated mainstream blockbuster cinema in a manner unseen again until Fury Road , squandered all that good will with astonishing speed by the time 2003 was over.

We’re looking into a possible pattern of nationwide anti-Catholic hate crimes.

Vampires aka John Carpenter’s Vampires (1998) (SPOILERS) John Carpenter limps less-than-boldly onward, his desiccated cadaver no longer attentive to the filmic basics of quality, taste, discernment, rhyme or reason. Apparently, he made his pre-penultimate picture to see if his enthusiasm for the process truly had drained away, and he only went and discovered he really enjoyed himself. It doesn’t show. Vampires is as flat, lifeless, shoddily shot, framed and edited as the majority of his ’90s output, only with a repellent veneer of macho bombast spread on top to boot.

White nights getting to you?

Insomnia (2002) (SPOILERS) I’ve never been mad keen on Insomnia . It’s well made, well-acted, the screenplay is solid and it fits in neatly with Christopher Nolan’s abiding thematic interests, but it’s… There’s something entirely adequateabout it. It isn’t pushing any kind of envelope. It’s happy to be the genre-bound crime study it is and nothing more, something emphasised by Pacino’s umpteenth turn as an under-pressure cop.

Maybe I’m a heel who hates guys who hate heels.

Crimewave (1985) (SPOILERS) A movie’s makers’ disowning it doesn’t necessarily mean there’s nothing of worth therein, just that they don’t find anything of worth in it. Or the whole process of making it too painful to contemplate. Sam Raimi’s had a few of those, experiencing traumas with Darkman a few years after Crimewave . But I, blissfully unaware of such issues, was bowled over by it when I caught it a few years after its release (I’d hazard it was BBC2’s American Wave 2 season in 1988). This was my first Sam Raimi movie, and I was instantly a fan of whoever it was managed to translate the energy and visual acumen of a cartoon to the realm of live action. The picture is not without its problems – and at least some of them directly correspond to why it’s so rueful for Raimi – but that initial flair I recognised still lifts it.

Remember. Decision. Consequence.

Day Break (2006) (SPOILERS) Day Break is the rare series that was lucky to get cancelled. And not in a mercy-killing way. It got to tell its story. Sure, apparently there were other stories. Other days to break. But would it have justified going there? Or would it have proved tantalising/reticent about the elusive reason its protagonist has to keep stirring and repeating? You bet it would. Offering occasional crumbs, and then, when it finally comes time to wrap things up, giving an explanation that satisfies no one/is a cop out/offers a hint at some nebulous existential mission better left to the viewer to conjure up on their own. Best that it didn’t even try to go there.

You absolute horror of a human being.

As Good as it Gets (1997) (SPOILERS) James L Brooks’ third Best Picture Oscar nomination goes to reconfirm every jaundiced notion you had of the writer-director-producer’s capacity for the facile and highly consumable, low-cal, fast-food melodramatic fix with added romcom lustre. Of course, As Good as it Gets was a monster hit, parading as it does Jack in a crackerjack, attention-grabbing part. But it’s a mechanical, suffocatingly artificial affair, ponderously paced (a frankly absurd 139 minutes) and infused with glib affirmations and affections. Naturally, the Academy lapped that shit up, because it reflects their own lack of depth and perception (no further comment is needed than Titanic winning the big prize for that year).

You cut my head off a couple of dozen times.

Boss Level (2021) (SPOILERS) Lest you thought it was nigh-on impossible to go wrong with a Groundhog Day premise, Joe Carnahan, in his swaggering yen for overkill, very nearly pulls it off with Boss Level . I’m unsure quite what became of Carnahan’s early potential, but he seems to have settled on a sub-Tarantino, sub-Bay, sub-Snyder, sub-Ritchie butch bros aesthetic, complete with a tin ear for dialogue and an approach to plotting that finds him continually distracting himself, under the illusion it’s never possible to have too much. Of whatever it is he’s indulging at that moment.

I dreamed about a guy in a dirty red and green sweater.

A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) (SPOILERS) I first saw A Nightmare on Elm Street a little under a decade after its release, and I was distinctly underwhelmed five or so sequels and all the hype. Not that it didn’t have its moments, but there was an “It’ll do” quality that reflects most of the Wes Craven movies I’ve seen. Aside from the postmodern tease of A New Nightmare – like Last Action Hero , unfairly maligned – I’d never bothered with the rest of the series, in part because I’m just not that big a horror buff, but also because the rule that the first is usually the best in any series, irrespective of genre, tends to hold out more often than not. So now I’m finally getting round to them, and it seemed only fair to start by giving Freddy’s first another shot. My initial reaction holds true.