Skip to main content

What are you doing, watching life in the slums?

Dead End
(1937)

In case you doubted it, there was never a monopoly on Denzel making all the painfully stagey movie adaptations of stage plays. Less still their getting rafts of Oscar nominations. It’s impossible to watch a certain kind of movie – or play, at any rate – without the Coen Brothers’ classic Barton Fink coming to mind, and its title character waxing “lyrical” about a tenement building on the Lower East Side, and the smell of fish, amid copious earnest moralising and an overwhelming air of self-importance. Which is Dead End all over. Like Barton Fink’s fish, it stinks.

Drina: I know that house in the country so well, I can almost build it.

William Wyler was entering a peak period of success at this point; he’d been nominated the previous year for Dodsworth, and would garner another seven nominations and two wins before his third and final statuette came winging his way at the end of the 1950s (for Ben-Hur). Quite a run, and quite a versatile array of genres and subject matter, such was the studio system.

Dead End came at the behest of Samuel Goldwyn, who snapped up the rights to Sidney Kingsley’s 1935 Broadway hit play for a crazy $165k (about $3m in today’s dosh). His intention was to translate the sometimes-unsuitable subject matter – to the Hayes Code – largely uncut. So while Francey (Claire Trevor, Best Supporting Actress nominated) is clearly sickly, her syphilis goes unmentioned. About the strongest allusion to her less-than-reputable lifestyle comes when the henchman of Baby Face Martin (Bogey), sent to call on her, reports that she isn’t up yet, and then adds pointedly “She seemed kind of busy, your Francey”. Obviously, Baby Face – who has returned to the neighbourhood through nostalgia or some such – is less interested in his former squeeze when he learns she’s sullied goods.

Goldwyn lavished a lavish set on the production (cinematographer Gregg Toland and Art Director Richard Day were also Oscar nominated; the former would go on to win for Wyler’s Wuthering Heights, the latter had already taken home two trophies, and would win another six, with twelve other noms besides!) Wyler wanted to shoot authentically on location, perhaps not such a grand idea when it came to swimming in the East River (unless you’re Cosmo Kramer). However, you can see his point. No matter how much it’s dirtied up with the occasional cockroach, the set is resolutely closed and confined, beginning and ending on the artifice of a pan to and from the cityscape. Which means most of the interactions and transitions between characters retain the overt staginess of the play; no matter how many sequences are effectively (noirishly) lit, the end results creak as much as the performances.

The introductory titles signpost the theme, of rich and poor, and how the former are lately encroaching on the East River because of its prettifying views, such that “now terraces look down into the windows of the tenement poor”. This divide is exactly as crudely fashioned as that sounds, with unruly street kidz hanging around a fortress-like doorway guarded by Ward Bond. The stately premises are inhabited by posh totty Kay (Wendy Barrie), and also unlucky rich kid Philip (Charles Peck), who gets a jolly good beating from the urchinz.

These kidz, popularly The Dead End Kids, had mostly appeared in Dead End’s Broadway incarnation and were contracted to United Artists, only to be released to Warner Bros (they also appeared in Angels with Dirty Faces amongst others) after they ran riot on the lot. They’re a wretchedly amateurish bunch, 
given to cries of "I’ll marbleise ya, you goon!" and poised somewhere between Happy Days and Once Upon a Time in America. In particular, the plight of Tommy (Billy Halop), doted over by big sister Drina (what kind of name is Drina? The kind given to a river in the Balkans, it seems). Drina is played by the lovely Sylvia Sidney, who was great in the previous year’s Sabotage. Unfortunately, here she’s saddled with a quite awful wet blanket and doormat character, whose inability to see Tommy’s recalcitrance is especially wearing.

Indeed, it’s surely a bit of an own goal that rich fellow Mr Griswald (Minor Watson) should seem eminently reasonable in wanting Tommy to face justice for knifing him and robbing and mugging Philip. It doesn’t help either that Drina’s protestations that her brother just made a mistake are terribly unpersuasive (“I’m sure he didn’t mean to”), while Griswald’s retorts are pretty good (“Yes, a mistake half-an-inch deep and painful”).

Dave: He was smart, and brave, and decent… at first.

Elsewhere, we have Joel McCrea’s poverty-trap architect Dave, a very McCrea bastion of rugged goodness and so faintly dull. His head’s been turned by upper-crust Kay, but you know he’ll end up with Drina and be the surrogate dad Tommy so desperately needs. Dave’s been set against Baby Face, objecting to his guns and knives approach and proving more than a match for him when it comes to a set-to. The latter is the movie’s biggest concession to, well, the movies, since the point from Dave dropping into the East River to shooting Bogey on a rooftop is about the only interval where Dead End feels genuinely cinematic. That and Kay blanching at the sickly coughing, the filthy roaches in the garbage and the crying babies when she steals her way to Dave’s derelict door.

McCrea apparently kept flinching in his scenes with Bogey, not because the latter was intimidating, but because Humphrey was on the spitty side. Yeuch. Bogey was there largely because they couldn’t get George Raft or Jimmy Cagney, and it would be another four years before he really broke through as a leading man. 

Hunk: We all make mistakes, boss. That’s why they put rubbers on the ends of pencils.

As noted, Dead End received a Best Picture nomination and three other nods in a year featuring ten nominees for the top slot (The Life of Emile Zola won, but The Awful Truth is probably the keeper). I have little compunction in writing this one off, and I doubt even a sympathetic adaptation, geared to actual realism, would have helped. It’s the kind of faintly patronising fare written by the middle classes about the working classes, the kind of thing Mike Leigh would later thrive off, which only further diminishes any pretensions towards drama heft or lingering resonance. Pauline Kael called this “ambience of Broadway social conscience of the 30s” “highly entertaining”, but it really isn’t. Still, Bogey’s mum’s response on seeing him is quite sobering: “Then get out of here, before I cut your face again”. It certainly explains why he got that “plastic”.


Popular posts from this blog

I’m smarter than a beaver.

Prey (2022) (SPOILERS) If nothing else, I have to respect Dan Trachtenberg’s cynical pragmatism. How do I not only get a project off the ground, but fast-tracked as well? I know, a woke Predator movie! Woke Disney won’t be able to resist! And so, it comes to pass. Luckily for Prey , it gets to bypass cinemas and so the same sorry fate of Lightyear . Less fortunately, it’s a patience-testing snook cocking at historicity (or at least, assumed historicity), in which a young, pint-sized Comanche girl who wishes to hunt and fish – and doubtless shoot to boot – with the big boys gets to take on a Predator and make mincemeat of him. Well, of course , she does. She’s a girl, innit?

Everyone creates the thing they dread.

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) (SPOILERS) Avengers: Age of Ultron ’s problem isn’t one of lack. It benefits from a solid central plot. It features a host of standout scenes and set pieces. It hands (most of) its characters strong defining moments. It doesn’t even suffer now the “wow” factor of seeing the team together for the first time has subsided. Its problem is that it’s too encumbered. Maybe its asking to much of a director to effectively martial the many different elements required by an ensemble superhero movie such as this, yet Joss Whedon’s predecessor feels positively lean in comparison. Part of this is simply down to the demands of the vaster Marvel franchise machine. Seeds are laid for Captain America: Civil War , Infinity Wars I & II , Black Panther and Thor: Ragnarok . It feels like several spinning plates too many. Such activity occasionally became over-intrusive on previous occasions ( Iron Man II ), but there are points in Age of Ultron whe

I’m the famous comedian, Arnold Braunschweiger.

Last Action Hero (1993) (SPOILERS) Make no mistake, Last Action Hero is a mess. But even as a mess, it might be more interesting than any other movie Arnie made during that decade, perhaps even in his entire career. Hellzapoppin’ (after the 1941 picture, itself based on a Broadway revue) has virtually become an adjective to describe films that comment upon their own artifice, break the fourth wall, and generally disrespect the convention of suspending disbelief in the fictions we see parading across the screen. It was fairly audacious, some would say foolish, of Arnie to attempt something of that nature at this point in his career, which was at its peak, rather than playing it safe. That he stumbled profoundly, emphatically so since he went up against the behemoth that is Jurassic Park (slotted in after the fact to open first), should not blind one to the considerable merits of his ultimate, and final, really, attempt to experiment with the limits of his screen persona.

If you ride like lightning, you're going to crash like thunder.

The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) (SPOILERS) There’s something daringly perverse about the attempt to weave a serious-minded, generation-spanning saga from the hare-brained premise of The Place Beyond the Pines . When he learns he is a daddy, a fairground stunt biker turns bank robber in order to provide for his family. It’s the kind of “only-in-Hollywood” fantasy premise you might expect from a system that unleashed Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man and Point Break on the world. But this is an indie-minded movie from the director of the acclaimed Blue Valentine ; it demands respect and earnest appraisal. Unfortunately it never recovers from the abject silliness of the set-up. The picture is littered with piecemeal characters and scenarios. There’s a hope that maybe the big themes will even out the rocky terrain but in the end it’s because of this overreaching ambition that the film ends up so undernourished. The inspiration for the movie

Death to Bill and Ted!

Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) (SPOILERS) The game of how few sequels are actually better than the original is so well worn, it was old when Scream 2 made a major meta thing out of it (and it wasn’t). Bill & Ted Go to Hell , as Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey was originally called, is one such, not that Excellent Adventure is anything to be sneezed at, but this one’s more confident, even more playful, more assured and more smartly stupid. And in Peter Hewitt it has a director with a much more overt and fittingly cartoonish style than the amiably pedestrian Stephen Herrick. Evil Bill : First, we totally kill Bill and Ted. Evil Ted : Then we take over their lives. My recollection of the picture’s general consensus was that it surpassed the sleeper hit original, but Rotten Tomatoes’ review aggregator suggests a less universal response. And, while it didn’t rock any oceans at the box office, Bogus Journey and Point Break did quite nicely for Keanu Reev

I think it’s pretty clear whose side the Lord’s on, Barrington.

Monte Carlo or Bust aka  Those Daring Young Men in Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) (SPOILERS) Ken Annakin’s semi-sequel to Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines tends to be rather maligned, usually compared negatively to its more famous predecessor. Which makes me rather wonder if those expressing said opinion have ever taken the time to scrutinise them side by side. Or watch them back to back (which would be more sensible). Because Monte Carlo or Bust is by far the superior movie. Indeed, for all its imperfections and foibles (not least a performance from Tony Curtis requiring a taste for comic ham), I adore it. It’s probably the best wacky race movie there is, simply because each set of competitors, shamelessly exemplifying a different national stereotype (albeit there are two pairs of Brits, and a damsel in distress), are vibrant and cartoonish in the best sense. Albeit, it has to be admitted that, as far as said stereotypes go, Annakin’s home side win

This entire edifice you see around you, built on jute.

Jeeves and Wooster 3.3: Cyril and the Broadway Musical  (aka Introduction on Broadway) Well, that’s a relief. After a couple of middling episodes, the third season bounces right back, and that's despite Bertie continuing his transatlantic trip. Clive Exton once again plunders  Carry On, Jeeves  but this time blends it with a tale from  The Inimitable Jeeves  for the brightest spots, as Cyril Basington-Basington (a sublimely drippy Nicholas Hewetson) pursues his stage career against Aunt Agatha's wishes.

Poetry in translation is like taking a shower with a raincoat on.

Paterson (2016) (SPOILERS) Spoiling a movie where nothing much happens is difficult, but I tend to put the tag on in a cautionary sense much of the time. Paterson is Jim Jarmusch at his most inert and ambient but also his most rewardingly meditative. Paterson (Adam Driver), a bus driver and modest poet living in Paterson, New Jersey, is a stoic in a fundamental sense, and if he has a character arc of any description, which he doesn’t really, it’s the realisation that is what he is. Jarmusch’s picture is absent major conflict or drama; the most significant episodes feature Paterson’s bus breaking down, the English bull terrier Marvin – whom Paterson doesn’t care for but girlfriend Laura (Golshifteh Farahani) dotes on – destroying his book of poetry, and an altercation at the local bar involving a gun that turns out to be a water pistol. And Paterson takes it all in his stride, genial to the last, even the ruination of his most earnest, devoted work (the only disappoint

Just because you are a character doesn't mean that you have character.

Pulp Fiction (1994) (SPOILERS) From a UK perspective, Pulp Fiction ’s success seemed like a fait accompli; Reservoir Dogs had gone beyond the mere cult item it was Stateside and impacted mainstream culture itself (hard to believe now that it was once banned on home video); it was a case of Tarantino filling a gap in the market no one knew was there until he drew attention to it (and which quickly became over-saturated with pale imitators subsequently). Where his debut was a grower, Pulp Fiction hit the ground running, an instant critical and commercial success (it won the Palme d’Or four months before its release), only made cooler by being robbed of the Best Picture Oscar by Forrest Gump . And unlike some famously-cited should-have-beens, Tarantino’s masterpiece really did deserve it.

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.