Skip to main content

You cut my head off a couple of dozen times.

Boss Level

(SPOILERS) Lest you thought it was nigh-on impossible to go wrong with a Groundhog Day premise, Joe Carnahan, in his swaggering yen for overkill, very nearly pulls it off with Boss Level. I’m unsure quite what became of Carnahan’s early potential, but he seems to have settled on a sub-Tarantino, sub-Bay, sub-Snyder, sub-Ritchie butch bros aesthetic, complete with a tin ear for dialogue and an approach to plotting that finds him continually distracting himself, under the illusion it’s never possible to have too much. Of whatever it is he’s indulging at that moment.

It’s Guy Ritchie who comes most to mind, though, since both tend towards a flashy, gangster-chic crime milieu. Ritchie, though – and I’m not trying to sing his praises, but he does sometimes come through – has a distinctive style and voice, however flawed it may be in terms of general worldview and maturity. Carnahan, ever since Smokin’ Aces (which looks positively well-conceived next to this) seems to have contented himself with a certain glorified vacuity signifying nothing (The A-Team, Stretch). That is, when he has actually got something off the ground (his career is littered with never-to-bes, including Mission: Impossible III, the Death Wish remake, Killing Pablo, White Jazz, Daredevil, Bad Boys 3). Or when he’s trying for something more (The Grey), he simply ends up looking like the best he has to say for himself is a streak of doleful nihilism. But manly with it. Always manly.

His movies tend to be quite well put together, and mostly quite watchable – although The Grey tested my patience once its trajectory became clear – but there’s a particular juvenilia involved that’s somehow more irksome than those of his kinetically-charged peers (the Bays, Snyders and Ritchies). Perhaps because he’s so discernibly aggressive with it, and so graceless is in his characterisations. Grillo seems like a good match for his tastes then, both inhabiting about the same level of B-chops in terms of stardom, projects, budget and critical ranking (they’re reteaming next for Copshop, with next-level B-player Gerard Butler. An embarrassment of semi-talents). Grillo’s the Stat to Carnahan’s Ritchie.

Frank is Roy Pulver, retired Delta Force hardman caught in a terminal loop of daily assassinations (his own, mainly), somehow – thickness, possibly – taking nearly three months’ worth of truncated days to realise his reset may just have something to do with ex Naomi Watts’ science experiments. The ones he was discussing with her just the night before, so surely quite fresh in his memory. She’s working for Mad Mel’s Colonel Clive Ventor, building an Osiris Spindle that will enable history to be rewritten (it’s like the Hadron Collider, but dinkier and involving less satanic rites on the premises). Realising she’s in danger, she slipped Roy into her spindle via his DNA or some such (it isn’t worth thinking too hard about, since it’s implausible enough that there’s a “plausible” explanation for the loop).

The reason Roy takes so long to get wise is that Carnahan wants to show us what a wag he is, with many-and-not-all-that-varied-actually, very violent stir-and-repeat deaths (of both Frank and his aggressors) in the time-honoured Groundhog Day fashion. Some of these are funny, some quite clever, but mostly there’s an off-putting sense of smugness, Carnahan resting on the laurels of believing this will work no matter what. Because – as I assumed – the Groundhog Day structure is pretty much a “can’t fail”. Instead, Boss Level veered at times, as Franks suggests, into territory where “It got fucking annoying”.

Fairly early on, we learn that Jemma (Watts) has been murdered, but obviously this can’t be so, or at any rate permanently, as she’s played by Watts. And even post-Book of Henry Watts isn’t quite reduced to fleeting cameos, even if playing Grillo’s ex is an undeniable climb down. Anyone would think she got more press for raising gender-stereotype-free children than acting. Accordingly, the movie’s emotional component is largely redundant, yet Carnahan feels obliged/is obliged to indulge it in a manner both pedestrian and trite – “I killed her when I ran from that relationship” – as Roy reconnects with Jemma and his son (Grillo’s actual son). There was a moment during the latter interaction when I wondered if we might be on the brink of plunging into a riff on Serenity (Roy Jr’s gaming cards Killville look rather like the array of assassins Frank is facing). But alas, that particular brand of genius was not to be.

Speaking of cameos, Mel’s presence is little more than a glorified one, in which he must undergo tediously meta-characterisation coding. I mean, Gibson’s accepting these parts, so he only has himself to blame (see also Dragged Across Concrete), but playing a character bemoaning “fucking liberals” and resolving a dispute over the place of origin of a sword with “Let’s not make this about race” is either baiting or foolishly assuming playing on one’s notoriety is a good idea. His major scene has Ventor relating a tale of a boa/boar encounter in 1979 Burma to Jemma (when Mel would have been a mere stripling of 23). He’s duly intimidating opposite his fellow antipodean, but Watts choices play as rather silly (she imitates his posture), and make you wonder other salient things, like how Jemma was so stupid in the first place as to take a job from Ventor, which further suggests she has fairly loose scruples, particularly if she’s willing to drop her ex in it.

There’s a sense of Carnahan magpie-ing elements and touches others have done much better. So there’s a “weirdo dwarf” (but with none of Martin McDonagh’s wit). Cliff Shorter’s synth theme suggests Stranger Things. There’s a Tarantino-esque sword-wielding assassin (“I am Guan Yin. Guan Yin has done this”), Selina Lo, and Roy must train up with Michelle Yeoh to beat her, except… he becomes a master in about 25 lessons? There’s a raft of irreverent dialogue, most of it poor, most notably “Harrison Ford had the shits” – why throw in one of Raiders’ best-known anecdotes, even among the hoi polloi, as if it’s a witty rejoinder? There are decent moments, of course, just as some of the action is decent – “I smell muffins. Do you smell muffins?” asks Will Sasso with a sword lodged in his forehead – but the proceedings are generally too noisy and busy, Carnahan clutching a grab bag of tunes including Burt Bacharach’s South American Getaway that serve to emphasise his ever-the-pretender-to-the-throne status.

Boss Level being what it is, Carnahan even throws in the end of the world, but he fails to make you care about any of it. If you only have one volume, it’s difficult to build anything, or ease off, or suggest subtler touches. It seems Blumhouse were called in to do that, offering a salvaging recut that they’re now in dispute over. Although frankly (grillo-ly), the released Boss Level seems exactly the kind of movie I’d expect Carnahan to deliver, so was the “disappointing and lacking in commercial appeal” original cut even more Carnahan-y? There’s also the problem that Grillo isn’t very loveable. I mean, he’s more personable than most of the B-grade ’80s/’90s action stars, but he isn’t adding anything singular to the material. He isn’t giving it a personality. And that’s the problem with Carnahan’s movies. They don’t have much personality, unless you count macho rattle.

Popular posts from this blog

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

Ziggy smokes a lot of weed.

Moonfall (2022) (SPOILERS) For a while there, it looked as if Moonfall , the latest and least-welcomed – so it seems – piece of apocalyptic programming from Roland Emmerich, might be sending mixed messages. Fortunately, we need not have feared, as it turns out to be the same pedigree of disaster porn we’ve come to expect from the director, one of the Elite’s most dutiful mass-entertainment stooges, even if his lustre has rather dimmed since the glory days of 2012.

What’s so bad about being small? You’re not going to be small forever.

Innerspace (1987) There’s no doubt that Innerspace is a flawed movie. Joe Dante finds himself pulling in different directions, his instincts for comic subversion tempered by the need to play the romance plot straight. He tacitly acknowledges this on the DVD commentary for the film, where he notes Pauline Kael’s criticism that he was attempting to make a mainstream movie; and he was. But, as ever with Dante, it never quite turns out that way. Whereas his kids’ movies treat their protagonists earnestly, this doesn’t come so naturally with adults. I’m a bona fide devotee of Innerspace , but I can’t help but be conscious of its problems. For the most part Dante papers over the cracks; the movie hits certain keynotes of standard Hollywood prescription scripting. But his sensibility inevitably suffuses it. That, and human cartoon Martin Short (an ideal “leading man” for the director) ensure what is, at first glance just another “ Steven Spielberg Presents ” sci-fi/fantas

All I saw was an old man with a funky hand, that’s all I saw.

The Blob (1988) (SPOILERS) The 1980s effects-laden remake of a ’50s B-movie that couldn’t. That is, couldn’t persuade an audience to see it and couldn’t muster critical acclaim. The Fly was a hit. The Thing wasn’t, but its reputation has since soared. Like Invaders from Mars , no such fate awaited The Blob , despite effects that, in many respects, are comparable in quality to the John Carpenter classic – and are certainly indebted to Rob Bottin for bodily grue – and surehanded direction from Chuck Russell. I suspect the reason is simply this: it lacks that extra layer that would ensure longevity.

Are you telling me that I should take my daughter to a witch doctor?

The Exorcist (1973) (SPOILERS) Vast swathes have been written on The Exorcist , duly reflective of its cultural impact. In a significant respect, it’s the first blockbuster – forget Jaws – and also the first of a new kind of special-effects movie. It provoked controversy across all levels of the socio-political spectrum, for explicit content and religious content, both hailed and denounced for the same. William Friedkin, director of William Peter Blatty’s screenplay based on Blatty’s 1971 novel, would have us believe The Exorcist is “ a film about the mystery of faith ”, but it’s evidently much more – and less – than that. There’s a strong argument to be made that movies having the kind of seismic shock on the landscape this one did aren’t simply designed to provoke rumination (or exultation); they’re there to profoundly influence society, even if largely by osmosis, and when one looks at this picture’s architects, such an assessment only gains in credibility.

That, my lad, was a dragon.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013) (SPOILERS) It’s alarming how quickly Peter Jackson sabotaged all the goodwill he amassed in the wake of The Lord of the Rings trilogy. A guy who started out directing deliciously deranged homemade horror movies ended up taking home the Oscar for a fantasy movie, of all genres. And then he blew it. He went from a filmmaker whose naysayers were the exception to one whose remaining cheerleaders are considered slightly maladjusted. The Desolation of Smaug recovers some of the territory Jackson has lost over the last decade, but he may be too far-gone to ever regain his crown. Perhaps in years to come The Lord of the Rings trilogy will be seen as an aberration in his filmography. There’s a cartoonishness to the gleeful, twisted anarchy on display in his earlierr work that may be more attuned to the less verimilitudinous aspects of King Kong and The Hobbit s. The exceptions are his female-centric character dramas, Heavenly Creat

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Part I (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

You keep a horse in the basement?

The ‘Burbs (1989) (SPOILERS) The ‘Burbs is Joe Dante’s masterpiece. Or at least, his masterpiece that isn’t his bite-the-hand-that-feeds-you masterpiece Gremlins 2: The New Batch , or his high profile masterpiece Gremlins . Unlike those two, the latter of which bolted out of the gate and took audiences by surprise with it’s black wit subverting the expected Spielberg melange, and the first which was roundly shunned by viewers and critics for being absolutely nothing like the first and waving that fact gleefully under their noses, The ‘Burbs took a while to gain its foothold in the Dante pantheon.  It came out at a time when there had been a good few movies (not least Dante’s) taking a poke at small town Americana, and it was a Tom Hanks movie when Hanks was still a broad strokes comedy guy ( Big had just made him big, Turner and Hooch was a few months away; you know you’ve really made it when you co-star with a pooch). It’s true to say that some, as with say The Bi

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the