Skip to main content

Deep down, I always knew it was a façade.


(SPOILERS) It seems the Kolchaks and Stahleskis have every chance of succeeding where Luc Besson’s EuropaCorp has recently floundered; in the unapologetically unreconstituted, muscular action genre (albeit EuropaCorp’s great error was bankrolling Besson’s folly Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets with a couple of chemistry-free, charisma-free leads). That doesn’t make their fare exclusively male by any means – see Atomic Blonde, and Kate – but they betray essentially minimal interest in refining or repurposing their fare to vouch wholesale for Hollywood’s current presiding and prescriptive socio-political interests. Indeed, I spent most of Nobody expecting its Mr and Mrs Smith shoe to drop, whereby Becca (Connie Nielsen) the wife of Hutch (Bob Odenkirk), turns out to be every bit as kick ass as hubby. But it doesn’t happen. Maybe in the sequel, then.

Derek Kolstad had his name on all three John Wick screenplays, so he knows his action beats, and he knows the best way to tell a hero tale is to have the odds stacked against him/her. Or did. It’s a reason John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum falters – particularly during the Halle Berry section – as things become just a little tooeasy. And so, in due course, it is here. Nobody is lean and direct, a refreshing ninety minutes in length, and Ilya Naishuller effectively exorcises the rank memory of Hardcore Henry – I haven’t seen it, no; the trailer was quite enough – with precisely shot and edited action sequences frequently lent a classical veneer through the use of tracks from the likes of Nina Simone, Andy Williams, Gerry and the Pacemakers, Louis Armstrong, Nat King Cole and Tchaikovsky.

It's only during the last third that Nobody loses something of its gumption, satisfied to transition into more of an ensemble affair, complete with indiscriminate machine gunfire mowing down swathes of bad guys (Kolstad favourites Russians – yes, it’s that old school) willy nilly. Before that, Odenkirk’s ex-auditor, now a family man living a quiet life, breaks cover when he attempts to retrieve his daughter’s Kitty Cat bracelet after an armed break-in (it turns out to have been simply mislaid). It’s his subsequent intervention on a bus invaded by odious types that triggers the eruption of his world, however, since one of his victims is the brother of crime lord Yulian Kuznetsov (Aleksei Serebryakov, more than matching Odenkirk in the charisma stakes and bringing palpable threat to bear too).

Before long, Hutch is fending off all manner of assassination attempts in order to keep his family and extended family safe. The latter turn out to include dad Christopher Lloyd and brother RZA. It’s particularly nice to see Lloyd on screen again, nonchalantly shotgunning assassins while watching TV. But I couldn’t help feel Kolstad resorts to this Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade element too soon; the first instalment should have been Hutch facing his adversaries solo. For the first hour, Nobody suggested it might be up to the standard of the first two John Wicks, but it stumbles with the wall-to-wall action that follows, offering too few suspense setups amid the mayhem of explosions and shootings.

Nevertheless, the movie rarely puts a foot wrong up to that point, carefully nursing the opening break-in, such that Hutch receives all-round mild reproof for holding back from doing his manly duty and whooping the intruders’ asses (from police, from his brother-in-law, and from his father-in-law & boss, the formidable Michael Ironside). This is grist to the mill of Hutch’s turning worm, even though we know he’s no such thing (the framing device finds him in a police interview).

Hutch may be an unstoppable killing machine once unleashed, but there’s an emphasis on John McClane fallibility too (even though knifings and pummellings conspicuously fail to stop him in his tracks). There are nice humorous touches too, such as him continually attempting to explain his backstory only for his audience to die on him. He and Yulian are really the same guy – “You came to my house, which you know, you DON'T fucking do!” – it’s simply that one rejected the direct diktats and settled instead for falling in line with the average Shmoes. The extent to which Becca has been involved in his old life is left open for debate, but I’m sure Nielsen took her meagre role hopeful she’ll be serviced with some action beats in any (probably quite likely) sequel.

The idea that everyday life is a façade, an endless routine of fakery, a veneer disguising whatever is really going on, is about as much as you can glean in broader subtext from Nobody, but it’s enough that Hutch is intent on puncturing that, ensuring he becomes the man he feels he is. Notably, this was Odenkirk’s idea. Odenkirk, of course, made a big thing of being double jabbed on the set of Better Call, Saul, leading to suggestions this might have been at the root of his heart attack a few months later. Smoke and fire, but there’s also the possibility that the whole thing was illusory, à la Oscar-winning Ant’s shot, and that it was designed to send a message of “Don’t worry about side effects, Bob’s fighting fit”. Unlike DMX. Perhaps the Elite are simply Breaking Bad fans.

If John Wick is 87North’s equivalent to the Taken franchise, then Nobody is probably closer to its Transporter (as opposed to a 3 Days to Kill). Going forward, they’re angling to extend their reach with a number of remakes including Kung Fu and Highlander, and it certainly looks as if they’re firing on all cylinders. Well, give or take those crucial plot beats.

Popular posts from this blog

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

If I do nothing else, I will convince them that Herbert Stempel knows what won the goddam Academy Award for Best goddam Picture of 1955. That’s what I’m going to accomplish.

Quiz Show (1994) (SPOILERS) Quiz Show perfectly encapsulates a certain brand of Best Picture nominee: the staid, respectable, diligent historical episode, a morality tale in response to which the Academy can nod their heads approvingly and discerningly, feeding as it does their own vainglorious self-image about how times and attitudes have changed, in part thanks to their own virtuousness. Robert Redford’s film about the 1950s Twenty-One quiz show scandals is immaculately made, boasts a notable cast and is guided by a strong screenplay from Paul Attanasio (who, on television, had just created the seminal Homicide: Life on the Streets ), but it lacks that something extra that pushes it into truly memorable territory.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.

In a few moments, you will have an experience that will seem completely real. It will be the result of your subconscious fears transformed into your conscious awareness.

Brainstorm (1983) (SPOILERS) Might Brainstorm have been the next big thing – a ground-breaking, game-changing cinematic spectacle that had as far reaching consequences as Star Wars (special effects) or Avatar (3D) – if only Douglas Trumbull had been allowed to persevere with his patented “Showscan” process (70mm film photographed and projected at 60 frames per second)? I suspect not; one only has to look at the not-so-far-removed experiment of Ang Lee with Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk , and how that went down like a bag of cold sick, to doubt that any innovation will necessarily catch on (although Trumbull at least had a narrative hinge on which to turn his “more real than real” imagery, whereas Lee’s pretty much boiled down to “because it was there”). Brainstorm ’s story is, though, like its title, possibly too cerebral, too much concerned with the consciousness and touting too little of the cloyingly affirmative that Bruce Rubin inevitably brings to his screenplays. T

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

Say hello to the Scream Extractor.

Monsters, Inc. (2001) (SPOILERS) I was never the greatest fan of Monsters, Inc. , even before charges began to be levelled regarding its “true” subtext. I didn’t much care for the characters, and I particularly didn’t like the way Pixar’s directors injected their own parenting/ childhood nostalgia into their plots. Something that just seems to go on with their fare ad infinitum. Which means the Pixars I preferred tended to be the Brad Bird ones. You know, the alleged objectivist. Now, though, we learn Pixar has always been about the adrenochrome, so there’s no going back…

You ever heard the saying, “Don’t rob the bank across from the diner that has the best donuts in three counties”?

2 Guns (2013) (SPOILERS) Denzel Washington is such a reliable performer, that it can get a bit boring. You end up knowing every gesture or inflection in advance, whether he’s playing a good guy or a bad guy. And his films are generally at least half decent, so you end up seeing them. Even in Flight (or perhaps especially in Flight ; just watch him chugging down that vodka) where he’s giving it his Oscar-nominatable best, he seems too familiar. I think it may be because he’s an actor who is more effective the less he does. In 2 Guns he’s not doing less, but sometimes it seems like it. That’s because the last person I’d ever expect blows him off the screen; Mark Wahlberg.

Do you know that the leading cause of death for beavers is falling trees?

The Interpreter (2005) Sydney Pollack’s final film returns to the conspiracy genre that served him well in both the 1970s ( Three Days of the Condor ) and the 1990s ( The Firm ). It also marks a return to Africa, but in a decidedly less romantic fashion than his 1985 Oscar winner. Unfortunately the result is a tepid, clichéd affair in which only the technical flourishes of its director have any merit. The film’s main claim to fame is that Universal received permission to film inside the United Nations headquarters. Accordingly, Pollack is predictably unquestioning in its admiration and respect for the organisation. It is no doubt also the reason that liberal crusader Sean Penn attached himself to what is otherwise a highly generic and non-Penn type of role. When it comes down to it, the argument rehearsed here of diplomacy over violent resolution is as banal as they come. That the UN is infallible moral arbiter of this process is never in any doubt. The cynicism