Skip to main content

I think I’m Pablo Picasso!

Venom: Let There Be Carnage

(SPOILERS) I get the impression that, whatever it is stalwart Venom fans want from a Venom movie, this iteration isn’t it. The highlight here for me is absolutely the wacky, love-hate, buddy-movie antics of Tom Hardy and his symbiote alter. That was the best part of the original, before it locked into plot “progression” and teetered towards a climax where one CGI monster with gnarly teeth had at another CGI monster with gnarly teeth. And so it is for Venom: Let There Be Carnage. But cutting quicker to the chase.

Andy Serkis’ movie knows to be brief, although there are occasional moments where one wonders if something wasn’t lost on the cutting room floor (particularly during the climax – one moment Hardy’s Eddie Brock is lying on the ground after being beaten by Carnage, the next he’s Venom pinned beneath rubble). There’s a more studied darkness to Serkis’ sensibility than his lightweight predecessor Ruben Fleischer, and for all that he may have more potential as a director – Mowgli, certainly, was way better than the billion-grossing The Jungle Book – I’m not sure that necessarily helps Let There Be Carnage’s comic energy.

Serkis is no one’s idea of a virtuoso, and he’s never visibly or rhythmically quite in tune with co-producer, co-story deviser and co-star (with himself) Hardy’s verbal dexterity or the ongoing mayhem – a Sam Raimi would have been ideal. He gets the job done, and he brings a similarly dampened-down darkness found in Mowgli to the frame, rather like a less flamboyant or imaginative Tim Burton. He has no panache, basically, but the bits here that don’t involve a surfeit of symbiote(s) often look very good thanks to DP Robert Richardson.

The plot is the usual so-so “birth a villain and have him showdown with the hero, who has his own set of problems” formula, with a certain degree of disconnect in Kelly Marcel’s screenplay (Marcel wrote Bronson, Hardy’s breakout, and has her name on this year’s Cruella. But also Fifty Shades of Grey). The end of the first movie saw Woody’s Cletus Kasady invoking the symbiote he hadn’t yet become, rather confusingly, and in between, there’s a whole gap of Eddie having met with him that doesn’t really feel like it happened, it’s just reported as it did (complete with Stephen Graham in possibly his most thankless role ever as detective Patrick Mulligan).

Woody’s sixty, but I’m guessing he’s supposed to be about twenty years younger, at which he’s less ludicrous than some thanks to a variable rugmaker (Graham’s is consistently less convincing). In truth, the prologue scenes between young Cletus (Jack Bandeira) and Frances Barrison/Shriek (Olumide Olorunfemi, but as an adult Naomie Harris, actually in her forties) are much more compelling than anything that unfolds between them later, and wouldn’t have gone amiss in a more galvanised version of The New Mutants.

Woody’s fine, but he’s doing Mickey Knox-lite, as nothing could out-crazy Hardy, which creates a problem for villains in this series. Besides them all being variations on themselves, that is. The energy between the actors isn’t really complementary; you need someone who stands out sufficiently distinctly and challenges the lead, but Woody as Kletus is renta-villainy, while the relationship with Frances needed a discernible spark it lacks. Eddie and Mulligan fail to spar effectively either; the new additions aren’t quite a bust, but they don’t take off.

Hardy and Hardy have oomph, of course, and Venom’s unwavering line in variations of “Let me eat him!” doesn’t get old. Albeit, I don’t know if it’s simply getting into the part, but Tom’s looking extra shop-worn and shlubby here, like he spent the entire shoot in his trailer eating junk food. The uncomfortable triangle with Anne (Michelle Williams) and Dan (Reid Scott) is amusing too (the latter given some surprising heroics in the final reel). And while I’m making personal remarks about the leads, I don’t know quite what Williams has been doing to her face, but setting your sights on the rictus Nicole Kidman look is never a great plastic-surgical idea.

Venom and Eddie engage in a series of slapstick fights, culminating in the de rigueur sequel plotline where the hero divests himself of his powers (Superman 2, Spider-Man 2) only to reclaim them for the final fight. It makes for a neat bromance, and there’s an inspired scene when Venom shows up at a costume party rave as himself. As a screenplay, however, Let There Be Carnage is never more than going through the motions, lacking the ambition to be other than more of the same, only slightly more comfortable in its own skin with much of that same now being comedy (reportedly, Hardy was pushing that way while Fleischer was resisting first time out).

Lacking an immersion in Venom-lore, the significance of Mulligan’s eyes glowing at the end escaped me. Particularly since his last encounter was with Shriek. Turns out he’s going to be yet another symbiote (Toxin). Somehow, both Venoms have been largely entertaining despite both following the CGI monster third act folly of The Incredible Hulk.

Inevitably then, the credits scene teaser twist of multiverse-ness was probably the most invigorating moment in the movie. How that’s followed up on, who knows, but we’re sure to catch at least a glimpse in Spider-Man: No Way Home (we’ve got Doc Ock, Electro and Green Goblin to be getting on with, so there’s some way to go for a Sinister Six, and Kevin Feige, between bobbing for ultra-wokeness, has implied this scene isn’t the end of the interaction of worlds).

I’m inclined to suggest the formatting of Venom: Let There Be Carnage is too pedestrian to make a great play for meta-commentary. Infection, of course, is the predominate element of the premise, but rather like a Cronenberg affair, instead of weakening the victim, it makes them stronger… if you’re one of the few chosen, that is. Notably, the symbiote is deleterious to everyone else Venom piggybacks on, and even Kletus ultimately clashes with his personal pally on relationship grounds. So be wary of what you let into your bloodstream?

Venom 3, then? I’m not desperate to see Hardy rematched with Graham, to be honest. But Hardy and Holland? Yeah, I could see that working. And perhaps even beyond Spider-Man: No Way Home and into uncharted territory.

Popular posts from this blog

I don’t think Wimpys still exist.

Last Night in Soho (2021) (SPOILERS) Last Night in Soho is a cautionary lesson in one’s reach extending one’s grasp. It isn’t that Edgar Wright shouldn’t attempt to stretch himself, it’s simply that he needs the self-awareness to realise which moves are going to throw his back out and leave him in a floundering and enfeebled heap on the studio floor. Wright’s an uber-geek, one with a very specific comfort zone, and there’s no shame in that. He evidently was shamed, though, hence this response to criticisms of a lack of maturity and – obviously – lack of versatility with female characters. Last Night in Soho goes broke for woke, and in so doing exposes his new clothes in the least flattering light. Because Edgar is in no way woke, his attempts to prove his progressive mettle lead to a lurid, muddled mess, one that will satisfy no one. Well, perhaps his most ardent fans, but no one else.

It looks like a digital walkout.

Free Guy (2021) (SPOILERS) Ostensibly a twenty-first century refresh of The Truman Show , in which an oblivious innocent realises his life is a lie, and that he is simply a puppet engineered for the entertainment of his creators/controllers/the masses, Free Guy lends itself to similar readings regarding the metaphysical underpinnings of our reality, of who sets the paradigm and how conscious we are of its limitations. But there’s an additional layer in there too, a more insidious one than using a Hollywood movie to “tell us how it really is”.

The voice from the outer world who will lead them to paradise.

Dune (2021) (SPOILERS) For someone who has increasingly dug himself a science-fiction groove, Denis Villeneuve isn’t terribly imaginative. Dune looks perfect, in the manner of the cool, clinical, calculating and above all glacial rendering of concept design and novel cover art in the most doggedly literal fashion. And that’s the problem. David Lynch’s edition may have had its problems, but it was inimitably the product of a mind brimming with sensibility. Villeneuve’s version announces itself as so determinedly faithful to Frank Herbert, it needs two movies to tell one book, and yet all it really has to show for itself are gargantuan vistas.

Give poor, starving Gurgi munchings and crunchings.

The Black Cauldron (1985) (SPOILERS) Dark Disney? I guess… Kind of . I don’t think I ever got round to seeing this previously. The Fox and the Hound , sure. Basil the Great Mouse Detective , most certainly. Even Oliver and Company , so I wasn’t that selective. But I must have missed The Black Cauldron , the one that nearly broke Disney, for the same reason everyone else did. But what reason was that? Perhaps nothing leaping out about it, when the same summer kids could see The Goonies , or Back to the Future , or Pee Wee’s Big Adventure . It seemed like a soup of other, better-executed ideas and past Disney movies, stirred up in a cauldron and slopped out into an environment where audiences now wanted something a touch more sophisticated.

Monster nom nom?

The Suicide Squad (2021) (SPOILERS) This is what you get from James Gunn when he hasn’t been fed through the Disney rainbow filter. Pure, unadulterated charmlessness, as if he’s been raiding his deleted Twitter account for inspiration. The Suicide Squad has none of the “heart” of Guardians of Galaxy , barely a trace of structure, and revels in the kind of gross out previously found in Slither ; granted an R rating, Gunn revels in this freedom with juvenile glee, but such carte blanche only occasionally pays off, and more commonly leads to a kind of playground repetition. He gets to taunt everyone, and then kill them. Critics applauded; general audiences resisted. They were right to.

It becomes easier each time… until it kills you.

The X-Files 4.9: Terma Oh dear. After an engaging opener, the second part of this story drops through the floor, and even the usually spirited Rob Bowman can’t save the lethargic mess Carter and Spotnitz make of some actually pretty promising plot threads.

Three. Two. One. Lift with your neck.

Red Notice  (2021) (SPOILERS) Red Notice rather epitomises Netflix output. Not the 95% that is dismissible, subgrade filler no one is watching but is nevertheless churned out as original “content”. No, this would be the other, more select tier constituting Hollywood names and non-negligible budgets. Most such fare still fails to justify its existence in any way, shape or form, singularly lacking discernible quality control or “studio” oversight. Albeit, one might make similar accusations of a selection of legit actual studio product too, but it’s the sheer consistency of unleavened movies that sets Netflix apart. So it is with Red Notice . Largely lambasted by the critics, in much the manner of, say 6 Underground or Army of the Dead , it is in fact, and just like those, no more and no less than okay.

Oh hello, loves, what year is it?

Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021) (SPOILERS) Simu Lui must surely be the least charismatic lead in a major motion picture since… er, Taylor Lautner? He isn’t aggressively bad, like Lautner was/is, but he’s so blank, so nondescript, he makes Marvel’s super-spiffy new superhero Shang-Chi a superplank by osmosis. Just looking at him makes me sleepy, so it’s lucky Akwafina is wired enough for the both of them. At least, until she gets saddled with standard sidekick support heroics and any discernible personality promptly dissolves. And so, Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings continues Kevin Feige’s bold journey into wokesense, seemingly at the expense of any interest in dramatically engaging the viewer.

What about the panties?

Sliver (1993) (SPOILERS) It must have seemed like a no-brainer. Sharon Stone, fresh from flashing her way to one of the biggest hits of 1992, starring in a movie nourished with a screenplay from the writer of one of the biggest hits of 1992. That Sliver is one Stone’s better performing movies says more about how no one took her to their bosom rather than her ability to appeal outside of working with Paul Verhoeven. Attempting to replicate the erotic lure of Basic Instinct , but without the Dutch director’s shameless revelry and unrepentant glee (and divested of Michael Douglas’ sweaters), it flounders, a stupid movie with vague pretensions to depth made even more stupid by reshoots that changed the killer’s identity and exposed the cluelessness of the studio behind it. Philip Noyce isn’t a stupid filmmaker, of course. He’s a more-than-competent journeyman when it comes to Hollywood blockbuster fare ( Clear and Present Danger , Salt ) also adept at “smart” smaller pict