Skip to main content

The voice from the outer world who will lead them to paradise.


(SPOILERS) For someone who has increasingly dug himself a science-fiction groove, Denis Villeneuve isn’t terribly imaginative. Dune looks perfect, in the manner of the cool, clinical, calculating and above all glacial rendering of concept design and novel cover art in the most doggedly literal fashion. And that’s the problem. David Lynch’s edition may have had its problems, but it was inimitably the product of a mind brimming with sensibility. Villeneuve’s version announces itself as so determinedly faithful to Frank Herbert, it needs two movies to tell one book, and yet all it really has to show for itself are gargantuan vistas.

I can’t say I didn’t like the movie or engage with it intermittently, but I didn’t warm to it. As frequently muddled, confusing, and sometimes underwhelming – Dino DeLaurentis cut the effects budget from under Lynch, but let’s face it, anyone hoodwinked into thinking the rogue mogul would be straight up going in was probably TM-ing their tits off, when not chain-smoking their way through the day – as the 1984 movie was, it had a pulse. A sense of a vast, strange, weird world and universe, one dense and layered and perhaps unknowable but still worth exploring for all that. Villeneuve’s take on the same is as arid as Arakis. That worked for me with Blade Runner 2049, the director’s essential iciness providing a distinctive shift on Scott’s cluttered neon grime chic, but this is all faux-portentousness (as was the case when Arrival collapsed in on itself with timey-wimey nonsense at the final hurdle).

I was most struck, however, by how banal Villenuve’s take on the book’s mystical elements is. Take away the politics – and he does, since they’re dealt such short shrift, you wonder why he thought he needed two movies, aside from those gargantuan vistas – and that’s Dune’s other main element. Yet his approximation of the same is either slightly risible or utterly lacking in resonance, and further evidences areas that were right about Lynch tackling Herbert. When Paul (Timothée Chalamet) has visions, they’re little more than wispy, sun-washed, Malick-primed glimpses of an enchanting Chani (Zendaya, who, in a nod to progressiveness – difficult in a story all about tyrannical male despots and the matriarchal force that guides the universe, I know – administers the opening, epic-scene-setting voiceover; just whose story is this? If Villeneuve is any guide, it’s hers come Part II, before backtracking and suggesting he’d been misquoted).

There’s no frisson or tension to Paul’s portents of the future or intuiting precise details about others or situations, just the plod of the prosaic. We’ve had this before with a too-well-known text finally getting the “version it needed”, and there it also felt as if it was inspirationally spent for being so well known (The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy). The entire exercise becomes little more than a fait accompli. When Paul or Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson, good, but not Francesca Annis) uses the Voice, it’s utterly underwhelming, entirely lacking any visual/verbal sense of how powerfully compelling it must be. It needs to give the viewer a degree of subjective sense for it to carry, and Villeneuve entirely flunks the opportunity.

One ends up looking all about for life in Dune, and only finding it sporadically, like the (beautifully depicted) Arakis desert mouse that so captivates Paul (and so gives him his name… in Part II). Hans Zimmer’s score is largely a bust, falling for clichéd, Hollywood-ised Arabic rhythms and strains, as if he’s competing with Villeneuve for the most stock manner of dealing with sandy climes (the same for whoever came up with Jessica’s ceremonial shawl and her sigil-covered face; Herbert was undeniably embracing Muslim themes in his book, but only someone with a dearth of imagination would interpret them with quite such pedestrian flair). Still, sooner such on-the-nose accompaniment than the frickin’ bagpipes (because what says colonial intruders better than a pair of bagpipes strolling across the moors?) Where are Toto when you need them?

I read – for the first time – Dune about a year ago, thinking I ought to take the plunge if I was to give a fair appraisal to whatever this version was attempting. I came away impressed with the amount of compression Lynch achieved – inevitably, his interpretation informed the way I absorbed the text – but came away from this Dune surprised by the degree to which Villeneuve fails to capitalise on the extra room to breathe. It further underlines Warner Bros’ fool’s move to put this on the big screen, rather than making it the next Game of Thrones. It was staring them in the face, and they flunked the test, resorting to wretched, inevitably-dead-in-the-water GRRM prequels. Obviously, I’m no Dune aficionado, but off the top of my head, the entire subplot of doubt and suspicion of Lady Jessica is completely gone. Which means Gurney (Josh Brolin) is shorn of significant motivation. Hawat (Stephen McKinley Henderson), meanwhile, becomes a non-entity.

Nothing of the Guild makes it into the movie, and the potency of the Spice is pretty much blue eyes and Paul seeing stars. The Bene Gesserit become depressingly mundane, rather than awe-inspiring and slightly terrifying. And while I’m all in favour of creating mystique – show don’t tell – the novel’s transhumanist themes (outlawed AI reconfigured as human computers, basically – Mentats who are essentially the embodiment of what Rudolf Steiner would call Ahrimanic influences) are barely even broached. Some eyeballs in the sky, and that’s about the extent of it. There’s precious little sense of a rich vibrant world, so spartan and detached is Villeneuve’s adaptation. There’s no nuance.

I keep going back to wanting something in this take to surprise me or make me sit up, rather than merely representing a solid or stolid, reasonable and respectable take on the material. But save for the weird passing spider-human thing in Baron Harkonenen’s chambers, I’ve got nothing. Look at the cast. Ferguson is fine. Oscar Isaac is fine. James Brolin is fine. Charlotte Rampling is fine (she’s no Siãn Philips, that’s for sure, max mon amour). Zendaya is fine, as inconsequential as she is, for all that Villeneuve has gone out of his way to big her up (big her up for Spider-Man, where she’s quite sparky, but here?) Javier Bardem is solid, but notably no more substantial than Every McGill. Stellan Skarsgård in a fat suit is fairly disappointing. Enough that you long for a stray pustule or two.

Dave Bautista fares better. He lacks the cartoonish malevolence of Paul L Smith, but he can rightly lay claim to being just about the best former wrestler turned actor there is. Chang Chen makes negligible impression, the ghost of Dean Stockwell (okay, he’s still with us) haunting the part of Dr Yeuh. Likewise, gender-swapped Sharon Duncan-Brewster is no instant-gravitas Max von Sydow as Dr Liet-Kynes (gender swap all you like, but make it memorable if you’re going there. She was much more convincing turning all half-Ice Warrior on us). The picture attempts diversity casting to balance its white centre – and possibly because it’s actually germane to the material for a change, but let’s not get carried away on that point – but does so with the same determined lack of inspiration found in every other nook and crevice (of which there are very few, because, y’know, gargantuan vistas. The much derided The Chronicles of Riddick also had gargantuan vistas, some of them not entirely dissimilar to those here, but managed to be a lot fun with it).

There is a star player in the recasting stakes, however, one rightly recognised as the charisma focus in a dune sea of also-rans: Jason Momoa as Duncan Idaho. He boasts exactly the kind of casual, exuberant confidence that seals the deal on why Paul would look up to him so; theirs is the only interaction here that carries the lightness of touch that made Lucas’ plundering of Herbert – amongst many other sources – initially so effervescent. Momoa also gets to run with a sterling last stand that plays like gangbusters.

That Duncan lands so well only serves to underline how much of the movie feels disappointingly truncated each time a celebrated scene, theme or character arrives. As far as nice touches go, I also liked the movie’s Doof Warrior, the guy doing acoustic warbling on Salusa Secundus prior an attack force of Sardaukar being sent to Arakis.

What’s that? I haven’t mentioned Paul? What’s there to say about Hollywood’s favourite twink Timothée? He can play fifteen just fine, coming equipped with a natural air of petulant sullenness, but he’s 25, and I can’t see him suddenly turning into a leader of men by the time he’s 35, let alone in the timeframe they’re hoping to make the rest of these movies. I guess it doesn’t matter too much, if they only do Part II.

Chalamet can act, but he isn’t winning. You aren’t on Paul’s side. For all that Villeneuve – rightly – goes to pains to point out that the position Paul is destined to attain is a terrible one, that along his way there he will kill a man for the first time and it is not a triumphant thing (although, still something to get behind dramatically… ), he makes the task that much more difficult for the viewer, asking them to empathise with remote, distant Timmy, traipsing around like a Smash Hits take on Tim Burton. I spent most of Paul’s fight with Jamis (Babs Olusanmokun) wondering how someone with that extent of fringe in their eyes ever expected to emerge victorious.

One thing that makes Dune a science-fiction movie of our time, of course, is the need to wear masks in order to survive. And for our heroes to wear masks. As a fact of life, rather than because they’re superheroes. Why, it’s almost as if, despite the stupidity of the task Warner Bros set themselves, of splitting a book into two but not filming part two at the same time, of casting a director who was no one’s idea of a crowd pleaser and a lead who’s much better at playing little shits than someone relatable, there was no way this iteration of Dune could fail… Roll on Part II.

Popular posts from this blog

I think I’m Pablo Picasso!

Venom: Let There Be Carnage (2021) (SPOILERS) I get the impression that, whatever it is stalwart Venom fans want from a Venom movie, this iteration isn’t it. The highlight here for me is absolutely the wacky, love-hate, buddy-movie antics of Tom Hardy and his symbiote alter. That was the best part of the original, before it locked into plot “progression” and teetered towards a climax where one CGI monster with gnarly teeth had at another CGI monster with gnarly teeth. And so it is for Venom: Let There Be Carnage . But cutting quicker to the chase.

I don’t think Wimpys still exist.

Last Night in Soho (2021) (SPOILERS) Last Night in Soho is a cautionary lesson in one’s reach extending one’s grasp. It isn’t that Edgar Wright shouldn’t attempt to stretch himself, it’s simply that he needs the self-awareness to realise which moves are going to throw his back out and leave him in a floundering and enfeebled heap on the studio floor. Wright’s an uber-geek, one with a very specific comfort zone, and there’s no shame in that. He evidently was shamed, though, hence this response to criticisms of a lack of maturity and – obviously – lack of versatility with female characters. Last Night in Soho goes broke for woke, and in so doing exposes his new clothes in the least flattering light. Because Edgar is in no way woke, his attempts to prove his progressive mettle lead to a lurid, muddled mess, one that will satisfy no one. Well, perhaps his most ardent fans, but no one else.

It looks like a digital walkout.

Free Guy (2021) (SPOILERS) Ostensibly a twenty-first century refresh of The Truman Show , in which an oblivious innocent realises his life is a lie, and that he is simply a puppet engineered for the entertainment of his creators/controllers/the masses, Free Guy lends itself to similar readings regarding the metaphysical underpinnings of our reality, of who sets the paradigm and how conscious we are of its limitations. But there’s an additional layer in there too, a more insidious one than using a Hollywood movie to “tell us how it really is”.

Give poor, starving Gurgi munchings and crunchings.

The Black Cauldron (1985) (SPOILERS) Dark Disney? I guess… Kind of . I don’t think I ever got round to seeing this previously. The Fox and the Hound , sure. Basil the Great Mouse Detective , most certainly. Even Oliver and Company , so I wasn’t that selective. But I must have missed The Black Cauldron , the one that nearly broke Disney, for the same reason everyone else did. But what reason was that? Perhaps nothing leaping out about it, when the same summer kids could see The Goonies , or Back to the Future , or Pee Wee’s Big Adventure . It seemed like a soup of other, better-executed ideas and past Disney movies, stirred up in a cauldron and slopped out into an environment where audiences now wanted something a touch more sophisticated.

Monster nom nom?

The Suicide Squad (2021) (SPOILERS) This is what you get from James Gunn when he hasn’t been fed through the Disney rainbow filter. Pure, unadulterated charmlessness, as if he’s been raiding his deleted Twitter account for inspiration. The Suicide Squad has none of the “heart” of Guardians of Galaxy , barely a trace of structure, and revels in the kind of gross out previously found in Slither ; granted an R rating, Gunn revels in this freedom with juvenile glee, but such carte blanche only occasionally pays off, and more commonly leads to a kind of playground repetition. He gets to taunt everyone, and then kill them. Critics applauded; general audiences resisted. They were right to.

It becomes easier each time… until it kills you.

The X-Files 4.9: Terma Oh dear. After an engaging opener, the second part of this story drops through the floor, and even the usually spirited Rob Bowman can’t save the lethargic mess Carter and Spotnitz make of some actually pretty promising plot threads.

Three. Two. One. Lift with your neck.

Red Notice  (2021) (SPOILERS) Red Notice rather epitomises Netflix output. Not the 95% that is dismissible, subgrade filler no one is watching but is nevertheless churned out as original “content”. No, this would be the other, more select tier constituting Hollywood names and non-negligible budgets. Most such fare still fails to justify its existence in any way, shape or form, singularly lacking discernible quality control or “studio” oversight. Albeit, one might make similar accusations of a selection of legit actual studio product too, but it’s the sheer consistency of unleavened movies that sets Netflix apart. So it is with Red Notice . Largely lambasted by the critics, in much the manner of, say 6 Underground or Army of the Dead , it is in fact, and just like those, no more and no less than okay.

Oh hello, loves, what year is it?

Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021) (SPOILERS) Simu Lui must surely be the least charismatic lead in a major motion picture since… er, Taylor Lautner? He isn’t aggressively bad, like Lautner was/is, but he’s so blank, so nondescript, he makes Marvel’s super-spiffy new superhero Shang-Chi a superplank by osmosis. Just looking at him makes me sleepy, so it’s lucky Akwafina is wired enough for the both of them. At least, until she gets saddled with standard sidekick support heroics and any discernible personality promptly dissolves. And so, Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings continues Kevin Feige’s bold journey into wokesense, seemingly at the expense of any interest in dramatically engaging the viewer.

What about the panties?

Sliver (1993) (SPOILERS) It must have seemed like a no-brainer. Sharon Stone, fresh from flashing her way to one of the biggest hits of 1992, starring in a movie nourished with a screenplay from the writer of one of the biggest hits of 1992. That Sliver is one Stone’s better performing movies says more about how no one took her to their bosom rather than her ability to appeal outside of working with Paul Verhoeven. Attempting to replicate the erotic lure of Basic Instinct , but without the Dutch director’s shameless revelry and unrepentant glee (and divested of Michael Douglas’ sweaters), it flounders, a stupid movie with vague pretensions to depth made even more stupid by reshoots that changed the killer’s identity and exposed the cluelessness of the studio behind it. Philip Noyce isn’t a stupid filmmaker, of course. He’s a more-than-competent journeyman when it comes to Hollywood blockbuster fare ( Clear and Present Danger , Salt ) also adept at “smart” smaller pict