Skip to main content

You got any Boom Boom Lemon?

Kate
(2021)

(SPOILERS) The dying protagonist subgenre is a difficult one to get right. The customary approach is one of world-weary resignation on the part of the poisoned or terminally ill party that sweetens the pill, suggesting they’re being done something of a favour. It’s also a smart idea to give them some sort of motive force, in order to see them through the proceedings before they kark it. Such as a mystery to solve; there’s a good reason D.O.A. is generally seen as a touchstone in fare of this ilk. Kate fumbles on both counts, leaving the viewer with a rather icky poisoning – you don’t want to be too distracted by that sort of thing, not least because suspension of disbelief that the already superheroic protagonist can function at all evaporates – and a lead character with the slenderest of relatability working for her. Most damningly, however, is a revenge plot that’s really rather limp.

The idea that 87North – the brains behind John Wick, Nobody and Atomic Blonde – are appropriating the EuropaCorp template wholesale, now Besson’s outfit is in a fix, seems to be further confirmed by Kate. It even has an entirely forgettable, insultingly lazy title working against it, almost as a badge of pride (this didn’t harm Lucy, of course, but if anything, its plot ought to have done that, rather than spawning a megahit). EuropaCorp already did the dying assassin thing a few years back with the actually pretty good but underseen 3 Days to Kill, where grizzled Kevin Costner is given an experimental drug to prolong his life while he tracks down an arms trafficker. There, however *SPOILER* Kev doesn’t buy the farm, doubtless as EuropaCorp had an eye on a franchise, little realising they weren’t going to make aging Kev the next Liam Neeson.

Besson’s outfit also has history with the female action protagonist, long before woke associations smothered any individuality or coherence in realising such characters (Besson’s the last person to be associated with the woke cause). Kate (Mary Elizabeth Winstead plays her) very evidently comes from the line of Besson trained assassins first seen in La Femme Nikita, and subsequently Colombiana and Anna (oh look, another one-name title, yawn). The benchmark is probably Leon/The Professional, though, in terms of outlining how a minor might fall into the trade of killing for a living; flashbacks in Kate outline her initiation into these leagues. But…

There’s very little to hang onto in Umair Aleem’s screenplay (previously of Bruce Willis “effort” Extraction). About the only distinctive element is the Japanese setting and perky pop soundtrack (also Japanese). But even these are rendered rather unremarkable by Cedric Nicolas-Troyan’s strictly formulaic direction. Nicolas-Troyan’s an FX guy who made his feature debut with forgettable sequel The Huntsman: Winter’s War, the kind of forgettable sequel only studios attempting to extend fairy tale hits beyond their means would think was a good idea (Maleficent: Mistress of Evil, Alice Through the Looking Glass). I’m guessing David Leitch and Chad Stahelski saw potential there, but it doesn’t pay off the way it did with Ilya Naishuller and Nobody. Nicolas-Troyan is competent, and a few action sequences raise a pulse (the penthouse punch up with Miyavi’s yakuza Jojima is more than decent), but more often than not, the timing is just that bit off being crisp and enervating.

Anyone with the briefest familiarity with this kind of movie will know from the first scene that Woody Harrelson’s handler Varrick will be revealed as a bad seed. Kate’s quest to do for her poisoner – she’s fallen victim to Polonium 204 – inevitably incorporates some regret and atonement for past deeds done, in this case assassinating a Yakuza member in front of her daughter. Note that Kate has no qualms about murdering people for a living, only doing it in front of their kids. A distinction we’re supposed to respect; Kate is that kind of movie. Miku Martineau gives a decent performance as Ani, said daughter, whom Kate inevitably befriends etc, but the chart of their friendship is strictly routine, all the way to Ani discovering the truth.

I hesitate to say it, because I’ve always found Winstead a winning performer, but she’s part of the problem here. There’s zero weight or substance to her character, something all the beatings, shootings, stabbings and increasingly advanced signs of radiation poisoning ironically serve to underline. Winstead’s clearly angling for the kind of chops Charlize displayed in Atomic Blonde (and Mad Max: Fury Road) but she never comes close. She’s better positioned as the resourceful everywoman (Live Free or Die Hard, The Thing, 10 Cloverfield Road) than angling for super-competent action chicks, certainly on the evidence of this and the godawful Birds of Prey.

But in complete fairness, it also goes back to the part. A dying Mel in Edge of Darkness carries with him years of regret and loss. All Winstead has on her side is the makeup department. Disbelief in the logistics takes over quite early on, as Kate begins calling on autoinjectors like they were candy, which seem to do the miraculous trick on stemming the deleterious effects of imminently failing vital organs.

By starting with a downbeat premise, Nicolas-Troyan is stuck with a movie that’s never going to be light or virtuoso, which inevitably leaves one looking about for dramatic meat. Woody simply trots out his Woody act, which is fine; it works. There’s a decent scene with Jun Kunimura (Tanaka in the Kill Bills) as Kate’s believed-objective Kijima, which rather highlights the benefit of underplaying when everyone else is shouting. But such moments are few and far between. Given 87North’s general track record, one vaguely wonders if Kate’s fizzle was less to do with any of the component parts than the hex that is making a movie for Netflix.


Popular posts from this blog

You were this amazing occidental samurai.

Ricochet (1991) (SPOILERS) You have to wonder at Denzel Washington’s agent at this point in the actor’s career. He’d recently won his first Oscar for Glory , yet followed it with less-than-glorious heart-transplant ghost comedy Heart Condition (Bob Hoskins’ racist cop receives Washington’s dead lawyer’s ticker; a recipe for hijinks!) Not long after, he dipped his tentative toe in the action arena with this Joel Silver production; Denzel has made his share of action fare since, of course, most of it serviceable if unremarkable, but none of it comes near to delivering the schlocky excesses of Ricochet , a movie at once ingenious and risible in its plot permutations, performances and production profligacy.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

Well, something’s broke on your daddy’s spaceship.

Apollo 13 (1995) (SPOILERS) The NASA propaganda movie to end all NASA propaganda movies. Their original conception of the perilous Apollo 13 mission deserves due credit in itself; what better way to bolster waning interest in slightly naff perambulations around a TV studio than to manufacture a crisis event, one emphasising the absurd fragility of the alleged non-terrestrial excursions and the indomitable force that is “science” in achieving them? Apollo 13 the lunar mission was tailor made for Apollo 13 the movie version – make believe the make-believe – and who could have been better to lead this fantasy ride than Guantanamo Hanks at his all-American popularity peak?

We’ve got the best ball and chain in the world. Your ass.

Wedlock (1991) (SPOILERS) The futuristic prison movie seemed possessed of a particular cachet around this time, quite possibly sparked by the grisly possibilities of hi-tech disincentives to escape. On that front, HBO TV movie Wedlock more than delivers its FX money shot. Elsewhere, it’s less sure of itself, rather fumbling when it exchanges prison tropes for fugitives-on-the-run ones.

I can’t be the worst. What about that hotdog one?

Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022) (SPOILERS) It would have been a merciful release, had the title card “ The End ”, flashing on screen a little before the ninety-minute mark, not been a false dawn. True, I would still have been unable to swab the bloody dildoes fight from my mind, but at least Everything Everywhere All at Once would have been short. Indeed, by the actual end I was put in mind of a line spoken by co-star James Wong in one of his most indelible roles: “ Now this really pisses me off to no end ”. Or to put it another way, Everything Everywhere All at Once rubbed me up the wrong which way quite a lot of most of the time.

Drank the red. Good for you.

Morbius (2022) (SPOILERS) Generic isn’t necessarily a slur. Not if, by implication, it’s suggestive of the kind of movie made twenty years ago, when the alternative is the kind of super-woke content Disney currently prioritises. Unfortunately, after a reasonable first hour, Morbius descends so resignedly into such unmoderated formula that you’re left with a too-clear image of Sony’s Spider-Verse when it lacks a larger-than-life performer (Tom Hardy, for example) at the centre of any given vehicle.

So, you’re telling me that NASA is going to kill the President of the United States with an earthquake?

Conspiracy Theory (1997) (SPOILERS) Mel Gibson’s official rehabilitation occurred with the announcement of 2016’s Oscar nominations, when Hacksaw Ridge garnered six nods, including Mel as director. Obviously, many refuse to be persuaded that there’s any legitimate atonement for the things someone says. They probably weren’t even convinced by Mel’s appearance in Daddy’s Home 2 , an act of abject obeisance if ever there was one. In other circles, though, Gibbo, or Mad Mel, is venerated as a saviour unsullied by the depraved Hollywood machine, one of the brave few who would not allow them to take his freedom. Or at least, his values. Of course, that’s frequently based on alleged comments he made, ones it’s highly likely he didn’t. But doesn’t that rather appeal to the premise of his 23-year-old star vehicle Conspiracy Theory , in which “ A good conspiracy theory is an unproveable one ”?

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

He’ll regret it to his dying day, if ever he lives that long.

The Quiet Man (1952) (SPOILERS) The John Wayne & John Ford film for those who don’t like John Wayne & John Ford films? The Quiet Man takes its cues from Ford’s earlier How Green Was My Valley in terms of, well less Anglophile and Hibernophile and Cambrophile nostalgia respectively for past times, climes and heritage, as Wayne’s pugilist returns to his family seat and stirs up a hot bed of emotions, not least with Maureen O’Hara’s red-headed hothead. The result is a very likeable movie, for all its inculcated Oirishness and studied eccentricity.

He doesn’t want to lead you. He just wants you to follow.

Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (2022) (SPOILERS) The general failing of the prequel concept is a fairly self-evident one; it’s spurred by the desire to cash in, rather than to tell a story. This is why so few prequels, in any form, are worth the viewer/reader/listener’s time, in and of themselves. At best, they tend to be something of a well-rehearsed fait accompli. In the movie medium, even when there is material that withstands closer inspection (the Star Wars prequels; The Hobbit , if you like), the execution ends up botched. With Fantastic Beasts , there was never a whiff of such lofty purpose, and each subsequent sequel to the first prequel has succeeded only in drawing attention to its prosaic function: keeping franchise flag flying, even at half-mast. Hence Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore , belatedly arriving after twice the envisaged gap between instalments and course-correcting none of the problems present in The Crimes of Grindelwald .