Skip to main content

I don’t think Wimpys still exist.

Last Night in Soho

(SPOILERS) Last Night in Soho is a cautionary lesson in one’s reach extending one’s grasp. It isn’t that Edgar Wright shouldn’t attempt to stretch himself, it’s simply that he needs the self-awareness to realise which moves are going to throw his back out and leave him in a floundering and enfeebled heap on the studio floor. Wright’s an uber-geek, one with a very specific comfort zone, and there’s no shame in that. He evidently was shamed, though, hence this response to criticisms of a lack of maturity and – obviously – lack of versatility with female characters. Last Night in Soho goes broke for woke, and in so doing exposes his new clothes in the least flattering light. Because Edgar is in no way woke, his attempts to prove his progressive mettle lead to a lurid, muddled mess, one that will satisfy no one. Well, perhaps his most ardent fans, but no one else.

Wright recounts how he was told by an Empire reader he should make a movie that passed the Bechdel Test (he also related this incident to the now uber-woke Empire, so woke, it can barely go a paragraph without mentioning toxic males as well as boasting a monthly “Black in Focus” column; well, of course it does, now it actually has a black journalist on the staff). And then by someone else that he should make Baby Driver with a female lead (but presumably without Kevin Spacey). And being essentially malleable – maybe not enough for Kevin Feige, but infinitely more so than Woody Allen or the Coen Brothers when it comes to the woke police snapping at one’s heels – he willingly capitulated. He even invoked the “comfort zone” measure of striving to improve himself.

Baby Driver succeeded – for the most part – because it unspooled from Wright’s own heartfelt but endearingly shallow pop-visual sensibility, strung together as it was by music and movie tropes. Even the difficult-to-love Scott Pilgrim vs. the World was similarly cued from a visual spark – making a comic book real. But if it’s tempting to suggest he was only truly in his element when collaborating with Simon Pegg – there’s a reason Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz stand up, or did last time I looked, and it may not be dissimilar to Danny Boyle and his homegrown first couple of movies – one needs only look at World’s End to recognise that ship long since sailed, before being capsized by unfettered success.

The consequence of his combination of a surfeit of style and an eager-to-please personality is that one never gets the sense Wright quite knows what, or who, he’s making Last Night in Soho for. Apart from appeasement. Yes, there’s a sliver of the autobiographical in the country girl (Thomas McKenzie’s Ellie) who heads for the big city of dreams. And Wright essays the London College of Fashion’s alpha bitches like he’s been on the receiving end of similar treatment; Jocasta is effectively ghastly, and well performed by Stephen Woolley’s (Palace Pictures) niece Synnøve Karlsen.

There’s a scene during the movie’s tiresome second half, towards the end of Ellie’s library hallucinations, where she discovers she’s about to stab Jocasta with a pair of scissors, and there’s a sudden glimmer of another, altogether more palpable palate. Alas, it quickly washes away into genre dishwater. Likewise, perhaps the most coherently cued sequence – as in, one you can see Wright fully embracing, rather than diligently piecing together like the parts of a homework project – is the Halloween party where Ellie’s drink is spiked and she loses herself to Happy House.

Ellie, obsessed with all things Swinging Sixties, discovers she can timeslip away from all the present-day hideousness into the idyll of that era, complete with Thunderball and Cilla. The transportive cues are from literature, of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe or The Box of Delights, but Wright perversely rears away from period veneration. He wants, feels he is required, has been told to, put a message in there. To lend himself support, he has enlisted Krysty Wilson-Cairns as co-writer, presumably hoping he wouldn’t be able to cop all the (toxic white male) blame for failing to pass muster. But Wilson-Cairns previously worked on the wafer-thin 1917 after contributing to the self-descriptive Penny Dreadful, so the pedigree she brings is itself suspect.

Ellie finds herself symbiotically doubling up with Sixties Sandie (Anya Taylor-Joy), who is as confident as she isn’t, and observes/experiences her situations and scene. Soon, Ellie has undergone a surge of creative energy at university and is dying her hair blonde. Alas, the lustre of swinging London wears off almost immediately, with chipper Jack (Smith) leading Sandie into a life of seedy, predatory, toxic (yes) white masculinity.

The first forty or fifty minutes of Last Night in Soho do at least allow Wright a flourish of visual exposition, replete with his expected stylistic aplomb and accompanying musically synched virtuosity. But there’s never once a sense that the weirdness on display, as the walls of Ellie’s mind begin to peel apart in the grip of vaunting hysteria, is the result of an unbridled imagination; once it becomes clear that hallucinations in movies are only hallucinations, they tend to have a limited shelf life (see Jacob’s Ladder or The Lighthouse). Wright’s plotting is borne of wrestling with the dilemma of “What would be weird here?” which inevitably leads to pedestrian scenes of ghostly zombies haunting Ellie in a library. I half expected them to materialise into Cybus-men.

Indeed, the opening scenes are desperately flat, as if Wright’s been taking his cues from Chibnall era Doctor Who, ladling on the character exposition (although, there’s precious little character here) and yielding stilted performances, since there’s no crutch of arch/comedic measure to be milked from his performers. The course he sets is un homage, to Polanski, to Giallo, but after the set up – à la The AvengersEscape in Time – he has no place to go. That the movie ultimately reveals itself as a female revenger in a sub-sub-Promising Young Woman vein, by way of a Grand Guignol slasher, is risibly after-the-fact. It appears to be exactly what it is, a last-ditch attempt to glue the proceedings together dramatically. But in his announced task of woke-ing his tale up, Edgar perversely manages to shine a spotlight on female characters with a dearth of substance, prettified in ways that are purely cosmetic (or fashionable) and lent character twists are that are demeaningly puerile.

Landlady Diana Rigg is revealed as present-day Sandie, a non-sequitur plot-twist version of Death Wish where her actions are entirely justified (as Ellie keeps telling her), because men are all bad (well, white ones), and “It felt right, Ellie”. We’re supposed to commiserate with her because “I’ve been in prison all my life”. Quite beside the turgid banality of the twist, it fails because there’s nothing underpinning it. Wright has established no murder mystery to be solved (Ellie’s vision of a stabbed Sandie is hardly that), or formative character to be traced, so making her a murderer is unearned. It’s cheap.

The one twist that plays – which isn’t a vote of confidence in it – is the reveal that Stamp’s spry old fella isn’t present-day Jack. Smith hoovers up an extended riff on his In Bruges deleted scene, but aside from the cockney accent has absolutely nothing to chew on. Instead of Jack, Stamp is revealed as the older version of a two-minute Sam Claflin cameo, and so becomes throwaway and borderline meaningless. And there’s something rather distasteful about the way Wright uses these icons, Rigg and Stamp, denigrating them with such sullied parts.

Bafflingly too – well, except that it’s okay, as she’s a female lead, so she’s “good” – Ellie gets away scot-free with being a complete loony, nearly stabbing a fellow student in the neck, getting an innocent old man killed (all white males are toxic, except for the one who’s a red herring) and her boyfriend stabbed. Let’s celebrate her! And she can celebrate Sandie, blowing her a kiss from the beyond of her mind. Michael Ajao is absurdly antiseptic as decent male John – he’s allowed, because he’s a person of colour – offering torturously sensitive lines like “I’m a good listener if you ever want to talk”; for his pains, he nearly falls foul of a #MeToo case of mistaken rapist.

While Taylor-Joy is little more than a cut out, McKenzie delivers an overdose of startled, squeaky mouse, crossbred with a Robert Smith panda. She was very good in Leave No Trace a few years back, but Ellie does her no favours at all. I’d hesitate to blame her, though. She’s stranded high and dry, assaulted by her director’s noble attempts to find his bruised feminine for two hours. Perhaps Wright wished to show the versatility of a Guillermo del Toro (although that side of the director comes under increasing doubt the further he strays from his Spanish language days), but all he’s really showing is his kinship with another shameless adolescent – as Jeff Wells put it, “47 going on 14” – who once attempted to show off his range; remember Zack Snyder’s Sucker Punch?

Wright is a sexless fellow, so it makes sense that he should relate sex to horror, and not in the way De Palma exhales libidinous threat, but as someone compelled to present it as unseemly and really quite repulsive. The manifestation of men, the seedier the better. Is it better to make a rather bad, shallow movie about a woman’s experience than not to make one at all? I’m doubtful, but I’ll reemphasise my initial point. There’s no shame in Wright inhabiting an oeuvre that suits him and being very good at it. Unlike Tarantino, another overgrown adolescent, Wright only has a visual voice, not an authorial one; when Tarantino homages, it invariably feels as if he’s making a genre his own. Which may be why he is celebrated by his peers. All Last Night in Solo can boast is an empty stylist.

Popular posts from this blog

I’m smarter than a beaver.

Prey (2022) (SPOILERS) If nothing else, I have to respect Dan Trachtenberg’s cynical pragmatism. How do I not only get a project off the ground, but fast-tracked as well? I know, a woke Predator movie! Woke Disney won’t be able to resist! And so, it comes to pass. Luckily for Prey , it gets to bypass cinemas and so the same sorry fate of Lightyear . Less fortunately, it’s a patience-testing snook cocking at historicity (or at least, assumed historicity), in which a young, pint-sized Comanche girl who wishes to hunt and fish – and doubtless shoot to boot – with the big boys gets to take on a Predator and make mincemeat of him. Well, of course , she does. She’s a girl, innit?

Just because you are a character doesn't mean that you have character.

Pulp Fiction (1994) (SPOILERS) From a UK perspective, Pulp Fiction ’s success seemed like a fait accompli; Reservoir Dogs had gone beyond the mere cult item it was Stateside and impacted mainstream culture itself (hard to believe now that it was once banned on home video); it was a case of Tarantino filling a gap in the market no one knew was there until he drew attention to it (and which quickly became over-saturated with pale imitators subsequently). Where his debut was a grower, Pulp Fiction hit the ground running, an instant critical and commercial success (it won the Palme d’Or four months before its release), only made cooler by being robbed of the Best Picture Oscar by Forrest Gump . And unlike some famously-cited should-have-beens, Tarantino’s masterpiece really did deserve it.

I’m the famous comedian, Arnold Braunschweiger.

Last Action Hero (1993) (SPOILERS) Make no mistake, Last Action Hero is a mess. But even as a mess, it might be more interesting than any other movie Arnie made during that decade, perhaps even in his entire career. Hellzapoppin’ (after the 1941 picture, itself based on a Broadway revue) has virtually become an adjective to describe films that comment upon their own artifice, break the fourth wall, and generally disrespect the convention of suspending disbelief in the fictions we see parading across the screen. It was fairly audacious, some would say foolish, of Arnie to attempt something of that nature at this point in his career, which was at its peak, rather than playing it safe. That he stumbled profoundly, emphatically so since he went up against the behemoth that is Jurassic Park (slotted in after the fact to open first), should not blind one to the considerable merits of his ultimate, and final, really, attempt to experiment with the limits of his screen persona.

Death to Bill and Ted!

Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) (SPOILERS) The game of how few sequels are actually better than the original is so well worn, it was old when Scream 2 made a major meta thing out of it (and it wasn’t). Bill & Ted Go to Hell , as Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey was originally called, is one such, not that Excellent Adventure is anything to be sneezed at, but this one’s more confident, even more playful, more assured and more smartly stupid. And in Peter Hewitt it has a director with a much more overt and fittingly cartoonish style than the amiably pedestrian Stephen Herrick. Evil Bill : First, we totally kill Bill and Ted. Evil Ted : Then we take over their lives. My recollection of the picture’s general consensus was that it surpassed the sleeper hit original, but Rotten Tomatoes’ review aggregator suggests a less universal response. And, while it didn’t rock any oceans at the box office, Bogus Journey and Point Break did quite nicely for Keanu Reev

Everyone creates the thing they dread.

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) (SPOILERS) Avengers: Age of Ultron ’s problem isn’t one of lack. It benefits from a solid central plot. It features a host of standout scenes and set pieces. It hands (most of) its characters strong defining moments. It doesn’t even suffer now the “wow” factor of seeing the team together for the first time has subsided. Its problem is that it’s too encumbered. Maybe its asking to much of a director to effectively martial the many different elements required by an ensemble superhero movie such as this, yet Joss Whedon’s predecessor feels positively lean in comparison. Part of this is simply down to the demands of the vaster Marvel franchise machine. Seeds are laid for Captain America: Civil War , Infinity Wars I & II , Black Panther and Thor: Ragnarok . It feels like several spinning plates too many. Such activity occasionally became over-intrusive on previous occasions ( Iron Man II ), but there are points in Age of Ultron whe

This entire edifice you see around you, built on jute.

Jeeves and Wooster 3.3: Cyril and the Broadway Musical  (aka Introduction on Broadway) Well, that’s a relief. After a couple of middling episodes, the third season bounces right back, and that's despite Bertie continuing his transatlantic trip. Clive Exton once again plunders  Carry On, Jeeves  but this time blends it with a tale from  The Inimitable Jeeves  for the brightest spots, as Cyril Basington-Basington (a sublimely drippy Nicholas Hewetson) pursues his stage career against Aunt Agatha's wishes.

Poetry in translation is like taking a shower with a raincoat on.

Paterson (2016) (SPOILERS) Spoiling a movie where nothing much happens is difficult, but I tend to put the tag on in a cautionary sense much of the time. Paterson is Jim Jarmusch at his most inert and ambient but also his most rewardingly meditative. Paterson (Adam Driver), a bus driver and modest poet living in Paterson, New Jersey, is a stoic in a fundamental sense, and if he has a character arc of any description, which he doesn’t really, it’s the realisation that is what he is. Jarmusch’s picture is absent major conflict or drama; the most significant episodes feature Paterson’s bus breaking down, the English bull terrier Marvin – whom Paterson doesn’t care for but girlfriend Laura (Golshifteh Farahani) dotes on – destroying his book of poetry, and an altercation at the local bar involving a gun that turns out to be a water pistol. And Paterson takes it all in his stride, genial to the last, even the ruination of his most earnest, devoted work (the only disappoint

I think it’s pretty clear whose side the Lord’s on, Barrington.

Monte Carlo or Bust aka  Those Daring Young Men in Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) (SPOILERS) Ken Annakin’s semi-sequel to Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines tends to be rather maligned, usually compared negatively to its more famous predecessor. Which makes me rather wonder if those expressing said opinion have ever taken the time to scrutinise them side by side. Or watch them back to back (which would be more sensible). Because Monte Carlo or Bust is by far the superior movie. Indeed, for all its imperfections and foibles (not least a performance from Tony Curtis requiring a taste for comic ham), I adore it. It’s probably the best wacky race movie there is, simply because each set of competitors, shamelessly exemplifying a different national stereotype (albeit there are two pairs of Brits, and a damsel in distress), are vibrant and cartoonish in the best sense. Albeit, it has to be admitted that, as far as said stereotypes go, Annakin’s home side win

If you ride like lightning, you're going to crash like thunder.

The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) (SPOILERS) There’s something daringly perverse about the attempt to weave a serious-minded, generation-spanning saga from the hare-brained premise of The Place Beyond the Pines . When he learns he is a daddy, a fairground stunt biker turns bank robber in order to provide for his family. It’s the kind of “only-in-Hollywood” fantasy premise you might expect from a system that unleashed Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man and Point Break on the world. But this is an indie-minded movie from the director of the acclaimed Blue Valentine ; it demands respect and earnest appraisal. Unfortunately it never recovers from the abject silliness of the set-up. The picture is littered with piecemeal characters and scenarios. There’s a hope that maybe the big themes will even out the rocky terrain but in the end it’s because of this overreaching ambition that the film ends up so undernourished. The inspiration for the movie

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.