Skip to main content

Just try to make it sound like you wrote it that way on purpose.

The French Dispatch
of the Liberty, Kansas Evening Sun

(SPOILERS) More a trifle than a Grand Bouffe, The French Dispatch is every bit as dry and distancing as The Grand Budapest Hotel was warm and welcoming, as if Wes Anderson’s set upon pushing as far as he possibly can in his studiously stylised direction, just to see how many are willing to come along for the ride. He’s done stories within stories before, but they’ve never been as conspicuously detached as they are here. Perhaps Wes watched The Ballad of Buster Scruggs and decided it was a good way to develop some sketchy ideas. However, one gets the impression a series of five-minute tableaux running to 100 minutes would be the ideal form for such aesthetic/ intellectual posing.

The tableaux abound here anyway, of course, along with varying aspect ratios, switches from black-and-white to colour and back again, Richard Scarry building fronts (complete with moving parts and people), and the clockwork consequences of Alexandre Desplat’s score. The French Dispatch is a Wes Anderson movie for those who can’t get enough of Wes Anderson movies. Which means I enjoyed it – I am, by and large, a fan – but at the same time, I was conscious of an encroaching sense of thinly-stretched shtick. That the elastic band might snap at any moment. For many former adherents it long since has, exhausted that he has no interest whatsoever in providing whatever it is they’re looking for (maturity, ditching the irony and kitschy quirk; none of these moves are a good idea, if you can only adopt them in a faux-manner, as Edgar Wright has discovered). Myself, I’m happy enough he has no interest in bending over backwards at the behest of his critics.

Indeed, some are fond of citing the halcyon days of Bottle Rocket and Rushmore, when Anderson had one foot in a world of people vaguely resembling the real thing; it was only with The Royal Tennenbaums (his best, with The Grand Budapest Hotel) that I climbed fully aboard his train, so such a move would have little appeal to me. There are those I have reservations about – The Life Aquatic never quite finds a groove so winds up strangely inert; Fantastic Mr Fox messes too much with source material I adore; Moonrise Kingdom is a little too preoccupied with its juvenile protagonists – but I generally look forward to each new entry in his canon, and when I haven’t (Isle of Dogs), I’ve been pleasantly surprised. So even Anderson parodying Anderson, as we’re almost experiencing here, has an appeal.

The presentation is expectedly meticulous – Anjelica Huston narrates introductions to the titular newspaper, publishing a final edition after its editor (Bill Murray’s Arthur Howitzer Jr) dies. The paper will comprise several articles from past editions, and an obit. As is invariably the case with a portmanteau production, some segments are more successful others, and going back to the five-minute tableaux notion, I believe Anderson would have been better keeping them short but sweet, as per Owen Wilson’s The Cycling Reporter (3/5), presenting the changes (or lack thereof) in the town of Ennui (geddit) before disappearing suddenly down a subway entrance on his bike. The French Dispatch is only 103 minutes, but feels twenty longer thanks to its deliberately unhurried posture.

Like the Three Bears’ porridge, Anderson only gets one of his three articles just right, and it’s the first. The others have a strong idea (revolutionary student revolt) or strong performances (Jeffrey Wright, Liev Schreiber) but not both. In The Concrete Masterpiece (4.5/5), Adrien Brody’s art dealer Julian Cadazio discovers Benicio del Toro’s incarcerated artist Moses Rosenthaler and makes him a sensation. There are expected – but amusing – barbs directed at abstract portraiture (Julian had Moses quickly sketch a perfect sparrow to prove he actually had a skill set) and the purity of motive in the artist’s choice of nude muse (Moses gets a slap for his over-attentiveness).

Tony Revolori appears in a charming shot where his younger Moses swaps places with del Toro’s elder one (the latter is perfectly called upon to inhabit that shambling, semi-coherent man-monster persona of his). Tilda Swinton delivers one of her classic cartoons as Dispatch writer JKL Berensen. Brody, with his gangly, beaky, hangdog bearing, only ever really feels at home in Anderson productions. Léa Seydoux reminds you she’s much more talented than a thankless Bond girl role could allow (all the Bond alumni here – Seydoux, Jeffrey Wright, even Mathieu Amalric – fare significantly better in this picture, even though, in the latter’s case, he hardly registers). The portmanteau sequence really ought to offer a satisfying twist development, and this one’s – Moses’ much-awaited artwork is an immoveable fresco – is a more than decent one.

Revisions to a Manifesto (2.5/5) broaches the illusion of journalistic neutrality via Lucinda Krementz (Frances McDormand) conducting an affair with revolting student Zeffirelli (Timothée Chalamet) and amending his resistance manual. Political cynicism’s on display, but in such an offhand fashion, you could barely be label it acerbic, less still directed. The idea of conducting the 1968 revolution via chess moves is better as just that, an idea, than in execution, such that it’s an amusing relief when the impasse is broken and the “tear gas and rubber bullets” are broken out.

Chalamet has the hair for an Anderson caricature, but none of the exaggerated personality; as far as the younger contingent goes, less-well-catered-for Anderson regulars Revolori and Saoirse Ronan (the latter presumably cast so Anderson could get her in a saucy showgirl outfit) display the kind of presence Timmy sorely lacks. Still, with this and Call Me by Your Name, he is evidently eager to boost himself as an equal-opportunities twink. McDormand’s solid as the emotionally-detached old maid, but this isn’t one of her indelible roles. Christoph Waltz appears in about one scene, with a scratchy beard.

The Private Dining Room of the Police Commissioner (3.5/5) finds Wright irresistibly inhabiting his best Orson Welles impression as a food journalist recounting a dinner with The Commissaire of the Ennui police force (Amalric) – served by the chef/officer Lieutenant Nescarrier (Stephen Park) – to a magnificently ’70s-styled TV interviewer (Liev Schreiber). Wright’s Roebuck Wright, incapable of reading a map, becomes entangled in the affair of the Commissaire’s kidnapped son Gigi (Winston Ait Hellal), which sounds like a perfect recipe, but it ends up ever so slightly overcooked, trying to be too clever for its own good. The animated chase interlude is an absolute winner, though.

Many of the extensive cast are offered little more than cameos. Other notables who barely get a look in – anyone would think this was a Malick movie, given the level of thankless involvement, just so they can bask in the light of Wes – include Elisabeth Moss, Griffin Dunne, Henry Winkler and returnees Jason Schwartzman, Fisher Stevens, Bob Balaban and Edward Norton. Jarvis Cocker also sings some French pop.

It goes without saying that Anderson continues untarnished by the Hollywood woke machine’s brush; such an eventuality would be as unlikely as his conforming to any kind of big studio narrative norm. If anything, he’s proved only more wilfully idiosyncratic in his attitudes. His next, however, features Guantanamo Hanks himself (or his brother), Margot Robbie, Matt Dillon, Bryan Cranston and (yawn) Scarlett Johansson. It remains to be seen how mould-able they are to Anderson’s enduring vision, and if Asteroid City takes a similarly scattershot approach to steering story as The French Dispatch.

Popular posts from this blog

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

If I do nothing else, I will convince them that Herbert Stempel knows what won the goddam Academy Award for Best goddam Picture of 1955. That’s what I’m going to accomplish.

Quiz Show (1994) (SPOILERS) Quiz Show perfectly encapsulates a certain brand of Best Picture nominee: the staid, respectable, diligent historical episode, a morality tale in response to which the Academy can nod their heads approvingly and discerningly, feeding as it does their own vainglorious self-image about how times and attitudes have changed, in part thanks to their own virtuousness. Robert Redford’s film about the 1950s Twenty-One quiz show scandals is immaculately made, boasts a notable cast and is guided by a strong screenplay from Paul Attanasio (who, on television, had just created the seminal Homicide: Life on the Streets ), but it lacks that something extra that pushes it into truly memorable territory.

Say hello to the Scream Extractor.

Monsters, Inc. (2001) (SPOILERS) I was never the greatest fan of Monsters, Inc. , even before charges began to be levelled regarding its “true” subtext. I didn’t much care for the characters, and I particularly didn’t like the way Pixar’s directors injected their own parenting/ childhood nostalgia into their plots. Something that just seems to go on with their fare ad infinitum. Which means the Pixars I preferred tended to be the Brad Bird ones. You know, the alleged objectivist. Now, though, we learn Pixar has always been about the adrenochrome, so there’s no going back…

All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies.

Watership Down (1978) (SPOILERS) I only read Watership Down recently, despite having loved the film from the first, and I was immediately impressed with how faithful, albeit inevitably compacted, Martin Rosen’s adaptation is. It manages to translate the lyrical, mythic and metaphysical qualities of Richard Adams’ novel without succumbing to dumbing down or the urge to cater for a broader or younger audience. It may be true that parents are the ones who get most concerned over the more disturbing elements of the picture but, given the maturity of the content, it remains a surprise that, as with 2001: A Space Odyssey (which may on the face of it seem like an odd bedfellow), this doesn’t garner a PG certificate. As the makers noted, Watership Down is at least in part an Exodus story, but the biblical implications extend beyond Hazel merely leading his fluffle to the titular promised land. There is a prevalent spiritual dimension to this rabbit universe, one very much

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.

Other monks will meet their deaths here. And they too will have blackened fingers. And blackened tongues.

The Name of the Rose (1986) (SPOILERS) Umberto Eco wasn’t awfully impressed by Jean Jacques-Annaud’s adaptation of his novel – or “ palimpsest of Umberto Eco’s novel ” as the opening titles announce – to the extent that he nixed further movie versions of his work. Later, he amended that view, calling it “ a nice movie ”. He also, for balance, labelled The Name of the Rose his worst novel – “ I hate this book and I hope you hate it too ”. Essentially, he was begrudging its renown at the expense of his later “ superior ” novels. I didn’t hate the novel, although I do prefer the movie, probably because I saw it first and it was everything I wanted from a medieval Sherlock Holmes movie set in a monastery and devoted to forbidden books, knowledge and opinions.

He tasks me. He tasks me, and I shall have him.

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) (SPOILERS) I don’t love Star Trek , but I do love Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan . That probably isn’t just me, but a common refrain of many a non-devotee of the series. Although, it used to apply to The Voyage Home (the funny one, with the whales, the Star Trek even the target audience for Three Men and a Baby could enjoy). Unfortunately, its high regard has also become the desperate, self-destructive, song-and-verse, be-all-and-end-all of the overlords of the franchise itself, in whichever iteration, it seems. This is understandable to an extent, as Khan is that rare movie sequel made to transcendent effect on almost every level, and one that stands the test of time every bit as well (better, even) as when it was first unveiled.

You ever heard the saying, “Don’t rob the bank across from the diner that has the best donuts in three counties”?

2 Guns (2013) (SPOILERS) Denzel Washington is such a reliable performer, that it can get a bit boring. You end up knowing every gesture or inflection in advance, whether he’s playing a good guy or a bad guy. And his films are generally at least half decent, so you end up seeing them. Even in Flight (or perhaps especially in Flight ; just watch him chugging down that vodka) where he’s giving it his Oscar-nominatable best, he seems too familiar. I think it may be because he’s an actor who is more effective the less he does. In 2 Guns he’s not doing less, but sometimes it seems like it. That’s because the last person I’d ever expect blows him off the screen; Mark Wahlberg.

Maybe the dingo ate your baby.

Seinfeld 2.9: The Stranded The Premise George and Elaine are stranded at a party in Long Island, with a disgruntled hostess.