Skip to main content

Just try to make it sound like you wrote it that way on purpose.

The French Dispatch
of the Liberty, Kansas Evening Sun

(SPOILERS) More a trifle than a Grand Bouffe, The French Dispatch is every bit as dry and distancing as The Grand Budapest Hotel was warm and welcoming, as if Wes Anderson’s set upon pushing as far as he possibly can in his studiously stylised direction, just to see how many are willing to come along for the ride. He’s done stories within stories before, but they’ve never been as conspicuously detached as they are here. Perhaps Wes watched The Ballad of Buster Scruggs and decided it was a good way to develop some sketchy ideas. However, one gets the impression a series of five-minute tableaux running to 100 minutes would be the ideal form for such aesthetic/ intellectual posing.

The tableaux abound here anyway, of course, along with varying aspect ratios, switches from black-and-white to colour and back again, Richard Scarry building fronts (complete with moving parts and people), and the clockwork consequences of Alexandre Desplat’s score. The French Dispatch is a Wes Anderson movie for those who can’t get enough of Wes Anderson movies. Which means I enjoyed it – I am, by and large, a fan – but at the same time, I was conscious of an encroaching sense of thinly-stretched shtick. That the elastic band might snap at any moment. For many former adherents it long since has, exhausted that he has no interest whatsoever in providing whatever it is they’re looking for (maturity, ditching the irony and kitschy quirk; none of these moves are a good idea, if you can only adopt them in a faux-manner, as Edgar Wright has discovered). Myself, I’m happy enough he has no interest in bending over backwards at the behest of his critics.

Indeed, some are fond of citing the halcyon days of Bottle Rocket and Rushmore, when Anderson had one foot in a world of people vaguely resembling the real thing; it was only with The Royal Tennenbaums (his best, with The Grand Budapest Hotel) that I climbed fully aboard his train, so such a move would have little appeal to me. There are those I have reservations about – The Life Aquatic never quite finds a groove so winds up strangely inert; Fantastic Mr Fox messes too much with source material I adore; Moonrise Kingdom is a little too preoccupied with its juvenile protagonists – but I generally look forward to each new entry in his canon, and when I haven’t (Isle of Dogs), I’ve been pleasantly surprised. So even Anderson parodying Anderson, as we’re almost experiencing here, has an appeal.

The presentation is expectedly meticulous – Anjelica Huston narrates introductions to the titular newspaper, publishing a final edition after its editor (Bill Murray’s Arthur Howitzer Jr) dies. The paper will comprise several articles from past editions, and an obit. As is invariably the case with a portmanteau production, some segments are more successful others, and going back to the five-minute tableaux notion, I believe Anderson would have been better keeping them short but sweet, as per Owen Wilson’s The Cycling Reporter (3/5), presenting the changes (or lack thereof) in the town of Ennui (geddit) before disappearing suddenly down a subway entrance on his bike. The French Dispatch is only 103 minutes, but feels twenty longer thanks to its deliberately unhurried posture.

Like the Three Bears’ porridge, Anderson only gets one of his three articles just right, and it’s the first. The others have a strong idea (revolutionary student revolt) or strong performances (Jeffrey Wright, Liev Schreiber) but not both. In The Concrete Masterpiece (4.5/5), Adrien Brody’s art dealer Julian Cadazio discovers Benicio del Toro’s incarcerated artist Moses Rosenthaler and makes him a sensation. There are expected – but amusing – barbs directed at abstract portraiture (Julian had Moses quickly sketch a perfect sparrow to prove he actually had a skill set) and the purity of motive in the artist’s choice of nude muse (Moses gets a slap for his over-attentiveness).

Tony Revolori appears in a charming shot where his younger Moses swaps places with del Toro’s elder one (the latter is perfectly called upon to inhabit that shambling, semi-coherent man-monster persona of his). Tilda Swinton delivers one of her classic cartoons as Dispatch writer JKL Berensen. Brody, with his gangly, beaky, hangdog bearing, only ever really feels at home in Anderson productions. Léa Seydoux reminds you she’s much more talented than a thankless Bond girl role could allow (all the Bond alumni here – Seydoux, Jeffrey Wright, even Mathieu Amalric – fare significantly better in this picture, even though, in the latter’s case, he hardly registers). The portmanteau sequence really ought to offer a satisfying twist development, and this one’s – Moses’ much-awaited artwork is an immoveable fresco – is a more than decent one.

Revisions to a Manifesto (2.5/5) broaches the illusion of journalistic neutrality via Lucinda Krementz (Frances McDormand) conducting an affair with revolting student Zeffirelli (Timothée Chalamet) and amending his resistance manual. Political cynicism’s on display, but in such an offhand fashion, you could barely be label it acerbic, less still directed. The idea of conducting the 1968 revolution via chess moves is better as just that, an idea, than in execution, such that it’s an amusing relief when the impasse is broken and the “tear gas and rubber bullets” are broken out.

Chalamet has the hair for an Anderson caricature, but none of the exaggerated personality; as far as the younger contingent goes, less-well-catered-for Anderson regulars Revolori and Saoirse Ronan (the latter presumably cast so Anderson could get her in a saucy showgirl outfit) display the kind of presence Timmy sorely lacks. Still, with this and Call Me by Your Name, he is evidently eager to boost himself as an equal-opportunities twink. McDormand’s solid as the emotionally-detached old maid, but this isn’t one of her indelible roles. Christoph Waltz appears in about one scene, with a scratchy beard.

The Private Dining Room of the Police Commissioner (3.5/5) finds Wright irresistibly inhabiting his best Orson Welles impression as a food journalist recounting a dinner with The Commissaire of the Ennui police force (Amalric) – served by the chef/officer Lieutenant Nescarrier (Stephen Park) – to a magnificently ’70s-styled TV interviewer (Liev Schreiber). Wright’s Roebuck Wright, incapable of reading a map, becomes entangled in the affair of the Commissaire’s kidnapped son Gigi (Winston Ait Hellal), which sounds like a perfect recipe, but it ends up ever so slightly overcooked, trying to be too clever for its own good. The animated chase interlude is an absolute winner, though.

Many of the extensive cast are offered little more than cameos. Other notables who barely get a look in – anyone would think this was a Malick movie, given the level of thankless involvement, just so they can bask in the light of Wes – include Elisabeth Moss, Griffin Dunne, Henry Winkler and returnees Jason Schwartzman, Fisher Stevens, Bob Balaban and Edward Norton. Jarvis Cocker also sings some French pop.

It goes without saying that Anderson continues untarnished by the Hollywood woke machine’s brush; such an eventuality would be as unlikely as his conforming to any kind of big studio narrative norm. If anything, he’s proved only more wilfully idiosyncratic in his attitudes. His next, however, features Guantanamo Hanks himself (or his brother), Margot Robbie, Matt Dillon, Bryan Cranston and (yawn) Scarlett Johansson. It remains to be seen how mould-able they are to Anderson’s enduring vision, and if Asteroid City takes a similarly scattershot approach to steering story as The French Dispatch.

Popular posts from this blog

You were this amazing occidental samurai.

Ricochet (1991) (SPOILERS) You have to wonder at Denzel Washington’s agent at this point in the actor’s career. He’d recently won his first Oscar for Glory , yet followed it with less-than-glorious heart-transplant ghost comedy Heart Condition (Bob Hoskins’ racist cop receives Washington’s dead lawyer’s ticker; a recipe for hijinks!) Not long after, he dipped his tentative toe in the action arena with this Joel Silver production; Denzel has made his share of action fare since, of course, most of it serviceable if unremarkable, but none of it comes near to delivering the schlocky excesses of Ricochet , a movie at once ingenious and risible in its plot permutations, performances and production profligacy.

Well, something’s broke on your daddy’s spaceship.

Apollo 13 (1995) (SPOILERS) The NASA propaganda movie to end all NASA propaganda movies. Their original conception of the perilous Apollo 13 mission deserves due credit in itself; what better way to bolster waning interest in slightly naff perambulations around a TV studio than to manufacture a crisis event, one emphasising the absurd fragility of the alleged non-terrestrial excursions and the indomitable force that is “science” in achieving them? Apollo 13 the lunar mission was tailor made for Apollo 13 the movie version – make believe the make-believe – and who could have been better to lead this fantasy ride than Guantanamo Hanks at his all-American popularity peak?

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

He’ll regret it to his dying day, if ever he lives that long.

The Quiet Man (1952) (SPOILERS) The John Wayne & John Ford film for those who don’t like John Wayne & John Ford films? The Quiet Man takes its cues from Ford’s earlier How Green Was My Valley in terms of, well less Anglophile and Hibernophile and Cambrophile nostalgia respectively for past times, climes and heritage, as Wayne’s pugilist returns to his family seat and stirs up a hot bed of emotions, not least with Maureen O’Hara’s red-headed hothead. The result is a very likeable movie, for all its inculcated Oirishness and studied eccentricity.

The Krishna died of a broken finger? I mean, is that a homicide?

Miami Blues (1990) (SPOILERS) If the ‘90s crime movie formally set out its stall in 1992 with Quentin Tarantino’s Reservoir Dogs , another movie very quietly got in there first at the beginning of the decade. Miami Blues picked up admiring reviews but went otherwise unnoticed on release, and even now remains under-recognised. The tale of “blithe psychopath” Federick J. Frenger, Jr., the girl whose heart he breaks and the detetive sergeant on his trail, director George Armitage’s adaptation of Charles Willeford’s novel wears a pitch black sense of humour and manages the difficult juggling act of being genuinely touching with it. It’s a little gem of a movie, perfectly formed and concisely told, one that more than deserves to rub shoulders with the better-known entries in its genre. One of the defining characteristics of Willeford’s work, it has been suggested , is that it doesn’t really fit into the crime genre; he comes from an angle of character rather than plot or h

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

You think a monkey knows he’s sitting on top of a rocket that might explode?

The Right Stuff (1983) (SPOILERS) While it certainly more than fulfils the function of a NASA-propaganda picture – as in, it affirms the legitimacy of their activities – The Right Stuff escapes the designation of rote testament reserved for Ron Howard’s later Apollo 13 . Partly because it has such a distinctive personality and attitude. Partly too because of the way it has found its through line, which isn’t so much the “wow” of the Space Race and those picked to be a part of it as it is the personification of that titular quality in someone who wasn’t even in the Mercury programme: Chuck Yaeger (Sam Shephard). I was captivated by The Right Stuff when I first saw it, and even now, with the benefit of knowing-NASA-better – not that the movie is exactly extolling its virtues from the rooftops anyway – I consider it something of a masterpiece, an interrogation of legends that both builds them and tears them down. The latter aspect doubtless not NASA approved.

You tampered with the universe, my friend.

The Music of Chance (1993) (SPOILERS) You won’t find many adaptations of Paul Auster’s novels. Original screenplays, yes, a couple of which he has directed himself. Terry Gilliam has occasionally mentioned Mr. Vertigo as in development. It was in development in 1995 too, when Philip Haas and Auster intended to bring it to the screen. Which means Auster presumably approved of Haas’ work on The Music of Chance (he also cameos). That would be understandable, as it makes for a fine, ambiguous movie, pregnant with meaning yet offering no unequivocal answers, and one that makes several key departures from the book yet crucially maintains a mesmerising, slow-burn lure.

Drank the red. Good for you.

Morbius (2022) (SPOILERS) Generic isn’t necessarily a slur. Not if, by implication, it’s suggestive of the kind of movie made twenty years ago, when the alternative is the kind of super-woke content Disney currently prioritises. Unfortunately, after a reasonable first hour, Morbius descends so resignedly into such unmoderated formula that you’re left with a too-clear image of Sony’s Spider-Verse when it lacks a larger-than-life performer (Tom Hardy, for example) at the centre of any given vehicle.

He doesn’t want to lead you. He just wants you to follow.

Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (2022) (SPOILERS) The general failing of the prequel concept is a fairly self-evident one; it’s spurred by the desire to cash in, rather than to tell a story. This is why so few prequels, in any form, are worth the viewer/reader/listener’s time, in and of themselves. At best, they tend to be something of a well-rehearsed fait accompli. In the movie medium, even when there is material that withstands closer inspection (the Star Wars prequels; The Hobbit , if you like), the execution ends up botched. With Fantastic Beasts , there was never a whiff of such lofty purpose, and each subsequent sequel to the first prequel has succeeded only in drawing attention to its prosaic function: keeping franchise flag flying, even at half-mast. Hence Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore , belatedly arriving after twice the envisaged gap between instalments and course-correcting none of the problems present in The Crimes of Grindelwald .