Skip to main content

Oh hello, loves, what year is it?

Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings

(SPOILERS) Simu Lui must surely be the least charismatic lead in a major motion picture since… er, Taylor Lautner? He isn’t aggressively bad, like Lautner was/is, but he’s so blank, so nondescript, he makes Marvel’s super-spiffy new superhero Shang-Chi a superplank by osmosis. Just looking at him makes me sleepy, so it’s lucky Akwafina is wired enough for the both of them. At least, until she gets saddled with standard sidekick support heroics and any discernible personality promptly dissolves. And so, Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings continues Kevin Feige’s bold journey into wokesense, seemingly at the expense of any interest in dramatically engaging the viewer.

Trevor: I know, facile, trite. I couldn’t agree more.

Because the movie is, like Black Widow before it, consummately inessential. The curious thing is, both had a degree of potential, outside of the Marvel homogenising machine. A tale of an MKUltra’d Natasha might have been a prequel worth exploring (not the one we got, clearly). And the mix for Shang-Chi, of a character already aware of, yet unimpressed by and avoiding, the supercharged Marvel milieu sidesteps the usual origin story (barring some undistinguished flashbacks). Yet such is Lui’s pervasive languidity, even when Shaun/Shang reveals his prowess during a bus attack, it could almost be as if he’s just discovering his skills for the first time. There’s no weight to any of it. It’s a rote reveal, and even hyperactive Akwafina (as best pal co-valet – an ideal profession for Liu – Katy) is unable to make it seem either exciting or legit.

Shang-Chi: Even if you could bring her back, what makes you think she’d want anything to do with you?

There was a further good idea here too. Tony Leung, for some reason that’s beyond me, chose this juncture in his long and distinguished career to take the Hollywood plunge, and if the choice does him no favours – you’re inclined to commiserate with Xu Wenwu for his disappointment of a son – the opening encounter with Ying Li (Fala Chen) and their dance of desire/courtship is – alas – as exotic and artistic as the movie will muster. This is an interesting kernel for a plot, of individuals of opposing morality who are nevertheless drawn inexorably to each other; the villain’s love story might have made a decent movie, but this isn’t that movie (although Disney are ramping up their “sympathy for the devil” pictures, so you never know). Consequently, it’s dealt with as little more than exposition, and Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings sorely lacks the spark that might make it seem distinctive or different; Leung and Chen weave a lure entirely absent elsewhere among the cast (a certain returning comic relief aside), so it’s a double blow that the good stuff is out of the way in the first ten minutes.

That might not have been the end of it: “My son is home”, and the uneasy family dynamic, had potential as a Vader-ish generational conflict, yet it’s played out with a despairing lack of tension, conviction, engagement or imagination. Particularly so with the inclusion of de rigueur beats like dad having a last moment bout of feeling for his son (Vader-ish), despite trying to kill him moments before (Vader-ish). Liu brings zero depth to the proceedings, and Leung can’t carry them on his own. Similarly, estranged sister Meng’er Zhang (Xu Xialing) is a personality black hole. Well, aside from being a strong woman who doesn’t need her brother and can whoop his butt. Which goes without saying, even though Shang-Chi is the nominal star of the show, at least until Marvel can replace him perhaps with his sister or maybe-possibly Akwafina.

The picture follows the well-trodden path of a threat/terror unleashed, although this one is slightly abstruse, with its activated pendants and ethereal call of the deceased. This is Marvel following in the Doctor Strange line (Benedict Wong makes a welcome appearance – an entire Wong move would have been far preferable to this weak sauce), such that we get some Harpies-lite off Jason and the Argonauts stealing souls to feed the Dweller in Darkness”. There’s a large well-rendered dragon on show come the finale, but otherwise the big showstopper is as boring as a dragon’s, or a Morris’s, ass.

The realm of Ta Lo is dampened by dull action in which about ten people line up to face a CGI threat (shades of Wakanda, but even less impressive). In general, there’s some decent choreography poking through, suggesting Destin Daniel Cretton could probably make a decent big budget movie, unfettered by Marvel edicts, although obviously the principle reason for employing him was Disney identity politics (as a director with Asian heritage).

Though, whether that’s what he should want (big budget movies) is a different matter. Short Term 12 was very solid, but his mainstream ascendency (The Shack, Just Mercy) has been considerably less promising. He wisely wasn’t big on going the superhero movie route in the first place, although unwisely swallowed the plankton that he could tell “an authentic story about Asian identity”. If a Marvel movie has ever told any form of authentic story – aside from perhaps Hulk – that would be a first.

Indeed, it’s downright hilarious reading the Wiki gloss job, flitting from waxing hot on its magnificent portrayal of race to an almost as up-there treatment of women, “who are kind of kicking his butt into gear throughout the movie…” Even a strong representational portrayal needs to know there are limits, if it’s a strong male representational portrayal.

Trevor: All this time I thought I was hallucinating.

Michelle Yeoh shows up, inevitably, as does Abomination, less so. Florian Munteanu makes an impression as a one-handed monolith. There are swathes of vaguely plastic countryside from cinematographer William Pope, making you suspect the use of Unreal Engine. Mark Ruffalo and Cretton regular Brie Larson cameo in the credit scene. Bruce Banner desperately needs one of those med beds.

Trevor: That’s a weird horse. What’s it looking at me for?

Then there’s Trevor Slattery (Ben Kingsley – who’s only a few years off eighty, but mercifully significantly less senile than Patrick Stewart). Inevitably, the need to be so tediously literal in explaining Shane Black’s Marvel entry – by far the best of the MCU canon – is slightly exasperating, but of course, there can be no slack granted or inhaling out of turn in the wokesense world. Thus, Trevor’s return is somehow attempting to atone for Iron Man Three’s attempt to atone for the racism of the original comics character, which of course, makes a whole lot of sense. So Slattery has reformed, which means you can like him now legitimately, as long as you make it clear he didn’t do a good thing, and you can just let him off as a loveable rascal. God, it’s tiresome. Isn’t it?

Soo: We’re now in a world where, at any moment, half the world’s population can just disappear. Life’s too short and fragile.

Kingsley’s delivery is spot on as ever, even if the writing of Trevor isn’t nearly as sharp as Black’s. Although, I liked the way one might read that Slattery’s employment as a fake terrorist came via “official” channels: “Anyway, the producer told me he worked for the BBC”. As if the BBC would ever be involved in deceiving whole nations about a global threat. Of course, there are big (global) events in Marvel-verse now, big (global) events that curiously (or not) mirror our world, or will do, if TPTB have their way. Even the final shot is in on that act, with Xialing taking over the Ten Rings, many of her warriors wearing stylish face nappies – the coof is strong in the super-strong. Clearly.

Katy: Oh, the Mega Soul Sucker was such a nasty bitch.

And clearly, Marvel is royally screwed, whatever reprieve No Way Home brings. They’ve gone from world dominating to joke in the space of two years, and the “relative” strength of their performance this year (piffling when Ant-Man is their nearest comparable MCU reference point) has actually fallen thorough the floor.

Popular posts from this blog

The Bible never said anything about amphetamines.

The Color of Money (1986) (SPOILERS) I tend to think it’s evident when Scorsese isn’t truly exercised by material. He can still invest every ounce of the technical acumen at his fingertips, and the results can dazzle on that level, but you don’t really feel the filmmaker in the film. Which, for one of his pictures to truly carry a wallop, you need to do. We’ve seen quite a few in such deficit in recent years, most often teaming with Leo. The Color of Money , however, is the first where it was out-and-out evident the subject matter wasn’t Marty’s bag. He needed it, desperately, to come off, but in the manner a tradesman who wants to keep getting jobs. This sequel to The Hustler doesn’t linger in the mind, however good it may be, moment by moment.

I said I had no family. I didn’t say I had an empty apartment.

The Apartment (1960) (SPOILERS) Billy Wilder’s romcom delivered the genre that rare Best Picture Oscar winner. Albeit, The Apartment amounts to a rather grim (now) PG-rated scenario, one rife with adultery, attempted suicide, prostitution of the soul and subjective thereof of the body. And yet, it’s also, finally, rather sweet, so salving the darker passages and evidencing the director’s expertly judged balancing act. Time Out ’s Tom Milne suggested the ending was a cop out (“ boy forgives girl and all’s well ”). But really, what other ending did the audience or central characters deserve?

Listen to the goddamn qualified scientists!

Don’t Look Up (2021) (SPOILERS) It’s testament to Don’t Look Up ’s “quality” that critics who would normally lap up this kind of liberal-causes messaging couldn’t find it within themselves to grant it a free pass. Adam McKay has attempted to refashion himself as a satirist since jettisoning former collaborator Will Ferrell, but as a Hollywood player and an inevitably socio-politically partisan one, he simply falls in line with the most obvious, fatuous propagandising.

Your desecration of reality will not go unpunished.

2021-22 Best-of, Worst-of and Everything Else Besides The movies might be the most visible example of attempts to cling onto cultural remnants as the previous societal template clatters down the drain. It takes something people really want – unlike a Bond movie where he kicks the can – to suggest the model of yesteryear, one where a billion-dollar grosser was like sneezing. You can argue Spider-Man: No Way Home is replete with agendas of one sort or another, and that’s undoubtedly the case (that’s Hollywood), but crowding out any such extraneous elements (and they often are) is simply a consummate crowd-pleaser that taps into tangible nostalgia through its multiverse take. Of course, nostalgia for a mere seven years ago, for something you didn’t like anyway, is a symptom of how fraught these times have become.

Doctors make the worst patients.

Coma (1978) (SPOILERS) Michael Crichton’s sophomore big-screen feature, and by some distance his best. Perhaps it’s simply that this a milieu known to him, or perhaps it’s that it’s very much aligned to the there-and-now and present, but Coma , despite the occasional lapse in this adaptation of colleague Robin Cook’s novel, is an effective, creepy, resonant thriller and then some. Crichton knows his subject, and it shows – the picture is confident and verisimilitudinous in a way none of his other directorial efforts are – and his low-key – some might say clinical – approach pays dividends. You might also call it prescient, but that would be to suggest its subject matter wasn’t immediately relevant then too.

You ruined every suck-my-silky-ass thing!

The Matrix Resurrections (2021) (SPOILERS) Warner Bros has been here before. Déjà vu? What happens when you let a filmmaker do whatever they want? And I don’t mean in the manner of Netflix. No, in the sequel sense. You get a Gremlins 2: The New Batch (a classic, obviously, but not one that financially furthered a franchise). And conversely, when you simply cash in on a brand, consequences be damned? Exorcist II: The Heretic speaks for itself. So in the case of The Matrix Resurrections – not far from as meta as The New Batch , but much less irreverent – when Thomas “Tom” Anderson, designer of globally successful gaming trilogy The Matrix , is told “ Our beloved company, Warner Bros, has decided to make a sequel to the trilogy ” and it’s going ahead “with or without us”, you can be fairly sure this is the gospel. That Lana, now going it alone, decided it was better to “make the best of it” than let her baby be sullied. Of course, quite what that amounts to in the case of a movie(s) tha

You just threw a donut in the hot zone!

Den of Thieves (2018) (SPOILERS) I'd heard this was a shameless  Heat  rip-off, and the presence of Gerard Butler seemed to confirm it would be passable-at-best B-heist hokum, so maybe it was just middling expectations, even having heard how enthused certain pockets of the Internet were, but  Den of Thieves  is a surprisingly very satisfying entry in the genre. I can't even fault it for attempting to Keyser Soze the whole shebang at the last moment – add a head in a box and you have three 1995 classics in one movie – even if that particular conceit doesn’t quite come together.

Abandon selective targeting. Shoot everything.

28 Weeks Later (2007) (SPOILERS) The first five minutes of 28 Weeks Later are far and away the best part of this sequel, offering in quick succession a devastating moral quandary and a waking nightmare, immortalised on the screen. After that, while significantly more polished, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo reveals his concept to be altogether inferior to Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s, falling back on the crutches of gore, nihilism, and disengaging and limiting shifts of focus between characters in whom one has little investment in the first place.

It’s always possible to find a good moral reason for killing anybody.

The Assassination Bureau (1969) (SPOILERS) The Assassination Bureau ought to be a great movie. You can see its influence on those who either think it is a great movie, or want to produce something that fulfils its potential. Alan Moore and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen . The just-released (and just-flopped) The King’s Men . It inhabits a post-Avengers, self-consciously benign rehearsal of, and ambivalence towards, Empire manners and attitudes, something that could previously be seen that decade in Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines (and sequel Monte Carlo or Bust , also 1969), Adam Adamant Lives! , and even earlier with Kind Hearts and Coronets , whilst also feeding into that “Peacock Revolution” of Edwardian/Victorian fashion refurbishment. Unfortunately, though, it lacks the pop-stylistic savvy that made, say, The President’s Analyst so vivacious.

This guy’s armed with a hairdryer.

An Innocent Man (1989) (SPOILERS) Was it a chicken-and-egg thing with Tom Selleck and movies? Did he consistently end up in ropey pictures because other, bigger big-screen stars had first dibs on the good stuff? Or was it because he was a resolutely small-screen guy with limited range and zero good taste? Selleck had about half-a-dozen cinema outings during the 1980s, one of which, the very TV, very Touchstone Three Men and a Baby was a hit, but couldn’t be put wholly down to him. The final one was An Innocent Man , where he attempted to show some grit and mettle, as nice-guy Tom is framed and has to get tough to survive. Unfortunately, it’s another big-screen TV movie.