Skip to main content

Good heavens, we've completely forgotten it's Christmas!

Meet Me in St. Louis 
(1944)

(SPOILERS) Seasonal fare, in as much as it covers all four of them. Meet Me in St. Louis isn’t the kind of musical designed to win the attention of those, such as myself, already reticent of the genre. Scant of plot, it very loosely follows the dramas – if you can call them that – of the Smith family over the year leading to the 1904 Louisiana Purchase Exposition World’s Fair. I dare say I may have seen the movie before, as a nipper; certainly, many of the songs are familiar, which always helps when a musical otherwise fails to transport one. And then, there are the fringe peculiarities. Can one say mudflood?

Vincent Minnelli’s third feature in a thirty-year career, one where the musicals became most indelible, was based on Sally Benson’s 1942 novel of the same name (itself arising from a series of her New Yorker pieces). The trials of the affluent aren’t really the stuff of greatness, but audiences lapped Meet Me in St. Louis up in its year of release (it came in second only to the also-very-“nice” Going My Way), and it undoubtedly remains something of a favourite. And a Christmas favourite at that.

The Smiths were based on Benson’s own family, and she provided advice to Minnelli, who was exacting in getting her world right. Aonzo (Leon Ames) and Anna (Mary Astor) have four daughters: Rose (Lucille Bremer), Esther (Judy Garland), Agnes (Joan Carroll), and Tootie (Margaret O’Brien). Obviously, the lion’s share of the plot and numbers are devoted to Esther, but there’s a surprising amount of kids’ malarkey revolving around then all-the-rage child star O’Brien. At least as significant a character, minus the romantic entanglements and heartache and replaced with a lot of yelling, she’s a monstrous riot-running infant given to extreme preciousness and an apparently infinite leash. 

Esther is keen on boy-next-door John Truett (Tom Drake), their hit-and-miss flirtation/ courtship culminating in a Christmas Eve ball where she’s accompanied by grandad (Harry Davenport). And then, of course, sings Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas to the uber-brat. The message for whom seems to be that, if you play up, you’re sure to get your own way (her tantrum causes dad to reconsider the planned move to New York, since St Louis is obviously the business).

Tootie: He tried to kill me, and when I screamed, he ran away.

It’s all very (Techni-) colourful of course, boasting the sort of period look you’ll only find in musicals (be it Mary Poppins or Hello, Dolly!) And credit where it’s due, Garland is in tremendous voice. The most striking part for me, though, is what Richard Schickel referred to as its “dreamy, occasionally surreal, darkness”.

Much of this is at the behest of, or involving, nightmare child Tootie, who goes around delivering weird drunk impressions and uttering ’orrible asseverations, as if reliving past traumas from a child’s-eye view (“She was murdered in a den of thieves, and I died of a broken heart. I’ve never even been buried because everyone’s scared to come near me”; “And I’m taking all my dolls, even the dead ones. I’m taking everything”; “… and Mr Braukoff was beating his wife with a red-hot poker…”; even her singing is freaky: “I was drunk last night, dear Mother, I was drunk the night before. But if you forgive me, Mother, I’ll never get drunk no more” (Sister Agnes isn’t much better: “I’ll stab you to death in your sleep, then I’ll tie your body to two wild horses until you’re pulled apart” Sheeeeesh!)

Johnny Tevis: The banshee will haunt you forever.

There’s also the false accusation against John (“He tried to kill me”), instantly believed even though it’s a bare-faced lie, and only remedied after John has received punitive measures. There’s the highly sinister Halloween episode, whereby the assembled youngsters gather round a bonfire in grotesque masks, as if attending some ghoulish witches’ sabbath as they send Tootie on her mission to “kill” Mr Braukoff (throw flour in his face). It would seem right at home in Kill List or Midsommar. Later, Tootie goes on a snowman destruction derby, as if smashing to pieces further spectres of the past.

Most curious of all is the final scene, taking place when Spring has sprung and everyone is gathered at the World’s Fair (the same year’s disastrous Olympics, also in St Louis, is conspicuously unmentioned). The smattering of World’s Fairs occurring during this time are – well, from the 1790s onwards – of course, very suspicious. Astonishingly crafted buildings shooting up for but a brief time, only to be summarily pulled back down again, showcases for an amazing run of inventions that would soon dry up. Were these expos legit, or were they a façade, a means of presenting a history that needed papering over and re-contextualising, while at the same time removing the worst – as in, most glaring – articles pointing to the ugly truth?

At the Fair, the brat – who else – comes running up to the assembled family and announces breathlessly, “Papa, we saw the Galveston Flood. Big waves came up and flooded the whole city, and when the water went back, it was all muddy and horrible and there were dead bodies”. Very much in keeping with the child’s grim bent, of course, but as Michelle Gibson notes, its positioning at this point in the picture is too uncanny to be ascribed to coincidence, or shrugging it off by reasoning “So what? The Galveston flood was only a couple of years earlier”. The salient point is, why here? At this cumulative stage? It’s essentially a declaration to anyone familiar with mudflood and the idea that these expos were merely reintroducing tech (and buildings) of an earlier, decimated or reset civilisation.

Anna: There’s never been anything like it in the whole world ever.
Tootie: Grandpa, they’ll never tear it down, will they?
Grandpa: Well, they better not.
Esther: I can’t believe it. Right here. Where we live. Right here in St Louis.

Naturally, there’s the official reinforcing narrative accompanying this. Yet it only serves to underline the strangeness. Esther says to John, echoing a deleted scene in which they visited the fairgrounds under construction “I liked it better when it was a swamp and just the two of us”. Grandad, meanwhile, waxes lyrical in benefit-of-hindsight fashion, about how “They better not” tear it all down.

So is the nostalgia fest that is Meet Me in St. Louis actually a clarion call to a lost civilisation. And is having a merry little Christmas, because it may be your last (per the original lyric), a reference to the majority of the population being obliterated by such a grubby flood (whether or not they even celebrated Christmas)? Don’t worry, we’ll mudfloodle through somehow. So have yourself a merry little Christmas now.





Popular posts from this blog

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 1 (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Is this supposed to be me? It’s grotesque.

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022) (SPOILERS) I didn’t hold out much hope for The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent being more than moderately tolerable. Not so much because its relatively untested director and his co-writer are mostly known in the TV sphere (and not so much for anything anyone is raving about). Although, it has to be admitted, the finished movie flourishes a degree of digital flatness typical of small-screen productions (it’s fine, but nothing more). Rather, due to the already over-tapped meta-strain of celebs showing they’re good sports about themselves. When Spike Jonze did it with John Malkovich, it was weird and different. By the time we had JCVD , not so much. And both of them are pre-dated by Arnie in Last Action Hero (“ You brought me nothing but pain ” he is told by Jack Slater). Plus, it isn’t as if Tom Gormican and Kevin Etten have much in the way of an angle on Nic; the movie’s basically there to glorify “him”, give or take a few foibles, do

All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies.

Watership Down (1978) (SPOILERS) I only read Watership Down recently, despite having loved the film from the first, and I was immediately impressed with how faithful, albeit inevitably compacted, Martin Rosen’s adaptation is. It manages to translate the lyrical, mythic and metaphysical qualities of Richard Adams’ novel without succumbing to dumbing down or the urge to cater for a broader or younger audience. It may be true that parents are the ones who get most concerned over the more disturbing elements of the picture but, given the maturity of the content, it remains a surprise that, as with 2001: A Space Odyssey (which may on the face of it seem like an odd bedfellow), this doesn’t garner a PG certificate. As the makers noted, Watership Down is at least in part an Exodus story, but the biblical implications extend beyond Hazel merely leading his fluffle to the titular promised land. There is a prevalent spiritual dimension to this rabbit universe, one very much

Whacking. I'm hell at whacking.

Witness (1985) (SPOILERS) Witness saw the advent of a relatively brief period – just over half a decade –during which Harrison Ford was willing to use his star power in an attempt to branch out. The results were mixed, and abruptly concluded when his typically too late to go where Daniel Day Lewis, Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro had gone before (with at bare minimum Oscar-nominated results) – but not “ full retard ” – ended in derision with Regarding Henry . He retreated to the world of Tom Clancy, and it’s the point where his cachet began to crumble. There had always been a stolid quality beneath even his more colourful characters, but now it came to the fore. You can see something of that as John Book in Witness – despite his sole Oscar nom, it might be one of Ford’s least interesting performances of the 80s – but it scarcely matters, or that the screenplay (which won) is by turns nostalgic, reactionary, wistful and formulaic, as director Peter Weir, in his Hollywood debu

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

If that small woman is small enough, she could fit behind a small tree.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 2 (SPOILERS) I can’t quite find it within myself to perform the rapturous somersaults that seem to be the prevailing response to this fourth run of the show. I’ve outlined some of my thematic issues in the Volume 1 review, largely borne out here, but the greater concern is one I’ve held since Season Two began – and this is the best run since Season One, at least as far my failing memory can account for – and that’s the purpose-built formula dictated by the Duffer Brothers. It’s there in each new Big Bad, obviously, even to the extent that this is the Big-Bad-who-binds-them-all (except the Upside Down was always there, right?) And it’s there with the resurgent emotional beats, partings, reunions and plaintively stirring music cues. I have to be really on board with a movie or show to embrace such flagrantly shameless manipulation, season after season, and I find myself increasingly immune.

Get away from my burro!

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) (SPOILERS) The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is beloved by so many of the cinematic firmament’s luminaries – Stanley Kubrick, Sam Raimi, , Paul Thomas Anderson and who knows maybe also WS, Vince Gilligan, Spike Lee, Daniel Day Lewis; Oliver Stone was going to remake it – not to mention those anteriorly influential Stone Roses, that it seems foolhardy to suggest it isn’t quite all that. There’s no faulting the performances – a career best Humphrey Bogart, with director John Huston’s dad Walter stealing the movie from under him – but the greed-is-bad theme is laid on a little thick, just in case you were a bit too dim to get it yourself the first time, and Huston’s direction may be right there were it counts for the dramatics, but it’s a little too relaxed when it comes to showing the seams between Mexican location and studio.

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls… dyin’ time’s here!

Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (1985) Time was kind to Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome . As in, it was such a long time since I’d seen the “final chapter” of the trilogy, it had dwindled in my memory to the status of an “alright but not great” sequel. I’d half-expected to have positive things to say along the lines of it being misunderstood, or being able to see what it was trying for but perhaps failing to quite achieve. Instead, I re-discovered a massive turkey that is really a Mad Max movie in name only (appropriately, since Max was an afterthought). This is the kind of picture fans of beloved series tend to loathe; when a favourite character returns but without the qualities or tone that made them adored in the first place (see Indiana Jones in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull , or John McClane in the last two Die Hard s). Thunderdome stinks even more than the methane fuelling Bartertown. I hadn’t been aware of the origins of Thunderdome until recently, mainly because I was