Skip to main content

The BBC have announced a cutback of one hundred percent.

The Goodies
5.13: The End

The Goodies tended to be at their most inventive when they had very little in the way of resources at their disposal. Typically, come the end of a season, bereft of location work, guest stars or expensive props, and so forced to make hay from the central trio (themselves) and office set. Off-the-wall introspection and – curiously – apocalyptic ennui occurred more than once under such circumstances, and possibly the most successful of these, both creatively and in terms of viewing figures, was The End.

Corbet Woodall: And finally, a service announcement. The BBC have announced a cutback of one hundred percent.

The Season Five finale, The End was one of six chosen for the BBC’s tentative foray into VHS releases of the series (none would follow until Network took up the DVD baton). The “Kids’ show!” jeer of John Cleese (in The Goodies and the Beanstalk) could, at times, feel justified, but the show at its sharpest was every bit as valid as its Oxbridge peers. In The End, like their Wuhan fellow victims – allegedly, but box office is booming! – The Goodies are sealed into their office. Albeit, under concrete and not remotely like a mudflood, where they must wait it out in the vain hope of rescue.

It’s Graeme who instigates their situation, having been paid fifty grand by Harry Highrise –per Andrew Pixley, based on property developer Harry Hyams, whose Centre Point development remained empty for years – to design the new Kew Gardens (with no gardens, or greenery whatsoever). This 350-foot-high block of offices will take the form of a 350-foot-high block of concrete. That there are no doors or windows is, as Graeme observes “The whole point”: “Rent is £4,000 per square foot, and that’s per minute” so no one can afford it. Further “As a matter of fact, there’s no rooms in there either, that’s so the squatters can’t move in”.

Such casual satire is typical of the show, laying in to urbanification, yet without any kind of observable ideal or zeal (renowned twitcher Bill gleefully shoots a cute bird in the episode’s opening moments). There’re subsequent digs at the Queen (now deceased, obviously), Tim’s royalism being one of the show’s favourite roasts. His letter precedes Neil’s to the bank in The Young Ones (the one that begins “Darling fascist bullyboy”) with “Oh Queen”, and most memorably has Graeme misspelling his name while taking dictation. The Queen later pays tribute to “Tim, Bill and the other one”.

Hopes of rescue are hampered by the building of the Brighton-to-Birkenhead freeway (an extenuated process depicted as noughts and crosses by Graeme on a map of England), taking one year, seven months, four days, three hours and five minutes (that’s after six months of Ministry of Works strike); it takes them much more than two years to run out of food (let alone air), at which point they consider eating Bill (“No I’m doing the sauce” objects Graeme, regarding who should kill Bill) before opting for the furniture instead (this sequence, inevitably, allows Garden to perform his runaway pet act upon his person, when he secures Tim’s mouse Gilbert and just about refrains from eating him).

By now, the phone is long since dead (“How can we have paid our bills, we’ve been stuck in a concrete block for two years, haven’t we?”) and the BBC has ceased to be (BC). Graeme has attempted to coordinate the trio into a functional societal unit, based on their unique status (ruling class, technical class and the workers – “And the cobblers”) since they have among them representatives of all three basic types.

Tim: But a man isn’t a man unless he exercises his right to fatherhood.
Bill: You can exercise it all you like, but you won’t find much use for it here.

Such political stirrings soon fall apart, however, after Tim bemoans his inability to foster children (“We three are doomed to be bachelors gay” imparts Bill), and Graeme hogs the lavatory for two weeks (“That was a unique experience”).

In the wake of societal and familial collapse, there is only God left to turn to. Graeme becomes a monk (complete with unsuccessful vow of silence) and in a turn of events – since it is by no means isolated in their oeuvre – that helps explain the disinterest in the show’s terrestrial repeat showings over the years, Tim becomes Jewish (having built a synagogue from matchsticks, he asks Graeme “Do you want to buy it?”), and Bill, with the aid of boot polish, becomes a Black Muslin (named Rastus Watermelon). As inadvisable as this avenue of humour is, it does elicit the classic line “Don’t mess with the Muslims, baby”. Next stop, War on Terror.

Graeme: Would you care for a glass of port?
Tim: I certainly would.
Graeme: So would I.

There’s still time for rampant hallucinations before we flash forward seventy years, complete with acute senility (“I used to have a big black woman with a cane handle”), and Bill as youthful as ever (“107 today!”) Until he dies. I’m unclear why Future Tim’s look involves his hair tied in a pate-tail, but Graeme’s Spock ears are spot on. Like Earthanasia, the episode ends with the final demise of the Goodies, although the entry of future versions suggests an existential loop (“I’m a teapot!”) whereby they are destined to a hopeless cycle of unwitting repetition and mortal error. Cheery, eh?

Tim: He’s pissed.
Graeme: Has he?

Also of note: the wall posters of (progressively more whiskery) David Essex and David Cassidy. Garden’s Cleese intonation (“Chop it off!”) and the array of nicknames and insults (“Old Graybags, old fuzzychops”). This reaches its zenith with the “Bulloddy” riff (Bill, of course, looks like Liza Minelli without the beard: “I’ve often wondered why you grew it”).

Graeme: It’s not such a bad old place.

The End received huge BBC2 viewing figures (10.3m) and even bigger BBC1 repeat-run ones (15.2m tuned in on 15.12.75). In many respects, The End is atypical of the show, eschewing prop-based humour for the most part and creating laughs from existential situations. They might not have been able, or wanted, to mine that every week, but it makes for an episode that stands the test of time – if not necessarily in a politically-correct sense – far more resiliently than much of their run.

Popular posts from this blog

The Bible never said anything about amphetamines.

The Color of Money (1986) (SPOILERS) I tend to think it’s evident when Scorsese isn’t truly exercised by material. He can still invest every ounce of the technical acumen at his fingertips, and the results can dazzle on that level, but you don’t really feel the filmmaker in the film. Which, for one of his pictures to truly carry a wallop, you need to do. We’ve seen quite a few in such deficit in recent years, most often teaming with Leo. The Color of Money , however, is the first where it was out-and-out evident the subject matter wasn’t Marty’s bag. He needed it, desperately, to come off, but in the manner a tradesman who wants to keep getting jobs. This sequel to The Hustler doesn’t linger in the mind, however good it may be, moment by moment.

I said I had no family. I didn’t say I had an empty apartment.

The Apartment (1960) (SPOILERS) Billy Wilder’s romcom delivered the genre that rare Best Picture Oscar winner. Albeit, The Apartment amounts to a rather grim (now) PG-rated scenario, one rife with adultery, attempted suicide, prostitution of the soul and subjective thereof of the body. And yet, it’s also, finally, rather sweet, so salving the darker passages and evidencing the director’s expertly judged balancing act. Time Out ’s Tom Milne suggested the ending was a cop out (“ boy forgives girl and all’s well ”). But really, what other ending did the audience or central characters deserve?

Listen to the goddamn qualified scientists!

Don’t Look Up (2021) (SPOILERS) It’s testament to Don’t Look Up ’s “quality” that critics who would normally lap up this kind of liberal-causes messaging couldn’t find it within themselves to grant it a free pass. Adam McKay has attempted to refashion himself as a satirist since jettisoning former collaborator Will Ferrell, but as a Hollywood player and an inevitably socio-politically partisan one, he simply falls in line with the most obvious, fatuous propagandising.

Your desecration of reality will not go unpunished.

2021-22 Best-of, Worst-of and Everything Else Besides The movies might be the most visible example of attempts to cling onto cultural remnants as the previous societal template clatters down the drain. It takes something people really want – unlike a Bond movie where he kicks the can – to suggest the model of yesteryear, one where a billion-dollar grosser was like sneezing. You can argue Spider-Man: No Way Home is replete with agendas of one sort or another, and that’s undoubtedly the case (that’s Hollywood), but crowding out any such extraneous elements (and they often are) is simply a consummate crowd-pleaser that taps into tangible nostalgia through its multiverse take. Of course, nostalgia for a mere seven years ago, for something you didn’t like anyway, is a symptom of how fraught these times have become.

Doctors make the worst patients.

Coma (1978) (SPOILERS) Michael Crichton’s sophomore big-screen feature, and by some distance his best. Perhaps it’s simply that this a milieu known to him, or perhaps it’s that it’s very much aligned to the there-and-now and present, but Coma , despite the occasional lapse in this adaptation of colleague Robin Cook’s novel, is an effective, creepy, resonant thriller and then some. Crichton knows his subject, and it shows – the picture is confident and verisimilitudinous in a way none of his other directorial efforts are – and his low-key – some might say clinical – approach pays dividends. You might also call it prescient, but that would be to suggest its subject matter wasn’t immediately relevant then too.

You ruined every suck-my-silky-ass thing!

The Matrix Resurrections (2021) (SPOILERS) Warner Bros has been here before. Déjà vu? What happens when you let a filmmaker do whatever they want? And I don’t mean in the manner of Netflix. No, in the sequel sense. You get a Gremlins 2: The New Batch (a classic, obviously, but not one that financially furthered a franchise). And conversely, when you simply cash in on a brand, consequences be damned? Exorcist II: The Heretic speaks for itself. So in the case of The Matrix Resurrections – not far from as meta as The New Batch , but much less irreverent – when Thomas “Tom” Anderson, designer of globally successful gaming trilogy The Matrix , is told “ Our beloved company, Warner Bros, has decided to make a sequel to the trilogy ” and it’s going ahead “with or without us”, you can be fairly sure this is the gospel. That Lana, now going it alone, decided it was better to “make the best of it” than let her baby be sullied. Of course, quite what that amounts to in the case of a movie(s) tha

You just threw a donut in the hot zone!

Den of Thieves (2018) (SPOILERS) I'd heard this was a shameless  Heat  rip-off, and the presence of Gerard Butler seemed to confirm it would be passable-at-best B-heist hokum, so maybe it was just middling expectations, even having heard how enthused certain pockets of the Internet were, but  Den of Thieves  is a surprisingly very satisfying entry in the genre. I can't even fault it for attempting to Keyser Soze the whole shebang at the last moment – add a head in a box and you have three 1995 classics in one movie – even if that particular conceit doesn’t quite come together.

Abandon selective targeting. Shoot everything.

28 Weeks Later (2007) (SPOILERS) The first five minutes of 28 Weeks Later are far and away the best part of this sequel, offering in quick succession a devastating moral quandary and a waking nightmare, immortalised on the screen. After that, while significantly more polished, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo reveals his concept to be altogether inferior to Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s, falling back on the crutches of gore, nihilism, and disengaging and limiting shifts of focus between characters in whom one has little investment in the first place.

It’s always possible to find a good moral reason for killing anybody.

The Assassination Bureau (1969) (SPOILERS) The Assassination Bureau ought to be a great movie. You can see its influence on those who either think it is a great movie, or want to produce something that fulfils its potential. Alan Moore and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen . The just-released (and just-flopped) The King’s Men . It inhabits a post-Avengers, self-consciously benign rehearsal of, and ambivalence towards, Empire manners and attitudes, something that could previously be seen that decade in Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines (and sequel Monte Carlo or Bust , also 1969), Adam Adamant Lives! , and even earlier with Kind Hearts and Coronets , whilst also feeding into that “Peacock Revolution” of Edwardian/Victorian fashion refurbishment. Unfortunately, though, it lacks the pop-stylistic savvy that made, say, The President’s Analyst so vivacious.

This guy’s armed with a hairdryer.

An Innocent Man (1989) (SPOILERS) Was it a chicken-and-egg thing with Tom Selleck and movies? Did he consistently end up in ropey pictures because other, bigger big-screen stars had first dibs on the good stuff? Or was it because he was a resolutely small-screen guy with limited range and zero good taste? Selleck had about half-a-dozen cinema outings during the 1980s, one of which, the very TV, very Touchstone Three Men and a Baby was a hit, but couldn’t be put wholly down to him. The final one was An Innocent Man , where he attempted to show some grit and mettle, as nice-guy Tom is framed and has to get tough to survive. Unfortunately, it’s another big-screen TV movie.