Skip to main content

Captain, he who walks in fire will burn his feet.

The Golden Voyage of Sinbad
(1973)

(SPOILERS) Ray Harryhausen returns to the kind of unadulterated fantasy material that made Jason and the Argonauts such a success – swords & stop motion, if you like. In between, there were a couple of less successful efforts, HG Wells adaptation First Men in the Moon and The Valley of the Gwangi (which I considered the best thing ever as a kid: dinosaur walks into a cowboy movie). Harryhausen’s special-effects supremacy – in a for-hire capacity – had also been consummately eclipsed by Raquel Welch’s fur bikini in One Million Years B.C. The Golden Voyage of Sinbad follows the expected Dynamation template – blank-slate hero, memorable creatures, McGuffin quest – but in its considerable favour, it also boasts a villainous performance by nobody-at-the-time, on-the-cusp-of-greatness Tom Baker.

Brian Clemens furnished Harryhausen with the screenplay; Clemens’ formidable TV successes (The Avengers, Thriller, The Professionals) belie that his movie work never quite seemed to hit the target (everything from Hammers like Captain Kronos – Vampire Hunter to wretched sequels such as Highlander II: The Quickening). Which is to say, The Golden Voyage of Sinbad screenplay does the job. Its most notable feature is establishing an up-against-it villain, one who actually has some stakes himself. Prince Koura (Baker) has his sights set on ruling Marabia (yeah, I know), which he will achieve through possession of an amulet showing the way to the Fountain of Destiny, which will in turn will yield due rewards.

Koura: To summon the demons of darkness, there is a price. And each time I call upon them, it consumes part of me.

While he’s a proficient dealer in the black arts, they take their toll on Koura, first aging his hand and then progressively his entire form (not quite to the extent of The Leisure Hive). He takes no heed of the warnings of his lieutenant Achmed (Takis Emmanuel). So not only has Koura something of a race against time to contend with – taking advantage of the rejuvenation the fountain offers, just as long as he gets there in time – but he is also presented with obstacles en route as significant as those of our heroes (“They mean to sacrifice us to their god” he notes of some green-skinned Lemurians).

Koura: You stole my courier.

There’s also the small factor in Koura’s favour that, despite his diabolical dealings, and machinations, Sinbad starts out doing him a wrong, swiping a piece of his amulet dropped by Koura’s winged homunculus (rather than Peking one). Adding to which, Sinbad is played by John Phillip Law, not exactly the most inimitable of actors, whereas Koura is played by Baker, one of the most of the same. Baker recounts how Law, besides getting a suntan in “about fifteen minutes” on location, “thought I had a slate loose”, and wound up injured during their final fight in an instance that was, as Baker tells it, entirely Law’s silly fault.

It seems Baker and the effects maestro got on, though. Ray tells how it was “his particularly striking eyes that immediately caught our attention reminding me of Conrad Veidt” (lots of people’s eyes reminded Harryhausen of Conrad Veidt, if your read his An Animated Life). Baker recounts the animator eventually retired because “Tom, I just got tired of being alone in a room”. But there’s undeniably also the factor of ILM superseding him, and studios no longer seeing stop-motion as viable (despite Clash of the Titans being a big hit, just not a Star Wars-sized one).

Director Gordon Hessler, who started out with Hitchcock, clearly picked up on the Veidt-esque striking eyes, as they receive numerous close ups. There’s also that voice (“Return!” commands Koura, Baker giving it his best Xoanon). Famously, this clinched Tom his most famous part. It has to be asked, though. Why would you cast this villainous psycho as children’s favourite Doctor Who? Ray Harryhausen was very complimentary about Hessler, who “possessed a constructive and positive feel for the fantasy and his involvement was one of the key elements that helped shape the picture and make it the success it was” (essentially, he understood what was required of these effects-led projects, and didn’t get in the way or impose himself on Harryhausen).

Rachid: They say it as all that is left of a once mighty continent, now sunk beneath the sea.

Much of the stop motion revolves around objects Koura animates, such as the homunculus. And Harryhausen favourites, ships’ mastheads and statues. The latter being of Kali. Not quite sure what that one’s doing in Lemuria, but Harryhausen always was fast and loose with legend (or rather, in Lemuria’s case, as Ray endearingly notes “like Atlantis, the science of geology refuses to acknowledge its existence”). The big attraction, however, if you go by the number of effects guys citing it as the example that inspired them to get into the industry, is the centaur. A cyclopean centaur at that. I actually rather prefer the late-addition griffin myself (planned as a Neanderthal).

Also in the cast are Martin Shaw – making his presence felt despite a meagre role – as crewman Rachid, and an uncredited Robert Shaw as the Oracle of All Knowledge (in a part earmarked for Orson Welles). Douglas Wilmer’s rather splendid as the masked Grand Vizier of Marabia; The Golden Voyage of Sinbad was originally planned to open with the homunculus doing for the Vizier’s face. Tom tells it that he was up for the Vizier part but was given Koura instead because he was so BIG, and Ray rather liked his inventiveness.

Rachid: Is this a ship or a monastery?

Then there’s Caroline Munro as slave girl Margiana. Munro suggests Welch was considered for her role, but I doubt there was a serious proposal at that stage in her career. Clemens had bigged up Munro, who was in Captain Kronos, and there’s no doubt she brought something to the part. Besides a certain feral quality, as Hakim (Grégoire Aslan) observes, “She is curvaceous”. Evidently, highlighting this was the objective of the costume department, and possibly as much a factor in the movie’s success as the effects (see also Welch’s fur bikini). Charmingly, Hakim testifies to Margiana’s qualities: “Not deliciously fat as I prefer them. But at night, cotton seed is the same as a pearl”.

Quite why Munro (“attractive and pleasant” said Harryhausen), or rather Mariana, should have an eye tattoo is never entirely clear, other than as a reason for the green natives to sacrifice her to the monocular centaur. Also notable is the Vizier’s mask design, later echoed in Flash Gordon and Kingdom of Heaven. There are numerous frivolous references to Allah (“Trust in Allah. Tie up your camel”). Kurt Christian plays good-for-nothing reluctant shipmate Haroun as Mickey Dolenz. The fountain of blood when Koura dies is very pre-Overlook Hotel. But then, this has Sinbad going gratuitously stab crazy on the back of a centaur, so restraint wasn’t on the cards.

The Golden Voyage of Sinbad isn’t up there with Jason and the Argonauts for sheer visual creativity and iconic set pieces, but it boasts a peerless villain, exotic locations and a winning momentum. Perhaps not golden, but a solid silver.


Popular posts from this blog

I’m smarter than a beaver.

Prey (2022) (SPOILERS) If nothing else, I have to respect Dan Trachtenberg’s cynical pragmatism. How do I not only get a project off the ground, but fast-tracked as well? I know, a woke Predator movie! Woke Disney won’t be able to resist! And so, it comes to pass. Luckily for Prey , it gets to bypass cinemas and so the same sorry fate of Lightyear . Less fortunately, it’s a patience-testing snook cocking at historicity (or at least, assumed historicity), in which a young, pint-sized Comanche girl who wishes to hunt and fish – and doubtless shoot to boot – with the big boys gets to take on a Predator and make mincemeat of him. Well, of course , she does. She’s a girl, innit?

Just because you are a character doesn't mean that you have character.

Pulp Fiction (1994) (SPOILERS) From a UK perspective, Pulp Fiction ’s success seemed like a fait accompli; Reservoir Dogs had gone beyond the mere cult item it was Stateside and impacted mainstream culture itself (hard to believe now that it was once banned on home video); it was a case of Tarantino filling a gap in the market no one knew was there until he drew attention to it (and which quickly became over-saturated with pale imitators subsequently). Where his debut was a grower, Pulp Fiction hit the ground running, an instant critical and commercial success (it won the Palme d’Or four months before its release), only made cooler by being robbed of the Best Picture Oscar by Forrest Gump . And unlike some famously-cited should-have-beens, Tarantino’s masterpiece really did deserve it.

I’m the famous comedian, Arnold Braunschweiger.

Last Action Hero (1993) (SPOILERS) Make no mistake, Last Action Hero is a mess. But even as a mess, it might be more interesting than any other movie Arnie made during that decade, perhaps even in his entire career. Hellzapoppin’ (after the 1941 picture, itself based on a Broadway revue) has virtually become an adjective to describe films that comment upon their own artifice, break the fourth wall, and generally disrespect the convention of suspending disbelief in the fictions we see parading across the screen. It was fairly audacious, some would say foolish, of Arnie to attempt something of that nature at this point in his career, which was at its peak, rather than playing it safe. That he stumbled profoundly, emphatically so since he went up against the behemoth that is Jurassic Park (slotted in after the fact to open first), should not blind one to the considerable merits of his ultimate, and final, really, attempt to experiment with the limits of his screen persona.

Death to Bill and Ted!

Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) (SPOILERS) The game of how few sequels are actually better than the original is so well worn, it was old when Scream 2 made a major meta thing out of it (and it wasn’t). Bill & Ted Go to Hell , as Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey was originally called, is one such, not that Excellent Adventure is anything to be sneezed at, but this one’s more confident, even more playful, more assured and more smartly stupid. And in Peter Hewitt it has a director with a much more overt and fittingly cartoonish style than the amiably pedestrian Stephen Herrick. Evil Bill : First, we totally kill Bill and Ted. Evil Ted : Then we take over their lives. My recollection of the picture’s general consensus was that it surpassed the sleeper hit original, but Rotten Tomatoes’ review aggregator suggests a less universal response. And, while it didn’t rock any oceans at the box office, Bogus Journey and Point Break did quite nicely for Keanu Reev

Everyone creates the thing they dread.

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) (SPOILERS) Avengers: Age of Ultron ’s problem isn’t one of lack. It benefits from a solid central plot. It features a host of standout scenes and set pieces. It hands (most of) its characters strong defining moments. It doesn’t even suffer now the “wow” factor of seeing the team together for the first time has subsided. Its problem is that it’s too encumbered. Maybe its asking to much of a director to effectively martial the many different elements required by an ensemble superhero movie such as this, yet Joss Whedon’s predecessor feels positively lean in comparison. Part of this is simply down to the demands of the vaster Marvel franchise machine. Seeds are laid for Captain America: Civil War , Infinity Wars I & II , Black Panther and Thor: Ragnarok . It feels like several spinning plates too many. Such activity occasionally became over-intrusive on previous occasions ( Iron Man II ), but there are points in Age of Ultron whe

Poetry in translation is like taking a shower with a raincoat on.

Paterson (2016) (SPOILERS) Spoiling a movie where nothing much happens is difficult, but I tend to put the tag on in a cautionary sense much of the time. Paterson is Jim Jarmusch at his most inert and ambient but also his most rewardingly meditative. Paterson (Adam Driver), a bus driver and modest poet living in Paterson, New Jersey, is a stoic in a fundamental sense, and if he has a character arc of any description, which he doesn’t really, it’s the realisation that is what he is. Jarmusch’s picture is absent major conflict or drama; the most significant episodes feature Paterson’s bus breaking down, the English bull terrier Marvin – whom Paterson doesn’t care for but girlfriend Laura (Golshifteh Farahani) dotes on – destroying his book of poetry, and an altercation at the local bar involving a gun that turns out to be a water pistol. And Paterson takes it all in his stride, genial to the last, even the ruination of his most earnest, devoted work (the only disappoint

If you ride like lightning, you're going to crash like thunder.

The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) (SPOILERS) There’s something daringly perverse about the attempt to weave a serious-minded, generation-spanning saga from the hare-brained premise of The Place Beyond the Pines . When he learns he is a daddy, a fairground stunt biker turns bank robber in order to provide for his family. It’s the kind of “only-in-Hollywood” fantasy premise you might expect from a system that unleashed Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man and Point Break on the world. But this is an indie-minded movie from the director of the acclaimed Blue Valentine ; it demands respect and earnest appraisal. Unfortunately it never recovers from the abject silliness of the set-up. The picture is littered with piecemeal characters and scenarios. There’s a hope that maybe the big themes will even out the rocky terrain but in the end it’s because of this overreaching ambition that the film ends up so undernourished. The inspiration for the movie

This entire edifice you see around you, built on jute.

Jeeves and Wooster 3.3: Cyril and the Broadway Musical  (aka Introduction on Broadway) Well, that’s a relief. After a couple of middling episodes, the third season bounces right back, and that's despite Bertie continuing his transatlantic trip. Clive Exton once again plunders  Carry On, Jeeves  but this time blends it with a tale from  The Inimitable Jeeves  for the brightest spots, as Cyril Basington-Basington (a sublimely drippy Nicholas Hewetson) pursues his stage career against Aunt Agatha's wishes.

I think it’s pretty clear whose side the Lord’s on, Barrington.

Monte Carlo or Bust aka  Those Daring Young Men in Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) (SPOILERS) Ken Annakin’s semi-sequel to Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines tends to be rather maligned, usually compared negatively to its more famous predecessor. Which makes me rather wonder if those expressing said opinion have ever taken the time to scrutinise them side by side. Or watch them back to back (which would be more sensible). Because Monte Carlo or Bust is by far the superior movie. Indeed, for all its imperfections and foibles (not least a performance from Tony Curtis requiring a taste for comic ham), I adore it. It’s probably the best wacky race movie there is, simply because each set of competitors, shamelessly exemplifying a different national stereotype (albeit there are two pairs of Brits, and a damsel in distress), are vibrant and cartoonish in the best sense. Albeit, it has to be admitted that, as far as said stereotypes go, Annakin’s home side win

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.