Skip to main content

Get yourselves to the Moon.


(SPOILERS) I wasn’t expecting that. I may have to retract my assessment that Sir Ken is one of the worst directors under the firmament. There’s no doubting his responsibility for the steaming pile that is Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, and I wouldn’t wish to go to the opposite of extreme of suggesting Belfast is some kind of small miracle, but it is, for the most part, a model of restraint and well-wrought performances. Almost as if, when faced with something personal, Branagh was ironically able to get out of its way.

Cynicism is due Belfast, however. It’s a modest little movie, calibrated, with its black-and-white and nostalgic/harsh autobiographical childhood elements, to score the kind of critical and awards garlands seen with past such escapades (Hope and Glory, Roma). Inevitably then, Belfast is gathering its own plaudits, but they’re inherently questionable.

The picture comes up short in terms of insights, offering low-fibre character types for family members and broad ones for villains, and much of its work is done for it, through the backdrop of the Troubles instilling an underlying – and sometimes overt – tension. Its movie-muse invocation is also slightly self-immolating, given Branagh’s chequered-at-best directorial career (he is no Guiseppe Tornatore, and his passion for the pictures, as identified by One Million Years B.C. and Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, is considerably less evocative).

It perhaps helps Ken that his choice of the child’s-eye view forestalls a deep dive into the period’s political turmoil; he ensures he doesn’t come unstuck simply by making it clear the unrest is bad for everyone, and in particular for the kids. His one sectarian is thoroughly bad seed Billy Clanton (Colin Morgan) – the western allusion is no coincidence – such that Jamie Dornan’s Pa observes “You’re a jumped-up gangster and always were” (as in, there’s no danger of mistaking his rottenness as politically motivated).

I feared the worst in the opening scene, as the camera indulges a typically OTT Sir Ken circular motion around young Buddy – Jude Hill, very good, possibly too note-perfect at times, but never in a suffocating Haley Joel Osment sense – as a protestant riot overruns his street. Was this going to be yet another motivelessly over-directed Branagh affair? Fortunately not, as the visceral mayhem of the subsequent rampage is involving and immersive (this isn’t far off the grandstanding opening of Jim Sheridan’s grittier but equally contrived In the Name of the Father).

Indeed, Ken seems to know better, most of the time, allowing Ken the writer and Ken the friend of actors to have priority. The tendency to over flourish only really intrudes again during the third act (well, if there are actual acts here), when a succession of rather unbelievable circumstances collides.

The idea that Ma (Caitríona Balfe) would drag her thieving son back to a looted supermarket amid the looting, given her desperate attempt earlier to pluck him from the oncoming riot, is a stretch. An even bigger one is Pa appearing (from nowhere) in a High Noon showdown, he and Billy framed by riot police either side. One might, given the accompanying soundtrack, see this as Buddy’s subjective embellishment – which is doubtful, given the picture is only intermittently keyed that way – but that makes it no less a dramatic misjudgement, given the care Branagh has taken to keep the family on the periphery of overt involvement in the growing unrest.

Additionally, I’ve never been to an Irish wake, so it may well be grieving sons embark on renditions of Endless Love before leading their wives in a romantic groove – earlier, they’re dancing in the street like Cliff Richard never went out of fashion – but tonally. it seemed not only askew but also askance. An old dear bellowing out Danny Boy on the street – “What did you do with the money?”; “What money?”; “The money your ma gave you for singing lessons” – seemed much more authentic.

Pa’s earlier baiting by Billy, to show his loyalty to the cause, and dismissal thereof, carries a quiet conviction laced with the understanding that this familial situation can’t be sustained. However, Ken’s inherent lack of subtlety can only really be counterweighted by performance, as it isn’t in his nature. While Dorman and Balfe make for an absurdly attractive couple, both are highly accomplished in their roles. Balfe gives the kind of deceptively effortless performance that ought to be getting the awards recognition showier turns will doubtless eclipse.

Ciarán Hinds and Judi Dench are as note-perfect as the grandparents as one would expect; Hinds is clearly playing older – and Dench younger – but I did wonder at the twenty-year age gap. It’s been said the picture is treacly, but my antennae for such elements is usually fairly acute, and aside from the classmate Buddy moons over and Grandma’s heartfelt “Go. Go now. Don’t look back” at the end, I didn’t feel I was being drowned in sentimental effluent.

Ken’s period flavour is sometimes vivid, at others rather self-conscious (again, Sheridan was as guilty with In the Name of the Father). He has nothing very profound to say about God, which makes sense given the family’s ambivalence (the fork in the road notwithstanding). The punctuation of everyday life with events of the year (1969) inevitably takes in the (alleged) Moon landings, and Star Trek, and young Ken Buddy is cutely seen reading a Thor comic; there is a slight sense of Branagh pulling up a Wiki list to pad out his picture (which is commendably brief), although that’s mostly in the form of the aforementioned junior pre-romance subplot. I was also given pause at a family ostensibly so strapped for cash being able to afford a Thunderbirds outfit for one of their offspring.

Branagh’s also light on diving into period attitudes. Time noted, with a glimmer of a raised eyebrow, that his Belfast “is much more diverse than viewers might expect”. Granny comments on an Asian neighbour, and Buddy is pressed by Moira (Lara McDonnell) into stealing chocolate from Mr Singh’s (Sid Sagar) corner shop, while his teacher is played by Irish-Nigerian Vanessa Ifediora. The black English soldier getting short with Ma receives no derisive comment. Granny’s initial response suggests Ken won’t be pressed into revisionism, but later examples imply presentism at play (“the romantic nostalgia of his own memory” as Time charitably put it). Buddy’s right that no one likes Turkish Delight, though.

The bursts of colour seen intermittently are likely conceits Ken took from other sources (Pleasantville, for example), an indication that the true vibrancy of life comes from an escape into the arts, be that John Sessions (!) on stage or a flying car. Elsewhere, your mileage may vary, but by my reckoning, nine Van Morrison songs on the soundtrack is at least eight too many.

The issue with Belfast, by and large, is less about how well observed and admirably played it is within the limitations of its canvas, than it’s positioning, so clearly positioned to attract plaudits, so composed with an eye to generating admiration (regular Branagh DP Haris Zambarkoukos does some valiant heavy lifting to that end, and the use of black and white is much more effective than the anaemic results seen in previous awards contenders Mank or Roma). It’s a minor, agreeable affair, although by Ken’s standards, that makes it something of a triumph.

Popular posts from this blog

You were this amazing occidental samurai.

Ricochet (1991) (SPOILERS) You have to wonder at Denzel Washington’s agent at this point in the actor’s career. He’d recently won his first Oscar for Glory , yet followed it with less-than-glorious heart-transplant ghost comedy Heart Condition (Bob Hoskins’ racist cop receives Washington’s dead lawyer’s ticker; a recipe for hijinks!) Not long after, he dipped his tentative toe in the action arena with this Joel Silver production; Denzel has made his share of action fare since, of course, most of it serviceable if unremarkable, but none of it comes near to delivering the schlocky excesses of Ricochet , a movie at once ingenious and risible in its plot permutations, performances and production profligacy.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

People still talk about Pandapocalypse 2002.

Turning Red (2022) (SPOILERS) Those wags at Pixar, eh? Yes, the most – actually, the only – impressive thing about Turning Red is the four-tiered wordplay of its title. Thirteen-year-old Mei (Rosalie Chiang) finds herself turning into a large red panda at emotive moments. She is also, simultaneously, riding the crimson wave for the first time. Further, as a teenager, she characteristically suffers from acute embarrassment (mostly due to the actions of her domineering mother Ming Lee, voiced by Sandra Oh). And finally, of course, Turning Red can be seen diligently spreading communist doctrine left, right and centre. To any political sensibility tuning in to Disney+, basically (so ones with either considerable or zero resistance to woke). Take a guess which of these isn’t getting press in reference to the movie? And by a process of elimination is probably what it it’s really about (you know in the same way most Pixars, as far back as Toy Story and Monsters, Inc . can be given an insi

I can’t be the worst. What about that hotdog one?

Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022) (SPOILERS) It would have been a merciful release, had the title card “ The End ”, flashing on screen a little before the ninety-minute mark, not been a false dawn. True, I would still have been unable to swab the bloody dildoes fight from my mind, but at least Everything Everywhere All at Once would have been short. Indeed, by the actual end I was put in mind of a line spoken by co-star James Wong in one of his most indelible roles: “ Now this really pisses me off to no end ”. Or to put it another way, Everything Everywhere All at Once rubbed me up the wrong which way quite a lot of most of the time.

We could be mauled to death by an interstellar monster!

Star Trek Beyond (2016) (SPOILERS) The odd/even Star Trek failure/success rule seemed to have been cancelled out with the first reboot movie, and then trodden into ground with Into Darkness (which, yes, I quite enjoyed, for all its scandalous deficiencies). Star Trek Beyond gets us back onto more familiar ground, as it’s very identifiably a “lesser” Trek , irrespective of the big bucks and directorial nous thrown at it. This is a Star Trek movie that can happily stand shoulder to shoulder with The Search for Spock and Insurrection , content in the knowledge they make it look good.

He's not in my pyjamas, is he?

Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice (1969) (SPOILERS) By rights, Paul Mazursky’s swinging, post-flower-power-gen partner-swap movie ought to have aged terribly. So much of the era’s scene-specific fare has, particularly so when attempting to reflect its reverberations with any degree of serious intent. Perhaps it’s because Mazursky and co-writer Larry Tucker (also of The Monkees , Alex in Wonderland and I Love You, Alice B. Toklas! ) maintain a wry distance from their characters’ endeavours, much more on the wavelength of Elliott Gould’s Ted than Robert Culp’s Bob; we know any pretensions towards uninhibited expression can’t end well, but we also know Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice have to learn the hard way.

I think World War II was my favourite war.

Small Soldiers (1998) An off-peak Joe Dante movie is still one chock-a-block full of satirical nuggets and comic inspiration, far beyond the facility of most filmmakers. Small Soldiers finds him back after a six-year big screen absence, taking delirious swipes at the veneration of the military, war movies, the toy industry, conglomerates and privatised defence forces. Dante’s take is so gleefully skewed, he even has big business win! The only problem with the picture (aside from an indistinct lead, surprising from a director with a strong track record for casting juveniles) is that this is all very familiar. Dante acknowledged Small Soldiers was basically a riff on Gremlins , and it is. Something innocuous and playful turns mad, bad and dangerous. On one level it has something in common with Gremlins 2: The New Batch , in that the asides carry the picture. But Gremlins 2 was all about the asides, happy to wander off in any direction that suited it oblivious to whet

We’ve got the best ball and chain in the world. Your ass.

Wedlock (1991) (SPOILERS) The futuristic prison movie seemed possessed of a particular cachet around this time, quite possibly sparked by the grisly possibilities of hi-tech disincentives to escape. On that front, HBO TV movie Wedlock more than delivers its FX money shot. Elsewhere, it’s less sure of itself, rather fumbling when it exchanges prison tropes for fugitives-on-the-run ones.

He’ll regret it to his dying day, if ever he lives that long.

The Quiet Man (1952) (SPOILERS) The John Wayne & John Ford film for those who don’t like John Wayne & John Ford films? The Quiet Man takes its cues from Ford’s earlier How Green Was My Valley in terms of, well less Anglophile and Hibernophile and Cambrophile nostalgia respectively for past times, climes and heritage, as Wayne’s pugilist returns to his family seat and stirs up a hot bed of emotions, not least with Maureen O’Hara’s red-headed hothead. The result is a very likeable movie, for all its inculcated Oirishness and studied eccentricity.

There is a war raging, and unless you pull your head out of the sand, you and I and about five billion other people are going to go the way of the dinosaur.

The X-Files 5.14: The Red and the Black The most noteworthy aspect of this two parter is that it almost – but not quite – causes me to reassess my previous position that the best arc episodes are those that avoid tackling the greater narrative head-on, attempting to advance the resistant behemoth. It may be less than scintillating as far as concepts go, but the alien resistance plot is set out quite clearly here, as are the responses to it from the main players.