Skip to main content

He’s a sick man, but he ain’t a crazy one.

The Little Foxes
(1941)

(SPOILERS) A handsomely mounted Southern melodrama that competed for Best Picture Oscar with such luminaries as Citizen Kane, The Maltese Falcon, Sergeant York and How Green Was My Valley, The Little Foxes has rather faded from view over the years, yet it still has much to offer, if you can get past the godawful wall-to-wall soundtrack (I’m hesitant to call it a score, as that would suggest some kind of legitimate intent).

This is yet another of the extraordinarily prolific, awards-piquing combinations of William Wyler and Sam Goldwyn that included Dodsworth (1936), Dead End (1937) and The Best Years of Our Lives (1946); without Goldwyn, Wyler also had The Letter (1940), with this movie’s Bette Davis, Mrs. Miniver (1942) and The Heiress (1949). Six Best Picture nominations in an eleven-year span!

Lillian Hellman adapted her own 1939 play (which starred Tallulah Bankhead), the title a quote from that most earthy and licentious of biblical books (The Song of Solomon); the foxes are, essentially, the Hubbards, partial to spoiling “the vines; for our vines have tender grapes”. Mercurial Ben (Charles Dingle) and Oscar (Carl Benton Reid) have inherited family wealth, all of it off the back of exploitation and ruthless conniving. As Horace Giddens (Herbert Marshall), fatally-ill husband of the brothers’ Sister Regina (Bette Davis) notes, “There must be better ways of getting rich than building sweatshops and pounding the bones of the town to make dividends for you to spend”.

The Hubbard brothers – in consort with Regina, dependant on her husband’s financial support – are brokering a deal with a Chicago businessman for a local cotton mill, the establishment of which will make them a mint (not that they aren’t comfortably off anyway). But the financing of their share requires the approval of sickly Horace, who proves not at all convinced when he’s persuaded to return from his sanatorium stay through opportunism on their part. The brothers hatch a scheme whereby Oscar’s feckless oaf of son Leo (Dan Duryea), a bank teller, will appropriate the bonds in Horace’s safety deposit box; they will be back before he knows they’ve gone. Naturally, this doesn’t go as planned.

The Little Foxes isn’t a tale of righteous forces triumphing over unwholesome materialism, however. It’s one of those eaten by greed, further self-immolating and getting no wiser in the process. The decent folk – besides the black help, all lacking agency in a manner that wouldn’t see it rewarded with a remake anytime soon – are in one way or another downtrodden or debilitated. Horace, once smitten with Regina, can take none of her calculated scorn and disdain. Their daughter Zannie (Teresa Wright) is blithely oblivious to her mother and uncles’ machinations, so the process of the picture involves a rude awakening. And poor Birdie (Patricia Collinge) drowns herself in drink, beaten down both verbally and physically by husband Oscar, and struck by the realisation of Leo, “My very own son, and I don’t love him”.

Davis is the star attraction, of course (and loaned to Goldwyn by Warner Bros), but this is very much an ensemble affair. Try as she might, she’s unable to overpower the proceedings. Marshall holds his own in any scene through Horace’s steady moral rectitude, while Dingle, as a palm-greasing opportunist but also a gregarious personality, supplies most of the humorous content along with an easy going, take-it-as-it-comes philosophy (Dingle, Reid, Duryea, Collinge and John Marriott all featured in the Broadway production). And Wright, who would go on to play daughter to Collinge in Hitchcock’s Shadow of a Doubt two years later, is winning as one passing from wilting violet to escaping her mother’s clutches and leaving her alone (in contrast to the stage play, she has a man, Richard Carlson’s David in John Krasinski mode, to run away with).

Nevertheless, Davis has the crucial moment, lifting, if you can call it that, The Little Foxes from low scheming to murderous intent, when she allows Horace, stricken and grasping for his medicine, to go after it himself. He collapses, and only then does she think better of her act and call for assistance. The gesture is too little too late, and her impervious expression upon his demise, and subsequent practicality (75 percent of the deal, which her brothers attempted to exclude her from, shall be hers), is the breaking point with Zannie.

Davis reportedly butted heads with Wyler, both wanting different things from the production. She purposefully played Regina differently to Bankhead; perhaps the first name influenced her, leading to a cold regality rather than a pugnacious person struggling for her rightful share (as a woman, and so granted no inheritance). Wyler wasn’t a fan of her choices and makeup, in particular. And he had a point; while her performance is commanding, it seems verging on a caricature of a remote, clipped Davis role. Contrastingly, she had a point that the grandiose family lodgings befit those who have it all, rather than want or need more.

Davis scores with the occasional amusing line – maybe not from uncredited script doctor Dorothy Parker’s pen, although it wouldn’t surprise me – such as, upon her brother noting, in relation to suggested nuptials between Leo and Zannie that it’s acceptable because their grandparents were first cousins: “Yes, and look at us”. The picture ends on Regina left alone, but Davis has done nothing to create empathy for her on any level, making her fate less effective than it might otherwise have been. And dropping Birdie from the proceedings after she gets sloshed seems unnecessarily blunt.

Davis earned her fifth Best Actress Oscar nomination; Wright and Collinge cancelled each other out for Best Supporting Actress (it went to Mary Astor). Cinematographer Greg Toland beat himself to a nomination for Citizen Kane (Arthur C Miller won, inconceivable as it may seem, for How Green Was My Valley). The movie was rewarded for none of its nine nominations, a record unbeaten until The Turning Point (eleven) and then The Color Purple. Pauline Kael called it “a handsome movie, well contrived and showily acted”, and it is that. If you can get past the music.





Popular posts from this blog

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 1 (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Is this supposed to be me? It’s grotesque.

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022) (SPOILERS) I didn’t hold out much hope for The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent being more than moderately tolerable. Not so much because its relatively untested director and his co-writer are mostly known in the TV sphere (and not so much for anything anyone is raving about). Although, it has to be admitted, the finished movie flourishes a degree of digital flatness typical of small-screen productions (it’s fine, but nothing more). Rather, due to the already over-tapped meta-strain of celebs showing they’re good sports about themselves. When Spike Jonze did it with John Malkovich, it was weird and different. By the time we had JCVD , not so much. And both of them are pre-dated by Arnie in Last Action Hero (“ You brought me nothing but pain ” he is told by Jack Slater). Plus, it isn’t as if Tom Gormican and Kevin Etten have much in the way of an angle on Nic; the movie’s basically there to glorify “him”, give or take a few foibles, do

All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies.

Watership Down (1978) (SPOILERS) I only read Watership Down recently, despite having loved the film from the first, and I was immediately impressed with how faithful, albeit inevitably compacted, Martin Rosen’s adaptation is. It manages to translate the lyrical, mythic and metaphysical qualities of Richard Adams’ novel without succumbing to dumbing down or the urge to cater for a broader or younger audience. It may be true that parents are the ones who get most concerned over the more disturbing elements of the picture but, given the maturity of the content, it remains a surprise that, as with 2001: A Space Odyssey (which may on the face of it seem like an odd bedfellow), this doesn’t garner a PG certificate. As the makers noted, Watership Down is at least in part an Exodus story, but the biblical implications extend beyond Hazel merely leading his fluffle to the titular promised land. There is a prevalent spiritual dimension to this rabbit universe, one very much

Whacking. I'm hell at whacking.

Witness (1985) (SPOILERS) Witness saw the advent of a relatively brief period – just over half a decade –during which Harrison Ford was willing to use his star power in an attempt to branch out. The results were mixed, and abruptly concluded when his typically too late to go where Daniel Day Lewis, Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro had gone before (with at bare minimum Oscar-nominated results) – but not “ full retard ” – ended in derision with Regarding Henry . He retreated to the world of Tom Clancy, and it’s the point where his cachet began to crumble. There had always been a stolid quality beneath even his more colourful characters, but now it came to the fore. You can see something of that as John Book in Witness – despite his sole Oscar nom, it might be one of Ford’s least interesting performances of the 80s – but it scarcely matters, or that the screenplay (which won) is by turns nostalgic, reactionary, wistful and formulaic, as director Peter Weir, in his Hollywood debu

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

If that small woman is small enough, she could fit behind a small tree.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 2 (SPOILERS) I can’t quite find it within myself to perform the rapturous somersaults that seem to be the prevailing response to this fourth run of the show. I’ve outlined some of my thematic issues in the Volume 1 review, largely borne out here, but the greater concern is one I’ve held since Season Two began – and this is the best run since Season One, at least as far my failing memory can account for – and that’s the purpose-built formula dictated by the Duffer Brothers. It’s there in each new Big Bad, obviously, even to the extent that this is the Big-Bad-who-binds-them-all (except the Upside Down was always there, right?) And it’s there with the resurgent emotional beats, partings, reunions and plaintively stirring music cues. I have to be really on board with a movie or show to embrace such flagrantly shameless manipulation, season after season, and I find myself increasingly immune.

Get away from my burro!

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) (SPOILERS) The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is beloved by so many of the cinematic firmament’s luminaries – Stanley Kubrick, Sam Raimi, , Paul Thomas Anderson and who knows maybe also WS, Vince Gilligan, Spike Lee, Daniel Day Lewis; Oliver Stone was going to remake it – not to mention those anteriorly influential Stone Roses, that it seems foolhardy to suggest it isn’t quite all that. There’s no faulting the performances – a career best Humphrey Bogart, with director John Huston’s dad Walter stealing the movie from under him – but the greed-is-bad theme is laid on a little thick, just in case you were a bit too dim to get it yourself the first time, and Huston’s direction may be right there were it counts for the dramatics, but it’s a little too relaxed when it comes to showing the seams between Mexican location and studio.

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls… dyin’ time’s here!

Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (1985) Time was kind to Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome . As in, it was such a long time since I’d seen the “final chapter” of the trilogy, it had dwindled in my memory to the status of an “alright but not great” sequel. I’d half-expected to have positive things to say along the lines of it being misunderstood, or being able to see what it was trying for but perhaps failing to quite achieve. Instead, I re-discovered a massive turkey that is really a Mad Max movie in name only (appropriately, since Max was an afterthought). This is the kind of picture fans of beloved series tend to loathe; when a favourite character returns but without the qualities or tone that made them adored in the first place (see Indiana Jones in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull , or John McClane in the last two Die Hard s). Thunderdome stinks even more than the methane fuelling Bartertown. I hadn’t been aware of the origins of Thunderdome until recently, mainly because I was