Skip to main content

If I ever met Huey Lewis, I’d be a wreck.

Season One

(SPOILERS) Of the Marvel Disney+ series thus far, this was the one that had the least going for it on paper. Overtly Woke credentials – teenager assumes the mantle from a self-confessedly toxic male – in combination with nigh-on the least interesting member of the Avengers. Although, obviously, that one’s a dead heat with Natasha Romanov. And yet, surprisingly, Hawkeye is easily the most satisfying of year’s TV foursome (I’m not including What If… ?)

The key is the relationship between Jeremy Renner’s Clint Barton and Hailee Steinfeld’s Kate Bishop, the eager young wannabe sparking off the guilt-ridden grizzled old pro. Hawkeye, as a non-powered C-list Avenger relegated to an entirely unstimulating comradeship with Natasha, isn’t short changed, on the one hand, by being usurped, because no one much held him in regard anyway. More than that, meeting Kate anchors him with substance and chemistry entirely unavailable during his big screen phase. Suddenly, he seems like a worthwhile character (this conspicuously did not happen when Natasha was teamed with little sis and fam in Black Widow).

There isn’t anything terribly original about Clint’s morbid regret over his Ronin days – albeit, it at least gives him something to dig into – but the Unforgiven-meets-buddy-movie aspect lands for the most part, with Kate unwilling to accept he’s a bad guy and proving resourceful in melting his resistance to a partner/junior bowman. Indeed, far from relegating Clint, this is all about someone idolising him in a way no MCU devotees did over the previous decade or so. The banter largely avoids the too cute/ Whedon-ishly quiptastic end of the spectrum – the stuff about costuming/branding does become laboured quite quickly, however – and enough is made of Kate learning the ropes to avoid her being an amazing wonder Rey. Albeit, surviving the fight with Kingpin is reasonably unbelievable.

Also notable is Clint’s familial relationship, something of a rarity in being established as solid and mutually supportive. Linda Cardellini’s role as Laura may be peripheral – more in the Holly McClane Die Hard 2 sense than Die Hard, if that – but it’s essential as a refreshing validation that, despite Clint’s own doubts and demons, he has someone who knows him, approves and affirms him. In contrast, it’s Kate for whom the family unit is a bust, and she gets duly accepted into a new one.

There are progressive credentials here, of course – this is the Whole New Wonderful Woke World of Kevin Feige – of the apologetically inclusive kind (as in: they aren’t the agenda’s main grist to the mill, but require nominal representation, purely from the cynical box-ticking angle, hence promising an Echo spin-off series no one will watch). So there’s a running theme of being differently abled, personified by Maya Lopez/Echo (Alaqua Cox, deaf and an amputee), and highlighted by her rebuke of Hawkeye for relying on a hearing aid.

What there isn’t, though, is an incongruous sense of virtue signalling. While the cart may have led the horse, in this and other areas – like the central, Hawkeye protegee destined to eclipse him in the same essential vein as Falcon becoming Cap and Ironheart taking over from Tony – there’s a sense these are germane, integrated elements rather than awkwardly imposed, patronising drop-ins (for that, look no further than one of the LARPers protesting Clint taking her bag because her wife gave it to her). Ultimately, there may be no less wokesense in Hawkeye’s plot, but if so, it’s more commendably insidious, as it achieves its goals without insulting the viewer’s intelligence.

Showrunner Jonathan Igla has some strong prior credits, not least Mad Men, and perhaps that non-comic book background leads to a show less MCU and more the kind of fare the failed Netflix Marvel shows might have been, with time, care, resources and due acknowledgement. I wouldn’t want to go overboard in lavishing praise on Hawkeye – it could probably have been pared back a little, as it rather treads water in the middle episodes – but it’s structurally solid and refreshingly unburdened by deus ex machinas or unmotivated moments.

I’m not sure the inclusion of Yelena – whom I’d forgotten would be in it, so she thus came as a surprise in the manner none of the other twists did – was such a positive. Interesting to see Florence Pugh and Steinfeld playing off each other, since they’re the same age, yet Pugh is playing the seasoned operative (in contrast, Steinfeld is much more convincing at anything remotely athletic). And if Pugh occasionally sounds like she’s about to overdose on her lyricised accent, she does bring a sense of fun to the part. Less so the rather tiresome “I must take revenge on Hawkeye until I mustn’t” revenge subplot, predictable in all the wrong ways.

Villains-wise, the MCU is now resorting to flagrant-yet-permissible national stereotypes of the John Wick variety – all Russians are inherently criminal. Which is fine. I mean, Disney will only ever offer a corporately-mandated approximation of the progressive, so we can’t be surprised when they reveal their true form.

There are some amusing beats with the Tracksuit Mafia, not least Kate offering relationship advice. Both Cox and particularly Fra Fee as fellow merc Kazi acquit themselves well in glorified henchmen roles. It’s nice to see Vincent D’Onofrio back – like Charlie Cox from the Netflix Marvel-verse – but it’s nevertheless difficult to pin Kingpin down as an intriguing character in his own right, for all his iconic stature (also notable is that his reveal at the end of 1.5: Ronin is a contender for the least dramatically executed cliffhanger ever).

Vera Farmiga as mum Eleanor was clearly going to be in on it from the first episode. Simon Callow is fun for all of the two scenes he’s in. Stealing the entire show, though, is Tony Dalton as Eleanor’s fiancé Jack Duquesne, the kind of borderline goofy, cartoon performance you might expect from a Joe Dante movie (possibly played by Robert Picardo). He takes the various repositionings of the plot in his stride – unwelcome potential stepfather; potential villain; framed innocent – before being revealed as a hilariously capable hero himself, hacking and parrying against the Tracksuit Mafia. If anyone deserves a spin-off show, it’s Jack.

There’s also a big thing with heroic LARPers which… well, I guess it’s sweet and inclusive of saddoes – by which I mean, that’s essentially the Disney+ messaging there – but it all becomes a little much by 1.6: So This Is Christmas? The festive setting makes for a nice background flavour, more in the Shane Black mode than over or underpowered dressing.

If nothing else, Hawkeye’s modest success suggests it may be hasty to write off the next slate of Woke Disney+ series sight unseen, however flavourless or cynical or opportunistic they may appear in concept form (the Moon Knight footage seen so far simply looked plain bad, however). As it stands, though, Hawkeye deserves credit for going some way towards retrospectively justifying Clint Barton’s existence.

Popular posts from this blog

The Bible never said anything about amphetamines.

The Color of Money (1986) (SPOILERS) I tend to think it’s evident when Scorsese isn’t truly exercised by material. He can still invest every ounce of the technical acumen at his fingertips, and the results can dazzle on that level, but you don’t really feel the filmmaker in the film. Which, for one of his pictures to truly carry a wallop, you need to do. We’ve seen quite a few in such deficit in recent years, most often teaming with Leo. The Color of Money , however, is the first where it was out-and-out evident the subject matter wasn’t Marty’s bag. He needed it, desperately, to come off, but in the manner a tradesman who wants to keep getting jobs. This sequel to The Hustler doesn’t linger in the mind, however good it may be, moment by moment.

I said I had no family. I didn’t say I had an empty apartment.

The Apartment (1960) (SPOILERS) Billy Wilder’s romcom delivered the genre that rare Best Picture Oscar winner. Albeit, The Apartment amounts to a rather grim (now) PG-rated scenario, one rife with adultery, attempted suicide, prostitution of the soul and subjective thereof of the body. And yet, it’s also, finally, rather sweet, so salving the darker passages and evidencing the director’s expertly judged balancing act. Time Out ’s Tom Milne suggested the ending was a cop out (“ boy forgives girl and all’s well ”). But really, what other ending did the audience or central characters deserve?

Listen to the goddamn qualified scientists!

Don’t Look Up (2021) (SPOILERS) It’s testament to Don’t Look Up ’s “quality” that critics who would normally lap up this kind of liberal-causes messaging couldn’t find it within themselves to grant it a free pass. Adam McKay has attempted to refashion himself as a satirist since jettisoning former collaborator Will Ferrell, but as a Hollywood player and an inevitably socio-politically partisan one, he simply falls in line with the most obvious, fatuous propagandising.

Your desecration of reality will not go unpunished.

2021-22 Best-of, Worst-of and Everything Else Besides The movies might be the most visible example of attempts to cling onto cultural remnants as the previous societal template clatters down the drain. It takes something people really want – unlike a Bond movie where he kicks the can – to suggest the model of yesteryear, one where a billion-dollar grosser was like sneezing. You can argue Spider-Man: No Way Home is replete with agendas of one sort or another, and that’s undoubtedly the case (that’s Hollywood), but crowding out any such extraneous elements (and they often are) is simply a consummate crowd-pleaser that taps into tangible nostalgia through its multiverse take. Of course, nostalgia for a mere seven years ago, for something you didn’t like anyway, is a symptom of how fraught these times have become.

Doctors make the worst patients.

Coma (1978) (SPOILERS) Michael Crichton’s sophomore big-screen feature, and by some distance his best. Perhaps it’s simply that this a milieu known to him, or perhaps it’s that it’s very much aligned to the there-and-now and present, but Coma , despite the occasional lapse in this adaptation of colleague Robin Cook’s novel, is an effective, creepy, resonant thriller and then some. Crichton knows his subject, and it shows – the picture is confident and verisimilitudinous in a way none of his other directorial efforts are – and his low-key – some might say clinical – approach pays dividends. You might also call it prescient, but that would be to suggest its subject matter wasn’t immediately relevant then too.

You ruined every suck-my-silky-ass thing!

The Matrix Resurrections (2021) (SPOILERS) Warner Bros has been here before. Déjà vu? What happens when you let a filmmaker do whatever they want? And I don’t mean in the manner of Netflix. No, in the sequel sense. You get a Gremlins 2: The New Batch (a classic, obviously, but not one that financially furthered a franchise). And conversely, when you simply cash in on a brand, consequences be damned? Exorcist II: The Heretic speaks for itself. So in the case of The Matrix Resurrections – not far from as meta as The New Batch , but much less irreverent – when Thomas “Tom” Anderson, designer of globally successful gaming trilogy The Matrix , is told “ Our beloved company, Warner Bros, has decided to make a sequel to the trilogy ” and it’s going ahead “with or without us”, you can be fairly sure this is the gospel. That Lana, now going it alone, decided it was better to “make the best of it” than let her baby be sullied. Of course, quite what that amounts to in the case of a movie(s) tha

You just threw a donut in the hot zone!

Den of Thieves (2018) (SPOILERS) I'd heard this was a shameless  Heat  rip-off, and the presence of Gerard Butler seemed to confirm it would be passable-at-best B-heist hokum, so maybe it was just middling expectations, even having heard how enthused certain pockets of the Internet were, but  Den of Thieves  is a surprisingly very satisfying entry in the genre. I can't even fault it for attempting to Keyser Soze the whole shebang at the last moment – add a head in a box and you have three 1995 classics in one movie – even if that particular conceit doesn’t quite come together.

It’s always possible to find a good moral reason for killing anybody.

The Assassination Bureau (1969) (SPOILERS) The Assassination Bureau ought to be a great movie. You can see its influence on those who either think it is a great movie, or want to produce something that fulfils its potential. Alan Moore and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen . The just-released (and just-flopped) The King’s Men . It inhabits a post-Avengers, self-consciously benign rehearsal of, and ambivalence towards, Empire manners and attitudes, something that could previously be seen that decade in Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines (and sequel Monte Carlo or Bust , also 1969), Adam Adamant Lives! , and even earlier with Kind Hearts and Coronets , whilst also feeding into that “Peacock Revolution” of Edwardian/Victorian fashion refurbishment. Unfortunately, though, it lacks the pop-stylistic savvy that made, say, The President’s Analyst so vivacious.

Abandon selective targeting. Shoot everything.

28 Weeks Later (2007) (SPOILERS) The first five minutes of 28 Weeks Later are far and away the best part of this sequel, offering in quick succession a devastating moral quandary and a waking nightmare, immortalised on the screen. After that, while significantly more polished, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo reveals his concept to be altogether inferior to Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s, falling back on the crutches of gore, nihilism, and disengaging and limiting shifts of focus between characters in whom one has little investment in the first place.

This guy’s armed with a hairdryer.

An Innocent Man (1989) (SPOILERS) Was it a chicken-and-egg thing with Tom Selleck and movies? Did he consistently end up in ropey pictures because other, bigger big-screen stars had first dibs on the good stuff? Or was it because he was a resolutely small-screen guy with limited range and zero good taste? Selleck had about half-a-dozen cinema outings during the 1980s, one of which, the very TV, very Touchstone Three Men and a Baby was a hit, but couldn’t be put wholly down to him. The final one was An Innocent Man , where he attempted to show some grit and mettle, as nice-guy Tom is framed and has to get tough to survive. Unfortunately, it’s another big-screen TV movie.