Skip to main content

If I ever met Huey Lewis, I’d be a wreck.

Season One

(SPOILERS) Of the Marvel Disney+ series thus far, this was the one that had the least going for it on paper. Overtly Woke credentials – teenager assumes the mantle from a self-confessedly toxic male – in combination with nigh-on the least interesting member of the Avengers. Although, obviously, that one’s a dead heat with Natasha Romanov. And yet, surprisingly, Hawkeye is easily the most satisfying of year’s TV foursome (I’m not including What If… ?)

The key is the relationship between Jeremy Renner’s Clint Barton and Hailee Steinfeld’s Kate Bishop, the eager young wannabe sparking off the guilt-ridden grizzled old pro. Hawkeye, as a non-powered C-list Avenger relegated to an entirely unstimulating comradeship with Natasha, isn’t short changed, on the one hand, by being usurped, because no one much held him in regard anyway. More than that, meeting Kate anchors him with substance and chemistry entirely unavailable during his big screen phase. Suddenly, he seems like a worthwhile character (this conspicuously did not happen when Natasha was teamed with little sis and fam in Black Widow).

There isn’t anything terribly original about Clint’s morbid regret over his Ronin days – albeit, it at least gives him something to dig into – but the Unforgiven-meets-buddy-movie aspect lands for the most part, with Kate unwilling to accept he’s a bad guy and proving resourceful in melting his resistance to a partner/junior bowman. Indeed, far from relegating Clint, this is all about someone idolising him in a way no MCU devotees did over the previous decade or so. The banter largely avoids the too cute/ Whedon-ishly quiptastic end of the spectrum – the stuff about costuming/branding does become laboured quite quickly, however – and enough is made of Kate learning the ropes to avoid her being an amazing wonder Rey. Albeit, surviving the fight with Kingpin is reasonably unbelievable.

Also notable is Clint’s familial relationship, something of a rarity in being established as solid and mutually supportive. Linda Cardellini’s role as Laura may be peripheral – more in the Holly McClane Die Hard 2 sense than Die Hard, if that – but it’s essential as a refreshing validation that, despite Clint’s own doubts and demons, he has someone who knows him, approves and affirms him. In contrast, it’s Kate for whom the family unit is a bust, and she gets duly accepted into a new one.

There are progressive credentials here, of course – this is the Whole New Wonderful Woke World of Kevin Feige – of the apologetically inclusive kind (as in: they aren’t the agenda’s main grist to the mill, but require nominal representation, purely from the cynical box-ticking angle, hence promising an Echo spin-off series no one will watch). So there’s a running theme of being differently abled, personified by Maya Lopez/Echo (Alaqua Cox, deaf and an amputee), and highlighted by her rebuke of Hawkeye for relying on a hearing aid.

What there isn’t, though, is an incongruous sense of virtue signalling. While the cart may have led the horse, in this and other areas – like the central, Hawkeye protegee destined to eclipse him in the same essential vein as Falcon becoming Cap and Ironheart taking over from Tony – there’s a sense these are germane, integrated elements rather than awkwardly imposed, patronising drop-ins (for that, look no further than one of the LARPers protesting Clint taking her bag because her wife gave it to her). Ultimately, there may be no less wokesense in Hawkeye’s plot, but if so, it’s more commendably insidious, as it achieves its goals without insulting the viewer’s intelligence.

Showrunner Jonathan Igla has some strong prior credits, not least Mad Men, and perhaps that non-comic book background leads to a show less MCU and more the kind of fare the failed Netflix Marvel shows might have been, with time, care, resources and due acknowledgement. I wouldn’t want to go overboard in lavishing praise on Hawkeye – it could probably have been pared back a little, as it rather treads water in the middle episodes – but it’s structurally solid and refreshingly unburdened by deus ex machinas or unmotivated moments.

I’m not sure the inclusion of Yelena – whom I’d forgotten would be in it, so she thus came as a surprise in the manner none of the other twists did – was such a positive. Interesting to see Florence Pugh and Steinfeld playing off each other, since they’re the same age, yet Pugh is playing the seasoned operative (in contrast, Steinfeld is much more convincing at anything remotely athletic). And if Pugh occasionally sounds like she’s about to overdose on her lyricised accent, she does bring a sense of fun to the part. Less so the rather tiresome “I must take revenge on Hawkeye until I mustn’t” revenge subplot, predictable in all the wrong ways.

Villains-wise, the MCU is now resorting to flagrant-yet-permissible national stereotypes of the John Wick variety – all Russians are inherently criminal. Which is fine. I mean, Disney will only ever offer a corporately-mandated approximation of the progressive, so we can’t be surprised when they reveal their true form.

There are some amusing beats with the Tracksuit Mafia, not least Kate offering relationship advice. Both Cox and particularly Fra Fee as fellow merc Kazi acquit themselves well in glorified henchmen roles. It’s nice to see Vincent D’Onofrio back – like Charlie Cox from the Netflix Marvel-verse – but it’s nevertheless difficult to pin Kingpin down as an intriguing character in his own right, for all his iconic stature (also notable is that his reveal at the end of 1.5: Ronin is a contender for the least dramatically executed cliffhanger ever).

Vera Farmiga as mum Eleanor was clearly going to be in on it from the first episode. Simon Callow is fun for all of the two scenes he’s in. Stealing the entire show, though, is Tony Dalton as Eleanor’s fiancé Jack Duquesne, the kind of borderline goofy, cartoon performance you might expect from a Joe Dante movie (possibly played by Robert Picardo). He takes the various repositionings of the plot in his stride – unwelcome potential stepfather; potential villain; framed innocent – before being revealed as a hilariously capable hero himself, hacking and parrying against the Tracksuit Mafia. If anyone deserves a spin-off show, it’s Jack.

There’s also a big thing with heroic LARPers which… well, I guess it’s sweet and inclusive of saddoes – by which I mean, that’s essentially the Disney+ messaging there – but it all becomes a little much by 1.6: So This Is Christmas? The festive setting makes for a nice background flavour, more in the Shane Black mode than over or underpowered dressing.

If nothing else, Hawkeye’s modest success suggests it may be hasty to write off the next slate of Woke Disney+ series sight unseen, however flavourless or cynical or opportunistic they may appear in concept form (the Moon Knight footage seen so far simply looked plain bad, however). As it stands, though, Hawkeye deserves credit for going some way towards retrospectively justifying Clint Barton’s existence.

Popular posts from this blog

I’m smarter than a beaver.

Prey (2022) (SPOILERS) If nothing else, I have to respect Dan Trachtenberg’s cynical pragmatism. How do I not only get a project off the ground, but fast-tracked as well? I know, a woke Predator movie! Woke Disney won’t be able to resist! And so, it comes to pass. Luckily for Prey , it gets to bypass cinemas and so the same sorry fate of Lightyear . Less fortunately, it’s a patience-testing snook cocking at historicity (or at least, assumed historicity), in which a young, pint-sized Comanche girl who wishes to hunt and fish – and doubtless shoot to boot – with the big boys gets to take on a Predator and make mincemeat of him. Well, of course , she does. She’s a girl, innit?

Just because you are a character doesn't mean that you have character.

Pulp Fiction (1994) (SPOILERS) From a UK perspective, Pulp Fiction ’s success seemed like a fait accompli; Reservoir Dogs had gone beyond the mere cult item it was Stateside and impacted mainstream culture itself (hard to believe now that it was once banned on home video); it was a case of Tarantino filling a gap in the market no one knew was there until he drew attention to it (and which quickly became over-saturated with pale imitators subsequently). Where his debut was a grower, Pulp Fiction hit the ground running, an instant critical and commercial success (it won the Palme d’Or four months before its release), only made cooler by being robbed of the Best Picture Oscar by Forrest Gump . And unlike some famously-cited should-have-beens, Tarantino’s masterpiece really did deserve it.

I’m the famous comedian, Arnold Braunschweiger.

Last Action Hero (1993) (SPOILERS) Make no mistake, Last Action Hero is a mess. But even as a mess, it might be more interesting than any other movie Arnie made during that decade, perhaps even in his entire career. Hellzapoppin’ (after the 1941 picture, itself based on a Broadway revue) has virtually become an adjective to describe films that comment upon their own artifice, break the fourth wall, and generally disrespect the convention of suspending disbelief in the fictions we see parading across the screen. It was fairly audacious, some would say foolish, of Arnie to attempt something of that nature at this point in his career, which was at its peak, rather than playing it safe. That he stumbled profoundly, emphatically so since he went up against the behemoth that is Jurassic Park (slotted in after the fact to open first), should not blind one to the considerable merits of his ultimate, and final, really, attempt to experiment with the limits of his screen persona.

Death to Bill and Ted!

Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) (SPOILERS) The game of how few sequels are actually better than the original is so well worn, it was old when Scream 2 made a major meta thing out of it (and it wasn’t). Bill & Ted Go to Hell , as Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey was originally called, is one such, not that Excellent Adventure is anything to be sneezed at, but this one’s more confident, even more playful, more assured and more smartly stupid. And in Peter Hewitt it has a director with a much more overt and fittingly cartoonish style than the amiably pedestrian Stephen Herrick. Evil Bill : First, we totally kill Bill and Ted. Evil Ted : Then we take over their lives. My recollection of the picture’s general consensus was that it surpassed the sleeper hit original, but Rotten Tomatoes’ review aggregator suggests a less universal response. And, while it didn’t rock any oceans at the box office, Bogus Journey and Point Break did quite nicely for Keanu Reev

Everyone creates the thing they dread.

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) (SPOILERS) Avengers: Age of Ultron ’s problem isn’t one of lack. It benefits from a solid central plot. It features a host of standout scenes and set pieces. It hands (most of) its characters strong defining moments. It doesn’t even suffer now the “wow” factor of seeing the team together for the first time has subsided. Its problem is that it’s too encumbered. Maybe its asking to much of a director to effectively martial the many different elements required by an ensemble superhero movie such as this, yet Joss Whedon’s predecessor feels positively lean in comparison. Part of this is simply down to the demands of the vaster Marvel franchise machine. Seeds are laid for Captain America: Civil War , Infinity Wars I & II , Black Panther and Thor: Ragnarok . It feels like several spinning plates too many. Such activity occasionally became over-intrusive on previous occasions ( Iron Man II ), but there are points in Age of Ultron whe

Poetry in translation is like taking a shower with a raincoat on.

Paterson (2016) (SPOILERS) Spoiling a movie where nothing much happens is difficult, but I tend to put the tag on in a cautionary sense much of the time. Paterson is Jim Jarmusch at his most inert and ambient but also his most rewardingly meditative. Paterson (Adam Driver), a bus driver and modest poet living in Paterson, New Jersey, is a stoic in a fundamental sense, and if he has a character arc of any description, which he doesn’t really, it’s the realisation that is what he is. Jarmusch’s picture is absent major conflict or drama; the most significant episodes feature Paterson’s bus breaking down, the English bull terrier Marvin – whom Paterson doesn’t care for but girlfriend Laura (Golshifteh Farahani) dotes on – destroying his book of poetry, and an altercation at the local bar involving a gun that turns out to be a water pistol. And Paterson takes it all in his stride, genial to the last, even the ruination of his most earnest, devoted work (the only disappoint

If you ride like lightning, you're going to crash like thunder.

The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) (SPOILERS) There’s something daringly perverse about the attempt to weave a serious-minded, generation-spanning saga from the hare-brained premise of The Place Beyond the Pines . When he learns he is a daddy, a fairground stunt biker turns bank robber in order to provide for his family. It’s the kind of “only-in-Hollywood” fantasy premise you might expect from a system that unleashed Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man and Point Break on the world. But this is an indie-minded movie from the director of the acclaimed Blue Valentine ; it demands respect and earnest appraisal. Unfortunately it never recovers from the abject silliness of the set-up. The picture is littered with piecemeal characters and scenarios. There’s a hope that maybe the big themes will even out the rocky terrain but in the end it’s because of this overreaching ambition that the film ends up so undernourished. The inspiration for the movie

This entire edifice you see around you, built on jute.

Jeeves and Wooster 3.3: Cyril and the Broadway Musical  (aka Introduction on Broadway) Well, that’s a relief. After a couple of middling episodes, the third season bounces right back, and that's despite Bertie continuing his transatlantic trip. Clive Exton once again plunders  Carry On, Jeeves  but this time blends it with a tale from  The Inimitable Jeeves  for the brightest spots, as Cyril Basington-Basington (a sublimely drippy Nicholas Hewetson) pursues his stage career against Aunt Agatha's wishes.

I think it’s pretty clear whose side the Lord’s on, Barrington.

Monte Carlo or Bust aka  Those Daring Young Men in Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) (SPOILERS) Ken Annakin’s semi-sequel to Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines tends to be rather maligned, usually compared negatively to its more famous predecessor. Which makes me rather wonder if those expressing said opinion have ever taken the time to scrutinise them side by side. Or watch them back to back (which would be more sensible). Because Monte Carlo or Bust is by far the superior movie. Indeed, for all its imperfections and foibles (not least a performance from Tony Curtis requiring a taste for comic ham), I adore it. It’s probably the best wacky race movie there is, simply because each set of competitors, shamelessly exemplifying a different national stereotype (albeit there are two pairs of Brits, and a damsel in distress), are vibrant and cartoonish in the best sense. Albeit, it has to be admitted that, as far as said stereotypes go, Annakin’s home side win

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.