Skip to main content

It feels wrong, doesn’t it? To interrogate a miracle.

Midnight Mass
(2021)

(SPOILERS) Midnight Mass, Mike Flanagan’s “deeply personal” Netflix horror, at least comes to the party with something to say. The problem is that its discourse is neither terribly original nor insightful, and it proceeds to rehearse it again and again, to diminishing effect, in ever longer monologues throughout its characteristically luxuriant (some might say a little baggy) runtime. It’s probably more interesting, then, as a metaphor, albeit one that wasn’t Flanagan’s express intent.

I’m unconvinced by Flanagan’s growing rep as the second coming of the horror auteur. He seems to veer closer to a more proficient Mick Garris in several key respects, picking up Stephen King projects no one else will handle but delivering them to much greater critical notices, whilst also making a comfy bed for himself on TV. I didn’t bother with The Haunting of Bly Manor, as I was underwhelmed with his take on The Haunting of Hill House (just stick to the Robert Wise film). Doctor Sleep, though, despite some protracted adrenochromic-vampiric-ravening business he indulged just that little too much (I have little desire to see the Director’s Cut for further, unexpurgated feeding), was a more admirable Shining sequel than anyone would have expected from the novel.

Midnight Mass picks up on such blood harvesting, but with a religious – Roman Catholic – spin, and is thus ripe for overtly literal readings. Some of these make it into the series, courtesy of Flanagan-surrogate Riley Finn (Zach Gilford); this really is the Catholic church, whether it’s feeding off the population financially, predating on altar boys, leading them astray under doctrinal pretexts, or engaging in more systemic Elite-connected activities, as one of the world’s more powerful, prevalent and endemic institutions.

Flanagan’s tale hinges on self-deception, and for that self-deception to sustain itself, he requires the conceit of a world that has never heard the word – or concept of – vampire. Which I find ever-so-slightly irksome; it’s essentially a lazy way out of some heavy lifting on the writer’s part. Possibly as lazy as using the bloodsuckers themselves. Unless, of course, Flanagan has a specific reason for using them, which he evidently does; it’s the core of the piece. Nevertheless, I’m sure there was a way to have his characters be aware and not also achingly self-aware, in the Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Whedonspeak, meta- sense. Most likely, Flanagan felt the example set by The Walking Dead gave him free licence, but it’s no less a hack deal than a world with no concept of ghosts or aliens or werewolves (something The Howling couldn’t imagine, in the latter case. Wolf attempts to get away with it, but then, it’s lycanthrope is so ludicrous, it shouldn’t count anyway).

Getting past that hurdle, the challenge facing Father Paul Hill/Monsignor Pruitt (Hamish Linklater) is to recognise that a demonic winged beast in demonic winged beast clothing is not in fact an angel at all. Which wouldn’t be much of a stretch, you’d have thought. I appreciate Flanagan’s efforts in having Paul contort his perception and learning in order to perceive the Angel (Quinton Boisclair) as a divine messenger, but by visualising it as such an undiluted beast – there’s nothing even of the antichrist in its realisation, in the sense of appearing outwardly benign – Flanagan manages to double down on the idea that anyone with the remotest religious conviction is a blind, queasy fool, who necessarily can’t see the wood for the trees. His premise seems calculated to be as absurdly antithetical as possible in that respect, even as the creature’s designs conjures notions of Nephilim and Sir Ridders’ Engineers from Prometheus (this beast is depicted merely a force of nature, however, rather than an erudite and cunning prescriber of master plans and overall purpose).

Perhaps Flanagan considered that was part and parcel of the core Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation he’d placed under the microscope. Of which, I have to say, for all its validity, seems not a little juvenile when presented in such an explicit manner (I’m not even sure Kevin Smith didn’t bring it up, vomitously, in Dogma. Not that I want to revisit it to find out, but it’s certainly in that general ballpark of go-to attacks on the religion). Like the world without vampires, there’s something “too easy” about such an attack, one personified by Samantha Sloyan’s psycho zealot Bev, who, of course, embodies everything that loathsome about a human being while cloaked in the mantle of an exceptional Christian. Sloyan is outstanding in the part (probably the best player in the cast), but the role is pitifully prosaic, and continually reminded me of the equally one-note hateable Mrs Carmody in The Mist.

So, Holy Communion and the Catholic doctrine that the bread and wine therein transubstantiates to the receiver. Yeah, well done Mike. An obvious comparison to vampirism beckons (“Whoever eats of my flesh and drinks of my blood shall have everlasting life”). Run with it for all it’s worth. If Flanagan had really wanted to be daring, he might have suggested it was inscribed as doctrine – or even the scripture itself, in the symbolic sense, whenever it was actually written – for precisely that reason. To inform the faithful of this monstrous proclivity, but wrap it up as a positive, in the manner of subconscious programming, in exactly the manner Paul does the Angel/vampire.

Flanagan is too capable a filmmaker to make these elements seem exactly stale, but Midnight Mass is dogged by a sense of familiarity. The setting itself – a remote island, pop. 127 – is probably the series’ most unreservedly successful element, in terms of instructing atmosphere and character, but it is also undeniably redolent of isolated communities gone awry elsewhere (The Wicker Man, the more recent Midsommar).

And so, much of the discussion on doctrinal points in Midnight Mass can become a little wearisome, banal even, through the accompanying relish with which Flanagan “exposes” the all-purpose qualities of Bible verse, as a tool for warranting any given act or attitude, to the extent of ones that are outright immoral. Flanagan is clearly fluent with the scriptures, but that makes this no less well-trodden a path as he rakes over old favourites (the less-than-benign nature of the Old Testament God, and indeed much of the consequent law and reason). At times, as we keep returning to Riley and Paul at their two-man AA meetings, Midnight Mass becomes simply an indulgence, a vehicle for Flanagan’s philosophical-scriptural circular grandstanding, and he simply doesn’t have enough of cogent interest to say – or more still of nuance – to justify itself.

There’s also a sense of inevitability to Flanagan’s thematic architecture. Riley studied all the religious faiths and texts in prison – sentenced for a drunk driving fatality that haunts him still – and “came out of that an atheist”. One of the fatally long monologues (so long, you’d think Chris Carter was a consultant) finds Riley setting out his pedestrian treatise on what happens when you die to professed believer Erin (Kate Siegel, also Mrs Flanagan). We later hear Erin’s own account of what she expects, which far from being some kind of affirmation of faith, retreats beneath the covers of Flanagan’s own outlook. Albeit, in her case, a kind of quasi-mystical atheism (“We are the cosmos dreaming of itself”).

This apparently derives from Flanagan having “more of a spiritual reaction reading Pale Blue Dot” than The Bible. Carl Sagan’s Dawkins-approved brand of infinite-universe/insignificant-man humanism perhaps shouldn’t be surprising from a filmmaker who, when it comes down to it, gets his aesthetic kicks from winged demons quaffing blood form an open vein. Although, even Dawkins’ brand of religious – the religion of science – fanaticism can get in the way of the overarching mission statement at times.

Flanagan duly couches the blood disorder afflicting the community in terms of scientism and has Muslim sheriff Hassan (Rahul Kohil) inform his son miracles can’t happen, per Allah; Flanagan, as per the memo, is scrupulous in avoiding any critique or interrogation of the Muslim faith (except on the part of hateful Bev, so that counts as an inverse validation. Curiously, I don’t remember any slights at mixed-race marriages, which you’d have thought would be fodder for among such a group). There’s various cynically representational box-ticking in filling out the small community – Annabeth Gish’s good rationalist lesbian doctor Sarah; Annarah Cymone’s good, formerly wheelchair-bound, mixed-race daughter – but it’s with the sheriff that Flanagan really makes a meal of his signposted progressivism, offering Hassan a frankly risible speech in Book VI: Act of The Apostles, one that crudely dumps his entire motivational background in absurdly embarrassing fashion when Sarah shows up to ask him, of all things, to do his job.

The substance of the sheriff’s monologue covers some pertinent ground, in particular with regard to FBI activities (addressed more singularly by Chris Morris in The Day Shall Come), but it’s frankly a terrible piece of writing that has no business busting its way in at this point in the story; Gish’s reaction, doing her damnedest to look earnest and sincere throughout, says it all. On the face of it, the environmentalism element is more evenly addressed – the community’s ruin at the doing of big oil, but in the long term, it is fishing quotas that are damaging them most – but there’s also a nod to the ill effects of inadequate money management and grabbing church officials as primary (well, secondary) culprits.

Flanagan throws in some effective reversals and twists, most notably the attack on Riley at the end of Book IV: Lamentations, but he also makes a hash of executing some aspects. The makeup for Alex Essore as Sarah’s mother Mildred is effective and subtle, such that the “de-aging” carries, but Linklater’s is absolutely dreadful as Pruitt, so there’s never any doubt about his true identity before its revealed. Of which, I found no one – aside from Sarah – recognising his younger self a stretch, even of the “Father, you know, you seem awfully familiar” variety. I took time to be persuaded by Linklater’s performance too. I was familiar with him from Legion, and there seemed to be an overplaying, performative tendency that rather put me off – that of a comedian attempting to play straight – along with an evangelical degree of sermonising that didn’t strike me as very Catholic (Flanagan would know best, I guess).

Other structural aspects felt somewhat ungainly too. Riley’s brother Warren (Igby Riney) features heavily in the first episode, but then barely registers until the final one. And the finale itself is a bit of an ordeal of manoeuvring characters to a desired outcome rather than offering them coherent and consistent motivation.

Also notable here is Flanagan – whose tale was long-gestating – inscribing a layer of topicality with allusions to virus and contagion spread from person to person (here, via blood, and the danger of it spreading to the mainland… So, what… is this vampire generally extra choosy? Why hasn’t it been siring wayward humans everywhere already?) Flanagan even has Sarah invoke Ignaz Semmelweis (and with it, the false equivalence of germ theory and virus theory as discussed in respect of 12 Monkeys, where Jeffrey Goines rambles on about him).

I’m tempted to run with the implications of hidden elite vampires operating through the church and feeding secretly on the population, who in turn see the world in a new and more vibrant druggy way when inducted into the club (in particular, the adrenochrome idea that presents itself with Erin’s pregnancy, where this force directly sucks the life out of the unborn infant in order to thrive, and those with the craving for this fabled/alleged substance succumbing to its demands over and above any inherent morality that would keep them from preying on others).

However, the viral aspect had me considering a less obvious allusion. The grey elite ascribing its messenger (be that messenger a Gates or a Fauci) to sell to the congregation/ populace the benefits of a life-giving/ preserving substance they should take into themselves, one that actually does nothing of the kind – receive the sacrament/take the jab – and actually ebbs away their essence and humanity. In order to achieve this, restrictions are imposed and rights removed (travel is prevented, lines of communication are cut off or impeded), only to be restored when they have received the prescribed “medication”, free once more to interact and mingle with the larger world. Meanwhile, those that resist are to be forcibly detained and jabbed (some of these jabbed also become immediate causalities, to be redacted from the public eye/record until the full plan has been executed).

As I noted in the Don’t Look Up review, however, it’s in the nature of such texts promising subtexts that they’re perceived in ways their makers may not have conceived – be that original conception climate change or religious fanaticism – when world events overtake them. Midnight Mass is a serviceable series, certainly by Netflix standards, but goes to emphasise that Flanagan needs someone honest on hand to tell him when he’s giving himself too much rope. Of course, that’s true of almost everything the streamer has done with an auterish eye.


Popular posts from this blog

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 1 (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Is this supposed to be me? It’s grotesque.

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022) (SPOILERS) I didn’t hold out much hope for The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent being more than moderately tolerable. Not so much because its relatively untested director and his co-writer are mostly known in the TV sphere (and not so much for anything anyone is raving about). Although, it has to be admitted, the finished movie flourishes a degree of digital flatness typical of small-screen productions (it’s fine, but nothing more). Rather, due to the already over-tapped meta-strain of celebs showing they’re good sports about themselves. When Spike Jonze did it with John Malkovich, it was weird and different. By the time we had JCVD , not so much. And both of them are pre-dated by Arnie in Last Action Hero (“ You brought me nothing but pain ” he is told by Jack Slater). Plus, it isn’t as if Tom Gormican and Kevin Etten have much in the way of an angle on Nic; the movie’s basically there to glorify “him”, give or take a few foibles, do

All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies.

Watership Down (1978) (SPOILERS) I only read Watership Down recently, despite having loved the film from the first, and I was immediately impressed with how faithful, albeit inevitably compacted, Martin Rosen’s adaptation is. It manages to translate the lyrical, mythic and metaphysical qualities of Richard Adams’ novel without succumbing to dumbing down or the urge to cater for a broader or younger audience. It may be true that parents are the ones who get most concerned over the more disturbing elements of the picture but, given the maturity of the content, it remains a surprise that, as with 2001: A Space Odyssey (which may on the face of it seem like an odd bedfellow), this doesn’t garner a PG certificate. As the makers noted, Watership Down is at least in part an Exodus story, but the biblical implications extend beyond Hazel merely leading his fluffle to the titular promised land. There is a prevalent spiritual dimension to this rabbit universe, one very much

Whacking. I'm hell at whacking.

Witness (1985) (SPOILERS) Witness saw the advent of a relatively brief period – just over half a decade –during which Harrison Ford was willing to use his star power in an attempt to branch out. The results were mixed, and abruptly concluded when his typically too late to go where Daniel Day Lewis, Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro had gone before (with at bare minimum Oscar-nominated results) – but not “ full retard ” – ended in derision with Regarding Henry . He retreated to the world of Tom Clancy, and it’s the point where his cachet began to crumble. There had always been a stolid quality beneath even his more colourful characters, but now it came to the fore. You can see something of that as John Book in Witness – despite his sole Oscar nom, it might be one of Ford’s least interesting performances of the 80s – but it scarcely matters, or that the screenplay (which won) is by turns nostalgic, reactionary, wistful and formulaic, as director Peter Weir, in his Hollywood debu

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

If that small woman is small enough, she could fit behind a small tree.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 2 (SPOILERS) I can’t quite find it within myself to perform the rapturous somersaults that seem to be the prevailing response to this fourth run of the show. I’ve outlined some of my thematic issues in the Volume 1 review, largely borne out here, but the greater concern is one I’ve held since Season Two began – and this is the best run since Season One, at least as far my failing memory can account for – and that’s the purpose-built formula dictated by the Duffer Brothers. It’s there in each new Big Bad, obviously, even to the extent that this is the Big-Bad-who-binds-them-all (except the Upside Down was always there, right?) And it’s there with the resurgent emotional beats, partings, reunions and plaintively stirring music cues. I have to be really on board with a movie or show to embrace such flagrantly shameless manipulation, season after season, and I find myself increasingly immune.

Get away from my burro!

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) (SPOILERS) The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is beloved by so many of the cinematic firmament’s luminaries – Stanley Kubrick, Sam Raimi, , Paul Thomas Anderson and who knows maybe also WS, Vince Gilligan, Spike Lee, Daniel Day Lewis; Oliver Stone was going to remake it – not to mention those anteriorly influential Stone Roses, that it seems foolhardy to suggest it isn’t quite all that. There’s no faulting the performances – a career best Humphrey Bogart, with director John Huston’s dad Walter stealing the movie from under him – but the greed-is-bad theme is laid on a little thick, just in case you were a bit too dim to get it yourself the first time, and Huston’s direction may be right there were it counts for the dramatics, but it’s a little too relaxed when it comes to showing the seams between Mexican location and studio.

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls… dyin’ time’s here!

Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (1985) Time was kind to Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome . As in, it was such a long time since I’d seen the “final chapter” of the trilogy, it had dwindled in my memory to the status of an “alright but not great” sequel. I’d half-expected to have positive things to say along the lines of it being misunderstood, or being able to see what it was trying for but perhaps failing to quite achieve. Instead, I re-discovered a massive turkey that is really a Mad Max movie in name only (appropriately, since Max was an afterthought). This is the kind of picture fans of beloved series tend to loathe; when a favourite character returns but without the qualities or tone that made them adored in the first place (see Indiana Jones in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull , or John McClane in the last two Die Hard s). Thunderdome stinks even more than the methane fuelling Bartertown. I hadn’t been aware of the origins of Thunderdome until recently, mainly because I was