Skip to main content

Now, that’s some unscrupulous shit.

The Harder They Fall

(SPOILERS) The revisionist western is a broad church, at its best opening out the genre to new ideas or perspectives while preserving a prevailing verisimilitude. Conversely, it also runs the danger of offering window dressing, with the “serious” commentary of the shallowest and most obvious kind. For the most part, The Harder They Fall amounts to little more than posturing pastiche, taking in historical figures but making no attempt to integrate them intelligently – or intelligibly – with its fictional framework (in the manner of, say, Butch Cassidy and Sundance Kid). The results are closer to something like Jake Scott’s Plunkett & Macleane, with a brazenly clashing score and an accompanying approach to milieu (costuming, photography, dialogue) and performance (everyone has a “I get to be a cowboy for a few weeks!” air about them). I mean, it’s fine for what it is, intermittently, which isn’t very much.

Perhaps debut feature director Jeymes Samuel should have lent in to the absurdity, in the way Sam Raimi upped the ante with The Quick and the Dead. As it is, you’re left wishing many of the more interesting – and previously largely unbroached by cinema – parts of the picture were explored, such as all-black towns that, amid The Harder They Fall’s blunderbuss format, could be mistaken for fanciful. Obviously, Samuel has no responsibility in that regard. But he’s inhabiting a revisionist landscape that is already well worn; you’re left asking what he has delivered that is remotely fresh or distinctive, and soon coming up short.

Indeed, the screenplay is awash with tropes and clichés courtesy of Samuel and Boaz Yakin. The latter, while a seasoned screenwriter, can boast very few tip-top results, which may simply be the luck of the rewrite, Hollywood being what it is. Alternatively, it can signify an Akiva Goldsman. The revenge for childhood trauma is out of Once Upon a Time in the West (and again, Raimi appropriated it for The Quick and the Dead). Only, this time it throws in a shark-jumping fraternal twist that entirely flounders (which goes back to how determinedly superficial Samuel’s affray is).

Many of these tropes follow suit. The sharpshooter. The cocky young gunslinger (RJ Cyler’s Beckwourth is essentially the Leo DiCaprio character from The Quick and the Dead). The ruthless psycho killer (Idris Elba’s Rufus Buck following in the footsteps of Henry Fonda. Elba’s main repose is glowering, of course, so he has that one sewn up). Others are based on kick-ass women (Zazie Beetz’s Stagecoach Mary, Regina King’s Trudy Smith and Danielle Deadwyler’s Cuffee, all shown kicking inherently deserving menfolk’s asses during the early stages). Others still are based on situational reversals of race, albeit the confrontational aspect is largely eschewed, aside from a train breakout and a robbery on a bank in a white town.

Some of these land more effectively than others. The Harder They Fall assumes something approaching momentum once the action settles on Redwood City, where Buck has ousted Wiley Escoe (Deon Cole), the former pal who turned him in. There are some reasonably staged shootouts and confrontations, and if the picture is typical overlong (it’s Netflix), it’s nimbler as it progresses. The cast’s dress-up box quality – Lakeith Stanfield is always Lakeith Stanfield, no matter how leftfield he’s cast – rather recalls Young Guns or Silverado, although those pictures were almost earnest in attempting “authenticity” by comparison. I’ve yet to be persuaded by the general raves surrounding lead Jonathan Majors.

There are praiseworthy exceptions. Delroy Lindo is more than solid as US Marshal Bass Reeves (also mentioned in so-woke-it-hurts Damon Lindelof’s Watchmen). Deadwyler too, despite the alluded-to fisticuffs, is strong. Mostly, though, The Harder They Fall is exactly as slick and empty as it evidently intends to be. Clearly too, per the final scene, it has set itself up for a sequel, which given it seems to have gone down well on Netflix, won’t be at all surprising.

Popular posts from this blog

The Bible never said anything about amphetamines.

The Color of Money (1986) (SPOILERS) I tend to think it’s evident when Scorsese isn’t truly exercised by material. He can still invest every ounce of the technical acumen at his fingertips, and the results can dazzle on that level, but you don’t really feel the filmmaker in the film. Which, for one of his pictures to truly carry a wallop, you need to do. We’ve seen quite a few in such deficit in recent years, most often teaming with Leo. The Color of Money , however, is the first where it was out-and-out evident the subject matter wasn’t Marty’s bag. He needed it, desperately, to come off, but in the manner a tradesman who wants to keep getting jobs. This sequel to The Hustler doesn’t linger in the mind, however good it may be, moment by moment.

I said I had no family. I didn’t say I had an empty apartment.

The Apartment (1960) (SPOILERS) Billy Wilder’s romcom delivered the genre that rare Best Picture Oscar winner. Albeit, The Apartment amounts to a rather grim (now) PG-rated scenario, one rife with adultery, attempted suicide, prostitution of the soul and subjective thereof of the body. And yet, it’s also, finally, rather sweet, so salving the darker passages and evidencing the director’s expertly judged balancing act. Time Out ’s Tom Milne suggested the ending was a cop out (“ boy forgives girl and all’s well ”). But really, what other ending did the audience or central characters deserve?

Listen to the goddamn qualified scientists!

Don’t Look Up (2021) (SPOILERS) It’s testament to Don’t Look Up ’s “quality” that critics who would normally lap up this kind of liberal-causes messaging couldn’t find it within themselves to grant it a free pass. Adam McKay has attempted to refashion himself as a satirist since jettisoning former collaborator Will Ferrell, but as a Hollywood player and an inevitably socio-politically partisan one, he simply falls in line with the most obvious, fatuous propagandising.

Your desecration of reality will not go unpunished.

2021-22 Best-of, Worst-of and Everything Else Besides The movies might be the most visible example of attempts to cling onto cultural remnants as the previous societal template clatters down the drain. It takes something people really want – unlike a Bond movie where he kicks the can – to suggest the model of yesteryear, one where a billion-dollar grosser was like sneezing. You can argue Spider-Man: No Way Home is replete with agendas of one sort or another, and that’s undoubtedly the case (that’s Hollywood), but crowding out any such extraneous elements (and they often are) is simply a consummate crowd-pleaser that taps into tangible nostalgia through its multiverse take. Of course, nostalgia for a mere seven years ago, for something you didn’t like anyway, is a symptom of how fraught these times have become.

Doctors make the worst patients.

Coma (1978) (SPOILERS) Michael Crichton’s sophomore big-screen feature, and by some distance his best. Perhaps it’s simply that this a milieu known to him, or perhaps it’s that it’s very much aligned to the there-and-now and present, but Coma , despite the occasional lapse in this adaptation of colleague Robin Cook’s novel, is an effective, creepy, resonant thriller and then some. Crichton knows his subject, and it shows – the picture is confident and verisimilitudinous in a way none of his other directorial efforts are – and his low-key – some might say clinical – approach pays dividends. You might also call it prescient, but that would be to suggest its subject matter wasn’t immediately relevant then too.

You ruined every suck-my-silky-ass thing!

The Matrix Resurrections (2021) (SPOILERS) Warner Bros has been here before. Déjà vu? What happens when you let a filmmaker do whatever they want? And I don’t mean in the manner of Netflix. No, in the sequel sense. You get a Gremlins 2: The New Batch (a classic, obviously, but not one that financially furthered a franchise). And conversely, when you simply cash in on a brand, consequences be damned? Exorcist II: The Heretic speaks for itself. So in the case of The Matrix Resurrections – not far from as meta as The New Batch , but much less irreverent – when Thomas “Tom” Anderson, designer of globally successful gaming trilogy The Matrix , is told “ Our beloved company, Warner Bros, has decided to make a sequel to the trilogy ” and it’s going ahead “with or without us”, you can be fairly sure this is the gospel. That Lana, now going it alone, decided it was better to “make the best of it” than let her baby be sullied. Of course, quite what that amounts to in the case of a movie(s) tha

You just threw a donut in the hot zone!

Den of Thieves (2018) (SPOILERS) I'd heard this was a shameless  Heat  rip-off, and the presence of Gerard Butler seemed to confirm it would be passable-at-best B-heist hokum, so maybe it was just middling expectations, even having heard how enthused certain pockets of the Internet were, but  Den of Thieves  is a surprisingly very satisfying entry in the genre. I can't even fault it for attempting to Keyser Soze the whole shebang at the last moment – add a head in a box and you have three 1995 classics in one movie – even if that particular conceit doesn’t quite come together.

Abandon selective targeting. Shoot everything.

28 Weeks Later (2007) (SPOILERS) The first five minutes of 28 Weeks Later are far and away the best part of this sequel, offering in quick succession a devastating moral quandary and a waking nightmare, immortalised on the screen. After that, while significantly more polished, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo reveals his concept to be altogether inferior to Danny Boyle and Alex Garland’s, falling back on the crutches of gore, nihilism, and disengaging and limiting shifts of focus between characters in whom one has little investment in the first place.

It’s always possible to find a good moral reason for killing anybody.

The Assassination Bureau (1969) (SPOILERS) The Assassination Bureau ought to be a great movie. You can see its influence on those who either think it is a great movie, or want to produce something that fulfils its potential. Alan Moore and The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen . The just-released (and just-flopped) The King’s Men . It inhabits a post-Avengers, self-consciously benign rehearsal of, and ambivalence towards, Empire manners and attitudes, something that could previously be seen that decade in Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines (and sequel Monte Carlo or Bust , also 1969), Adam Adamant Lives! , and even earlier with Kind Hearts and Coronets , whilst also feeding into that “Peacock Revolution” of Edwardian/Victorian fashion refurbishment. Unfortunately, though, it lacks the pop-stylistic savvy that made, say, The President’s Analyst so vivacious.

This guy’s armed with a hairdryer.

An Innocent Man (1989) (SPOILERS) Was it a chicken-and-egg thing with Tom Selleck and movies? Did he consistently end up in ropey pictures because other, bigger big-screen stars had first dibs on the good stuff? Or was it because he was a resolutely small-screen guy with limited range and zero good taste? Selleck had about half-a-dozen cinema outings during the 1980s, one of which, the very TV, very Touchstone Three Men and a Baby was a hit, but couldn’t be put wholly down to him. The final one was An Innocent Man , where he attempted to show some grit and mettle, as nice-guy Tom is framed and has to get tough to survive. Unfortunately, it’s another big-screen TV movie.