Skip to main content

Children are a crushing responsibility.

The Lost Daughter

(SPOILERS) For her directorial debut, Maggie Gyllenhaal has chosen to make a sensitively shot, acutely measured movie about quite awful people. And so, of course, it has garnered raves. There’s no doubting The Lost Daughter is perceptively staged – she’d make a good horror director, should she ever wish to tackle that genre – and that Gyllenhaal extracts exactly the desired performances from her cast, but if she expected us to trawl through two hours of her protagonist Leda’s subjective discontent, despair and tense encounters and give it two thumbs up, making her so profoundly unsympathetic probably wasn’t the best way to go about it.

I mentioned horror movies, and in a slightly different take on the material, probably a Ben Wheatley one, Leda’s straight-up mentalist act early on, combined with the menacing and obnoxious family of Greek-Americans, of whom she is warned “They’re bad people” would lead to a denouement where she is surrounded by Greeks wearing masks and summarily stabbed with multiple hat pins. It probably wouldn’t have been a better movie, but Gyllenhaal’s setting is oppressively heavy with such tension, mostly thanks to that bloody doll (and in a Wheatley movie, there’s no way a randomly bruising pine cone would just be random).

This deed isn’t really about Leda’s confession “I’m an unnatural mother” though, is it? I mean, what it is, is a movie (or novelistic) conceit, one purely designed to imbue tension and unease. It has very little to do with her flashbacks to her younger self (Jessie Buckley) dealing with two daughters, and her decision to abandon them for three years to be with a dashing – well, okay, not so dashing, but he has a prodigious beard – professor (Peter Sarsgaard). Fair enough, she couldn’t deal, and she tells Nina (Dakota Johnson, trying her inadequate best to seem Greek-American) how the experience of bolting “felt like I’d been trying not to explode, and then I exploded”; “That doesn’t sound amazing” responds Nina levelly. But stealing the doll doesn’t reinforce the idea of a wayward, regretful parent; it makes her plain psychotic.

So no, I didn’t welcome the time spent in Leda’s company (Olivia Colman plays her, doing her patented fuddled, difficult-piece-of-work act). And again, the movie – when it isn’t indulging flashbacks that curiously add very little, other than creating a dissonance between the idea that Buckley could become Colman – seems set on kneading tension from her encounters as if she should be, if not sympathetic, someone with whom we might empathise. Yet her every encounter is absurdly awkward, invariably because she’s so prickly and/or nutso, or because those she encounters are themselves weirdos. There’s a point with this kind of movie where you cumulatively ask yourself why you’re watching, because you know you aren’t going to win. And yet, you feel it incumbent upon yourself to see it through.

Gyllenhaal adapted Ellen Ferrante’s 2006 novel La figlia oscura; perhaps it’s a better read, especially in the original Italian. She may have been very faithful, in which case, the problem is more her esteem for the material than its translation to screen. The filmmaking has a sure eye for the exhaustingly uncomfortable, be it a desiccated Ed Harris as handyman Lyle, presumably attempting to get his end away (Harris is hardly in the thing in any consequential way, so perhaps he and Mags are mates), or young Will (Paul Mescal), whom Leda invites to dinner. Or the long, crazy looks Nina or Callie (Dagmara Domińczyk) give her, at least suggesting Leda’s not the only one on the island with a screw loose. On the other hand, when a worm wriggles out of the doll’s mouth, you’re left wondering if Gyllenhaal took in the Suspira remake while considering whether or not to cast Johnson and the tone was more a whim than essential.

As it plays, The Lost Daughter comprises Leda – presumably stubbornly – putting up with the insufferably vulgar family intruding on her idyll almost from the moment she stretches out in the Sun. No one’s idea of a good time, but she – again, presumably – gets her kicks through knowing she knows something they don’t: the location of the precious doll she appropriates from the bairn who goes missing at one point. It might be on the extreme side, but Nina stabbing Leda with a hat pin is a more rational response to being told of the deranged theft than anything Nina does.

On this evidence, Gyllenhaal will probably make a slam dunk at some point, although that presumes her facility with filmic language doesn’t invest the material with similarly pseudy-but-oh-sensitive resistibility. Because there’s a literalness to The Lost Daughter, in the psychology of emotion, that may prevent her from scaling any great heights. Still, the awards circuit is lapping it up, and Colman is in permanent favour right now (BAFTA aside).

Popular posts from this blog

If I do nothing else, I will convince them that Herbert Stempel knows what won the goddam Academy Award for Best goddam Picture of 1955. That’s what I’m going to accomplish.

Quiz Show (1994) (SPOILERS) Quiz Show perfectly encapsulates a certain brand of Best Picture nominee: the staid, respectable, diligent historical episode, a morality tale in response to which the Academy can nod their heads approvingly and discerningly, feeding as it does their own vainglorious self-image about how times and attitudes have changed, in part thanks to their own virtuousness. Robert Redford’s film about the 1950s Twenty-One quiz show scandals is immaculately made, boasts a notable cast and is guided by a strong screenplay from Paul Attanasio (who, on television, had just created the seminal Homicide: Life on the Streets ), but it lacks that something extra that pushes it into truly memorable territory.

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

You ever heard the saying, “Don’t rob the bank across from the diner that has the best donuts in three counties”?

2 Guns (2013) (SPOILERS) Denzel Washington is such a reliable performer, that it can get a bit boring. You end up knowing every gesture or inflection in advance, whether he’s playing a good guy or a bad guy. And his films are generally at least half decent, so you end up seeing them. Even in Flight (or perhaps especially in Flight ; just watch him chugging down that vodka) where he’s giving it his Oscar-nominatable best, he seems too familiar. I think it may be because he’s an actor who is more effective the less he does. In 2 Guns he’s not doing less, but sometimes it seems like it. That’s because the last person I’d ever expect blows him off the screen; Mark Wahlberg.

In a few moments, you will have an experience that will seem completely real. It will be the result of your subconscious fears transformed into your conscious awareness.

Brainstorm (1983) (SPOILERS) Might Brainstorm have been the next big thing – a ground-breaking, game-changing cinematic spectacle that had as far reaching consequences as Star Wars (special effects) or Avatar (3D) – if only Douglas Trumbull had been allowed to persevere with his patented “Showscan” process (70mm film photographed and projected at 60 frames per second)? I suspect not; one only has to look at the not-so-far-removed experiment of Ang Lee with Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk , and how that went down like a bag of cold sick, to doubt that any innovation will necessarily catch on (although Trumbull at least had a narrative hinge on which to turn his “more real than real” imagery, whereas Lee’s pretty much boiled down to “because it was there”). Brainstorm ’s story is, though, like its title, possibly too cerebral, too much concerned with the consciousness and touting too little of the cloyingly affirmative that Bruce Rubin inevitably brings to his screenplays. T

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Tippy-toe! Tippy-toe!

Seinfeld 2.7: The Phone Message The Premise George and Jerry both have dates on the same night. Neither goes quite as planned, and in George’s case it results in him leaving an abusive message on his girlfriend’s answerphone. The only solution is to steal the tape before she plays it. Observational Further evidence of the gaping chasm between George and Jerry’s approaches to the world. George neurotically attacks his problems and makes them worse, while Jerry shrugs and lets them go. It’s nice to see the latter’s anal qualities announcing themselves, however; he’s so bothered that his girlfriend likes a terrible TV advert that he’s mostly relieved when she breaks things off (“ To me the dialogue rings true ”). Neither Gretchen German (as Donna, Jerry’s date) nor Tory Polone (as Carol, George’s) make a huge impression, but German has more screen time and better dialogue. The main attraction is Jerry’s reactions, which include trying to impress her with hi

Say hello to the Scream Extractor.

Monsters, Inc. (2001) (SPOILERS) I was never the greatest fan of Monsters, Inc. , even before charges began to be levelled regarding its “true” subtext. I didn’t much care for the characters, and I particularly didn’t like the way Pixar’s directors injected their own parenting/ childhood nostalgia into their plots. Something that just seems to go on with their fare ad infinitum. Which means the Pixars I preferred tended to be the Brad Bird ones. You know, the alleged objectivist. Now, though, we learn Pixar has always been about the adrenochrome, so there’s no going back…