Skip to main content

I don’t know what you mean by “You’re a peckerwood”.


(SPOILERS) Steven Soderbergh’s latest impersonal, production-line effort – if only he really had retired – is pretty dumb, but also highly efficient. Which counts for something when mounting a claustrophobic thriller. The director previously unleashed pandemic propaganda flick Contagion on a pliant audience and has more recently applied himself to whatever safe, popular, good liberal narrative exercises tickled to his rather eclectic fancy, be they the low-fruit Panama-Papers “exposé” The Laundromat or last year’s disastrous, uber-woke Oscar Ceremony. Here, he’s servicing more of the same – plandemic backdrop; a proliferation of obedient mask junkies; nominal threat of pervasive surveillance tech as a sub for actual commentary; proactive heroine who does for the villains – but it largely delivers. That is, if you can excuse screenwriter David Koepp’s frankly ludicrous central conceit.

Koepp’s laying on the premise a bit thick as it is. It would surely be sufficient were Angela (Zoë Kravitz), pilloried by propaganda about the coof, simply terrified of leaving her spacious apartment – she must get paid a packet – but she also has pre-existing agoraphobia. And OCD. And toothache. She’s a tech analyst for the Amygdala Corporation, reviewing error responses in its KIMI device – an Alexa-like virtual assistant – and encoding solutions. When, through Blow Out-esque isolation of an audio recording and some rather naff subjective visuals on Soderbergh’s part, Angela hears what she believes is a murder, she informs her superiors. Wouldn’t you know it, though, the guy who ordered the murder is only the CEO of Amygdala (Derek DelGaudio), eager to make as much as he can from the firm’s imminent IPO. What are the chances, eh? Of all the rotten luck, that Angela should stumble on a murder by her own (ultimate) boss.

If you can get past that – and I absolutely wouldn’t blame you if you can’t – Soderbergh ratchets up the tension as Angela ventures out into terrifying, coof-infested Seattle, only to be confronted by something even more terrifying. That’s right, her (immediate) boss is none other than Mrs Guantanamo Hanks herself, Rita Wilson – there’s no way she can be good! True to form, she reneges on her promise to Angela (“I thought that you said we would do it in the presence of the FBI”) and it isn’t long before the latter is hotfooting it through the streets, pursued by a couple of armed assassins (Jacob Vargas and Charles Halford).

There’s a top-notch sequence in which Angela is strong-armed into a waiting van, a crowd of Stop the Sweeps protesters coming to her aid (what the protesters’ presence is about is unclear: a genuine concern raised by Soderbergh, or looking forward to no one owning anything – like their own houses à la Nomadland – and being happy?) In due course, she makes it back to her apartment, where it turns out the overweight nosy neighbour (Devin Ratray) is not a sinister peeper at all. Or maybe he is, but he can still be a hero. Angela manages to turn the tables on her assailants in a manner as unlikely as her accidentally discovering her CEO is a murderer, but this nevertheless makes for a satisfyingly ramped-up denouement.

Kravitz sports blue hair throughout, suggests she’s auditioning for The Fifth Element or Run Lola Run. Although, in this case, the hair seems there to distract from her lack of personality; it’s also a great aid to any unassuming assassins in the vicinity, as you’ll stick out like a sore thumb. Soderbergh is careful to include lots of loving shots of Kravitz in her skimpies. But forget about that: his messaging on the dangers of unchecked tech is about as groundbreaking as his earlier acclaim for covering the energy industry’s environmental pollution and the war on drugs. It could even be argued that KIMI is instrumental in Angela winning out, so perhaps AI’s our friend? Nevertheless, she is outraged to discover her bosses know her mental health history (“Why is that in my file?”) and that she gave permission for her data to be recorded in aid of a retinal scan (the old terms and conditions ruse).

Soderbergh is as preoccupied with Angela’s mental state as the thriller mechanics, perhaps unsurprising given his previous forays Side Effects and Unsane (and before that, Kafka and Schizopolis). Her brain-care specialist (Emily Kuroda) is evidently tired of her patient’s shit and reminds her of the dangers of obsessiveness, of “thinking about something to the exclusion of all else, like the virus. Like Evergreen”. This is then mentioned again (“What happened to you at Evergreen?”) There can be no coincidence that Koepp and Sodebergh dropped this in – well, about as much of one as discovering Angela’s boss is the murderer – so the question is what we’re supposed to divine from it. The instant assumption must be that Angela has previously cried wolf, that she has a history of “false” or conspiratorial mindset claims. That seems to be the allusion, as the reference is surely intended to dismiss the idea the Evergreen vessel in the Suez Canal was involved in child trafficking.

So… Angela is right this time, but she was wrong on that occasion (let’s not forget Contagion, where MSM-in-indie-clothing Soderbergh vilified the alt-medicine view via Jude Law’s self-promoting truther)? Or should we believe her Evergreen story too? Isn’t that the credo of #MeToo? After all, that would support the assumption she’s a reliable witness who has a history of being falsely accused (“I was assaulted and the police put me on trial instead of him”: a kind of extreme inversion of #MeToo) Unless her remarkable adeptness with a nail gun – Koepp relying on Chekov’s Upstairs Building Work for her weapon of choice – as she comes on like some kind of T2 Sarah Connor or Halloween 2/9 Laurie Strode, is meant to suggest she has history of putting down toxic men. No, I suspect not.

Either way. KIMI’s message seems to be that, in order to get over one’s agoraphobia, one ought to kill two or three people. Never fails. The picture features an unenviable cameo from Erika Christensen. I wonder how that conversation went (“Hi Erika. Last time we worked together, you played a junkie. Now I want you to be horribly murdered. It will only take up two minutes of screen time. Deal?”)

When asked about his work in the ‘90s, the director commented “I wasn’t sure what kind of films I wanted to make”. You’d be forgiven for assuming very little had changed. Since coming out of “retirement” in 2017, Soderbergh’s movies have been largely missable – at least, those I haven’t missed – and I suspect KIMI’s built-in obsolescence (no one will want to be reminded of the good old coof days) will do it no favours in that regard. Mostly, it’s standard Soderbergh: methodical, clinical, austere, coolly calculated and distancing. The sort of thing a KIMI would shoot if it were a filmmaker.

Popular posts from this blog

You were this amazing occidental samurai.

Ricochet (1991) (SPOILERS) You have to wonder at Denzel Washington’s agent at this point in the actor’s career. He’d recently won his first Oscar for Glory , yet followed it with less-than-glorious heart-transplant ghost comedy Heart Condition (Bob Hoskins’ racist cop receives Washington’s dead lawyer’s ticker; a recipe for hijinks!) Not long after, he dipped his tentative toe in the action arena with this Joel Silver production; Denzel has made his share of action fare since, of course, most of it serviceable if unremarkable, but none of it comes near to delivering the schlocky excesses of Ricochet , a movie at once ingenious and risible in its plot permutations, performances and production profligacy.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

People still talk about Pandapocalypse 2002.

Turning Red (2022) (SPOILERS) Those wags at Pixar, eh? Yes, the most – actually, the only – impressive thing about Turning Red is the four-tiered wordplay of its title. Thirteen-year-old Mei (Rosalie Chiang) finds herself turning into a large red panda at emotive moments. She is also, simultaneously, riding the crimson wave for the first time. Further, as a teenager, she characteristically suffers from acute embarrassment (mostly due to the actions of her domineering mother Ming Lee, voiced by Sandra Oh). And finally, of course, Turning Red can be seen diligently spreading communist doctrine left, right and centre. To any political sensibility tuning in to Disney+, basically (so ones with either considerable or zero resistance to woke). Take a guess which of these isn’t getting press in reference to the movie? And by a process of elimination is probably what it it’s really about (you know in the same way most Pixars, as far back as Toy Story and Monsters, Inc . can be given an insi

I can’t be the worst. What about that hotdog one?

Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022) (SPOILERS) It would have been a merciful release, had the title card “ The End ”, flashing on screen a little before the ninety-minute mark, not been a false dawn. True, I would still have been unable to swab the bloody dildoes fight from my mind, but at least Everything Everywhere All at Once would have been short. Indeed, by the actual end I was put in mind of a line spoken by co-star James Wong in one of his most indelible roles: “ Now this really pisses me off to no end ”. Or to put it another way, Everything Everywhere All at Once rubbed me up the wrong which way quite a lot of most of the time.

We could be mauled to death by an interstellar monster!

Star Trek Beyond (2016) (SPOILERS) The odd/even Star Trek failure/success rule seemed to have been cancelled out with the first reboot movie, and then trodden into ground with Into Darkness (which, yes, I quite enjoyed, for all its scandalous deficiencies). Star Trek Beyond gets us back onto more familiar ground, as it’s very identifiably a “lesser” Trek , irrespective of the big bucks and directorial nous thrown at it. This is a Star Trek movie that can happily stand shoulder to shoulder with The Search for Spock and Insurrection , content in the knowledge they make it look good.

I think World War II was my favourite war.

Small Soldiers (1998) An off-peak Joe Dante movie is still one chock-a-block full of satirical nuggets and comic inspiration, far beyond the facility of most filmmakers. Small Soldiers finds him back after a six-year big screen absence, taking delirious swipes at the veneration of the military, war movies, the toy industry, conglomerates and privatised defence forces. Dante’s take is so gleefully skewed, he even has big business win! The only problem with the picture (aside from an indistinct lead, surprising from a director with a strong track record for casting juveniles) is that this is all very familiar. Dante acknowledged Small Soldiers was basically a riff on Gremlins , and it is. Something innocuous and playful turns mad, bad and dangerous. On one level it has something in common with Gremlins 2: The New Batch , in that the asides carry the picture. But Gremlins 2 was all about the asides, happy to wander off in any direction that suited it oblivious to whet

We’ve got the best ball and chain in the world. Your ass.

Wedlock (1991) (SPOILERS) The futuristic prison movie seemed possessed of a particular cachet around this time, quite possibly sparked by the grisly possibilities of hi-tech disincentives to escape. On that front, HBO TV movie Wedlock more than delivers its FX money shot. Elsewhere, it’s less sure of itself, rather fumbling when it exchanges prison tropes for fugitives-on-the-run ones.

He’ll regret it to his dying day, if ever he lives that long.

The Quiet Man (1952) (SPOILERS) The John Wayne & John Ford film for those who don’t like John Wayne & John Ford films? The Quiet Man takes its cues from Ford’s earlier How Green Was My Valley in terms of, well less Anglophile and Hibernophile and Cambrophile nostalgia respectively for past times, climes and heritage, as Wayne’s pugilist returns to his family seat and stirs up a hot bed of emotions, not least with Maureen O’Hara’s red-headed hothead. The result is a very likeable movie, for all its inculcated Oirishness and studied eccentricity.

He's not in my pyjamas, is he?

Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice (1969) (SPOILERS) By rights, Paul Mazursky’s swinging, post-flower-power-gen partner-swap movie ought to have aged terribly. So much of the era’s scene-specific fare has, particularly so when attempting to reflect its reverberations with any degree of serious intent. Perhaps it’s because Mazursky and co-writer Larry Tucker (also of The Monkees , Alex in Wonderland and I Love You, Alice B. Toklas! ) maintain a wry distance from their characters’ endeavours, much more on the wavelength of Elliott Gould’s Ted than Robert Culp’s Bob; we know any pretensions towards uninhibited expression can’t end well, but we also know Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice have to learn the hard way.

There is a war raging, and unless you pull your head out of the sand, you and I and about five billion other people are going to go the way of the dinosaur.

The X-Files 5.14: The Red and the Black The most noteworthy aspect of this two parter is that it almost – but not quite – causes me to reassess my previous position that the best arc episodes are those that avoid tackling the greater narrative head-on, attempting to advance the resistant behemoth. It may be less than scintillating as far as concepts go, but the alien resistance plot is set out quite clearly here, as are the responses to it from the main players.