Skip to main content

If you could smell between my groins, you’d understand.

House of Gucci

(SPOILERS) It’s easy to see why reactions to House of Gucci have been all over the map. And why it has done decent business despite a shortfall in critical raves. Perhaps insufficient business when set against its price tag, but compared to Sir Ridders’ other 2021 movie (The Last Duel), it’s a monster. Starring the fame monster. House of Gucci boasts the director’s typically unmoderated, get-it-in-the-can approach to the many-and-varied subject matter that has characterised his output over the last two decades: efficient, effective, but lacking any sense of authorial oversight beyond the technical (which is ever-accomplished but also entirely indifferent). It’s thus down to the cast to give the movie oomph, which means, intermittently, that House of Gucci is highly entertaining. But only intermittently.

It’s never an easy task, trying to persuade a biopic to stand on its own two feet, divorced from the necessity of a linear, overliteral retelling its protagonists’ potted history. House of Gucci’s problem ought to have been less the danger of homogenising the material than honing what to include, as there’s so much wheat there: the internecine family disputes feuds and routs; the generational approbation; the domestic scene of Maurizio Gucci (Adam Driver) and wife Patrizia Reggiani (Lady Gaga); the conflict and rage that led to the latter murdering the former. Simply on the latter front, I was a little surprised the investigation and trial were largely dropped, as Ridders’ “in” is more Patrizia than her husband (the picture essentially ends with his offing).

I was left with lingering questions. Like why it took two years to arrest Patrizia (it seems that, despite her being an immediate suspect, there was no evidence, so the police were looking into other possibilities, such as Maurizio having been “the target of an international plot after sell his stake… to an Arab bank”). I was also, as is frequently the case with protracted biopics, occasionally distracted by the timeline. When there’s a quarter of a century covered, the odd greying of temples isn’t really sufficient delineation. Scott is very haphazard with supplying definite dates, which is even more irritating; why an onscreen year is justified in some instances but not in others is something only a man in his mid-eighties can answer, perhaps semi-coherently.

Co-writer (with Roberto Bentivegna) Becky Johnston has past experience of the biopic – Seven Years in Tibet – and of divas – she adapted Prince of Tides for Streisand and wrote Under the Cherry Moon for Prince – so she’s no novice; I suspect the lack of clarity is largely down to Scott, though. You can see similar indifference to peaks, troughs and the range of events in the likes of Exodus: Gods and Kings and All the Money in the World. I’m sure the same will be true of Kitbag Napoleon.

Where there are goods here, cheap knock-offs or not, they’re in performance. Popular (alleged) bubble-headed Satanist spirit cooker and one-of-each-genitaled Lady Gaga/Stefani Germanotta follows her persuasive turn in A Star is Born with another persuasive turn. While every criticism levelled at her personally may be valid – not least her deplorable showing on the award circuit, spouting guff about suffering for her art; I don’t know, as I’ve strenuously avoided any such preening outpourings – there’s no doubting that she’s an energetic tour de force here. Like a svelter Miriam Margolyes in I Love You to Death mode, but with added “Is there an exorcist in the house?” eyes (for that, you want Margolyes kicking Arnie’s ass in End of Days). She essays the turn from adoring wife to homicidal ex with aplomb (whether Patrizia had priors in regard to her conviction is up for debate). Regardless of whether the accent stinks – Hayek’s dialect coach suggested “… it sounds more Russian” – hers is easily the most engaging lead performance of this year’s potential Best Actress Oscar nominees.

Driver is typically proficient. Here he sports nose-normalising super specs that do their level best. Maurizio is an easily overshadowed, taciturn and interiorised role, and it doesn’t help that the transition from a guy happy to work for his father-in-law’s trucking business and reluctant to return to the family fold – at the urging of Al Pacino’s Uncle Aldo, rather than Jeremy Irons’ father Rudolfo, who has disinherited him – should be underdeveloped. It would seem to be at Patrizia’s urging, but the point where Maurizio segues from passenger to active participant is a bit blurry, taking in as it does deceiving cousin Paolo (Jared Leto) and allying himself with family lawyer Domenicio De Sole (Jack Huston).

There’s no reticence in the performances of Pacino, Irons and Leto. Leto is, of course – beside having alleged #MeToo proclivities in abundance – the absurdist scene stealer of the movie. Paolo’s more a Les Grossman cartoon than an actual person, but he’s hugely entertaining with it and an absolute boost to House of Gucci. Indeed, the best thing you can say about Scott is that he didn’t rein his actor in, and let Leto just go with it. Paulo’s an Italian caricature up to eleven – Mike Myers would be proud to call such a performance his own – and he comes equipped with some flat-out hilarious dialogue, often in the form of mis- or made-up sayings (“My bladder may be full, but my dreams are even fuller”; “Does an elephant shit in the jungle?”; “I could finally soar. Like a pigeon”; “Don’t even look at me, you lying sack of potatoes”) And that’s when he isn’t strangling vowels like he’s auditioning for Clouseau: “He’s quiet like a moose. A tiny little moose”.

Even Pacino’s no match for Leto, which doesn’t make their scenes together any less enjoyable. Particularly since Paolo is such an incredible dimwit – much more so than the actual Paolo, it seems, whose fashion label was a success and who sniffed out the discrepancies in the Gucci balance sheet because the profits made no sense – that Aldo has no choice but to admit defeat in the face of overwhelming ignorance (the parking garage scene is priceless). Leto’s scenes with Irons are equally amusing, although the key enjoyment for me was seeing Irons and Pacino share a scene. It helps that the characters – reserved and gregarious respectively – are natural fits and contrasts. Irons in the part is infinitely preferable to the initially attached De Niro.

There’s additional support from Salma Hayek (her hubby is CEO of Kering, of which Gucci is a subsidiary) and Youssef Kerkour (as the founder of Intercorp, destined to purchase Gucci). Huston, who has been drifting in and out of jobs listlessly since making a mark in Boardwalk Empire and crashed and burned in his big bid at stardom (Ben-Hur), finally earns a strong supporting role. Unfortunately, it’s a strong supporting role in which all the other strong supporting roles instantly demand all the attention in the room.

Ideally, House of Gucci would have achieved the giddy satirical zest of The Wolf of Wall Street, both in interrogating the greed at the subject matter’s core and appreciating just how alluring and intoxicating it is. What we’re presented with here are one percenters, but far from the uber-elite variety; the Guccis are simply the better (or worse) half living, and an highly colourful example of a dysfunctional (extended) family.

One noticeable takeaway is Ridders’ atypical reliance on a pop soundtrack. Not generally his style, and here we have an eclectic selection including George Michael, Donna Summer, Bowie, Blondie, New Order, The Eurythmics, Pino Donaggio, an Italian cover of I’m a Believer and Eric B & Rakim. The score from Ridley regular Harry Gregson-Williams is rather good too.

I’d label House of Gucci flashy but empty, but that would only be a compliment if it reflected the gaudy excesses of the family’s strife. I’ve seen it referred to as camp – Tom Ford: “In real life, none of it was camp. It was at times absurd, but ultimately it was tragic” – but a few OTT performances don’t really make the movie so. This is most similar to Scott’s previous super-rich bio All the Money in the World; he isn’t striving for anything definable or distinct; he’s simply filming the script and leaving it at that. Sometimes he’s servicing something off-the-wall – Leto – but as a filmmaker, there’s little discernible difference between this and Robin Hood. That’s why A Good Year remains such an oddity: a romcom, a genre he has no aptitude for, and it shows (but which is nevertheless quite likeable despite itself). House of Gucci occasionally splashes glorious tastelessness over its audience, despite Scott’s best efforts to avoid a mess.


Popular posts from this blog

You were this amazing occidental samurai.

Ricochet (1991) (SPOILERS) You have to wonder at Denzel Washington’s agent at this point in the actor’s career. He’d recently won his first Oscar for Glory , yet followed it with less-than-glorious heart-transplant ghost comedy Heart Condition (Bob Hoskins’ racist cop receives Washington’s dead lawyer’s ticker; a recipe for hijinks!) Not long after, he dipped his tentative toe in the action arena with this Joel Silver production; Denzel has made his share of action fare since, of course, most of it serviceable if unremarkable, but none of it comes near to delivering the schlocky excesses of Ricochet , a movie at once ingenious and risible in its plot permutations, performances and production profligacy.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

People still talk about Pandapocalypse 2002.

Turning Red (2022) (SPOILERS) Those wags at Pixar, eh? Yes, the most – actually, the only – impressive thing about Turning Red is the four-tiered wordplay of its title. Thirteen-year-old Mei (Rosalie Chiang) finds herself turning into a large red panda at emotive moments. She is also, simultaneously, riding the crimson wave for the first time. Further, as a teenager, she characteristically suffers from acute embarrassment (mostly due to the actions of her domineering mother Ming Lee, voiced by Sandra Oh). And finally, of course, Turning Red can be seen diligently spreading communist doctrine left, right and centre. To any political sensibility tuning in to Disney+, basically (so ones with either considerable or zero resistance to woke). Take a guess which of these isn’t getting press in reference to the movie? And by a process of elimination is probably what it it’s really about (you know in the same way most Pixars, as far back as Toy Story and Monsters, Inc . can be given an insi

I can’t be the worst. What about that hotdog one?

Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022) (SPOILERS) It would have been a merciful release, had the title card “ The End ”, flashing on screen a little before the ninety-minute mark, not been a false dawn. True, I would still have been unable to swab the bloody dildoes fight from my mind, but at least Everything Everywhere All at Once would have been short. Indeed, by the actual end I was put in mind of a line spoken by co-star James Wong in one of his most indelible roles: “ Now this really pisses me off to no end ”. Or to put it another way, Everything Everywhere All at Once rubbed me up the wrong which way quite a lot of most of the time.

We could be mauled to death by an interstellar monster!

Star Trek Beyond (2016) (SPOILERS) The odd/even Star Trek failure/success rule seemed to have been cancelled out with the first reboot movie, and then trodden into ground with Into Darkness (which, yes, I quite enjoyed, for all its scandalous deficiencies). Star Trek Beyond gets us back onto more familiar ground, as it’s very identifiably a “lesser” Trek , irrespective of the big bucks and directorial nous thrown at it. This is a Star Trek movie that can happily stand shoulder to shoulder with The Search for Spock and Insurrection , content in the knowledge they make it look good.

I think World War II was my favourite war.

Small Soldiers (1998) An off-peak Joe Dante movie is still one chock-a-block full of satirical nuggets and comic inspiration, far beyond the facility of most filmmakers. Small Soldiers finds him back after a six-year big screen absence, taking delirious swipes at the veneration of the military, war movies, the toy industry, conglomerates and privatised defence forces. Dante’s take is so gleefully skewed, he even has big business win! The only problem with the picture (aside from an indistinct lead, surprising from a director with a strong track record for casting juveniles) is that this is all very familiar. Dante acknowledged Small Soldiers was basically a riff on Gremlins , and it is. Something innocuous and playful turns mad, bad and dangerous. On one level it has something in common with Gremlins 2: The New Batch , in that the asides carry the picture. But Gremlins 2 was all about the asides, happy to wander off in any direction that suited it oblivious to whet

We’ve got the best ball and chain in the world. Your ass.

Wedlock (1991) (SPOILERS) The futuristic prison movie seemed possessed of a particular cachet around this time, quite possibly sparked by the grisly possibilities of hi-tech disincentives to escape. On that front, HBO TV movie Wedlock more than delivers its FX money shot. Elsewhere, it’s less sure of itself, rather fumbling when it exchanges prison tropes for fugitives-on-the-run ones.

He’ll regret it to his dying day, if ever he lives that long.

The Quiet Man (1952) (SPOILERS) The John Wayne & John Ford film for those who don’t like John Wayne & John Ford films? The Quiet Man takes its cues from Ford’s earlier How Green Was My Valley in terms of, well less Anglophile and Hibernophile and Cambrophile nostalgia respectively for past times, climes and heritage, as Wayne’s pugilist returns to his family seat and stirs up a hot bed of emotions, not least with Maureen O’Hara’s red-headed hothead. The result is a very likeable movie, for all its inculcated Oirishness and studied eccentricity.

He's not in my pyjamas, is he?

Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice (1969) (SPOILERS) By rights, Paul Mazursky’s swinging, post-flower-power-gen partner-swap movie ought to have aged terribly. So much of the era’s scene-specific fare has, particularly so when attempting to reflect its reverberations with any degree of serious intent. Perhaps it’s because Mazursky and co-writer Larry Tucker (also of The Monkees , Alex in Wonderland and I Love You, Alice B. Toklas! ) maintain a wry distance from their characters’ endeavours, much more on the wavelength of Elliott Gould’s Ted than Robert Culp’s Bob; we know any pretensions towards uninhibited expression can’t end well, but we also know Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice have to learn the hard way.

There is a war raging, and unless you pull your head out of the sand, you and I and about five billion other people are going to go the way of the dinosaur.

The X-Files 5.14: The Red and the Black The most noteworthy aspect of this two parter is that it almost – but not quite – causes me to reassess my previous position that the best arc episodes are those that avoid tackling the greater narrative head-on, attempting to advance the resistant behemoth. It may be less than scintillating as far as concepts go, but the alien resistance plot is set out quite clearly here, as are the responses to it from the main players.