Skip to main content

I didn’t do it with me nose.

My Left Foot
(1989)

(SPOILERS) It probably shouldn’t be a surprise that My Left Foot loads the dice in its triumph-over-adversity tale; to have done otherwise would surely have kept the Oscar from Deserving Daniel, and would almost certainly have forestalled its Best Picture nod. Nevertheless, I’d remembered it to be much less beholden to such savvy stirring of the emotions, less pressed into the service of aspirational highlights and rousing vignettes, perhaps because its working-class Dublin milieu is a far cry from The Theory of Everything’s rarefied Oxbridge atmosphere. They’re very much on the same page, though, delivering smooth, palatable disability dramatics, just with some colourful effing and blinding to suggest this one is a rough-and-ready slice of life.

Essentially then, My Left Foot, for all its “authentic” vernacular, is your run-of-the-mill sanitised biopic, complete with ending the story on a high note (Christy Brown’s marriage to Mary Carr) and opting out of what happened next. Which is fine, if that’s what you need to get more bums on seats. But you can’t then complain when there are accusations, justified ones, that it lacks something and the telling is desperately pedestrian, unable to locate an effective “in” to the story, such that it foists the musty old, “remembrance of times past” flashback structure (in this case, via Christy attending a charity event).

Anne Billson (The Film Yearbook Volume 9) was the rare critic at the time who cut My Left Foot no slack, facing down all points of contention where her peers usually fall in line to commend such fare. She not only acknowledged the typical trait of the biopic – “the narrative ambles on from one scene to the next without prospect of respite: edited highlights from its subject’s life, a few chuckles, some tears…” – she also addressed the evergreen vote-winner tack for awards-friendly movies of this ilk: “Suffering is perceived as a holy condition, and those who suffer are afforded a sainthood”. This, combined with director Jim Sheridan and cinematographer Jack Conroy’s approach to the visual character, a “brownish tinge which in British television terms denotes nostalgia, honest poverty and/or home-baked bread”, made the whole enterprise not a little rich.

Many of her criticisms occurred to me separately as I rewatched the picture. It’s one I never warmed to enormously the first time, but I began to find it simultaneously overly manipulative and pervasively unchallenging. Time Out’s John Morrish noted the liberties My Left Foot took with the Brown’s life, and they’re ones that, at points, become actively ludicrous. In particular, the “What is it Lassie? There’s a kid trapped down the mine? Fetch help, Lassie! Fetch help!” approach to Christy’s heroic acts (“A chair-bound superhero” Billson calls the character). Witness young Christy (Hugh O’Conor, later of The Young Poisoner’s Handbook) fetch help (Lassie) after pregnant mum (Brenda Fricker, the impossibly perfect vision of the best mother ever) takes a tumble down the stairs. And then later, transformed into Dan the Man, using his weight to open the door to where dad (Ray McAnally, stern but caring) has collapsed from a heart attack. Because mum obviously couldn’t have done it much more swiftly and convincingly herself.

Other such instances abound. Too much aspirational polish. Christy plays football! Christy has a plan for stealing coal! Christy and his family start a pub brawl at dad’s wake (and what a lark it is)! Christy and mum build a studio for Christy! Elmer Bernstein’s score only adds to that slightly treacly – treacle splashed with mud, or peat – quality. As Billson suggested, this is in lieu of any idea quite how Christy scaled his daunting peak: “we have no more idea than his startled family how he taught himself to write and spell”. The same applies to composing and typing. She invokes George Romero’s Monkey Shines – a movie I haven’t seen since, but I recall being impressive – and notes the salient difference: “he is making a film, not airing his sensitivity and compassion”.

I enjoyed most of the performances, archetypes as they are. Fricker (winning an Oscar), and McAnally (a BAFTA) elevate anything they do. Adrian Dunbar and Cyril Cusack make their presence felt in small roles. And Fiona Shaw is central to easily the picture’s best scene, one both Billson and Pauline Kael (nearing the end of her reviewing career) singled out admiringly. Christy, who has become infatuated with Shaw’s Eileen Cole, his tutor/carer, is incandescent with rage when he learns at a dinner that she is engaged to Dunbar. His awful, venomous behaviour is squirm-inducingly riveting, charged and compelling in a manner absent from the rest of the movie (Billson: the film “for an all-too brief moment, enables the audience to exercise its imagination and take a guess at what life must really have been like for a heart and soul trapped in the broken body of Christy Brown”).

Kael, contrastingly, fell for My Left Foot wholesale, comparing Daniel Day-Lewis’ performance to Sir Larry as Richard III (twice!) and calling it a “great, exhilarating movie – a comedy about suffering…” Billson was much more cynical about the leading man’s turn, noting he was “working hard at becoming Britain’s answer to Meryl Streep” and that fellow wheelchair-using Oscar contender Tom Cruise didn’t stand a chance, as Lewis “gets to drool, suffer from cerebral palsy and do an Irish accent”.

Anyone assuming abled actors could play disabled individuals without a murmur of discontent at the time should note Morrish’s review, where he suggests Day-Lewis “transcends the carping about casting an actor without cerebral palsy”. All the same, there’s a certain irony to his winning an Oscar for this, given that, less than a decade earlier, misbegotten children across the British Isles were being reprimanded en masse for Joey Deacon impressions. Day-Lewis’s is undoubtedly an accomplished performance, but it’s in no way beyond reproach or exempt from doubts over its legitimacy.

Reputedly, Day-Lewis remained in character throughout the shoot, to the frustration of crewmembers having to push him around. Less authentically, however, he could only attain the necessary dexterity with his right foot, so requiring frequent mirror shots. Anthony Holden in The Secret History of the Hollywood's Academy Awards also expressed cynicism about the actor’s presence on the Oscar trail, noting how, only months earlier, his career had seemed in tatters after his on-stage Hamlet breakdown; now, here he was, coasting the chat show circuit like a pro.

This was also a very early case of Miramax and their “shrewd piece of Oscar campaigning”. They “seized the moment”, rather than the day, earning nominations that year as distributor of this, Sex, Lies and Videotape and Cinema Paradiso (the latter a win, having previously pulled off a similar feat for fellow Best Foreign Language film Pelle the Conqueror the year before). For My Left Foot, the indie rustled up a meeting of Hollywood and Washington at a “Reception and Celebration Supporting legislation for Americans with Disabilities”. Quite hilariously, they also inflicted a double dose of bad taste in their attempts to manipulate votes from their Academy marks: at the accompanying movie screening, they placed a White chocolate left foot in small white box on every seat. Not only that, they managed not to leave this gift on the wheelchairs. And you wonder why the Weinsteins went the way they did.

Down and Dirty Pictures’ account throws further shade on this saga of success. Harvey managed to convince UK production company Granada’s head of programming that “it had to be marketed hard because Day-Lewis was a romantic lead, and nobody wanted to see him folded up on himself like an accordion. Along the way, of course, he promised he would get the actor an Oscar”. Weinstein paid $3m for worldwide rights, and for the US release, he “straightened out some of those rough Irish accents” (a fledgling example of his scissor-y hands). With little budget to pony up campaign treats – well, aside from those white chocolate left feet, I guess – Miramax had to rely on screener tapes: “The tapes are what did it for My Left Foot” claimed Harvey, suggesting they “gave us parity’ with the big boys. There’s undoubted admiration for his nous in the book, less so his more temperamental foibles.

Peter Biskind noted “Harvey loves to quote Day-Lewis as saying ‘There’s only one part of you that works – the ability to pick scripts and pick movies. Otherwise, you’re a complete disaster as a person’”. Underlining this is the tale of Harvey trying to finagle his head of acquisitions Alison Brantley’s Oscar-night ticket away from her (she had been babysitting Day-Lewis in his Oscar bid, and he gave her a ticket to the event in gratitude). She knew her days were numbered for refusing to acquiesce: “You don’t stand up to Harvey”. Brantley was commendably unrepentant: “I went, and I sat next to Daniel, and it was great”. The movie would make $14.7m stateside, an unqualified success for a picture that cost less than a million. Biskind reported however, that producer Noel Pearson still hadn’t seen a cent of profit two years after its tidy performance.

None of which is to single My Left Foot out for blame; it’s very rare for the biopic to deliver the goods, and even someone goosing the material up as much as Oliver Stone did in the year’s other disability contender stumbled through literalness. My Left Foot may have won some, but it isn’t a winner where it counts.




Popular posts from this blog

You were this amazing occidental samurai.

Ricochet (1991) (SPOILERS) You have to wonder at Denzel Washington’s agent at this point in the actor’s career. He’d recently won his first Oscar for Glory , yet followed it with less-than-glorious heart-transplant ghost comedy Heart Condition (Bob Hoskins’ racist cop receives Washington’s dead lawyer’s ticker; a recipe for hijinks!) Not long after, he dipped his tentative toe in the action arena with this Joel Silver production; Denzel has made his share of action fare since, of course, most of it serviceable if unremarkable, but none of it comes near to delivering the schlocky excesses of Ricochet , a movie at once ingenious and risible in its plot permutations, performances and production profligacy.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

People still talk about Pandapocalypse 2002.

Turning Red (2022) (SPOILERS) Those wags at Pixar, eh? Yes, the most – actually, the only – impressive thing about Turning Red is the four-tiered wordplay of its title. Thirteen-year-old Mei (Rosalie Chiang) finds herself turning into a large red panda at emotive moments. She is also, simultaneously, riding the crimson wave for the first time. Further, as a teenager, she characteristically suffers from acute embarrassment (mostly due to the actions of her domineering mother Ming Lee, voiced by Sandra Oh). And finally, of course, Turning Red can be seen diligently spreading communist doctrine left, right and centre. To any political sensibility tuning in to Disney+, basically (so ones with either considerable or zero resistance to woke). Take a guess which of these isn’t getting press in reference to the movie? And by a process of elimination is probably what it it’s really about (you know in the same way most Pixars, as far back as Toy Story and Monsters, Inc . can be given an insi

I can’t be the worst. What about that hotdog one?

Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022) (SPOILERS) It would have been a merciful release, had the title card “ The End ”, flashing on screen a little before the ninety-minute mark, not been a false dawn. True, I would still have been unable to swab the bloody dildoes fight from my mind, but at least Everything Everywhere All at Once would have been short. Indeed, by the actual end I was put in mind of a line spoken by co-star James Wong in one of his most indelible roles: “ Now this really pisses me off to no end ”. Or to put it another way, Everything Everywhere All at Once rubbed me up the wrong which way quite a lot of most of the time.

We could be mauled to death by an interstellar monster!

Star Trek Beyond (2016) (SPOILERS) The odd/even Star Trek failure/success rule seemed to have been cancelled out with the first reboot movie, and then trodden into ground with Into Darkness (which, yes, I quite enjoyed, for all its scandalous deficiencies). Star Trek Beyond gets us back onto more familiar ground, as it’s very identifiably a “lesser” Trek , irrespective of the big bucks and directorial nous thrown at it. This is a Star Trek movie that can happily stand shoulder to shoulder with The Search for Spock and Insurrection , content in the knowledge they make it look good.

He's not in my pyjamas, is he?

Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice (1969) (SPOILERS) By rights, Paul Mazursky’s swinging, post-flower-power-gen partner-swap movie ought to have aged terribly. So much of the era’s scene-specific fare has, particularly so when attempting to reflect its reverberations with any degree of serious intent. Perhaps it’s because Mazursky and co-writer Larry Tucker (also of The Monkees , Alex in Wonderland and I Love You, Alice B. Toklas! ) maintain a wry distance from their characters’ endeavours, much more on the wavelength of Elliott Gould’s Ted than Robert Culp’s Bob; we know any pretensions towards uninhibited expression can’t end well, but we also know Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice have to learn the hard way.

I think World War II was my favourite war.

Small Soldiers (1998) An off-peak Joe Dante movie is still one chock-a-block full of satirical nuggets and comic inspiration, far beyond the facility of most filmmakers. Small Soldiers finds him back after a six-year big screen absence, taking delirious swipes at the veneration of the military, war movies, the toy industry, conglomerates and privatised defence forces. Dante’s take is so gleefully skewed, he even has big business win! The only problem with the picture (aside from an indistinct lead, surprising from a director with a strong track record for casting juveniles) is that this is all very familiar. Dante acknowledged Small Soldiers was basically a riff on Gremlins , and it is. Something innocuous and playful turns mad, bad and dangerous. On one level it has something in common with Gremlins 2: The New Batch , in that the asides carry the picture. But Gremlins 2 was all about the asides, happy to wander off in any direction that suited it oblivious to whet

We’ve got the best ball and chain in the world. Your ass.

Wedlock (1991) (SPOILERS) The futuristic prison movie seemed possessed of a particular cachet around this time, quite possibly sparked by the grisly possibilities of hi-tech disincentives to escape. On that front, HBO TV movie Wedlock more than delivers its FX money shot. Elsewhere, it’s less sure of itself, rather fumbling when it exchanges prison tropes for fugitives-on-the-run ones.

He’ll regret it to his dying day, if ever he lives that long.

The Quiet Man (1952) (SPOILERS) The John Wayne & John Ford film for those who don’t like John Wayne & John Ford films? The Quiet Man takes its cues from Ford’s earlier How Green Was My Valley in terms of, well less Anglophile and Hibernophile and Cambrophile nostalgia respectively for past times, climes and heritage, as Wayne’s pugilist returns to his family seat and stirs up a hot bed of emotions, not least with Maureen O’Hara’s red-headed hothead. The result is a very likeable movie, for all its inculcated Oirishness and studied eccentricity.

There is a war raging, and unless you pull your head out of the sand, you and I and about five billion other people are going to go the way of the dinosaur.

The X-Files 5.14: The Red and the Black The most noteworthy aspect of this two parter is that it almost – but not quite – causes me to reassess my previous position that the best arc episodes are those that avoid tackling the greater narrative head-on, attempting to advance the resistant behemoth. It may be less than scintillating as far as concepts go, but the alien resistance plot is set out quite clearly here, as are the responses to it from the main players.